Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 11:56:27 AM6/17/10
to
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971

Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis

by Bill Levinson

Godwin’s Law says that, if you have to compare your opponent to Hitler
or Nazis, you lose the argument. The exception consists of situations
in which actual Nazis are involved, and this is true of Radio Islam’s
“The Blood Orgy of the Jewish Devils” (credit to Lee Kaplan for the
tip).

This is a great site! Your struggle [Radio Islam´s] is an
honorable and righteous one; one that actually touches us all since
the filthy hand of the Jews (Zionists if you prefer) has a
stranglehold on so many of our countries.

My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine. It is refreshing to
see the blame for so many of the world’s ills laid in the lap of those
where it belongs…the Jews; not just the zionists but the Jews.

Pastor Ray Redfeairn
USA

The Stormfront White Nationalist Community refers to Ray Redfeairn as
“Pastor Ray,” so it is almost certainly the same GENUINE Nazi
hatemonger. See also this Web page from another white supremacist
group.

Al Nakba

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 4:20:19 PM6/17/10
to

radio islam are muzzie poofs trying to convince themselves that they
are the herrenvolk, while clearly, they have de-evolved from the rest
of humanity..

Larry

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 4:52:37 PM6/17/10
to
Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:9ba62f45-30b6-4189-
9c18-146...@11g2000prw.googlegroups.com:

> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.

Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that way
since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.

They attacked and killed us in 1967. Americans should never forget the USS
Liberty. Here's the survivors' own story on their very own webpage....

http://gtr5.com/

Any senator knows never to oppose Israel or the AIPAC controllers. It's
just political suicide as the funding stops. What we get is what we get.

When they attacked Liberty, an act of war in international waters, our
response should have been to level Tel Aviv to rubble....setting an example
that would have served us very well since 1967. But, Israel and the Jews
can sink any ship they want and the world does NOTHING to them or to stop
it all. Now they've cost us Turkey, one of America's best allies in the
region and a settling force for peace. One more country where Americans
are hated because of ISRAEL.

--
http://www.goveg.com/feat/agriprocessors/responseToOUStatement.asp
Watch the FULL video. I dare ya! Shechitah barbarians!

Larry

Bert Hyman

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 5:03:32 PM6/17/10
to
In news:Xns9D9AAB7AE56...@74.209.131.13 Larry
<no...@home.com> wrote:

>
> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:9ba62f45-30b6-4189-
> 9c18-146...@11g2000prw.googlegroups.com:
>
>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>
> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.

How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?

How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

*us*

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 5:35:36 PM6/17/10
to
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:56:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>... situations
>in which actual Nazis are involved...

The Bush crime family of treasonous wimps
never renounced its fealty to the Third Reich.

Larry

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 7:34:22 PM6/17/10
to
Bert Hyman <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:Xns9D9AA35CA20FDVeebleFetzer@
216.250.188.140:

Why is it every time someone says something against the Jews he's A)
antisemite or B) ignorant of history?

Which part of Khazaria are your Jews from, Bert?

Where you get neo-Nazis from in my post or the gtr5.com website is a
mystery. Not everyone who can't stand fucking Jews is a Nazi, just some of
us.

http://gtr5.com/ We must never forget them......

Smiler.

unread,
Jun 17, 2010, 9:05:51 PM6/17/10
to
Larry wrote:
> Bert Hyman <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9D9AA35CA20FDVeebleFetzer@ 216.250.188.140:
>
>> In news:Xns9D9AAB7AE56...@74.209.131.13 Larry
>> <no...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:9ba62f45-30b6-4189-
>>> 9c18-146...@11g2000prw.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>>>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>>
>>> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>>> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>
>> How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>
>> How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?
>>
>
> Why is it every time someone says something against the Jews he's A)
> antisemite or B) ignorant of history?
>
> Which part of Khazaria are your Jews from, Bert?
>
> Where you get neo-Nazis from in my post or the gtr5.com website is a
> mystery. Not everyone who can't stand fucking Jews is a Nazi, just
> some of us.
>
> http://gtr5.com/ We must never forget them......

So you're a bigotted anti-semite but not a nazi...hmmmmm.

--
Smiler
The godless one.
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to perfectly
fit the prejudices of their believers.


Larry

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 12:57:23 AM6/18/10
to
"Smiler." <Smi...@Jo.king.com> wrote in news:PDzSn.4327$ex1.824
@newsfe11.ams2:

> So you're a bigotted anti-semite but not a nazi...hmmmmm.
>
>

Absolutely, GUILTY AS CHARGED and very proud of it.

The day they fired the first shot on USS LIberty, we should have taken out
Tel Aviv.....

Doug

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 1:29:12 AM6/18/10
to
"Al Nakba" <william...@bluebottle.com> wrote in message
news:483ec05e-aa8d-42bd...@k17g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

**************************
They have devolved by choice (as Michael might say).


Doug

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 1:32:45 AM6/18/10
to
"Larry" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D9B98471E...@74.209.131.13...

