Piso Christ Pdf Free Download

[Karon Howey]

You may be asking yourself several questions at this point. Such asů
"who were the Piso family members?" and, "why would they want to
create Christianity?" In addition to these questions, you may also be
asking yourself, "since this all happened so long ago, how can anyone
be sure of just what happened and how can anyone know just WHO did
what?" All of these are very good questions. And this report will help
you to understand all of this and answer other questions which you may
not have even thought to ask about. Remember, we are discussing this
on a scholarly level. This is necessary.The first thing that I think that you should know about is just HOW it
is that we researchers have gotten to the point where we are now able
to identify just WHO the authors of the New Testament texts really
were - so let's start there. It was actually a very long process which
involved the work of several researchers over the course of quite a
few years. The first person to compile the evidence which points to
the Roman authorship of the New Testament texts was Prof. Bruno Bauer.
He was far ahead of his time. He did not stop where other researchers
of his time did, he examined the texts in ways that others were not
able to.He knew that to get at the truth that he would have to be objective
and he also knew that what this meant was that he would have to
examine the texts as LITERATURE. And he also knew that he had to
become as a detective and look for motives, clues and evidence within
the texts themselves. What did it mean to examine the early New
Testament texts as literature? It meant not believing the story itself
until there was reason to prove it to be valid and true; and instead,
examining HOW the story was put together. It meant looking for
literary components and devices. And it also meant not believing
(assuming) that the authors were who they had claimed to be, at least
until or that too was also proven to be true - or not.What this is basically saying is that he was working through a process
of elimination so that he could obtain a set of FACTS that were true
and then from those reach conclusions which would either support the
validity of the texts or expose them as fraudulent. Now why so many of
the other scholars of that time or since have not thought to do this
very same thing, has remained a mystery. Perhaps part of what may
explain this is that scholars have been taught by other scholars who
were used to simply reading and believing what they read instead of
teaching students how to be extra-critical when it comes to dealing
with ancient texts (literature). Our level of scholarship requires
objectivity and much more discipline.Bruno Bauer's great work, 'Christ And The Caesars' was published in
Berlin in 1877. In all of these years, as far as any scholar that I
know of is aware of, there has never been an English translation of
this book until very recent years. I will give you a list of sources
for the books that I cite in this report at the end. There were
indeed, students which followed Bauer's example. But these were few
and far between. Most of those scholars never gained the attention,
recognition or exposure that their works deserved.The next person that we should mention is James Ballantyne Hannay. He
too, had reached the conclusion that the Romans were the creators of
the Christian religion. He was an English scholar of some renowned in
his time and had associated with many of the important British
scholars of his time. He had participated in the production of 'The
Oxford Encyclopedia Biblica.' But his own work on the subject of the
Roman creation of Christianity was published posthumously some months
after his death in 1925. The title of that book is 'The Rise, Decline
and Fall of the Roman Religion'.So, though the majority of scholars never even heard of either of
these authors or their works, their works DID exist and established a
foundation of knowledge in this area to work from. And even though
these authors apparently were not able to identify the actual authors
of the New Testament texts, they were able to give us quite a bit of
evidence for the case that the Romans were the actual authors. And
knowing what we do now, it is quite understandable just WHY these
earlier scholars were not able to make that identification - as this
is quite complicated, and one must know a number of things which were
not known to them in their time.As this is only a short report, I must be as brief as possible and
still touch upon what I think is important for you to know about. So,
as I was saying, there were a number of things which one needs to know
about in order to understand the subject well enough to form correct
conclusions. One of those is that the researcher much know just WHO
the Romans were (or rather the leaders of the Romans) at certain
times. For instance, not all of the Roman emperors were the same nor
did they have the same agenda. Another thing which is of great
importance in understanding this subject is that the leaders of the
Jews too, were not all the same - and this is also important to know.
