I agree with Charlie, and as she pointed out, we've had this conversation before. I don't think we ever made it "official" (although, I don't think we've ever made anything official ever), but the general consensus we had agreed to was that unless they are specifically being offered as freeskool classes/events, they shouldn't be on our calendar.
I'm all for the occupy movement, but putting what are basically their events on the calendar is a precedent that says to me that a tampa freeskool organizer can post whatever events they want for *any* organization. And I think we want to avoid that.
I don't have a problem with occupiers teaching freeskool classes on location (which could be considered a joint class, that's fine), but as Jill and Sarah were saying, they need to be clearly defined as tampa freeskool classes, with appropriate descriptions, and (I'm adding) not point to the occupy page. I don't think there's a problem with the descriptions saying something like "this class is being taught in conjunction with Occupy Tampa."
I don't want to offend any of our organizers / members / involved people who are really involved with Occupy, and while it's probably true that most freeskools are in fact anarchistic and political, I've never really felt that vibe here among the majority of those of us involved. If that's the route that people generally want to go, then that's fine, but if we become largely sucked up as part of occupy, I think we stand to lose a lot of people (not because they necessarily disagree (although some probably do), but just due to lack of interest.)
Sorry for the rant. I was originally just going to say "I agree with Charlie." Apparently I failed at that. =P
Avi