> "Smiler." <Smi...@Jo.king.com> wrote in news:PDzSn.4327$ex1.824
> @newsfe11.ams2:
>
>> So you're a bigotted anti-semite but not a nazi...hmmmmm.
>>
>>
>
> Absolutely, GUILTY AS CHARGED and very proud of it.
>
> The day they fired the first shot on USS LIberty, we should have taken out
> Tel Aviv.....
>

What about:

i. the nearly 300 marines killed by islamonazis in Beirut?
ii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Cole?
iii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Stark?
iv. the nearly 3000 killed on 9-11 by muslimes?
v. those killed in the first WTC bombing by muslimes?
vi. the US soldiers killed at Ft. Hood by an islamonazi?
vii. the assassination of Bobby Kennedy by an islamonazi?
viii. the Beltway Sniper victims (also killed by muslimes)?

anything to say about those events boyo?

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:30:11 AM6/18/10
to
Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>
>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis

The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:31:39 AM6/18/10
to
Bert Hyman <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>Larry

>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in

>>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of


>>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>
>> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>
>How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?

I see that you can't actually refute his statement.

>How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?

How long have you been a neonazi religious bigot who wants to kill
people?

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Doug

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:48:50 AM6/18/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1b12cb$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...

You mean like the muslimes right? You know, the religion that
slaughtered some 2 to 3 million people in the name of allah and
bumhammad in the 20th century. You know, the religion that
continues to slaughter and persecute people of other faiths in
every last one of their islamonazi sties.

> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
>


Doug

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:50:33 AM6/18/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...

> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>>
>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>
> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>

Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled
all the way to Berlin to have a private audience w/Hitler
and advocate for the extension of the Holocaust to include
the Mid-East. The same Grand Fuckti who raised an entire
division of islamonazis to fight for the nazis. Hitler seemed mighty
fond of muzzies, even while he deprecated Christianity.

> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
>


The Revd

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 5:44:56 AM6/18/10
to
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:48:50 -0700, "Doug" <andx...@gmail.invalid>
wrote:

And yet you continue to suck jew raghead ass, Duhg. In your alleged
mind, what makes those ragheads superior to the ones you berate above?

The Peeler

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 6:51:15 AM6/18/10
to

You still found no one who would be willing to suck your longing dirty
psychopathic ass, poor The Retard? So you just have to keep dreaming about
it online, eh? LOL

--
The Retard about himself:
"And you just wish someone, anyone, anything would cornhole you!"

Larry

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 8:07:18 AM6/18/10
to
"Doug" <andx...@gmail.invalid> wrote in
news:hvf0ir$kbj$1...@news.eternal-september.org:

>> Absolutely, GUILTY AS CHARGED and very proud of it.
>>
>> The day they fired the first shot on USS LIberty, we should have
>> taken out Tel Aviv.....
>>
>
> What about:
>
> i. the nearly 300 marines killed by islamonazis in Beirut?
> ii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Cole?
> iii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Stark?
> iv. the nearly 3000 killed on 9-11 by muslimes?
> v. those killed in the first WTC bombing by muslimes?
> vi. the US soldiers killed at Ft. Hood by an islamonazi?
> vii. the assassination of Bobby Kennedy by an islamonazi?
> viii. the Beltway Sniper victims (also killed by muslimes)?
>
>

So, your defense is Israeli atrocities are JUSTIFIED by Islamic atrocities?

That's kinda, well, fucking stupid isn't it?

Does it justify Israelis cluster bombing little innocent kids with burning
phosphorus....just because they were unlucky enough to be born to religious
zealots like Jews, Muslims or Christians?

Your round-robin bullshit deflection AWAY from discussing Israeli
atrocities doesn't fly with me. Islamists are equally as bad as Jews.
American Jews and American Muslims and American Xtians are all guilty of
genocide because they are the ones FUNDING the atrocities, just as guilty
as the bastards pulling the trigger.

NOONE will be safe until the LAST lawyer has been hung by the entrails of
the LAST theist.

Larry

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 8:15:09 AM6/18/10
to
"Doug" <andx...@gmail.invalid> wrote in news:hvf51g$s1m$1...@news.eternal-
september.org:

> You mean like the muslimes right? You know, the religion that
> slaughtered some 2 to 3 million people in the name of allah and
> bumhammad in the 20th century. You know, the religion that
> continues to slaughter and persecute people of other faiths in
> every last one of their islamonazi sties.
>
>

We've got to stop allowing any discussion of Jewish atrocities to be
hijacked by the Islamist atrocities excuse. Every time you bring up the
subject of Jewish atrocities they try to turn it around into a discussion
of Islam's horrible genocides.

