Regarding the threats of Faryar Mansouri
NUR
As far as I am aware you are not a spokesperson for Jahahshah Javid.
If you are, could kindly clarify your position in writing and
elaborate as to exactly what your position might be?
I will say it again. Kindly refrain from communicating with me in any
public form. If you have outstanding issues, you can contact me
attorney directly yourself or have your attorneys contact.
Finally, your statement here,
There is no doubt that you will have to account for all this one
day... you probably already are.
Is an explicit threat. As such any current or future events, actions
or extra-legal interferences undertaken against myself or members of
my family outside of the specific purview of the law will be deemed to
be actions and interferences undertaken by yourself and the
organization you belong to, and as such I reserve my rights to the
fullest extent of the law against such previous and current threats or
egregious interferences.
NUR
Dear Mr Mansouri:
As far as I am aware you are not a spokesperson for Jahahshah Javid.
If you are, could kindly clarify your position in writing and
elaborate as to exactly what your position might be?
I will say it again. Kindly refrain from communicating with me in any
public form. If you have outstanding issues, you can contact my
attorney directly yourself or have your attorneys contact them.
NUR
more succinct, than anything uttered by Faryar's so-called avatar.
This malice and sectarian hatred by Mansouri is nothing more than the
fact that I have had the temerity and courage to proclaim my own
personal prophethood against the claims of Mirza Husayn 'Ali Nuri
Baha'u'llah. It does not even occur to him that, archetypally
speaking, he is playing the very role of the ignorant detractor of a
given theophany that his so-called avatar decries in the Kitab-i-Iqan.
You have to love the Spirit and the proviidence of karma for turning
the tables on the Baha'is and placing them in a situation where they
get to stand in the very position of those who they once condemned for
their narrow mindedness.
Now if Mr Mansouri wishes, and consents, seeing how he believes he
owns this site, perhaps I can post my 19 commandments as a whole here
on Iranian.Com as a blog.
NUR
of double-speak over this concept of "unity," but at the end of the
day uniformity is precisely what they mean by it. Take the concept of
freedom of conscience and liberty,for example: both notions which
Baha'i texts condemn. Husayn 'Ali Baha' unequivocally condemns liberty
(hurriya) in his Kitab-i-Aqdas and recent UHJ members are on record
saying that "freedom of conscience is a dangerous delusion from
Christianity." When you put these notions together, coupled with the
fact that the Baha'i institutions and authorities are meant to be
infallible, what you end up with in reality is a completely Orwellian
system where the notion of unity is precisely that of a Stalinist
uniformity.
"We have inherited a dangerous delusion from Christianity that our
individual conscience is supreme. This is not a Baha'i belief. In the
end, in the context of both our role in the community and our role in
the greater world, we must be prepared to sacrifice our personal
convictions or opinions. The belief that individual conscience is
supreme is equivalent to "taking partners with God" which is abhorrent
to the Teachings of the Faith."
http://www.bahai-library.org/talks/martin.watson.html
NUR
of double-speak over this concept of "unity," but at the end of the
day uniformity is precisely what they mean by it. Take the concept of
Baha'i texts condemn. Husayn 'Ali Baha' unequivocally condemns liberty
(hurriya) in his Kitab-i-Aqdas and recent UHJ members are on record
saying that "freedom of conscience is a dangerous delusion from
Christianity." When you put these notions together, coupled with the
fact that the Baha'i institutions and authorities are meant to be
infallible, what you end up with in reality is a completely Orwellian
system where the notion of unity is precisely that of a Stalinist
uniformity.
"We have inherited a dangerous delusion from Christianity that our
individual conscience is supreme. This is not a Baha'i belief. In the
end, in the context of both our role in the community and our role in
the greater world, we must be prepared to sacrifice our personal
convictions or opinions. The belief that individual conscience is
supreme is equivalent to "taking partners with God" which is abhorrent
to the Teachings of the Faith."
http://www.bahai-library.org/talks/martin.watson.html
http://www.fglaysher.com/bahaicensorship/DMartin.htm
Comment: those taking partners with God are precisely the ones
substituting their very much worldly institutions and power for the
Divine and the sanctity of the individual. The Voice of every
individual conscience must be held supreme because EVERY INDIVIDUAL
CONSCIENCE IS THE VOICE OF GOD! Mr Douglas Martin, together with the
founder of his creed, have it all wrong because they got it all
backwards.