I detail these things in my book 'The Synthesis of Christianity'.Next, we come to Abelard Reuchlin. I often refer to him as a 'great
man'. And this is because he is the very first person to identify the
true authors of the New Testament and present that information in
written form, making that available to the public for the very first
time! He did so in a booklet which he had finished in 1979. There was
a second printing of his booklet ('The True Authorship of the New
Testament') in 1986. He wrote about how the Roman Piso family had
created the idea for a new religion to replace Judaism, and how when
they went to Nero for permission to proceed and promote it; Nero did
not grant them permission and so, they plotted against his life in
order to obtain control of the seat of power over Rome so that they
could proceed with their plans.Reuchlin also states some of the reasons for the need of some Roman
royals to create this new religion and leave behind (destroy) the old
Jewish religion. For one thing, the leaders of the Jews were relatives
of Arrius Calpurnius Piso, the main creator of the Christian religion.
And they were losing control over the Jews. Neither the existing Roman
religion, nor the existing Judaean religion contained all of the
elements which were necessary for the 'New Rome' which the Pisos and
their close relatives had in mind to create. And so, those had to be
replaced with one which DID contain all of that. Also, few scholars
will talk about the long all-out war which was going on at that time
and which actually lasted over 100 years! So, this was not just about
something which these certain Romans wantedů it was about what they
NEEDED in order to win the war and create that 'New Rome'.So, Reuchlin's booklet tells how the various Piso family members wrote
the texts of the New Testament. He gives the dates in which these
texts were written, and information about each of these family
members. And since his work has been available to others, several
others have written about this. At a point when there are approx. 450
million people in the U.S. alone, there are about 2 million people who
have heard about the Roman Piso family and their authorship of the New
Testament. Before long though, many more people will know about this -
and write about it!Abelard Reuchlin tells us about Arrius Calpurnius Piso, and how he
used many alias identities to create the illusion that several people
were writing independently of each other about several things, when in
fact he and his close relatives were doing all of the writing for
public consumption! In other words, the Roman authors were writing in
concert with each other for a specific cause; because they had the
same motives in common. Some of the authors that he examines and
discusses in his booklet are: Flavius Josephus, Pliny the Younger,
Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius and Flavius Arrian. Contrary to what most
people even today think about ancient texts and authors, there were
many of them and a vast amount of their works DO survive today and ARE
available to most people - IF they know where to find them. Which
brings me to the questions which I had brought up at the beginning of
this report. And those are:(1) "Who were the Piso family members?" This can be better answered by
getting the research material which I have already mentioned. But
briefly, the Roman Piso family were Roman royals who had been in
positions of authority along side other Roman aristocrats. And who, at
various times were moneyers, consuls, governors. Their ancestry, just
as the Julian Caesars, went back to ancient kings of Troy and even
further. In fact, understanding their ancestry is key to understanding
so much of this - as you will find out later as you do your own
research of this subject (see 'inherited name/titles').By the time that Nero became emperor, the Roman aristocrats had
endured a long war which was causing them a great many problems. This
war, which really was gaining momentum from the time of the Maccabees
or Hasmonean Kings, was being put forth in the name of REAL freedom
and human rights for all people in the Roman Empire. It was the
Pharisees, primarily, who were responsible for this unrest in their
unrelenting desire for the abolition of slavery from within the Roman
Empire. They were joined by the Essenes as their philosophy regarding
slavery was the same. In fact, the leadership of all of the sects of
the Jews were closely related. In the year 6 C.E. (A.D.), the Essenes
ceased to be called Essenes and instead were referred to as 'Scribes'.
They played a more passive role in helping the Pharisees in this war.Arrius C. Piso was descended from the Herodian rulers of Judaea
through his mother's side of the family. The Herodians were the
overseers of the Jewish sects, but particularly, they were the
authority over the Sadducees, and the Sadducees were the enemies of
the Pharisees in regards to their goals. The Sadducees represented the
vested interests of the rich royals, while the Pharisees represented
the interests of the average person. The Herodians were Roman
installed rulers of Judaea, replacing the Maccabees. However, there
was great support for the Pharisees as so many more people were NOT
rich royals and had been living under harsh conditions for so long.