It all runs in a big circle and the innocents who never had anything to do
with it, little Jews' kids and little Muslims' kids always bear the brunt
of the atrocities both sides continue to commit.

Maybe what's needed is to cleanse the area of all of them, then start over
with a religion-free zone across the Middle East of less insane transplants
from a less murderous part of the planet.....a sort of power correction to
make the planet more secure. We have the weapons for that......

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 1:30:56 PM6/18/10
to
Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:4c1b12cb$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Bert Hyman <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>>Larry
>>>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>
>>>>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>>>>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>>>
>>>> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>>>> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>>
>>>How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>
>> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>>
>>>How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?
>>
>> How long have you been a neonazi religious bigot who wants to kill
>> people?
>
>You mean like the muslimes right?

Yep.

> You know, the religion that
>slaughtered some 2 to 3 million people in the name of allah and

Today Christians ... stand at the head of [this country]... I pledge
that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy
Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian
spirit ... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in
literature, in the theater, and in the press - in short, we want to
burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole
life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past ...
(few) years.

- Adolf Hitler, quoted in: The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, 1922-1939,
Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 1:31:53 PM6/18/10
to
Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>>>
>>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>>
>> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>
>Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
>nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled

All you have is blind hatred. Just like the nazis.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:26:25 PM6/18/10
to
On Jun 17, 1:52 pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
> Michael Ejercito<mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:9ba62f45-30b6-4189-
> 9c18-1461ebaf2...@11g2000prw.googlegroups.com:

>
> > My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> > the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>
> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct.  It's been that way
> since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>
Who ruled that place before the time that you allege that the
Zionist state stole the land?


Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 2:26:50 PM6/18/10
to
On Jun 18, 10:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> Doug <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >"Ray Fischer" <rfisc...@sonic.net> wrote in message
> >news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...

> >>Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>
> >>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>
> >> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>
> >Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
> >nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled
>
> All you have is blind hatred.  Just like the nazis.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer        
> rfisc...@sonic.net  
Yeah, 9/11 was no big deal, right?


Michael

The Revd

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 4:43:27 PM6/18/10
to

You are a craven jewloving gook.

As a craven jewloving gook, you are, below all else.

The Peeler

unread,
Jun 18, 2010, 5:15:40 PM6/18/10
to

You are a sick subnormal degenerate perverted psychopathic swine! And you
KNOW it! <G>

> As a craven jewloving gook, you are, below all else.

As the sick subnormal degenerate perverted psychopathic swine that you are,
NOBODY and NOTHING is ever below you! And you know THAT too! <BG>

--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard!

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 3:06:04 AM6/19/10
to
Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 18, 10:31�am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> Doug <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >"Ray Fischer" <rfisc...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>> >news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> >>Michael Ejercito�<mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>>
>> >>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>>
>> >> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>>
>> >Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
>> >nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled
>>
>> All you have is blind hatred. �Just like the nazis.
>
> Yeah, 9/11 was no big deal, right?

Yeah, the extermination of millions of Jews was no big deal, right?
The deaths of half a million Muslims in Iraq gives you great joy,
doesn't it? Supporting brutal dictators is just what you love to have
happen.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Doug

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 7:22:20 AM6/19/10
to
"Larry" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9D9B52B7A99...@74.209.131.13...

> "Doug" <andx...@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> news:hvf0ir$kbj$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>>> Absolutely, GUILTY AS CHARGED and very proud of it.
>>>
>>> The day they fired the first shot on USS LIberty, we should have
>>> taken out Tel Aviv.....
>>>
>>
>> What about:
>>
>> i. the nearly 300 marines killed by islamonazis in Beirut?
>> ii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Cole?
>> iii. the sailors killed by islamonazis on the USS Stark?
>> iv. the nearly 3000 killed on 9-11 by muslimes?
>> v. those killed in the first WTC bombing by muslimes?
>> vi. the US soldiers killed at Ft. Hood by an islamonazi?
>> vii. the assassination of Bobby Kennedy by an islamonazi?
>> viii. the Beltway Sniper victims (also killed by muslimes)?
>>
>>
>
> So, your defense is Israeli atrocities are JUSTIFIED by Islamic
> atrocities?
>

The Israelis COMPENSATED the families of the victims
of the USS Liberty attack. What have your islamonazi
brethren done for the families of the victims of islamonazi
terrorism? Killed them?

> That's kinda, well, fucking stupid isn't it?
>
> Does it justify Israelis cluster bombing little innocent kids with burning
> phosphorus....just because they were unlucky enough to be born to
> religious
> zealots like Jews, Muslims or Christians?
>

If your islamonazi brethren would stop firing rockets, Katayushas
and mortar rounds into Israel unilaterally they would'nt have to
beat your psychopathic arse down on a semi-regular basis.

You see, islamonazi baboons have to accept RESPONSIBILITY
for THEIR OWN ACTIONS and responses to same.