NUR
narrower ideology, and when all others outside of it who are opposed
to such ideology for principled reasons defined by such ideologues as
inhabiting the space of hate, we are dealing with sectarian religious
bigotry. When legitimate grievances are casually dismissed or glossed
over by sectarian ideologues who paint their victims as the
perpetrators and themselves as victims, when all can see the
predatorial behavior of these individuals themselves and what they do,
we are dealing with sectarian religious bigotry. When history is
whitewashed and absolute, demonstrable lies are masqueraded as truth,
with the exponents of such facts denounced and dealt by blood-curdling
mobs, we are dealing with sectarian religious bigotry. Everything
written by Faryar on this and other boards in regards to myself and
other individuals who have had the courage to stand against the Bahai
lynch mob here and its leader Faryar, is blatantly about sectarian
religious bigotry on the part of the Bahais
I never shied away from supporting my views with evidence and holding
my own against this lynch mob. I have never been afraid to admit what
I have done, nor am I ashamed of anything I have ever said or done. I
have played fair even though I have played hard. My conscience is
absolutely, crystal clear, and I will one day go to my grave (whether
from natural causes, or as a result of foul play on the part of the
Baha'is, which is a very real possibility) without an atom of regret
for the fact that I stood up to one of the, in my opinion, most evil
organizations and most corrupt communities on the face of the earth!
But with that said, while I live I will not hold my breath or stay my
conscience for one second to the hatefilled and dishonest sectarian
diatribes of maniacal, one track minded religious bigots such as
Faryar Mansouri and his type, especially since what the Spirit has
raised no man can ever take down! And it is for this reason that to
myself and for my Self I can proclaim the litany of my Self, and say,
Verily I am the Holy Pre-Eternal and the Living Light!
NUR
love of TRUTH, which bahaism is a complete, total and absolute
negation on every level. But, tell us, where exactly is the love in
this statement by your founder:
"O phlebotomist of the Divine Unity! Throb like the artery in the body
of the Contingent World, and drink of the blood of the Block of
Heedlessness for that he turned aside from the aspect of thy Lord the
Merciful!"
Where is the love in the individuals your founder had murdered because
they chose to disagree with his claim?
Where is the love in the countless lives your creed has destroyed over
the generations because they chose to disagree with it?
Where is the love in the continual defamation and libel your texts
articulate of the memory of those who have had the backbone and
principle to dare speak the truth about your creed and its corruption
and lies?
Where is the love in the number of innocent working class individuals
Habib Sabet screwed blind?
Where is the love in the innocents Hozhabr Yazdani manhandled and
whose lives he destroyed?
Where was the love in Shoghi Effendi's bigotted public statement about
his brother's wife being "a lowborn Christian"?
Where was the love in the bitter inter-family war of Abbas Effendi and
Muhammad Ali?
Where is the love in the lawsuit your NSA brought against the Orthodox
Bahais for claimed trademark infringement of the name Bahai?
Where was the love in the actions and messages of Stephan Birkland
towards Juan Cole and the Walbridges in 1996?
Where is the love in pitting family members against each over
ideology?
If you want to speak about where the love might be, begin by
interrogating your own self and your own creed (as I did) and open
your blinded eyes to the fact that there is no love in Bahaism, or in
you. There is lots of blind arrogance, self-righteousness,
triumphalist hatred, exclusivity, adamant stupidity, self-delusion and
meglomania amongst you Bahais, but very little of anything else, let
alone love.
Take the whole log stuck in your eye out of your own eye first,
Faryar, before ever judging anyone else about thiese issues. And the
Other Side is not a Judge's Judy's court where there are Divine courts
judging people to eternal oblivion or reward. And, besides, I am not
afraid of standing alone, whether here or over there. So take your
childish anthropomorphic fire and brimstone narrative, and get off my
blogs!