Life Selector Hack Password
Janie Mccorey
I am a web developer and I sometimes have a field in a form (e.g. inside a CMS) where it makes no sense for 1Password to pop up, and where it's actually causing the editors problems to keep dismissing the popup.
If the page contains no password fields, then adding the autocomplete="off" attribute should suffice. However, if there is a password field on the page then 1Password will ignore that attribute. The best course of action here would be to collect some page details for us so we can teach 1Password not to show up on that page anymore on our side.
I've even tried with an HTML document consisting of a single form with a single input field (type=text or type=email) - 1Password pops up regardless of having the autocomplete="off" attribute on or not.
I'd prefer not to have my 1password trigger here as I don't want to input anything sensitive by accident. I can't really tell GitHub to turn off autocomplete as I'd imagine that's more a feature, not a bug :chuffed:
Currently, 1Password doesn't have a custom attribute to inject in a specific input field to prevent it from showing up. Instead, it does its best to determine where it should appear. It is not perfect now, and it does sometimes appear where it should not. However, 1Password is improving as we are teaching it to be smarter.
I agree that 1Password's suggestions likely aren't of much use for this field, and it would be best to avoid showing them here. I've made note of both that and your request for an attribute to tell 1Password not to show up internally.
In the meantime, the best solution we have to offer here would be adding the autocomplete="off" attribute to the field. That'll prevent 1Password's suggestions from automatically popping up, leaving just the icon in the field (much less obtrusive).
This shouldn't be a hard thing to accomplish. Obviously you (1Password) are looking for inputs on the page, why not just check if that input has a data attribute (could be anything, like data-1password="false") and if that attribute exists with the given value, don't display the icon/popup.
It would seem that the obvious solution is to ignore fields based on a custom 1password data attribute, ala Lastpass. All this faffing around with other attributes in the hope that 1password will somehow work it out is crazy. "Try these attributes and maybe it'll work plus you'll lose some other functionality" is not a solution.
Well, I also have hard time understanding why you won't just add ignoring some specific data attribute. Especially when autocomplete="off" is not causing 1p icon to disappear.
But ok, your choice to make devs life harder, we have to deal with this ;). I am facing similar issue as @tibineagu - no password field, but icon keeps appearing in one input. Hope this info helps you make 1password better, let me now if you need more details.
Is there any update on this? I too support the idea of a data- attribute on form elements to keep 1password from showing up for that specific field. Another example of this is on adwerx.com, where I work. If you go to adwerx.com, look for the "Target by Zip Code" section and click "Check Availability" you'll get a popover dialog with two fields "Your Name" and "Your city, state". The second field uses google's APIs to list city/states that match what you're typing.
To reproduce the problem, type a name in the first field and start typing a city in the second field. You'll get a list of suggestions. As soon as I hit the down arrow to select one of those suggestions the 1password dialog pops up and obscures the list. It's really quite jarring.
If we could just add a an attribute to the field like data-disable-1password="true"` that 1password ignores, then life would be easier. Failing that, maybe let advanced users specify something in the plugin settings to ignore specific CSS selectors so that individuals can shut it off?
I totally get wanting to make 1password smarter, but, as you said above, that's a never ending task. My wife already uses LastPass. I'm invested in 1Password, but this is the type of thing that encourages users like me to consider switching. It's important and should be addressed.
I too am having this problem - we have a country select combobox written with Downshift, and for some mysterious reasons 1Password keeps on trying to autofill it, even if autocomplete="off", which makes basically 0 sense. Aggreed with all the others, that it seems bizarre that 1Password is both resistant to A) making a disable data- flag and B) keeps telling us to use autocomplete="off" when that doesn't actually seem to work.
Using an HTML input type="search" should be a guarantee that we wouldn't show up, but this does inform browsers that it is a search field and cause them to react differently. For example, many browsers will display an icon in and clear the field if the user hits esc. Here is an example of a search field that will never display the 1Password inline menu:
Theoretically, yes. That said, an HTML id or HTML name starting or ending with search would also be something you could do without changing how the field is displayed and greatly improve the chance that we don't consider it interesting.
Your suggestions to enforce a disabling of 1Password on an input field is to make it an input of type "search" OR add a prefix/suffix of 'search' to an Input element's id or name attributes? Seriously?
The first is bad HTML and the second will only "improve the chance" of 1Password not appearing. Developers should not be hacking their forms to have a password manager's extension disabled consistently and easily.
This overarching subject is something we continue to have discussions on internally. Our primary concern remains that developers will use this power to disable 1Password in the browser in places they shouldn't. I've added your feedback to our issue we have on this.
Get an authentication session matching the desired scopes. Rejects if a provider with providerId is notregistered, or if the user does not consent to sharing authentication information withthe extension. If there are multiple sessions with the same scopes, the user will be shown aquickpick to select which account they would like to use.
Currently, there are only two authentication providers that are contributed from built in extensionsto the editor that implement GitHub and Microsoft authentication: their providerId's are 'github' and 'microsoft'.
Text editor commands are different from ordinary commands asthey only execute when there is an active editor when the command is called. Also, thecommand handler of an editor command has access to the active editor and to anedit-builder. Note that the edit-builder is only valid while thecallback executes.
The currently active debug session or undefined. The active debug session is the onerepresented by the debug action floating window or the one currently shown in the drop down menu of the debug action floating window.If no debug session is active, the value is undefined.
Converts a "Source" descriptor object received via the Debug Adapter Protocol into a Uri that can be used to load its contents.If the source descriptor is based on a path, a file Uri is returned.If the source descriptor uses a reference number, a specific debug Uri (scheme 'debug') is constructed that requires a corresponding ContentProvider and a running debug session
Register a debug adapter descriptor factory for a specific debug type.An extension is only allowed to register a DebugAdapterDescriptorFactory for the debug type(s) defined by the extension. Otherwise an error is thrown.Registering more than one DebugAdapterDescriptorFactory for a debug type results in an error.
Register a debug configuration provider for a specific debug type.The optional triggerKind can be used to specify when the provideDebugConfigurations method of the provider is triggered.Currently two trigger kinds are possible: with the value Initial (or if no trigger kind argument is given) the provideDebugConfigurations method is used to provide the initial debug configurations to be copied into a newly created launch.json.With the trigger kind Dynamic the provideDebugConfigurations method is used to dynamically determine debug configurations to be presented to the user (in addition to the static configurations from the launch.json).Please note that the triggerKind argument only applies to the provideDebugConfigurations method: so the resolveDebugConfiguration methods are not affected at all.Registering a single provider with resolve methods for different trigger kinds, results in the same resolve methods called multiple times.More than one provider can be registered for the same type.
Start debugging by using either a named launch or named compound configuration,or by directly passing a DebugConfiguration.The named configurations are looked up in '.vscode/launch.json' found in the given folder.Before debugging starts, all unsaved files are saved and the launch configurations are brought up-to-date.Folder specific variables used in the configuration (e.g. '$workspaceFolder') are resolved against the given folder.
b37509886e