Leaving aside the trivial and often personal fights between Husayn-
Alists and Nima, I have never seen any one in this forum who came
close to challenge his analysis of such difficult theological
concepts.
I put it to the Bahais that if Husayn-Ali produced for example a
commentary such as one written by Nima, they would have published it
as a proof over Aqdas which is the most boring thing one could ever
read.
As a Bayani I wish Nima success in serving the faith of Bayan and His
Holiness the Primal Point and may God compensate his service at the
next Resurrection as promissed in Bayan.
Steve
Interesting standards you Bayanis have.
Viv.
I'm afraid I don't read much here anymore - the trivial and often
personal fights are a bit boring - so I missed this. Was it posted here
and can you point me to it?
> Steve
First, go back and read again what I said in full. Second, given your
performance you are in no position to judge the standard of Bayanis.
I leave it to Nima to decide if he wants to make it available to all.
If it looks good then it must be good???? So were the Emperor's New
Clothes!
I couldn't however
> help but register here my admiration for his gift and ability to dare
> to deep into a domain that many would gloat over their ability to
> understand a little bit about it let alone analyse it.
Just like two blind men arguing about the colour scheme in the Sistine
Chapel!
> Leaving aside the trivial and often personal fights between Husayn-
> Alists and Nima, I have never seen any one in this forum who came
> close to challenge his analysis of such difficult theological
> concepts.
Not unlike a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat ... that isn't
there ... most of us have more pressing matters with which to be concerned.
> I put it to the Bahais that if Husayn-Ali produced for example a
> commentary such as one written by Nima, they would have published it
> as a proof over Aqdas which is the most boring thing one could ever
> read.
At least you can read it (the Aqdas) without having to suffer vacuous
name-dropping and sophistry ... not to mention ... which I won't ... the
fact that if one dares question or doubt the arguments put forth by the
Wahid Azal, one must endure a pernicious assault on one's intellect,
honesty, probity, integrity, genes, family and sanity. Far safer to either
ignore him ... or worship him. I much prefer the former and, apparently, so
does just about everybody else. Fact is that he has become such a nasty
piece of work, that just about nobody is prepared to give him any semblance
of credibility by engaging in any form of dialogue.
> As a Bayani I wish Nima success in serving the faith of Bayan and His
> Holiness the Primal Point and may God compensate his service at the
> next Resurrection as promissed in Bayan.
Don't worry on that score .... Nima has recorded his conversations with the
Godhead ... there'll be an almighty lawsuit if any of the contractual
conditions linked to his manifestationness are breached.
>
> Steve
W
How's that letter from your solicitor in order to silence me coming
along, eh IRA fellow travelling freak-show? My assault on you was well
deserved. And your whining is the height of hypocrisy, but
confirmation that you met your match in a determined Iranian such as
me who was ready, willing and able to beat you to the punch.
W
--
Besides the history of posts, let's see what these two posts would do
to Dead Weed's credibility in a *real* courtroom at the very outset of
things, and this before actual taped confessions to being supporters
of the Irish Republican Army have even been heard!
--
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/
thread/bd7e852c70316c9/d146728618637ab4?
lnk=st&q=Guardian&rnum=3#d146728618637ab4
"The Beloved Guardian assured us that those diseased people who
attacked the Cause of God would deservedly suffer and be destroyed
and behold, this vicious one was struck down exactly as you will be
destroyed for your wanton and outrageous lies and calumnies."
http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/t...
Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: "Asparagus" <k...@spimspam.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:06:29 -0000
Local: Tues, Nov 27 2007 12:06 pm
Subject: Re: Asparagus will reveal all
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
"AHWA" <wahidaza...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:85c25a12-eeb4-4a24-aa67-
eff7dbc1b...@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 27, 10:17 am, "Asparagus" <k...@spimspam.com> wrote:
>> sometime tomorrow asparagus will reveal all to this wonderful group of
>> people
> That you are a crippled donkey inhabiting a dishevelled excuse feces.
> No secret there.
Not at all. I leave that mantle to and for you alone
Asparagus shall reveal himself as the Greatest Living Irishman for
whose
wrongly reported demise you claimed the credit.
Told you never to mess with the Reaper. You didn't listen.
Gotcha!
Well Steve, that would be a stinging reproof - if it had any substance
to it. Can you give some examples of my "performance" that is so bad
it deprives me of the right to comment on your friend Nima's vile
language and behaviour?
Viv/
- All Bad
<bayani....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5a6176aa-9e1d-402a...@b9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> I couldn't however
>
> > help but register here my admiration for his gift and ability to dare
> > to deep into a domain that many would gloat over their ability to
> > understand a little bit about it let alone analyse it.
