PHYSICS PERSECUTES HAMMOND
George Hammond
"Beable van Polasm" <beable+...@beable.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:n28ygzl...@dingo.beable.com...
> "George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >
> > "TimC" <tcon...@no.astro.spam.swin.accepted.edu.here.au> wrote:
> >
> > > All this just proves that the editors of the noedic journal *and* the
> > > reviewers were on crack. Hardly surprising.
> >
> > [GH]
> > Richard L. Amoroso editor of the Noetic Journal is a PhD in
> > relativity, internationally known, editor of a recent Book by Kluwer
> > Publishing (one of the world's premier scientific publishers)
> > entitled: _Gravitation_ (2001) containing papers by Wolfgang Rindler
> > and many other internationally famous physicists, as well as 3
> > papers of his own on Relativity subjects. He was recently chairman
> > of a presentation division in the VIGIER-IV conference in Paris. To
> > call him a pot smoking Hippie I think is a little far fetched.
>
> That gets us back to this previous exchange:
>
> "George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > "SMEEBAG" <brad....@keypoint.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:c4vn4f$1hsi$1...@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
> > >
> > > And while your at it perhaps you could direct us to some plausible
> > > critiques of your work
> >
> > [GH]
> > There aren't any... no plausible person has ever read it.
>
> Is Richard L. Amoroso a "plausible person"? Has he read your work?
[GH]
Sure is; sure has. We discussed, edited and reviewed
the paper for over a year before he agreed to publish it
in the Noetic Journal.
Now, if you're going to ask me to divulge his comments
on the bathroom wall of the internet, the answer is no.
If you want to publish a critique in the Noetic Journal,
go ahead and I'm sure plenty of people will answer it including
both me and the editor. Of course i doubt that anything you
would write could possibly get by the reviewers as
being "scientifically competent".
>
> > The 5 reviewers of my paper in Pergamon
> > Press' _New ideas In Psychology_, an internationally
> > prominent journal, were all of professorial rank
> > in Psychometry and/or Physics. They UNANAMOUSLY
> > recommended the paper for publication.
>
> Are those five reviewers "plausible people"? Have they read your work?
[GH]
Sure are; sure did. However "peer reviewers" are "anonymous"
people and DO NOT divulge their opinions to the public.
>
> > So obviousl;y you're just another loudmouth internet
> > sot and line professional internet graffitier like 99%
> > of all internet posters are.
>
> Are you a loudmouth internet sot and line professional internet
> graffitier, George?
[GH]
Obviously not, since my theory (discovery) has been published int the
peer reviewed literature, and I am a graduate physicist to boot.
But, you can't point to ONE OTHER POSTER on this astronomically
long thread who isn't a well known internet heckler w/o any scientific
(or other) education, and who isn't a well known internet "kook".
[GH]
By the way Polasm.. since you at least manifest enough intelligence
to be cautious, I would mention this interesting turn of events.
The existence of the "Christian Science Church" has recently
made an impression on me. I have been investigating Mary Baker
Eddy... in fact, have now read her entire collected works, and
have investigated the history of the CS church 1880-2004.
I am amazed to find that my discovery "proves" everything
that Mary Baker Eddy ever said.... mainly that "God is mind,
and mind is God". Moreover, I am amazed to find out that
this "scientific religious movement" has been going on in New
England for 200 years... beginning apparently with Emerson
and the "transcendentalists"... and then to Mary Baker Eddy
and the founding of the CS "religion". All this time I have never realized
that my discovery is part of a much larger movement, a movement
that began in my own backyard (I was born and raised in
Massachusetts). All this time I have been out canvassing the world
screaming in the ears of foreign bigshots... and all the time the
most advanced people, and the largest and most powerful
supporting institutions (CS church for instance) are right in
my own backyard..... I was born right in the middle of it
and only discovered it AFTER I discovered the scientific
proof of God that "proves it all true".
