Dear LSR friends:
Since so many of you ride tandems and/or use triple-chainrings on a touring bike for thousands of clicks, I have some questions. My wife and I have been back on the tandem for about six months and did okay in the Texas Time Trials six-hour ride. I have a lot of experience building and fitting road and triathlon frames, but not as much with a triple chain-ring and definitely not on a tandem. We have an older frame and drivetrain we bought with Ultegra 9-speed, and we really do not miss the 10th or 11th bear, and generally speaking, ultegra is a reliable system. The rear cogset is 11-32 and shifts just fine in all gears.
The problem comes with the front triple, which is 32-44-54 with a 175mm crank set for me (170mm for wife on stoker). This works good for me as captain because I'm used to 175mm and a 54-tooth big ring on my road and time-trial bikes, and with the 32x32 front-rear selection we can climb longer 15% grades reasonably well. The most unreliable aspect is going from the 44 ring to the 54 ring, usually after climbing and then wanting to go back downhill in 54x11, one of the funnest parts of tandem riding, descending very fast after a slower tandem climb. It just will not a reliable jump into the 54-tooth ring, no matter how much adjustment I've done. I have 20 years experience configuring Shimano an SRAM chainrings and shifters, going back to 9-speed non-indexed left shifter lever and of course newer STI shifters, so I know most of the quirks of adjusting a front derailleur and tensioning the cable. No matter how good I get the front derailleur and left shifter working on the bike stand at home, at some point in a hilly ride, it becomes very difficult to move to 54. Sometimes this means riding a lot in 44x11 when we'd rather be in 54x11 or 54x13. About the only way to make it go over is to get off the back and do it by hand, or sometimes by waiting a long time in 44x11 with chain rattling until it goes drops in spontaneously. Of course, once I get home and reset the cable again, everything seems to work fine. Also, after several hours of finagling, I'm 95% sure the left derailleur is mounted correctly, no way to get it move rather right with the chain (cage would actually hit the crank). There just is not that much room for error or adjustment on a Co-Motion Tandum with an Ultegra triple. It's meant to fit about only one way with maybe a millimeter and/or a degree of variation, not nearly as much room to play around as with a 2x10 road bike setup.
So I wanted to ask some questions about how you actually ride with the triple and/or tandem:
1. When I have been using a double, at least in the old days before electronic shifting, it was not a good idea to ride much at all in something like 53x23, because the chain would rub against the derailleur cage. You could shift into that okay most of the time, but not a good place to be for more than 100 meters or so of riding, inefficient. I try to follow that rule with the tandem, but because it's so hard to go from 44 to 54 chain ring, I find myself having to stay in 54x32 even though it's not the most efficient choice. How often do you even use your biggest ring on your tandem in easier brevet-paced riding?
2. Do you find yourself riding more and more in the middle ring (for me, 44 teeth) and only using the larger (53 or 54-tooth) ring for cogs like 13, 12, 11? In other words just for longer downhills. 44-tooth for me is like a pro-sized time-trial bike small chain ring, and I have done this a lot, just not so much as required with the tandem.
3. The biggest problems seem more frequent after a longer time spent in 32 ring climbing 11-15% grade with 32x32. That seems to make it harder to EVER get the derailleur back to far-right into the 54 coming down the hill.
4. My Ultegra 6503 front triple derailleur is not very worn at all, an older model but very little wear with strong springs. The cable is also relatively unworn, but I'm going to get a new 3000mm cable this week because I've frayed the derailleur end of the cable due to so many adjustments and attempts to make it work right.
5. I do have an external cable tensioner barrel on the left captain side to tension it more, but this works for early home rack setup, but tends to become less helpful after hours of riding.
From a modern perspective, I can fix all of this by going to a 2x11 electronic front shifter, either SRAM etap (preferred) or Shimano, but this make it harder to go with 32-tooth front ring, which we DO need. We can't just go with 34x28 to climb, just not enough, or even 39-42 tooth ring. There aren't any 2x ring setups that can jump from 32 to 52,53, or 54 tooth front ring. If this were a solo upright touring bike the 2x11 electronic would be the solution for me, but not for my wife on a tandem. Because we have 9-speed rings and cranks, the 2x11 or even 3x10 means spending $2,000 for an all-new electronic drivetrain, including two new cranksets with rings for the narrower chain. By the time we do all that, we might as well upgrade the whole bike, but we bought this one on eBay eight years ago and it still works great, not ridden much between 2009 and early 2017. If we were 20 years younger and weighed 40 pounds less for both riders, maybe 2x would work for us, but that's not going to happen.
So I'd like to find a practical way to keep riding the 9-speed triple, which is plenty of gears but currently unreliable to the big chain ring. I've already got a newer front derailleur, and could even get a newer Ultegra left STI shifter for triple, but I'm not really sure I need it. Maybe there is some strategy to use in shifting during rides that avoids this problems? I'm even thinking of installing an older aerobar non-indexed left shifter from one of my original 1999 triathlon bikes (we have aerobars on the tandem) and just seeing if I can "feather" the front ring shifts better than index triple STI shifter--weird solution, but might work if can't find a better way.
Another reason this is so different for me is that I'm using to doing a 200km brevet averaging 20+ with 54-42 front rings even on our hilliest courses with no problem. Tuula and I are more like 14mph over only 130km hilly course in Texas Time trials. Totally different kind of riding, not as competitive, so what I would like is simply reliable and comfortable.
Thanks for any ideas.
Regards,
Tom Rodgers