>
> Just like two blind men arguing about the colour scheme in the Sistine
> Chapel!
You Dead Weed Would say that! You are the one with one eye and that is
positioned in your center rear.
>
> > Leaving aside the trivial and often personal fights between Husayn-
> > Alists and Nima, I have never seen any one in this forum who came
> > close to challenge his analysis of such difficult theological
> > concepts.
>
> Not unlike a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat ... that isn't
> there ... most of us have more pressing matters with which to be concerned.
Dead Weed! Surprise me at least for once! Have something to say.
>
> > I put it to the Bahais that if Husayn-Ali produced for example a
> > commentary such as one written by Nima, they would have published it
> > as a proof over Aqdas which is the most boring thing one could ever
> > read.
>
> At least you can read it (the Aqdas) without having to suffer vacuous
> name-dropping and sophistry ... not to mention ... which I won't ... the
> fact that if one dares question or doubt the arguments put forth by the
> Wahid Azal, one must endure a pernicious assault on one's intellect,
> honesty, probity, integrity, genes, family and sanity. Far safer to either
> ignore him ... or worship him. I much prefer the former and, apparently, so
> does just about everybody else. Fact is that he has become such a nasty
> piece of work, that just about nobody is prepared to give him any semblance
> of credibility by engaging in any form of dialogue.
No, for that purpose you read his Kitab-i Badi and Shoghi's GPB.
Or even better read the memoirs of your God's companion (Salmani,
Husayn-Ali's private killer).
>
> > As a Bayani I wish Nima success in serving the faith of Bayan and His
> > Holiness the Primal Point and may God compensate his service at the
> > next Resurrection as promissed in Bayan.
>
> Don't worry on that score .... Nima has recorded his conversations with the
> Godhead ... there'll be an almighty lawsuit if any of the contractual
> conditions linked to his manifestationness are breached.
The one contract I can confirm is you guaranteed to join your
master(s) in Hell
Yes (and Nima's vile language and behavior towards you lot is
perfectly justified):
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?enc_author=INtARxoAAACrWswZouebQMcuTdAIcFrTJR6Y7StSDFSsuippEO5ZkQ&scoring=d
Shut up and go away already, LOSER skank.
W
Which is 100% warranted and rightfully deserved where you pieces of
dung are concerned.
W
Did Steve appoint you his spkesman, Nima? If this is the best you can
do he should ask for his money back.
Every single one of your posts is ample proof of you being nothing
more than a weez noise made by mosquitoes.
Speaking about Mosquitoes, apparently Husayn-Ali has such bad memories
of the mosquitoes in Edirne that he likened Abba's wife to a Mosquitoe
of Edirne. What does that make Shoghi? Son of a mosquitoe!
http://www.bayanic.com/notes/memoirs/memoirs.html
I asked:
Well Steve, that would be a stinging reproof - if it had any
substance
to it. Can you give some examples of my "performance" that is so bad
it deprives me of the right to comment on your friend Nima's vile
language and behaviour?
Viv/
and you... changed the subject.
Thanks for the clear admission that you cannot.
What interesting standards you Bayanis have.
V.
Are you regressing, Nima?
This sounds like playground talk to me.
I'm sorry, Nima, but "I'm gonna get my solicitor to take out an
injuction to stop you saying nasty things about me on the
internet" sounds much more like Nima-talk than Dermod-talk
to me.
Dermod reserves his lawyers for real-world problems that
have real-life consequences, in my experience.
Telling you the truth to your face in words short enough for
even you to understand is a job no-one needs litigation for.
Paul
What is really puzzling about this is that, he has claimed that I'm a member
of a ruthless terrorist organisation ... and am resorting to sending lawyers
after him!?!?!?
Yes... one would think that with your resources you could arrange
something much more direct-- and permanent!
--Sekhmet
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
This is how many times now, I've made you look like the lying creep
and decietful idiot that you are?
W
Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: "Asparagus" <k...@spimspam.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:29:20 +0100
Local: Tues, Apr 1 2008 9:29 am
Subject: Re: Who is Rod Wicks?
Well! He hasn't pissed off!
Release those taped conversations at peril of a criminal charge in
Queensland.
If they prove me a terrorist, then take them to the Police. Do that
immediately or shut your lying mouth!
As for who is Rod Wicks?
Well, for one he is a decent human being and for two, he is a decent
human
being.
Those two things distinguish him from guttersnipe and gobshites like
you.
> Yes... one would think that with your resources you could arrange
> something much more direct-- and permanent!
One would think. But these days the operative word with Dermod Ryder/
Asparagus is "has-been," much like the rest of you as well.
W
> What interesting standards you Bayanis have.
