The concept of filtering traffic is not something new in the land of
the pure although I find the idea of censorship per se an impure one.
Egypt, Iran, China, Burma, Saudi Arabia, North Korea and a few other
countries are on Reporters Sans Frontiers' Internet Enemy list. In
these countries, there is virtual control over what the population can
see or do over the internet. For a complete list, see the Wikipedia
article at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship
PTA already watches internet traffic under the guise of stopping
illegal voice traffic. The Narus system installed in PTA cost a cool
10 million dollars of your and my tax Rupees.
PTCL has Bluecoat proxies in place which can do deep packet inspection
and filtering of URLs (even https: based). TWA uses 'cheaper' way of
filtering URL which is to redirect traffic through squid proxies for
certain sites and then for the filtered URL displaying a message to
the user informing them that access to the URL is blocked.
The URLs to be blocked are 'pondered over' by a committee comprising
of MoIT officials, PTA officials and then some. The committee
frequently floats URLs which are to be blocked based upon different
factors i.e. political, social, religious etc.
If the URL filtering is blocked by PTCL, it doesn't usually degrade
the performance since their infrastructure is geared to handle this.
Even TWA filtering, though trivial, will get the job done without
degrading the internet. Misconfiguration is another thing. However, in
the last six months, I am not aware of any such misconfigurations
occurring at TWA or PTCL.
Regards
Masud