from :
http://www.vedicsciences.net/articles/sanskrit-enlightenment.htmlThe
endings are what make Sans-krit a language of mathematic-like
precision. By
the endings added onto nouns or verbs, there is an
obvious determination of
the precise interrelationship of words
describing the activity of persons and
things in time and space,
regardless of word order. Essentially, the endings
constitute the
"software" of the basic program of the
language,
and once a pattern has been noted, it is a simple
exercise to
recognize all the individual instances that fit the pattern
rather
than see the pattern after all the individual instances have
been
learned.
Perhaps the greatest hope for the return of San skrit
lies in
computers. It's precision play with computer tools could awaken
the
capacity in human beings to utilize their innate higher mental
faculty
with a momentum that could inevitably transform the
world.
more on why sanskrit is suitable for computer coding .. '
view of prof.
Lakshmi Thathachar, melkote, india
from :
http://www.goodnewsindia.com/index.php/Magazine/story/melkote-sanskrit-academy/P3/for
those who are in the programming profession OOP
is the key
word
for those who are not in the programming profession,
Object
Oriented Programming is a method of coding
where 'classes' are a quality
ascribed to "objects"
"The current time in human history is ripe, he
feels for India's young
techno wizards to turn to researching Mimamsa and
developing the
ultimate programming language around it"
It was
Panini who formalised Sanskrit's grammer and usage about 2500
years ago. No
new 'classes' have needed to be added to it since then.
"Panini should be
thought of as the forerunner of the modern formal
language theory used to
specify computer languages," say J J O'Connor
and E F Robertson. Their
article also quotes: "Sanskrit's potential
for scientific use was greatly
enhanced as a result of the thorough
systemisation of its grammar by Panini.
... On the basis of just under
4000 sutras [rules expressed as aphorisms ],
he built virtually the
whole structure of the Sanskrit language, whose
general 'shape' hardly
changed for the next two thousand years."
Every
'philosophy' in Sanskrit is in fact a 'theory of everything'.
[The many
strands are synthesised in Vedanta --Veda + anta--, which
means the 'last
word in Vedas'.] Mimamsa, which is a part of the
Vedas, even ignores the God
idea. The reality as we know was not
created by anyone --it always was--, but
may be shaped by everyone out
of free will. Which is a way of saying --in OOP
terms-- that you may
not touch the mother or core classes but may create any
variety of
instances of them. It is significant that no new 'classes' have
had to
be created. Thathachar believes it is not a 'language' as we know
the
term but the only front-end to a huge, interlinked, analogue
knowledge
base. The current time in human history is ripe, he feels for
India's
young techno wizards to turn to researching Mimamsa and developing
the
ultimate programming language around it; nay, an operating
system
itself.