Indeed. Give no inch and absolutely take no prisoners where lying,
deceitful demon scum like you are concerned. That is the standard.
W
> Are you regressing, Nima?
>
> This sounds like playground talk to me.
Well, then, come to the playground, _bitch_, and let's talk, face to
face...
W
So when do you raise the standard?
See! His sword is in his hand!
Whoops! The end has fallen off!
This is how many times now, I've made you look like the lying creep
and decietful idiot that you are?
Wee mistake here! In fact two wee mistakes ....
One Paul is not Asparagus
And two, the rest of us spell "deceitful" in that way and not yours ....
"Has been???????"
Still is intelligent, charming, charismatic and handsome ... and boulevards
ahead of you in every department
> So when do you raise the standard?
When I am standing over your collective carcasses.
W
> "Has been???????"
> Still is intelligent, charming, charismatic and handsome ... and boulevards
> ahead of you in every department
Only in his senile wet dreams regarding mis-spent youth shooting
defective pellets! Your pseudo-intelligence, conceited charm and
ugliness couldn't see a punch coming that decked your stupid fat
fenian backside flat on the canvass. And I am still waiting for you to
carry good on your threat, twat!
W
Ugliness!!!! Yup! I am ugly!
But it's not my problem ... I don't have to look at me!
And I didn't see that punch coming ... and I have been to Specsavers! Did
anybody else see that punch ... or should it be reported as a missing punch?
Good that you know what you are.
> But it's not my problem ... I don't have to look at me!
Of course not. You look at a reflection of your arse instead of your
face in the mirror: your arse which is your face.
W
No matter how much he tries, Nima just can't stop reminding us of his
fixations and where his true ineterests lie.
Obviously he has eyes in his arse and assumes that everybody else is
similarly endowed.
I must admit that the mental picture of him bent in double so that the eyes
in his arse can guide the razor as he shaves gives a whole new dimension to
"Brasilian."
With assistance from your Zimmer frame?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimmer_Frame
Viv
You are lucky being on the same side of the fence as Dead Weed
worshipping the same 'master' otherwise you would have earned a lot
more for your nothing from Dead Weed than you what you are from Nima.
I've noticed that you don't tend to turn up to fights when they have
been
arranged.
I make that zero.
>
> http://groups.google.com.au/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/t...
> Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
> From: "Asparagus" <k...@spimspam.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:29:20 +0100
> Local: Tues, Apr 1 2008 9:29 am
> Subject: Re: Who is Rod Wicks?
>
> Well! He hasn't pissed off!
>
> Release those taped conversations at peril of a criminal charge in
> Queensland.
>
> If they prove me a terrorist, then take them to the Police. Do that
> immediately or shut your lying mouth!
>
> As for who is Rod Wicks?
>
> Well, for one he is a decent human being and for two, he is a decent
> human
> being.
>
> Those two things distinguish him from guttersnipe and gobshites like
> you.-
So, have you taken those tapes to the police? Or are you still here
crowing that Dermod has said something which he hasn't said, acting
the big man, but really being full of piss and wind?
Looks like another direct challenge you ducked, here.
And I concur with Dermod in his judgement of you relative to
Mr Wicks - thanks for bringing that one to my attention. Clearly,
I missed quite a lot during the year I wasn't posting around here!
Paul.
> I've noticed that you don't tend to turn up to fights when they have
> been
> arranged.
Speak for yourself, Viv. I came to meet you. You didn't show and then
lied about it.
W
> And I concur with Dermod in his judgement of you relative to
> Mr Wicks - thanks for bringing that one to my attention. Clearly,
> I missed quite a lot during the year I wasn't posting around here!
You mean during the year you retired your Paul Hammond handle and put
your sorry tail between your legs and disappeared after the
humiliation Steve handed you over the 19 years issue, posting as Viv
instead. As for Rod Wicks: he's just another of the dime'a'dozen
stupid, has-been skippy dumb retired welfare bureaucrats living in the
sticks of Victoria thinking his deception wouldn't ultimately catch up
with him. Like you, he is all talk and all hot air!
W
I don't know how many fights with Viv you've dodged, but you certainly
dodged one with me. And I'm not the only one. I believe you stood
someone up in America before now - was it Randy Burns?
You talk big, but never turn up. That's why I started calling you the
Holy Chicken, you remember?
I've dodged nothing with your alter ego, especially since I have
ripped it news orifices every time it has opened its toilet can here.
And with your Palu Hamhead handle, I came exclusively to the UK to
kick his ass, and he never showed.
>. I believe you stood
> someone up in America before now - was it Randy Burns?
No.
> You talk big, but never turn up.