Doug

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 7:24:11 AM6/19/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1bad50$0$1654$742e...@news.sonic.net...

Islamofucker, some million Christians died fighting the nazis,
including my great uncle.

Furthermore, you're quoting the speeches Hitler made to the
masses, which didn't reflect his true disdain for Christianity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler%27s_religious_views

Please GFY with a rusty jackhammer.

> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
>


Doug

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 7:25:19 AM6/19/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1c6c5c$0$1643$742e...@news.sonic.net...

Islamofucker, the majority of civilian deaths in Iraq have been
the result of muslime pig on muslime pig violence -- excepting
the 300,000 Iraqi Christians who have fled islamopig persecution,
murder and rape.

> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
>


Proteus IIV

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 8:07:22 AM6/19/10
to

WITH A NIC NAC TALIWAK
GIVE A DOG A BONE
THIS OLD POST IS GOING HOME

WHAT DO ALL HAVE IN COMMON ?
BLOOD IS RED
SNOW IS WHITE
THE SKY BLUE

THIS ARGUEMENT IS BELIGERANT AND FUTILE

JEWS BARELY OWN THEMSELVES
COMMUNIST JUST WANTED EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE TO ACT AND BE EQUAL

HATRED IS THE CRIME

DON'T PRETEND TO BE ALRUGHT OR BETTER THAN THOSE THAT PERSECUTE YOU IF
YOURN HEATB IS FUL OF HATE YOU'LL GO BACK AGAIN TO THE SAME
PUT ASIDE YOUR OWN MORTAL NOTIOMS AND FEELINGS
JUST SAY NO
AND LIVE
BE THE WAY THAT IS RIGHT


I AM PROTEUS

drahcir

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 8:16:34 AM6/19/10
to
On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> Bert Hyman  <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> >Larry
> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in

> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>
> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct.  It's been that
> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>
> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>
> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.

Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
statement, thus refutes it. Simple "minds" like yours apparently have
difficulty with such complex lines of thought.


>
> >How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?
>
> How long have you been a neonazi religious bigot who wants to kill
> people?

I'd ask how long you've been a simpleton, but that would be the same
as asking your age, and my parents taught me that that's not a polite
question to ask strangers.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer        
> rfisc...@sonic.net  

drahcir

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 8:21:30 AM6/19/10
to

inanities in capital letters are still inanities

Proteus IIV

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 8:26:41 AM6/19/10
to
WITH FUCKING DICK SUCKER! CLAM HAMMER! KNEE TREMBLER! BUG UP THE ASS!
FALLOPIAN FIDDLER! PIECE-OF-FLUFF! BUGGER-ARSED! SLOPPY SLUT! A NIC
NAC TALIWAK FUCKING NYMPHOMANIAC! BARFAIRY! FUCK PUPPET! SLAP SKIN!
POOFTER! SLOPPY SLUT! GIVE A DOG A FUCKING FAGGOT-WORKER! BONE THIS
OLD POST FUCKING DROOPERS! ASS-FUCKING! THROAT CHOKER! IS GOING HOME
SHAG! CHICKEN-FUCKER!

WHAT FUCKING VILLAGE-BICYCLE! SNATCH! FREAK! DO ALL HAVE IN FUCKING
ASS-LICKER! SHLONG! BUTT BLASTER! COMMON ? BLOOD IS FUCKING
FLASH-GIRL! BUTTHEAD! BUM BASHER! KIPPERS! BELLY-BUMPING!
CHICKEN-FUCKER! BUGGERING! RED SNOW IS WHITE FUCKING CLITTY! ASSWIPE!
BROTHEL! DOUBLE D'S! THE SKY BLUE CUNT RAG! BUGGERLING!

THIS FUCKING LOVE TRUNCHEON! BUMP AND GRIND! GENITALIA! ARGUEMENT IS
FUCKING ANAL IMPALER! DILDO! BELIGERANT AND FUTILE FUCKING BUTT
REAMER! BARN ANIMAL! BACK-DOOR BANDIT! ASS MASTER! OFFICE-BIKE!

JEWS FUCKING ARSE BANDIT! ARSEBALL! YELLOW BASTARD! ANAL JOUSTER!
FELLATIO! HAY BAG! CERVIX POUNDER! ANAL JOYRIDER! BARELY OWN
THEMSELVES FUCKING ANAL INTERCOURSE! THIGH! ASS-SELLER!
TAKE-OUT-HOOKER! COMMUNIST JUST WANTED FUCKING HAY BAG! EVERYTHING AND
EVERYONE FUCKING ENTRAILS! PISS HANDLE! CERVIX POUNDER! TO ACT AND
FUCKING JIZZ RECEPTACLE! ANUS! BUTT BLASTER! BE EQUAL PUSSY LIP!
FLOWER BOY! ASS MITES! NIGGER BALL!

