Primitive-type arrays

[Saswat Anand]

Hello,

It seems that Tamiflex does not correctly log names of the classes corresponding to primitive-type arrays. For example,  for an invocation, forName("[Z"), it (probably) logs java.lang.Boolean[], which is not correct because the two classes are different. Or am I missing something?

Thanks,

Saswat

[Eric Bodden]

Hi Saswat.

Thanks a lot for your mail, this was indeed a bug. I just committed a
patch. Would you mind checking out the current head and giving it a
try?

Cheers,
Eric

--
Dr. Eric Bodden, http://bodden.de/
Principal Investigator in Secure Services at CASED
Coordinator of the CASED Advisory Board of Study Affairs
PostDoc at Software Technology Group, Technische Universität Darmstadt
Tel: +49 6151 16-5478    Fax: +49 6151 16-5410
Mailing Address: S2|02 A209, Hochschulstraße 10, 64289 Darmstadt

[Saswat Anand]

Hi Eric,

The bug appears to have been fixed.

It is good to see the new java.lang.reflect.Field stuff. Any plans to
handle the two "newInstance" methods of java.lang.reflect.Array?

Saswat

[Eric Bodden]

> It is good to see the new java.lang.reflect.Field stuff. Any plans to
> handle the two "newInstance" methods of java.lang.reflect.Array?

Oh, I did not know those exist. Good point. Yes, we should definitely
include those. I won't have much time to do so within the next few
weeks, though.

Thanks for pointing that out!

Eric