That sounds like to the letter, limey ponce. Limey ponces are all
talk; no action. Of course you are always welcome to come here to OZ
and challenge the perception and the assertion which goes with it.
Ball in your coward...I mean "court..., limey coward ;-)
W
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> On 16 May, 08:29, áÇ Çáå ÇáÇ Çááå ÍÞÇð ÍÞÇð <wahidaza...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On May 16, 7:35 am, PaulHammond <pahamm...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> > > I've noticed that you don't tend to turn up to fights when they have
> > > been
> > > arranged.
> > Speak for yourself, Viv. I came to meet you. You didn't show and then
> > lied about it.
> > W
> I don't know how many fights with Viv you've dodged, but you certainly
> dodged one with me.
I've dodged nothing with your alter ego, especially since I have
ripped it news orifices every time it has opened its toilet can here.
And with your Palu Hamhead handle, I came exclusively to the UK to
kick his ass, and he never showed.
>. I believe you stood
> someone up in America before now - was it Randy Burns?
No.
> You talk big, but never turn up.
That sounds like you to the letter, limey ponce. Limey ponces are all
As always, you remember this entirely the wrong way around.
> >. I believe you stood
> > someone up in America before now - was it Randy Burns?
>
> No.
>
Someone else then. But I'm sure it was Randy.
> > You talk big, but never turn up.
>
This remains unanswered, of course, because too clearly true.
I mean what I say. Not a word less or more. And I'm a man of my
word.
Is that something you can say with a straight face?
I notice, you did NOT deign to notice the major point of my comment
on your reposting Dermod's earlier challenge to you.
Do you think we don't notice that your silence is as good as an
admission that what you threaten did not come to pass?
(reposted)
> So, have you taken those tapes to the police? Or are you still here
> crowing that Dermod has said something which he hasn't said, acting
> the big man, but really being full of piss and wind?
> Looks like another direct challenge you ducked, here.
Nima again:
> with him. Like you, he is all talk and all hot air!
>
Just so as we're sure, it's not the spouting windbag here who
crows how much he OWNS this place that all talk and hot air!
You have also been sure about a great many things, which have been
proven wrong again and again by moi: let's start with the two David
Kelley experts Naama Pyritz interviewed in her film that made you and
your patrons look like the assholes that you are, the 19 years Steve
ripped you a new asshole, your adamant assertion that Asparagus was
not Dermod Ryder, and that you are not a bahaim ad nauseum. You are a
proven LIAR, time and again, as well as proven to have a basic problem
with honesty, not to mention consistency. But if it is all the same,
if that old man twerp and has-been Randy Burnes wants a piece of me, I
am happy to oblige ANY TIME.
>
> > > You talk big, but never turn up.
>
> This remains unanswered, of course, because too clearly true.
This is the truth. You have failed to turn up in real life every time
I have challenged to put your dirty limey bahaim $$$ where your
dirtier mouth is, and you have wussed out each time.
W
No, you don't. A dishonest, two-faced lying bahaim piece of shite like
you don't know the meaning of saying what they mean, unless you be
certifiably insane, which is also a possibility.
> I notice, you did NOT deign to notice the major point of my comment
> on your reposting Dermod's earlier challenge to you.
Because the challenge has already been met and I have called that
fenian wanker's bluff and hot air.
> Just so as we're sure, it's not the spouting windbag here who
> crows how much he OWNS this place that all talk and hot air!
The windbag here is you as it has always been you and your demon
friends. The hot air is yours, and I DO own this place. Get used to
it. Now reply to this here, one year belatedly, m'kay Viv:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/browse_thread/thread/9e2a8370cd8ffb5c/0cb80bf8b836b7b5?q=Nineteen+Years&lnk=nl&
W
Dearest Stephanie,
Have you thought about learning to understand and fluently express yourself
in the English language?
I think you should.
> Dearest Stephanie,
>
> Have you thought about learning to understand and fluently express yourself
> in the English language?
>
> I think you should.
Dearest Dead Weed,
Have you thought about taking your has-been head out of your soiled
backside, knowing when you have been utterly defeated, humiliated and
exposed for the shifty, two-faced scum-bag rat and quisling that you
are and crawl back under the rock of that craggy Island you crawled
from out under back in 2000?
Both Steve and I know you should.
W
Lord help us!
'Tis only yourself and your alter ego who believe that ... and sure you're
both members of the Flat Earth Society (defunct)!
Indeed.
W
It's good to know that you know where to turn for the assistance you so
badly need.
Have a nice day!
>
> W
You said "Lord help us," and I agreed. May whatever higher power you
believe in help you!
> Have a nice day!
Drop dead!
W
>
>
> > W