> Is it generally possible to catch Errors?
As far as I know it is not.. A work around I use for testing for a error is to ---set up a separate task that will repeat the error-- 'checking task'
- from the original task use 'perform task' to start the checking task ( you can send some variables with %par1, %par2.)
- in the 'checking task' do not check 'continue on error' for the action that will usually throw the error. After that action do a return value..
So if you get a error you will not get a return value because the task will exit.
If you get a return value then there will be no error...
Let me know if that is not clear....
Not sure if this will work in your case but it is the only error checking I know. You could search the group for other possible solutions..
Hope this helps in some way... Rich..