Re: [taskjuggler-dev] Monte Carlo simulation

41 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Chris Schlaeger

unread,
Jul 4, 2011, 4:58:13 AM7/4/11
to taskjug...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:06 AM, jchimene <jchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in developing a Monte Carlo simulator for TJ. Is the TJ
> owner interested in such an addon?

That probably depends on the result. The current heuristical scheduler
provides reasonably good results for most common cases. It's far from
perfect, but fast enough for practical use.

It's certainly possible to provide alternative schedulers. If you can
demonstrate good results with acceptable performance, I'd be certainly
interested. See the 'How To Contribute' section in the manual for some
guidelines.

I'm optimizing the scheduler performance right now. Many internal data
structures are in flux. I should be done in a few weeks. But you can
certainly start looking at the code.

Chris

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Chris Schlaeger

unread,
Jul 4, 2011, 1:52:18 PM7/4/11
to taskjug...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:05 PM, jchimene <jchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, is the server amenable to AJAX? If so, I'm thinking of using
> Google Web Toolkit for the front-end. The server can do the math and
> supply the raw results, leaving the presentation to GWT.

The server is written in Ruby, just like the rest of the applications.
We make very little use of Java script.

Chris

Message has been deleted

Chris Schlaeger

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 3:50:20 AM7/7/11
to taskjug...@googlegroups.com
Jeff,

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Jeff Chimene <jchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached, please find a spreadsheet implementation of the proposed
> scheduling simulation.

you probably have to explain a bit more what this is, what it can be
used for and how.

Chris

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Chris Schlaeger

unread,
Jul 11, 2011, 6:58:27 AM7/11/11
to taskjug...@googlegroups.com
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Chimene <jchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should I wait for any feedback on this, or abandon this idea for TJ?

I still haven't understood the relationship between TJ projects and
your spread sheet. What's the purpose? How should it be used with TJ?

Chris

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages