87 views

Skip to first unread message

Nov 3, 2014, 6:40:59 AM11/3/14

to tangl...@googlegroups.com

I previously build a site with food recipes. Here users could change the number of people/serving size, and the list of ingredients would update correspondingly. Functionality much alike Tangle. I spend some time trying to get singular and plural nouns correct. The simple solution I ended up using was adding a little extra HTML markup (and JS). Something like this (using the example from the frontpage):

Where the attribute**data-s="cookie"** contains the singular noun and is used when **this.cookies < 2** and the attribute **data-p="cookies"** contains the plural noun, and is used when **this.cookies ≥ 2**. And correspondently for **this.calories**. Why 2? Well you say ½ cookie, 1 cookie, 1½ cookie, but say 2 cookies, 3 cookies, etc. The solutions is not perfect – language is tricky and not always that logical. I.e. you would must likely also say 0 cookies. And furthermore these "rules" depend on which language we are talking about; English, Danish, German, or a third.

Case plural: *When you eat ***3 cookies**, you consume **150 calories**.

Case singular: *When you eat ***1 cookie**, you consume **1 calorie**.

HTML

`When you eat <span data-var="cookies" class="TKAdjustableNumber"> <span data-s="cookie" data-p="cookies">cookies</span></span>, you consume <span data-var="calories"> <span data-s="calorie" data-p="calories">calories</span></span>.`

Where the attribute

Perhaps the above mention approach could be of interest. Feel free to use any or all of it.

Best regards

Jonas

PS: Regarding **decimals, fractions and rounding of numbers** (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tangle-talk/decimal/tangle-talk/aJL0SZhaids/orwD3UGKhz0J). My approach was to use a combination. The underlying assumption was that users had a better understanding when numbers were presented as fractions rather than decimals, i.e. **⅓** rather than **0.333**, and instead of **3.333** I would use **3⅓** or just **3 **(I think that up until 10 I used the fraction, above 10 i ignored any decimal). **BUT** only up until a certain threshold "fractional level", i.e. people have a poor understanding of **⅜**, so here I might instead have used **0.375** or approximated it to **⅓**.

I found inspiration in http://www.mindspring.com/~alanh/fracs.html Here the first 4 lines/approximations/fractions for any decimal number (<1) are fairly easy for must people to comprehend. So I would present one of these.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu