#TERRORISTS ARE NOT SMARTER TODAY! II

Susan Williams

unread,

Sep 24, 2004, 2:36:45 AM9/24/04

to

We never had to worry about terrorism all our lives in the United
States. Bush told us we are in a New Day now where Terrorists are
smarter and more shrewd. Is that true?

The whole thing and issue of terrorism is a hoax and the government
actually is in alliance with the terrorists.

The saying is that terrorists are smarter now why the formerly
impregnable America was penetrated. But that's not really true. The
reason terrorism is now in our lives is because new leaders came along
telling us about some New World Order.

Just look backward and you will see that terrorists are not very smart
today. They attack on 911, Bush is stronger and given dictator
powers. They attack Iraqi oil installations and the price of oil
climbs: bush is stronger. Everything they do makes Bush stronger.
Will they continue till Bush takes away more and more of our liberties
and the man who can never sympathize with the Arab plight then becomes
an absolute dictator?

If they were smart, they would try something else, like...

It's easy to take care of a good American president who truly loves
freedom and the Constitution. Just do what happened in 1963 against
President Kennedy.

Are terrorists smart enough to do that? To attack the man getting
stronger who will not outwardly listen to any Arab or Muslim plight?
Or is it better to attack the citizens of America where the result is
they lose more of their liberties and Bush gets stronger!

In His Grace,

Susan

Message has been deleted

Morton Davis

unread,

Sep 24, 2004, 11:17:24 AM9/24/04

to

"Socialism is a Mental Disease" <root@localhost.> wrote in message
news:bnd8l05lggu9tesm5...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:36:45 -0500, Susan Williams
> <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >The whole thing and issue of terrorism is a hoax and the government
> >actually is in alliance with the terrorists.
> >
>

> The retarded bitch strikes again.
>
>
What do you have against retarded bitches that you'd insult them so
horribly?

-*MORT*-

Susan Williams

unread,

Sep 24, 2004, 11:27:45 AM9/24/04

to

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:00:59 GMT, Socialism is a Mental Disease
<root@localhost.> wrote:

>On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:36:45 -0500, Susan Williams
><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>

>>The whole thing and issue of terrorism is a hoax and the government
>>actually is in alliance with the terrorists.
>>
>

>The retarded bitch strikes again.

I love you too, O damned one?

Next time come with a point so that others don't know your expertise
in psychiatry.

How can we get a world of peace when a New World staffed by you
hateful pack of damned Jesuits is coming?

Here now, look at the eye chart and deal with the issues. Stop
showing that you can't...

STUPID AMERICANS!

RRRIIIINGGGG...

Terrorist #2:
Hello!

Terrorist #1:
Hello. Muhammad Rachmad?

Muhammad Rachmad:
Yes. Is this Ibrahim?

Ibrahim:
Yes.

Very excited. Want to tell you of new plan. The best thing to do we
conclude is to send our men to America and have them trained to fly
planes. That way they can hijack the planes, and, instead of calling
for a ransom or anything, we can have them use the planes to ram into
buildings.

Muhammad Rachmad:
What are you talking about? We thought of that already. We've been
through that before. It's been 50 years since World War II, and you
know we have not had much success staging terror attacks against the
United States! We were always caught!

Remember also that we understood our plates were full enough with
Israel on our hands? We've already discussed what would be gained
having a super-power to add to our plight. Didn't we discuss this
before?

Ibrahim:
Don't worry. Trust me. Things will be different this time. Yes,
America was impregnable to terror attacks, but that will all change.
Something is different this time.

Muhammad Rachmad:
What is it that is different?

Ibraham:
Nevermind that. Just trust me. We're planning to fly planes from
several locations. Three planes from different cities to fly to New
York. We've decided the best target would be the World Trade Center
buildings.

Muhammad Rachmad:
Where are you planning to fly the planes from?

Ibrahim:
Well, right now we plan one plane to fly from Boston.

Muhammad Rachmad:
Are you mad! You all are telling me you are going to fly planes from
a long distance away in order to crash into two prominent US buildings
in the most controlled airspace in the country?! YOU ALL HAVE LOST
IT!

Why can't you hijack the plane from New York itself?!

Ibrahim:
No, don't worry! Trust me! It will go through!

Muhammad Rachmad:
Why are you so sure it will go through? You almost sound as if you
believe the planes would be LET THROUGH!

Ibrahim:
EXACTLY! Trust me! There is great leader who will let the hijacked
planes through!

Muhammad Rachmad:
YOU ARE NUTS! I can't understand what has come over you!

Ibrahim:
WE WOULD NOT DO THIS IF WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WOULD GO THROUGH!

We will even have time to let the passengers call home so that we can
make the situation more distressful to the stupid Americans!

Muhammad Rachmad:
So you have connections with the Americans?

Ibrahim:
Put it this way. If we fail, we would be the laughing stock of all
Islam to pull off such a feat from a great distance. Trust me: IT
WILL GO THROUGH! There is great leader in American who will help us!

Not only that, I bet you even after that, the stupid Americans will
re-elect that great leader claiming him to be a protector from
terrorism!

Muhammad Rachmad:
You think the Americans are that stupid??

Ibrahim:
You watch and see. DON'T WORRY! YOU JUST TRUST ME! We're not
talking about the British here. We're talking about the Americans!

Hey, gotta go. I think I'm being watched...

Click...

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:36:31 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:40:29 -0500, Susan Williams
><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:08:16 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:34 -0500, Susan Williams
>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:44:27 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:01:13 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:19:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:49:10 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:02:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:03:02 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>STUPID AMERICANS!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What this fool forgets is the simple fact that until 9-11 hijackers
>>>>>>>>>were to be dealt with by cooperating with them, and allowing them to
>>>>>>>>>to go where they wanted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Of course it didn't take long for that policy to go away, in
>>>>>>>>>fact...THAT VERY MORNING Flt 93 was the first hijacked plane that
>>>>>>>>>didn't adhere to that policy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh, and the writer of the post is a bufoon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why thank you Jesuit!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope. Not Christian. Wrong again!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But Jesuit, isn't it great that the terrorists knew ahead of time they
>>>>>>would be able to penetrate American systems from so great a distance?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I didn't know I was that good! Especially with
>>>>>>>>your usual proof!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see reading comprehension is another of your shortcomings...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Be careful of me. I don't just give empty accusations like you Opus
>>>>>>Deiites.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just empty thoughts and silly repetitions then?
>>>>
>>>>You mean like you Jesuits that keep trailing empty thoughts and silly
>>>>repetitions and don't engage in the facts?
>>>
>>>What's a Jesuit?
>>
>>What's a daring terror attack at 911 done as if the terrorists knew it
>>would go through?
>
>Didn't understand the question, huh? What is a Jesuit??

Didn't understand the meaning of the header of the thread, huh Jesuit?

What's the point of the thread you are working so hard to smother out?

>>>>Years, no answer to why you Jesuits trail only our posts claiming them
>>>>to be weird as if weird posts are not found all over the internet.
>>>
>>>Ding dong!
>>
>>Obviously my posts are the only insane ones that are true?
>
>LOL Your posts make as much sense as John Kerry's positions on the
>issues....

You mean like the malarky you Jesuits bring that we have a right to
disagree?

LOL.. You neglect your children to remain here and have the Jesuit
wind-up key to follow the Jesuit Oath. Wasn't this point mentioned
before. Why did you lie again? If my posts don't make sense why are
you a Vatican psychiatrist to know you have to trail them to smother
them out for dear life?

>>You claim sanity as the other Jesuits, yet you now confess you are a
>>ding dong and avoid the issues.
>
>No, I am saying YOU are a ding dong!

I'm saying YOU are a Jesuit. Now that statement is true!

What is a person who trails ding dongs, then? A ding dong Jesuit
bell?

>>>>We don't bow to your despotism nor censorship in pretense you don't
>>>>support censorship.
>>>
>>>Who's "we"? Do you refer to those voices in your head too?
>>
>>We don't bow to your despotism nor censorship in pretense you don't
>>support censorship.
>
>We? How many voices do you hear? Do they have names? Do you like
>them? Do they scare you?

Overcome your fear of one "ding dong" first before you discuss with
me, Jesuit!

>>>>>>But Jesuit, isn't it great that the terrorists knew ahead of time they
>>>>>>would be able to penetrate American systems from so great a distance?
>>>>>
>>>>>Speaking of repetition.....
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nifty that the hijackers knew they could pull off such a stunt and
>>>>>>>>didn't even bother to fly the planes out of New York. Not even one!
>>>>
>>>>I will repeat anything that is not answered by the new fangled New
>>>>World order psychiatrists.
>>>
>>>Of which I am sure you have been introduced to many of them.
>>
>>Wasn't it nifty that terrorists like you were able to stage such a
>>daring attack on 911 involving planes flying from long distances AS IF
>>THEY KNEW IT WOULD GO THROUGH?
>
>You pays your money, you takes your chances. The same (wierd)
>question could be asked of the Japanese when they attacked Pearl
>harbor ( I think).

You mean like my question of why you self-appointed psychiatrists
accusing everyone of mental problems who disagrees with you then
always trail our posts to smother them out for dear life after posting
that our posts are nonsense as your only defense on issues?

You think? They had radar and other sophisticated devices to tell
what was coming during WWII? Surely just the reason you didn't even
attempt to answer till now proves you never had an argument!

>>The words are plain. Jesuits can't see it except when they struggle
>>to divert from it as thou.
>
>Thou? Forsooth? Ye nay and doubtest?

The words are plain. Jesuits can't see it except when they struggle
to divert from it as thou.

>>>>Just like strange posters repeat similar attacks year after year
>>>>without engaging in the issues and become psychiatrists.
>>>
>>>LOL Maybe they're trying to tell you something........?
>>
>>I know I'm posting the truth already. You don't have to join them
>>telling me that.
>
>We?

Remember, as you have said, we are insane to you and other strange
Jesuits who leech onto our posts. We have different priorities enough
for us to understand what is the subject heading of this thread with
its concern and what it means.

>>>>>>>I see sanity is also not within your grasp.
>>>>
>>>>You mean just because I disagree with you and claim evidence must be
>>>>dealt with instead of bowing to censorship despots?
>>>
>>>No, because you refer to me as "Jesuit". Because you sometimes speak
>>>in third person. Because for all of your words you don't actually SAY
>>>anything.
>>
>>I bet I don't allow others to disagree either, huh Jesuit?
>
>Ding dong!