The common people desired basic human rights and an end to the
practice of slavery. And so, this was what was driving them so
passionately in their war against certain royals. What you are
learning about here, is actually the OTHER side of the 'Jesus story'.The slaves themselves were uprising and they were even starting to
kill their own masters - sacrificing themselves in the process of this
cause to end slavery. And this is what was so frightening to the
royals of the Roman Empire. They were in danger of losing their own
lives to their own slaves! And slaves were not being 'obedient' as
they once were. Can you imagine what a problem this represented to
royals who were used to living a very comfortable life and of being in
complete control over the lives of all of their slaves? This is one of
the main reasons for the creation of the Christian religion, because
one of the main
components of it was to pacify the slaves and keep them obedient. This
was accomplished by giving them advice such as to be 'content' in
their life situation and by telling them that they will receive their
'reward' in 'Heaven'. But these very same people who were now creating
this new religion were the descendants of those who had been creating
other religions for thousands of years! They knew the truth about
religion because this had been their own family business since the
very first creation of the idea of the first religion. They knew that
'god' was only an idea, a concept which their ancestors had created
and used in creating religion. They also knew that the other concepts
involved were also created and not actually real.So, in the time of Nero, the Piso family and their royal relatives
were trying to overthrow him. And in response to this, he had several
of them put to death. He did this with Seneca, who was a relative of
the Pisos. And he did this with Lucan, Seneca's nephew. Nero had to
put a number of the Piso family relatives to death as they were doing
everything that they could to get rid of him. He had to put to death
his general Corbulo. He was informed of a plot by the Piso family from
Milichus, and he had to put Gaius Calpurnius Piso to death for this by
ordering him to commit suicide. But because Gaius Piso did this, Nero
spared the lives of Gaius Piso's family. He exiled Arrius Calpurnius
Piso, Gaius Piso's son, to military duty outside of Rome - to the
East!To better inform you of many of the fine details which you should know
about, I am currently writing other books and booklets about this in
which I give more details about the Piso family members and what each
of them were doing with regards to creating and helping to create the
Christian religion. So be looking out for these! I realize that so
much of this information is difficult for many people to keep straight
and so a part of what I want to do is to make lists which people can
refer to for various details and statistical information. I have done
this already to some extent in my 'The Synthesis of Christianity'.
Once people know all of these things and have a firm understanding and
background in this area, it becomes very exciting as it is really an
unfolding drama - a REAL one, which serves to explain so many things
which have remained unknown to so many for such a long time!We have determined that Arrius Calpurnius Piso was married at least 3
times, and that he had 4 sons and 1 daughter. The names of these
children are: Alexander (who died), Julius, Justus, Proculus and
Claudia Phoebe (aka Pompeia Plotina). Much of this information, about
his wives and children can be found in his writings as Flavius
Josephus. Reuchlin's booklet about this is very scholarly and
condensed. Thus, is it difficult for some to read completely. But do
try to do so, including the footnotes section.(2) "Why would they want to create Christianity?" Well, I think that
we have already answered that at least in part. However, to better
understand this we must see it from their perspective. They were
highly educated royal Romans and they understood this very important
fact; and that is that even IF they were able to take control of the
Roman Empire, they would need a means in which to maintain and KEEP
that power and authority. And this is where the creation of a new
religion came in. I have made a list of some of the most important
things that these royal Romans would need in order to achieve those
goals and these things are evident in the New Testament texts. You can
find that information in 'The Synthesis of Christianity'.While Arrius Piso was in exile, serving in the military under Nero, he
was a Roman general. Reuchlin says, "Nero sent young (Arrius) Piso to
Syria as governor." Yes, he was governor of Syria, just as many of his
ancestors were! And this put him in the position of being not only
governor, but also commander over several other generals who were
leading the Roman legions in Syria; including Judaea. Reuchlin
continues by saying, "That post gave him command of the legions
controlling Judaea. His own "history" (writing as Flavius Josephus)
records his service in Judaea in the year 65 (C.E./A.D.) under the
name of Gessius Florus and in 66 with the pseudonym Cestius Gallus"
(Ref. 'The True Authorship of the New Testament', Abelard Reuchlin).
Arrius Piso, in order to get away with all that he did, had to make
use of many alias names or 'pennames'. But his use of those names can
be deduced and determined from a number of factors, particularly
because he, himself, wanted people to one day find out just what he
did and to know just how he did it. So thus, we have seen examples of
WHY they would want or need to create Christianity. There was a war
going on. A solution was needed for the problems which confronted the
royals of the time. The revolts of both the slaves and the common
people, led by the Pharisees, had to be stopped. And they had to have
a way in which to maintain their control of the masses once they were
able to gain control over Rome.(3) "Since this all happened so long ago, how can anyone be sure of
just what happened and how can anyone know just WHO did what?"
