**<PROTEIN_ID> [PDB NOT RELEASED or WITHDRAWN]
<Sequence_ID> No Template Selected
And as a consequence, for all my sequences I get:
Method cannot be applied to [<sequence_id1> vs <sequence_id2>], proba_pair will be used instead.
Could you help me figure out how to use my pdb files as templates?
Best,
Esteban
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tcoffee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tcoffee+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tcoffee/8e1a95e6-938b-4f4c-9e3f-6d575ef4704cn%40googlegroups.com.
pid 15360 -- Method cannot be applied to [AMO81812 vs QXJ62528], proba_pair will be used instead
Dear Esteban, Dear all
I think I know what is the issue: Expresso assumes you are
working on public PDBs and it checks them against a list
downloaded from PDB and stored in
~/.t_coffee/cache/pdb_entry_type.txt, since your PDBS are not
public, it complains.
There are two workaround:
1- the correct one, a bit more involved: use 3D-Coffee instead of
Expresso. 3D-Coffee is like Expresso without BLAST. You will need
to build your your own template files that bind sequences and PDBs
><seq name> _P_ <PDB>
as many lines as needed
Then run t_coffee -in=reduced_CBP21_nopipe_ren.fa
-template_file <your template file> -method sap_pair
you can add other structural pairwise
methods, mustang_pair, TMalign_pair are the main ones I would
recommand. In our hand TMalign_pair + sap_pair is often the
best.
OR, quick and dirty
2-update ~/.t_coffee/cache/pdb_entry_type.txt by concatenating a
list of all your PDBs following the original format (one entry per
list)
111d nuc diffraction
111l prot diffraction
111m prot diffraction
112d nuc diffraction
112l prot diffraction
You may want to run the cat in your script to avoid your
pdb_entry_file being updated. Note that I have not had time to
check it. YOu may want to add TWO PDBs manualy and see if it works
All of these decision were taken before AF2... In the next
release I will make Expresso more tolerant to unrealeased PDBs.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Cheers,
Cedric
PS: I am also preparing a fix for the missing binaries. More on
this soon.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tcoffee/1e0d445d-da9a-4c89-826a-187474e0ed53n%40googlegroups.com.
-- ########################################## Dr Cedric Notredame, PhD Group Leader Notredame's lab - Comparative Bioinformatics Group Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme Room 440.03 Centre de Regulació Genòmica (CRG) Dr. Aiguader, 88 08003 Barcelona Spain Ph# + 34 93 316 02 71 Fax# + 34 93 316 00 99 Mobile# + 34 66 250 47 82 email cedric.n...@crg.eu url www.tcoffee.org blog cedricnotredame.blogspot.com ORC-ID: 0000-0003-1461-0988 ###########################################
-- Method cannot be applied to [HKU4_NC009019_382-597 vs hMERS_EMC-2012_JX869059_377-592], proba_pair will be used instead
Hello Tyler,
I am not entirely sure what is the issue. We did the conda
distribution quite some time ago and are not actively maintaining
it. In fact I think there are two such distro including one we did
not do and that was not maintained. We have it high on our
todolist to look into this or something equivalent for easier
uptake. The most trustworthy way would be compiling the latest
github beta or download from the website. I think updating will
help, 12 is pretty old and predates our use of AF2 structures.
http://tcoffee-packages.s3-website.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/#Beta/Latest/
Version_13.45.60.cd84d2a
If it does not work, in your template file you should specify the
absolute path of your structures files. I think it should work. I
would recommend doing this anyway as you may end up with
alternative structures of the same sequences. This would specify
your things in a permanent way.
All these structure based things in T-Coffee were based on the unformulated assumption that AF2 would never happen... but now that it has, we clearly need to do a bit of thinking, which is not so bad :)
Cheers,
Cedric
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tcoffee/033d1c8a-bc0f-47d9-ad1e-cd9a47a691aen%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tcoffee/46d58ad1-9990-4465-952a-e4b17f45f727n%40googlegroups.com.