On Sunday, 12 January 2020 03:00:14 UTC+10,
denisgi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Before I reply to material below, I want to ask Dale to take note of the time >of Nima’s recent comment. Nima is up after 2AM, foaming at the mouth, possibly >intoxicated, arguing with folks on the Internet, because unlike us, he’s >totally not a “loser”.
And what are you doing, Giron, arguing with someone "up after 2AM, foaming at the mouth, possibly intoxicated, arguing with folks on the Internet" when apparently you have a family with a kid to feed and claim to have a full-time job in the HR of the UN building, unless you are being paid to do so, which proves my case (yet again) that you are a paid troll and a criminal stalker.
> Recall the point: I was not citing your Jewish heritage as a knock against >you. Rather I was noting that you accuse others of having Jewish ancestry, as >part of a polemic against them, yet you are of Jewish ancestry.
> It’s an example of how many of your polemical claims about others are often >true of yourself.
This is a complete BS argument by you because I haven't taken anyone's ancestry against them. Try again without the fallacies and cite specifics rather than AIPAC rabbits you draw out of your kike a$$!
> NUR wrote:
> > No relative of mine in QLD would be
> > seen dead at a Jewish function,
> > particularly as those of them who are
> > fundamentalist Baha'is consider
> > attending such an event in bad form.
>
> Would this include a relative whom you claimed is no longer a Baha’i?
Yes, it would. Unless you have actual evidence to the contrary, which you can then present -- which you wouldn't be able to.
> NUR wrote:
> > Ask him to name the relative.
>
> I just shared your request. My source (who I never claimed is the person you >named) says to tell you the first name of the relevant _close_ relative is one >similar to that of a certain deity once popularly worshiped in Rome. They think >you should know what that refers to... *shrug*
Complete and utter BS.
<Gironovskyian cock-suckery snipped>
> Again, the point was one about your own projection. You used that phrase as a >slur against Noman, yet you are of Jewish ancestry and claim to be a Freemason.
We are talking about the same Neuman who utterly hates your guts and says you are AIPAC, right? The projection is all your own.
>
> I guess I have to yet again explain your own book to you. Note the following:
>
> (a) On page 34 of your self-published book, "Liber Decatriarchia Mystica," you declared that Basphomet is Metatron.
Yes
> (b) On page 88 of the same book, you declared Fatima to be both "the Creatrix" and "the Shekinah".
Yes
> (c) On page 107 of that work, you claimed to have received a new revelation from Fatima/"the Shekinah," and you said she appeared in a form resembling Angelina Jolie (seriously!).
Yes
> (d) Also on page 107, you state that Metatron is "the Supreme Manifestation of the Shekinah".
Yes
> In short, if we put it all together, you claimed to have received a new (and inimitable) revelation from Baphomet in the form of Angelina Jolie.
Whatever. Be that as it may, "Baphomet" was a fabrication of your own wholly church.
> NUR wrote:
> Thank you. That’s another statement worth documenting.
Document it.
>So, again, you accuse others of Satanism,
Because you are a bona fide Satanist, whether in your Catholic form or as an acolyte of Duginism and ONA. Aleister Crowley could not hold a candle to what you are involved with.
>yet praised Crowley and claimed to >receive a new revelation from Baphomet (in >the form of Angelina Jolie!).
So what? Are you jealous??
> Well, first and foremost, it speaks to the theme of your projection.
You are Obsessed with projections, aren't you, Giron? You are not making an argument. Again, you are simply pulling rabbits out of your a$$.
>You accuse others of supporting color revolutions, yet you called for Jonbesh e >Sabz to overthrow the IRI.
Jonbesh-e- Sabz DID NOT begin as a "color revolution," you dumbfuck. It was a grassroots, homegrown and spontaneous movement that then got infiltrated by the usual suspects. Be that as it may, your very own buddy Navid Nasr was a supporter and was putting "Where is My Vote" hashtags in 2009. We all were!
> On a side note, it also is basically a confession that you lied to Daniel >Mabsout when he confronted you on that question (right around the same time you >got kicked out of the unrelated Shiᶜa ᶜIrfan group for lying about people).
And what specifically did I lie to Mabsout about? I explained the nuances of the Green movement in this post as a response to that fiend (who is actually an alias of Gilad Atzmon)
https://wahidazal.blogspot.com/2016/12/why-i-stopped-supporting-green-movement.html
That you are too dishonest (or lazy) to do your homework properly, does not frame the situation in the manner in which you claim.
> Didn’t you deny using racial slurs earlier in this thread?
No, I didn't deny it. When it is deserved, I make the slur. You should know me better than that.
> Someone who knows your family told me.
Bullshit. You are hearing voices in your head. Go see a shrink.
> Didn’t you turn forty in December of 2011? But notice I said you received >financial help up until around when you were forty.
Like I said, I was a partner in a family business that went down in 2009 as a result of the GFC. Surely, your *source* knows the difference between income accrued from a business and handouts?
> My source said little doodool tala stopped receiving checks in 2011.
Your source is your own schizophrenia, i.e. voices you are hearing in your head as a *projection* of your own malevolence. Go ask Alan Godlas to write you up a prescription for some heavy duty anti-psychotics.
> Would that be welfare or your wife or both? But either, yes, I heard you were >cut off in 2011, so just before you turned forty.
Your information is totally warped. Cut off from what? Again, the 2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) took down our family business. There was no more income for anyone. But feel free to produce documentary evidence for what the voice in your head may be telling you about my financial history.
> I was told you certainly long benefitted from family business, but calling you >a “business partner”? Eh... heh...
I was on the board. Problem with that? Tough shit.
> Likewise, if you claim you have had actual jobs, you are invited to let us >peruse your tax records (American, Australian, or German). Note: not required, >rather merely invited.
Go fuck yourself, cocky conceited kike motherfucker! Who are you? You are a low level operator who has to supplement his income with trolling online and stalking the political enemies of the political enemies of AIPAC in order to make ends meet. That is the lowlife that you are. Let us see your tax records, CVs, etc, first a$$hole! You are a convicted criminal who spent time in the US prison system, which according to one source was due to a homicide you were accessory to. And then you have the chutzpah to ask people to provide you with their financial records?! I am accusing you of being involved in the murder of my wife. The only thing you will ever get from me - if you get anything - is a bullet straight to the middle of your criminal troll skull!
Die, Giron! DIE! And la'nat upon your house too!
<snip>