40 Hadees Pdf In Hindi
Dallas Themshirts
They All say That Our Prophet Muhammed SAWS Did Rafaidan And Ahle hadees Also Do Rafadain , So Iam Confused , I Went To Sunni Jamat Mosque Imam , He Said That is your Friend A Alim , I Said No , He Said Thats All Wrong , Iam Alim I have Studied More I Know So I Should Follow Sunni
We advise you to follow the predominantly practiced madh-hab (in light of what was explained earlier) in your area. You may forward details of your whereabouts to ad...@daruliftaa.net so that we may guide you to reliable scholars.
Dear Naseer Saheb (Observer), I know you are on Ramazan leave and I don't really want to bother you,and understand, that you may not even see it. But since I notice Muhammad Yunussaheb not responding to your observations on the issue of hadith regarding therelative purity of a male child's urine over that of a female child, perhapsfor fear of being maligned further, (Imyself have that fear, as do many others who have stopped engaging with you,knowing your frustrations and how they come out,) it seems it is my duty to setthe record straight, or at least to put on record my own thoughts on the issue.
When Syed Manzoor Alam brought out the urine-relatedhadees, to challenge Mr. Ghulam Ghouse's blind faith in hadees, he was, Ithink, not focusing on that particular hadees but the unreliability, absurdnessof many so-called authentic (sahis) hadeeses. When some people arguing againstblind belief in hadees quote pornographic material, their intention is not toeither discuss that particular pornographic content, or even to disabuse us ofthe very institution of hadees but to attack the blind faith in hadees, puttingit on a pedestal even above the holy Quran, as Tablighi Jamaat and ahl-e-hadeespeople and generally nearly all Muslims do.
As I understand, you too are against blind faith in all so-calledauthentic or sahih hadees. And so is Yunus Saheb. But, forgetting the largerpicture, and rather than supporting Mr. Manzoor Alam, as would be expected fromyou, knowing your views, you started defending the relative purity of a malechild's urine over that of a female child. You first went to the medical worldfor evidence, argued over it and wanted everyone to fall in line. When that didnot happen and Yunus Saheb objected, you started calling him names and thenwent to the extent of scanning thediscourse of three law schools to prove that the hadith Mr. Alam was discussingwas not a weak hadith.
Yunus Saheb's view in the matter, if you have read his article theevolution of hadith sciences, is the same as that of Imam Muslim's who saidthat much of what is called authentic is really doubtful/ weak. So even if youprove that this hadees is sahih, he would still consider it weak as his minddoes not accept it to be true.
There can be several objections to this particular hadees from commonsense. For instance, the youngest daughter of the Prophet, Hazrat Fatima wasborn in the first year of revelation when the Prophet was not even quite sureif he was receiving any message from God. How could he at that nascent stageadvise Hazrat Khadija on the relative purity of a male baby's urine and greaterimpurity of the female baby's urine. Apparently there was such acute dearth ofswathes of cloth and water in those days in the Arabian desert that theProphet's wives faced great hardship during their periods and, in practice, there was no question of changing clothes evenif a baby soiled it.
Anyway, this whole discussion is basically taking us away from the point- the blind belief and inordinate reverence Muslims have for hadees. I do notattach much significance to, as Yunus Saheb does, the quotation from ImamMuslim who basically said that much of what is called authentic was reallydoubtful/ weak. The reason I don't, is that while this quotation may guideexegetes and scholars like Muhammad Yunus, no one in the community has so muchas heard of it, much less would put any value to it. Muslims believe that sahihis sahih, authentic is authentic. They would consider any hadees weak only ifit is not found in sihah-e-sitta (صحاح ستہ), the six authentic collections of hadees,particularly Bukhari and Muslim. And these authentic collections of ahadees arefull of absurdities, misogynistic statements, inducement to violence, pornographic material, character assassination attempts onthe prophet that today's Islamophobes quote and then we get angry.
Even if Naseer Saheb, you think you have successfully established the relativepurity of a male child's urine over that of his sister, you will not be able tostand up to all the absurd and plainly wrong and unbelievable ahadees that areput before you. So it would be best if you joined us in communicating to themasses of Islam that Islam was completed with Quran in the time of ProphetMohammad (saw) and any other books that come later are not scripture of Islam.If someone wants to benefit from collections of ahadees, as they surely can,they are free to do so, but not free to consider Islamic scripture a collectionthat came 200 or 300 years after the demise of the Prophet.