Remember that I said that Arrius Piso WANTED people to one day find
out not only WHAT he did, but HOW he did it? I will now tell you more
about this aspect of this.What these people were doing while creating Christianity, was also to
create a lasting monument to THEMSELVES! They were improving upon the
idea of being buried in pyramids and instead, built themselves
monuments in the literary works that they were creating! And they were
doing this because they understood that stone monuments would stand
for only so long; but their literature would LAST much longer. And
particularly so, IF those who were in power after their death were
their own descendants who KNEW just what they had done and who would
also follow in that same tradition!What does this mean? It means that not only was all that was written
in THEIR time for public consumption was controlled by royals; but
that this was true for most of history SINCE that time! In other
words, "history" as we have been taught, did not happen in the way in
which we were told! And that is because there was no freedom of speech
in history until fairly recent times. It appears that this only really
began with the establishment of the United States of America. Before
that time, the world was virtually ruled by kings, other royals, and
religious leaders - all of whom controlled the production of ALL
books. So, the history back to the earliest times were kept in near
'pristine' condition with regards to their contents. And the authors
were actually royals, despite what the authors of those books may have
claimed.Now, we get into a whole other area of this. And that is how this was
concealed from the public for so long. No one could write books (or
literature in general) for public consumption except for royals, under
penalty of death. This is how the royals were able to maintain their
control and put down most revolts. But over the course of time, little
by little, change occurred. A part of that change took place with the
invention of moveable type and the printing press.The Church tried very hard to suppress the news of these inventions
and to keep them out of the hands of people - because they knew what
this would mean. And that was that the average person would soon have
the ability to start producing their own books and other material at a
rate which could not be controlled or destroyed by royals and church
authorities. In essence, they saw that this would mean that after
thousands of years of controlling all that was written for public
consumption, that was going to finally come to an end. Since scholars
in general did not know this, they made incorrect assumptions about
history. I have noted at least 6 major assumptions which scholars have
made regarding history and have detailed those in my books.We have already explained quite a bit about our knowing WHO did WHAT.
But there is so much more to know and also to learn about still.
Again, we can be sure or certain of just what happened, because it was
done under what we might term 'pristine' conditions. Those who were
writing for most of the history after Arrius Piso and his immediate
family had died, were their own descendants! And so, they maintained
what their great ancestors had written and preserved them for
posterity. They even kept their own private family archives. Next, how
can anyone know just WHO did what? Because they were egotists. They
all wanted to receive credit for what they did!For instance, we know that 'Jesus' was never a real person. But was
instead a created 'composite' character that was played in the gospels
by the person who had created him! And that was Arrius Piso. What is
one way that we can tell that Arrius Piso was his creator? Well, for
one thing, it is Arrius Piso, writing as Flavius Josephus who is the
very first person to make mention of 'Christ' in his works. This was
done for the purpose of historicizing 'Jesus'. He makes certain that
people will know that when he mentions 'Christ' without calling him
'Jesus' that people would be able to know that he IS referring to
'Jesus' as the Christ by making mention of his brother 'James'. Also,
as a scholar, we find that the New Testament texts make anti-Semitic
remarks in several places. Which seems strange when one considers the
fact that 'Jesus' is supposed to have been Jewish. But we learn more
about all of these so-called contradictions as we discover the truth
about the creation of the Christian religion.And WHY did Arrius Piso chose to call his messiah 'Jesus'? He did so
because this was a way to ridicule the Jews (Pharisees, whom he was at
war with), because a son of Gamaliel was named 'Jesus'
(Yeshia/Joshua). Arrius could do this because his ancestry would allow
him to do so. He was descended from High Priests who had this same
name. And so, he was entitled to use that name just as he was able to
use other name/titles that he had inherited from his other ancestors.