So... I think the time has come to stop talking to a lot
of "kooks" on the internet and start talking to the C.S.
church about organizing a "competent evaluation" of my
discovery... it turns out that THEY are the only ones who
have any scientific idea of what God is... and apparently,
they are big enough to be able to "ignore internet kooks"
without any problem.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
Patrick Phelan
> Obviously not, since my theory (discovery) has been published int the
> peer reviewed literature, and I am a graduate physicist to boot.
Would you like to peer-review other theories? After all, the big names
in physics only got that way because other people pay attention to them,
and what would people pay attention to more than a discussion on their
own work?
How about this guy:
What is and what will be: Integrating spirituality and science
http://www.mtnmath.com/willbe.html
He doesn't have a nice and easy equation like god=guv, but it does seem
to be swimming in complex theories. He also is/was an Acting Assistant
Professor at UCLA, and almost got a Ph.D. in physics, too. I'm sure
you'll be the best of friends.
--
Patrick Phelan
w____\\W//___w Te Hupenui
46 72 69 6E 6B 20 72 75 6C 65 73 21
http://mysite.verizon.net/fantod/
Earle Jones
"George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> So... I think the time has come to stop talking to a lot
> of "kooks" on the internet and start talking to the C.S.
> church about organizing a "competent evaluation" of my
> discovery... it turns out that THEY are the only ones who
> have any scientific idea of what God is...
*
George: That is a *great* idea. I agree that you should stop
discussing you 'discovery' on the internet and take it up with those
who might understand it -- the Christian Science Church.
earle
*
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
Charles & Mambo
[snip bullcrap]
> The existence of the "Christian Science Church" has recently
> made an impression on me. I have been investigating Mary Baker
> Eddy... in fact, have now read her entire collected works, and
> have investigated the history of the CS church 1880-2004.
> I am amazed to find that my discovery "proves" everything
> that Mary Baker Eddy ever said.... mainly that "God is mind,
> and mind is God".
[snip bullcrap]
Oh, man, another one that Jim Jones failed to take with him.
--
Come down off the cross
We can use the wood
Tom Waits, Come On Up To The House
George Hammond
"Patrick Phelan" <fan...@geocities.com> wrote in message
news:fantod-36DD50....@news.verizon.net...
> [GH]
> > Obviously not, since my theory (discovery) has been published int the
> > peer reviewed literature, and I am a graduate physicist to boot.
>
> Would you like to peer-review other theories? After all, the big names
> in physics only got that way because other people pay attention to them,
> and what would people pay attention to more than a discussion on their
> own work?
>
> How about this guy:
> What is and what will be: Integrating spirituality and science
> http://www.mtnmath.com/willbe.html
>
> He doesn't have a nice and easy equation like god=guv, but it does seem
> to be swimming in complex theories. He also is/was an Acting Assistant
> Professor at UCLA, and almost got a Ph.D. in physics, too. I'm sure
> you'll be the best of friends.
[GH]
Look.... mathematicians know less about God than anyone, even less
than Physicists who are practically clueless.
WHY.... because "God" is the theory (explanation) of:
1. Dirt, garbage, filth
2. Suffering, agony, death
3. Human degredation
4. Poverty
5. Disease
6. Inferiority, poor health
WHAT IN THE HELL do you think a good smelling, highly paid,
totally sheltered person like an academic Physicist or Mathematician
who never sees or talks too or has lived with the lower depths of
human society would know about them, or their problems?
NOTHING
is the answer.
That is why they have NO IDEA what these billions of people are
talking about when they start talking about "God".
Instead of figuring out that it's something SIMPLE like the effect
on reality of having half your brain ungrown from STARVATION,
they sit there at their desk munching Chinese take-out dinners
and speculate that maybe "God is an intergalactic force field".
The supreme idiocy, arrogance, impudence, and vicious fat
cheeked tripe of these individuals defies description or even
human speech. It is the cause of mass revolutions for chrissakes.
The most historic and fabulous production of this type is
TIPLER'S book about the "universe as a computer God"....
pure metaphorical horseshit from beginning to end... by a guy
who has never faced desperation, death and suffering, poverty
stricken garbage smelling filth and horror, and never will.