Let us keep putting before our public the most absurd of the thousandsof such ahadees from the sihah-e-sitta (صحاح ستہ) and ask Muslims to apply their minds andthink if the prophet could have said things like that. This is a minimum testthat the great imams of hadees should have necessarily applied. Had they done so,we would not be in such a sorry mess today or indeed in our history.
I think Yunus Saheb has said somewhere that in the prevailing milieu ofthe wide acceptability of these ahadees in their time, it was not possible forthe imams to have rejected these ahadees. But if that is the case, why do theseimams deserve our reverence. We revere people like Prophet Mohammad who stoodup to the storms of protest at what must have been for Meccans his completely unacceptableand unpopular views. Anyway reverence for imams Bukhari, Muslim, etc. is not atall an issue today. The issue is how to bring down the institution of hadeesfrom its pedestal higher than even Quran, how to convince them that hadees isnot Islamic scripture and any blind faith in sihah-e-sitta (صحاح ستہ) 'authentic' hadeesis unwarranted.
This is an excellent point. After it is determined whether a Hadith is "authentic" or "inauthentic", there are two more points to remember. (1) Is it a good Hadith? Does it say something that is wise, sensible and useful? (2) Even if a Hadith is authentic and good, it does not have a divine status, it is not comparable to the Quran and it is not binding. It cannot be cited to resolve any issues. It has the status of folklore.
Words to remember!Instead of spending our time on the Hadiths and Sunnah, let us concentrateon what the Quran is trying to tell us. If overinclusive compiling bynon-professional compilers makes some verses unclear or confusing, let usfollow a simple rule. If a verse does not pass all of thefollowing five tests, let us skip it and move to the next verse:
It is Alam who has brought up the subject of girls urinevis-a-vis boys urine and was badgering Ghaus with it. If he accuses Ghaus ofblind belief, his attack is based on blind disbelief. If it were not so, hewould have posed his question with proof that there is no material differenceand the hadith is nonsensical.
Dear Yunus Saheb, you start with denouncing those who quote the weakestof Hadeeses (difficult to understand how you characterise any one hadees asweakest, as there are thousands alike that even in authoritative Bukhari andMuslims and the other four "authentic" hades books), and then go onto quote renowned non-Muslim authors praising Mohammad.
Beinga student of Hadith i have come to know that Hadith itself allows flexibilityin each and every age. Quran and Hadith have given us principles on the basisof which we can deal with every issue in a just manner in every age.
Let us make this our motto. If God left some issues untouched, there must be a reason for it. Since Prophet Mohammad's Islam did not create the institution of ulema or that of Hadees, we have Quran and our own reason and intuition to guide us. Let us disregard institutions created by monarchs who had usurped the Islamic institution of Khilafat and needed ways to justify their misrule.
To wind up this long commentary I must remind you that Hadith is so deeply entrenched in Muslim psyche that the moment you want to discard them as rubbish, no one will take you seriously, And this is the problem with many radical intellectual some you have on this forum who cherry pick the most atrocious in Sahih (Imam Bukhari and Muslim) compilations and widen your distance from the Ulama whom you have to win and enlighten and not antagonize and keep in darkness for you can never correct people by demonizing and ridiculing them as some people on this forum do in the name of progressiveness.
By muhammad yunus - 6/26/2014 1:24:21 AM
Thereare plenty of hadeeses which give excellent lessons, great explanations ofQur'anic verses, beautiful stories. If we like them, the most we can say aboutthem is that the prophet may have said something like this in his own words.The hadeeses that are out of character of Quran or amount to character ofassassination of the prophet, or downright pornography, and there are many likethis in the so-called most authoritative of the books are obviousconcoctions. We should treat them as such.
Ghaussb., . . . If you find some good advice in aHadith or in any other book, do follow it. It is our need forauthorised answers to every question that is a problem. Do we need asystem that gives us rules on everything, on how to live, how to behave, how topray, how to relate to each other, what to eat, what not to eat, how to punishsinners etc etc. If we had to live by such an all-encompassing system ofrules, our spontaneity, creativity and spirit of enterprise would beextinguished and we would lag behind as a society. In fact we do lagbehind as a society. We as Muslims are number one only in one thing andthat is in killing other Muslims!
c80f0f1006