The lying Bahai Internet Agency hack known as Sag Koochooloo

[NUR]

So we don't need to revist this specific case for your benefit alone.
As for Anvar and Faryar being respectable, we must agree to disagree
on this one. To me they have only slightly more credibility than you
do, but only just. Asking them to cover for you with anyone is like
asking a clinically diagnosed pathological case to take the stand and
promise to tell the truth so help them..If you want to prove anything,
I've already offered you a more credible and verifiable option, and
that is to contact my attorney.

That said, if you weren't a Baha'i and were in fact an atheist, you
would have no need or basis to vigorously defend the Haifan Bahais and
their specific agenda against their detractors (and in situations
where they are blatantly in the wrong) with the kind of fire and
malice that you do: a fire and malice that only belongs to a card
carrying member and no one else. Once again, there is a long
established pattern of certain online personas and archedefenders
claiming to be non-Bahais, and then out-Bahaing the Baha'is in their
attacks. So as of right now you are a typical BAHAI INTERNET AGENCY
liar, like all the others before you, and as such your plausible
denial is nothing more than the Bahai species of taqiyya known as
hikmat:

Susan Stiles Maneck,
http://bahai-library.com/bsr/bsr06/62_maneck_hikmat.htm
WISDOM AND DISSIMULATION IN THE BAHA’I WRITINGS: The Use and meaning
of Hikmat in the Baha’i Writings

QUOTE

"In many cases hikmat calls for the apparent suspension of a Bahá'í
principle in order to ensure the protection of the Faith."