The guy hasn't got a CLUE as to what God is!
The URL citation you have given me above is ANOTHER
ONE OF THESE OVERPRIVILEGED SHITHEADS who
doesn't know what God is.
Look, an uneducated Jewish carpenter who never went to school
figured out what it is 2,000 years ago and is the world's most famous
person for doing so... he lived in the dirt and the garbage of the lowest
classes... he FOUND OUT what God is..... that "God" is the
phenomonological effect on reality caused by having 20% of your
brain missing.... due mainly to malnourishment, poverty and
starvation..... and that it effects EVERY HUMAN BIENG!
the explanation of GOD is so fuckin simple that an IDIOT
can undestand it..... the only people who can't understand it
are halfass rich people who don't know what poverty is.
OK.... Jesus knew it, Mary Baker Eddy knew it (she even said
it explictly: "God is mind".) But no one could understand them or believe
them because they couldn't PROVE it.
OK... that has all changed........ I HAVE PROVED IT...... yes,
found the first scientific proof that God is caused by "brain growth"
and that GOD=G_uv.
Now, maybe that doesn't mean anything to a shithead like you, and
it certainly doesn't mean anything to Fred Tipler or the rest of the
jerks in white shirts and ties walking around talking about "God"
who haven't a clue as to what it is........ but the discovery of a PROOF
of it will sooner or later fall into the hands of the poor and the starving
who
DO know what God is....... and one of these days they will lay the axe
to the root of rich elitism and it's "intergalactic cosmical God".
George Hammond
"Earle Jones" <earle...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:earle.jones-08C4...@netnews.comcast.net...
Get the f--- outta here you overprivileged mollycoddled
halfa-- piece of puke...
David Evens
wrote:
>George Hammond wrote:
>
>[snip bullcrap]
>> The existence of the "Christian Science Church" has recently
>> made an impression on me. I have been investigating Mary Baker
>> Eddy... in fact, have now read her entire collected works, and
>> have investigated the history of the CS church 1880-2004.
>> I am amazed to find that my discovery "proves" everything
>> that Mary Baker Eddy ever said.... mainly that "God is mind,
>> and mind is God".
>[snip bullcrap]
>
>Oh, man, another one that Jim Jones failed to take with him.
We're going to have to check dates and determine if this was because
George was already in a soft room at the time.
Earle Jones
"George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Earle Jones" <earle...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:earle.jones-08C4...@netnews.comcast.net...
> > In article <VQffc.142147$K91.355327@attbi_s02>,
> > "George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > So... I think the time has come to stop talking to a lot
> > > of "kooks" on the internet and start talking to the C.S.
> > > church about organizing a "competent evaluation" of my
> > > discovery... it turns out that THEY are the only ones who
> > > have any scientific idea of what God is...
> >
> > *
> > George: That is a *great* idea. I agree that you should stop
> > discussing you 'discovery' on the internet and take it up with those
> > who might understand it -- the Christian Science Church.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> [GH]
> Get the f--- outta here you overprivileged mollycoddled
> halfa-- piece of puke...
*
George: Don't be hostile -- cool it! I was just agreeing with you.
Go discuss your 'discovery' with those who will agree with you --
the Christian Scientists. You suggested it -- I agree. You post
your stuff here in the atheist newsgroups and everybody jumps all
over you. Go for a more comfortable audience.
And you call me 'overpriviliged' -- that's a laugh.
As you say, the Christian Scientists are the ones who might
understand your great 'discovery' -- after all, as you say, "THEY
are the only ones who have any scientific idea of what God is..."
Go and wallow around in the amniotic warmth of certainty -- the
blood of the lamb, the womb of Jesus. The Christian Scientists will
confirm your 'discovery', which seems to be what you need right now.
And then you can experience closure, reaffirming your profound
enlightened 'discovery' to the waiting audience of the great
unwashed.
And then you can die happy.
Of course, you will be worm food just like the rest of us.
earle
*
Earle Jones
"George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> wrote:
*
George Hammond:
In all seriousness, I think you should lay off this newsgroup for a
while. You are wandering close to the edges of incoherence -- I
don't think you realize it, but believe me, you are.
Take some time off -- it will do you good.
Go some where and relax and let these conversations pass into the
past.
I am not going to argue any more with you -- if you have a proof of
God's existence, that is fine. I certainly have no proof of God's
nonexistence.
Just relax for a week or so. I really worry about you.
If you would like to chat privately over the phone, I will give you
my home phone number-- I don't want to see you go too far out in
these newsgroups.
Just let me know. email me at earle...@comcast.net.
Best of luck,
George Hammond
[GH]
Look... no attempt to ingratiate yourself with me is going
to erase the fact that you're an uneducated loudmouth jerk.
The only thing that's incoherent is the "internet newsgroups"
with their millions of miles of drunks, bozo's, stalkers,
hecklers, drug addicts, stupid computer science undergrads
posting graffiti, and a million miles of mental cases and kooks,
of which you are certainly one.
Meanwhile, my websites are doing a landoffice business and i receive
endless email from "serious and responsible" people... not just
halfass internet hecklers... like you. Fact is, half the Christian Science
church has now discovered the thing and I'm overwhelmed with
email from them.
So get the f--- outta here mental case and go back to
your job as a frycook or sheetrock hanger or parking cars or whatever
it is you're supposed to be doing and stop harrassing
intellectuals and scholars like me.... the nazi party died
years ago screwball.
Patrick Phelan
> "Earle Jones" <earle...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:earle.jones-5381...@netnews.comcast.net...
> > In article <9cEfc.48144$rg5.98111@attbi_s52>,
> > "George Hammond" <resea...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Patrick Phelan" <fan...@geocities.com> wrote in message
> > > news:fantod-36DD50....@news.verizon.net...
> > > > [GH]
> > > > > Obviously not, since my theory (discovery) has been published int
> the
> > > > > peer reviewed literature, and I am a graduate physicist to boot.
> > > >
> > > > Would you like to peer-review other theories? After all, the big names
> > > > in physics only got that way because other people pay attention to
> them,
> > > > and what would people pay attention to more than a discussion on their
> > > > own work?
> > > >
> > > > How about this guy:
> > > > What is and what will be: Integrating spirituality and science
> > > > http://www.mtnmath.com/willbe.html
> > > >
> > > > He doesn't have a nice and easy equation like god=guv, but it does
> seem
> > > > to be swimming in complex theories. He also is/was an Acting Assistant
> > > > Professor at UCLA, and almost got a Ph.D. in physics, too.
Zing.
> > > > I'm sure
> > > > you'll be the best of friends.
> > >
> > > [GH]
> > > Look.... mathematicians know less about God than anyone, even less
> > > than Physicists who are practically clueless.
> > > WHY.... because "God" is the theory (explanation) of:
> > >
> > > 1. Dirt, garbage, filth
> > > 2. Suffering, agony, death
> > > 3. Human degredation
> > > 4. Poverty
> > > 5. Disease
> > > 6. Inferiority, poor health
> > >
> > > WHAT IN THE HELL do you think a good smelling, highly paid,
> > > totally sheltered person like an academic Physicist or Mathematician
> > > who never sees or talks too or has lived with the lower depths of
> > > human society would know about them, or their problems?
> > > NOTHING
> > > [Snip rest of review]
I think I may need to rewrite your review:
He smells good, but I disagree with his theory that God is good. I claim
God is Disease and Human Degredation. God smells like garbage. As Mary
Baker Eddy said, "God is mind". Yes, the 20% that is missing.
Thank you, have a good night.
--
Patrick Phelan
w____\\W//___w Te Hupenui
Very Little Gravitas Indeed
http://mysite.verizon.net/fantod/
George Hammond
[GH]
Ok, P.P. you've recognized this much:
> Baker Eddy said, "God is mind". Yes, the 20% that is missing.
and Hammond's has proved it to 2-decimal point accuracy.
Knowing that, you know more than 99% of the human race about God.
Congratulations.
================================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
================================================