HATRED FUCKING ANAL FISSURE! COCK! ANAL JOB! CABBAGE HEAD! IS THE
FUCKING WANK! BUTTFUCK! BONE DANCER! DWARF! MOOSE! BONE GOBBLER!
BROTHEL-KEEPER! INTESTINE! FAT-MOUTH! FILTHY SHITTER! BITCHES'
CHRISTMAS! ANAL BUCCANEER! CRIME BUTTHEAD! ASS MAN! KIPPER RIPPER!
BUTT SNIPER!

DON'T FUCKING SNATCH! FELLATIO! PRETEND TO BE FUCKING QUEER! SAUSAGE
JOCKEY! ALRUGHT OR BETTER FUCKING SMEGMA! FLOPPERS! SWING BOTH WAYS!
BLEED THE LIZARD! BELLY THICKET! THAN THOSE THAT FUCKING SUCKER! ANAL
BEADS! FESTBALL! PERSECUTE YOU IF FUCKING JAM-TART! YOURN HEATB IS
FUCKING ASS KISSER! GLOBES! PIECE OF CRUMPET! FUL OF HATE FUCKING
NIGGER COCKSUCKER! ARSE BANDIT! YOU'LL GO BACK FUCKING ANUS!
BELLY-BUMPING! BONEHEAD! CROTCH! AGAIN TO THE FUCKING HARD-ON! LOVE
BLOBS! NIPPLE! SAME PUT ASIDE FUCKING CARNAL MEMBER! YOUR OWN MORTAL
FUCKING BALLOONS! ARSESUCKER! NOTIOMS AND FEELINGS FUCKING INTESTINE!
JUST SAY NO FUCKING RUNNING SORE! AND LIVE BE FUCKING BOOTS AND
SPOOKS! LOVE BLOBS! ARSELICKER! THE WAY THAT FUCKING BUM CRUMBS! PIMP!
IS RIGHT LOVE MELONS! ANAL WART! PUSSING BOIL!


I FUCKING APE CROTCH! JIZZ-MOPPER! AM PROTEUS SEX PISTOL! DICK FLOGGER!

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 3:30:59 PM6/19/10
to
Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Israelis COMPENSATED the families of the victims
>of the USS Liberty attack.

$500/family. $12 million in total compensation to the US.

As compared with the $3 billion in aid that Israel gets every year.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 3:32:15 PM6/19/10
to
Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>> Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> You know, the religion that
>>>slaughtered some 2 to 3 million people in the name of allah and
>>
>> Today Christians ... stand at the head of [this country]... I pledge
>> that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy
>> Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian
>> spirit ... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in
>> literature, in the theater, and in the press - in short, we want to
>> burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole
>> life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past ...
>> (few) years.
>>
>> - Adolf Hitler, quoted in: The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, 1922-1939,
>> Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872
>>
>
>Islamofucker,

Ah, the genocidal hatred of the neonazi.

> some million Christians died fighting the nazis,

The nazis were christians.

>Furthermore, you're quoting the speeches Hitler made to the
>masses, which didn't reflect his true disdain for Christianity:

Smirk. He were no true scotsman.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 3:32:54 PM6/19/10
to
drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> Bert Hyman  <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Larry
>> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>
>> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct.  It's been that
>> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>
>> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>
>> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>
>Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
>ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his

Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 3:33:56 PM6/19/10
to
Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:4c1c6c5c$0$1643$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Jun 18, 10:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> Doug <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >"Ray Fischer" <rfisc...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>> >news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>>>> >>Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>>>>
>>>> >>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>>>>
>>>> >> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>>>>
>>>> >Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
>>>> >nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled
>>>>
>>>> All you have is blind hatred. Just like the nazis.
>>>
>>> Yeah, 9/11 was no big deal, right?
>>
>> Yeah, the extermination of millions of Jews was no big deal, right?
>> The deaths of half a million Muslims in Iraq gives you great joy,
>> doesn't it? Supporting brutal dictators is just what you love to have
>> happen.
>
>Islamofucker,

There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
of millions of Jews by the nazis.

> the majority of civilian deaths in Iraq have been
>the result of muslime pig on muslime pig violence

Kind of like WWII?

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

drahcir

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 10:08:23 PM6/19/10
to
On Jun 19, 3:32 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
statement you're defending, you racist, hypocritical asshole.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer        
> rfisc...@sonic.net  - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Larry

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 10:37:20 PM6/19/10
to
rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1af3$0$1619
$742e...@news.sonic.net:

> Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>The Israelis COMPENSATED the families of the victims
>>of the USS Liberty attack.
>
> $500/family. $12 million in total compensation to the US.
>
> As compared with the $3 billion in aid that Israel gets every year.
>

Like I said, we should have leveled Tel Aviv to rubble.

--
Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...

