I hope this message finds you well.
I encountered an issue while generating the vampire.UCF file using the latest versions of TB2J (0.9.9.4) and TB2J-OpenMX (0.5.0). The resulting file does not appear to follow the standard format expected by Vampire. I have attached the generated file for your reference.
Could you kindly advise on what might be causing this issue? I would be very grateful for any suggestions or guidance you could provide toward resolving it.
Best regards
Khoveto Vero
Dear Dr. He Xu,
Thank you for the recent updates to TB2J and TB2J-OpenMX. While performing calculations with latest TB2J version, I encountered an issue with the exchange interaction values written to the vampire.ucf file. It appears that an additional factor may have been unintentionally included in the printed exchange values, as highlighted in the attached file.
Additionally, I would like to confirm whether the exchange interactions in the vampire.ucf file can be used directly in Vampire simulations or if they need to be divided by 2, as mentioned on the TB2J official website: "Since version 0.7.1, the TB2J-Vampire output takes the 'tensorial' format, in which the exchange values are 2 times that in the convention of TB2J."
For reference, I have attached the vampire.ucf file generated from my calculations. Could you kindly clarify the following:
Does the current vampire.ucf(exchange interaction value) file require manual adjustment (i.e., division by 2) before use in simulations?
Is there indeed an unintended extra factor in the printed exchange values?
Your guidance on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You.
Best regards,
Khoveto Vero