As 'Jesus' he used his 'Prince of Peace' title, which he had inherited
from his ancestor who was known to the public as 'Hercules'. He used
the 'Christ' name, which came from his ancestor 'Mitheridates
Chrestas'. He used the 'Saviour' title for 'Jesus', which he inherited
from his ancestor who was the great ruler over the Syrians, Antiochus
Soter ('Soter' is 'Saviour'). And so on with the other name/titles
associated with 'Jesus'.So, in various ways in which we have now discovered, the authors of
the New Testament left us the ability to find out just who they were.
They were not stupid people. These were people of great intellect and
they knew that what they were doing would last for a very long time
and the reason that they knew this was because they had obtained the
means in which it would. Their very own close relatives were in
control of the Roman Empire and all that was written for public
consumption. And as they had learned from their very own ancestors,
once such power has been gained, it would most likely last for as long
as those who were ruling were careful enough to MAKE it last.I am aware of the fact that this report does not come close to
answering all of your questions, but in reality, you should not expect
it to. This is a subject which is very complicated and which requires
a great deal of knowledge and information to understand properly. It
is even above the understanding of most of the current scholars -
which is why they have not been able to write about it as I and a few
others have. In fact, we have terms for scholars and their level of
understanding ancient history. There are those who think that history
happened just as they read about it on a superficial level without
examining it as critically as we do, and they are called 'The Old
Classical Scholarship'. There are those who are scholars whose
findings to some degree agree with ours, but who do not yet know or
understand what we do. And we call those scholars 'Transitory', as
they are (at least to some extent) on they way to understanding it.
And what we call ourselves is 'The New Classical Scholarship'. Our
findings will one day replace that of the Old Classical Scholarship
and make the old ways and methods of teachings of history obsolete.As stated above, those who have been studying history as scholars
before now have been doing so under the incorrect assumption that
history had happened differently than it actually did happen. And, in
doing so, they have based their conclusions upon at least 6 major
false assumptions (which as I also said, I have listed and detailed in
my book 'The Synthesis of Christianity'). But I have endeavored to
give you a brief outline of many of the important points regarding
this subject. And as promised, I will give you a list (below) of the
books that I have cited (and others), as well as sources for those
books. I would also like to inform you that you may not need to
purchase all of the books listed as you may be able to find them
either posted online or else at your local college or university
library. I would not expect to find such scholarly books at the public
library though. I know that someday people will be able to find them
in EVERY library.LIST OF BOOKS & SOURCES:'Christ and the Caesars', Bruno Bauer, Berlin, 1877. A translation
into English, published by and available from Alexander Davidonis,
James Island, P.O. Box 12814, 732 Gin House Court, Charleston, SC
29412. Price: $54.00'The Oxford Encyclopedia Biblica', circa 1920. Out of print. A copy
may be found in the British Museum, in the rare books archives
section.'The Rise, Decline and Fall of the Roman Religion', James Ballantyne
Hannay, pub. 1925. Health Research Books, P.O. Box 850, Pomeroy, WA
99347. 1-888-844-2386. FAX 1-509-843-2387'The True Authorship of the New Testament', Abelard Reuchlin, 1986.
Order from: The Abelard Reuchlin Foundation, P.O. Box 5652, Kent, WA
99064. Price: $5.00The works of 'Flavius Josephus'. See both Whiston translation (a copy
may be found online) and Loeb Classical Library edition. William
Whiston edition may be ordered from Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids,
Michigan 49501. Write to Harvard University Press for a copy of their
catalog of Loeb Classical Library edition titles: Harvard University
Press, 79 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138.'Greek-English Interlinear New Testament', George Ricker Berry. Order
from: Zondervan Publishing House, 1415 Lake Drive, SE, Grand Rapids,
MI 49506 (Request their catalog for current price).'The Synthesis of Christianity' (Second Edition), Roman Piso, 2002.
Price: $19.95. Order from: FRC, P.O. Box 103, Altoona, WI 54720-0103,
by check or money order payable to FRC.'Piso Christ!', Roman Piso, 2002. Price: $19.95. Order from: FRC, P.O.
Box 103, Altoona, WI 54720.And URL's: ://www.angelfire.com/wi2/eduarticles ://members.tripod.com/ReuchlinA ://www.angelfire.com/wi/famtreeCheers!Roman

c80f0f1006