Larry

Larry

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 10:49:38 PM6/19/10
to
rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632
$742e...@news.sonic.net:

> There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
> of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>
>

Bullshit. The Nazis didn't have the FUEL to burn 6,000,000 Jews, to say
nothing of the millions of Poles, Russians and other concentration camp
workers they didn't like. Problem one....lack of fuel, specifically
coke.

Further investigations of the pits they threw the bodies into have a
physics problem. The pits dimensions are quite well known. Nazis took
pictures of them we captured. No offsite burial grounds were dug to
keep the locals from revolting. The best way to stack bodies is laying
flat, piled neatly one atop the other head to toe to head to toe. There
is, obviously, an average VOLUME for each body. If you multiply that
volume by 6,000,000 Jews (not to mention Poles, Russians, Lithuanians,
and other non-Jewish holocaust victims that are totally forgotten in the
Jewish Holocaust Industry intense noise and reality distortion
fields)....the size of the pits would be many magnitudes larger than the
available total pit volumes ever dug.

The 6,000,000 number came from an American newspaper reporter and was
adopted by the Holocaust Industry who propagated it far and wide. It's
not based in any kind of fact.

If one human being died at any concentration camp, it's a horrible
atrocity I am not trying to forgive or forget....but this Holocaust
Industry Guilt Distortion Field bullshit simply doesn't wash, then or
now......

It doesn't matter whether the killing is of a Jew at Auchwitz or a
little Palestinian kid by burning phosphorus sprayed on him by Israeli
helicopters in Gaza City. Both are war crimes against humanity. One of
them has been tried in court and found guilty. Many hanged, many hunted
down like the dogs they were at the Nuremberg Trials at the end of WW2.
The other atrocities have NEVER BEEN TRIED IN AN INTERNATIONAL COURT.
Try to figure out why noone is in the dock, pleading for his shitty life
over the thousands of Palestinian men, women and especially children
these animals have murdered just for being there.

LIke I said....We should have leveled Tel Aviv, years ago.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 10:55:00 PM6/19/10
to
On Jun 19, 10:49 pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
> rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632
> $742ec...@news.sonic.net:

>
> > There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
> > of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>
> Bullshit.  The Nazis didn't have the FUEL to burn 6,000,000 Jews,

yes they did

to say
> nothing of the millions of Poles, Russians and other concentration camp
> workers they didn't like.  Problem one....lack of fuel, specifically
> coke.

no problem


>
> Further investigations of the pits they threw the bodies into have a
> physics problem.  The pits dimensions are quite well known.  Nazis took
> pictures of them we captured.  No offsite burial grounds were dug to
> keep the locals from revolting.  The best way to stack bodies is laying
> flat, piled neatly one atop the other head to toe to head to toe.  There
> is, obviously, an average VOLUME for each body.  If you multiply that
> volume by 6,000,000 Jews (not to mention Poles, Russians, Lithuanians,
> and other non-Jewish holocaust victims that are totally forgotten in the
> Jewish Holocaust Industry intense noise and reality distortion
> fields)....the size of the pits would be many magnitudes larger than the
> available total pit volumes ever dug.

oops, you forgot - they burned lots of the bodies.


>
> The 6,000,000 number came from an American newspaper reporter and was
> adopted by the Holocaust Industry who propagated it far and wide.  It's
> not based in any kind of fact.

nope. comes from lots of independent scholarly research.


>
> If one human being died at any concentration camp, it's a horrible
> atrocity I am not trying to forgive or forget....but this Holocaust
> Industry Guilt Distortion Field bullshit simply doesn't wash, then or
> now......

You are an emptyhead spewing nonsense without a milligram of support.


>
> It doesn't matter whether the killing is of a Jew at Auchwitz or a
> little Palestinian kid by burning phosphorus sprayed on him by Israeli
> helicopters in Gaza City.  Both are war crimes against humanity.  One of
> them has been tried in court and found guilty.  Many hanged, many hunted
> down like the dogs they were at the Nuremberg Trials at the end of WW2.  
> The other atrocities have NEVER BEEN TRIED IN AN INTERNATIONAL COURT.  
> Try to figure out why noone is in the dock, pleading for his shitty life
> over the thousands of Palestinian men, women and especially children
> these animals have murdered just for being there.
>
> LIke I said....We should have leveled Tel Aviv, years ago.

No one cares what an emptyhead said.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 19, 2010, 11:40:27 PM6/19/10
to
On Jun 19, 10:37 pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
> rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1af3$0$1619
> $742ec...@news.sonic.net:

>
> > Doug <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>The Israelis COMPENSATED the families of the victims
> >>of the USS Liberty attack.
>
> > $500/family.  $12 million in total compensation to the US.
>
> > As compared with the $3 billion in aid that Israel gets every year.
>
> Like I said, we should have leveled Tel Aviv to rubble.

Can you think of a way to level a modern city WITHOUT turning it to
rubble? See? As I said, you are an emptyhead.

Proteus IIV

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 12:57:20 AM6/20/10
to

NICE TRY TROLL
YOU ARE PATHETIC
SOMEONE HURT YOUR WITTLE FEELINGS ?

YOU SHIOULD HAVE YOUR BRAIN WASHED OUT WITH DRAIN-O YOU FILTY MINDED
SORE TROLL

I AM PROTEUS
[ not the wannabe Troll that barfed above]

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 3:27:10 AM6/20/10
to
drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 19, 3:32�pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> drahcir �<justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> >> Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Larry
>> >> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>> >> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>
>> >> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>> >> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>
>> >> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>
>> >> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>>
>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>>
>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>
>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
>statement you're defending,

Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.

> you racist, hypocritical asshole.

Another rightard asshole screeches his outrage at the truth.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 3:27:43 AM6/20/10
to
Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
>rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632
>
>> There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
>> of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>
>Bullshit. The Nazis didn't have the FUEL to burn 6,000,000 Jews, to say
>nothing of the millions of Poles, Russians and other concentration camp

Kook.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Mickey

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 5:56:54 AM6/20/10
to
On Jun 17, 5:03 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> Innews:Xns9D9AAB7AE56...@74.209.131.13Larry

>
> <no...@home.com> wrote:
>
> > Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > news:9ba62f45-30b6-4189-
> > 9c18-1461ebaf2...@11g2000prw.googlegroups.com:

>
> >> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> >> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>
> > Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct.  It's been that
> > way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>
> How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>
> How long have you and your kind been siding with the neo-Nazis?

Probably long before he started posting in alt.atheism.
We've always known he's a fascist.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 9:52:21 AM6/20/10
to
On 20 Jun 2010 07:27:10 GMT, rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Jun 19, 3:32�pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>> drahcir �<justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>> >> Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >Larry
>>> >> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> >> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>>> >> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>>
>>> >> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>>> >> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>>
>>> >> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>>
>>> >> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>>>
>>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
>>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>>>
>>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>>
>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
>>statement you're defending,
>
>Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.

yes, it has, you moron. I explained how above. You're apparently too
stupid to perceive it.


>
>> you racist, hypocritical asshole.
>
>Another rightard asshole

Imbecile can't even come up with his own insult. Pitiful - and
typical.

Larry

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 1:08:00 PM6/20/10
to
drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote in news:e8f2d9cc-6c14-4d64-
a161-312...@r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:

> Can you think of a way to level a modern city WITHOUT turning it to
> rubble? See? As I said, you are an emptyhead.
>

Actually, we have neutron weapons that can simply depopulate a city without
disturbing the newspapers on the rack. Cleanup must be undertaken rapidly
before the bodies start to rot, another problem for the victors.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 2:40:55 PM6/20/10
to
On Jun 20, 1:08 pm, Larry <no...@home.com> wrote:
> drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote in news:e8f2d9cc-6c14-4d64-
> a161-312b1244d...@r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:

>
> > Can you think of a way to level a modern city WITHOUT turning it to
> > rubble? See? As I said, you are an emptyhead.
>
> Actually, we have neutron weapons that can simply depopulate a city without
> disturbing the newspapers on the rack.  Cleanup must be undertaken rapidly
> before the bodies start to rot, another problem for the victors.

But you didn't say "depopulate", you pitiful little emptyhead. Did
your, ahem, "brain" forget already? Or is this its pitiful attempt to
be sly? Oh look! It seems you snipped your original statement away. I
wonder why.... Here, allow me to replace it for you:

> Like I said, we should have leveled Tel Aviv to rubble.

As you can see, you said "level" - nothing about "depopulate". Did you
actually think someone of your limitations could get something like
that by ME, a Jew? It seems you are childishly naive as well as stone
stupid. In consideration of your defects, I repeat the question for
you: Can you think of a way to LEVEL a modern city WITHOUT turning it
to rubble?
>

raven1

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 2:57:15 PM6/20/10
to
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:56:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Godwin’s Law says that, if you have to compare your opponent to Hitler
>or Nazis, you lose the argument.

Actually, it says that as the length of any thread increases, the
probability of a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis approaches 1.

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 6:10:52 PM6/20/10
to
drahcir <sg...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Jun 19, 3:32�pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> drahcir �<justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> >> Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> >Larry
>>>> >> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> >> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
>>>> >> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>>>>
>>>> >> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
>>>> >> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>>>>
>>>> >> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>>>>
>>>> >> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>>>>
>>>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
>>>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>>>>
>>>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>>>
>>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
>>>statement you're defending,
>>
>>Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.
>
>yes, it has, you moron. I explained how above.

All you do insist that you know better than others. Given that you're
a stupid rightard asshole that really counts for nothing at all.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Proteus IIV

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 7:04:14 PM6/20/10
to
On Jun 20, 6:10 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> rfisc...@sonic.net  

YOU LOW LIFE DEVIANTS DESERVE ONE ANOTHER
AND ANYTHING THAT HAPPENS TO YOU

I AM PROTEUS

drahcir

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 7:49:31 PM6/20/10
to
On Jun 20, 6:10 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

> drahcir  <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> > rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>drahcir  <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On Jun 19, 3:32 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >On Jun 18, 2:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> >> Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> >> >Larry
> >>>> >> >> Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>>> >> >>> My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> >>>> >> >>> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine.
>
> >>>> >> >> Well, at least he got this part absolutely correct. It's been that
> >>>> >> >> way since the Zionist state was stolen from the Palestinians.
>
> >>>> >> >How long have you and your kind been completely ignorant of history?
>
> >>>> >> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.
>
> >>>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
> >>>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>
> >>>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>
> >>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
> >>>statement you're defending,
>
> >>Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.
>
> >yes, it has, you moron. I explained how above.
>
> All you do insist that you know better than others.  

No, I've done that nowhere - you are apparently hallucinatory as well
as stone stupid. Was your mother an alcoholic?

Given that you're
> a stupid rightard asshole that really counts for nothing at all.
>
> --
> Ray Fischer        

> rfisc...@sonic.net  

Gord McFee

unread,
Jun 20, 2010, 9:58:01 PM6/20/10
to
On 19/06/2010 10:49 PM, Larry wrote:

> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632
> $742e...@news.sonic.net:
>
>> There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
>> of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>
> Bullshit. The Nazis didn't have the FUEL to burn 6,000,000 Jews, to say
> nothing of the millions of Poles, Russians and other concentration camp
> workers they didn't like. Problem one....lack of fuel, specifically
> coke.

No one has ever claimed that the Nazis burned six million Jews.

Straw man dismissed.

[tripe deleted]

--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time

Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org

Doug

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 1:16:45 AM6/21/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1d1b3f$0$1632$742e...@news.sonic.net...

But you're a true asshole.

> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
>


Doug

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 1:20:51 AM6/21/10
to
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632$742e...@news.sonic.net...

> Doug <andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>>news:4c1c6c5c$0$1643$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>>> Michael Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Jun 18, 10:31 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>> Doug <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >"Ray Fischer" <rfisc...@sonic.net> wrote in message
>>>>> >news:4c1b1273$0$1619$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>>>>> >>Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>>>>>
>>>>> >> The usual neonazi hatred and murderou bigotry.
>>>>>
>>>>> >Yeah, the muzzies were always great friends with the
>>>>> >nazis, after all, the Grand Fuckti of Jerusalem travelled
>>>>>
>>>>> All you have is blind hatred. Just like the nazis.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, 9/11 was no big deal, right?
>>>
>>> Yeah, the extermination of millions of Jews was no big deal, right?
>>> The deaths of half a million Muslims in Iraq gives you great joy,
>>> doesn't it? Supporting brutal dictators is just what you love to have
>>> happen.
>>
>>Islamofucker,
>
> There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
> of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>

The hypocrisy of the islamofuck.

Try telling that to the 2.5 Armenian and Assyrian Christians
killed/enslaved by islamonazis in the early 20th century.

Tell that to the million odd kufars/infidels slaughtered by
islamonazis in the Sudan/Darfur.

Try telling that to the millions of Sikhs and HIndus
slaughtered by islamonazis in the Indian sub-continent
since 1948, then die.

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 3:37:11 AM6/21/10
to

And now you're lying. How long have you been completely without
morals or ethics?

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 3:38:18 AM6/21/10
to

And there's more of the neonazi religious hatred.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

The Peeler

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 5:51:15 AM6/21/10
to
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:58:01 -0400, Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com>
wrote:

>On 19/06/2010 10:49 PM, Larry wrote:
>
>> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4c1d1ba4$0$1632
>> $742e...@news.sonic.net:
>>
>>> There's just the sort of rabid religious hatred that caused the deaths
>>> of millions of Jews by the nazis.
>>
>> Bullshit. The Nazis didn't have the FUEL to burn 6,000,000 Jews, to say
>> nothing of the millions of Poles, Russians and other concentration camp
>> workers they didn't like. Problem one....lack of fuel, specifically
>> coke.
>
>No one has ever claimed that the Nazis burned six million Jews.
>
>Straw man dismissed.
>
>[tripe deleted]

>Gord McFee


>I'll write no line before its time

>Visit the Holocaust History Project
>http://www.holocaust-history.org

Why don't you delete *that* tripe?

The Peeler

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 7:39:30 AM6/21/10
to
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:51:15 +0800, The Retard, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj, impersonating his master, The Peeler, wrote:

<snip our resident psycho's usual psychotic garbage>

Attention!

Our resident psychopath, The Retard, unable to cope with his fears and
impotent anger, is now reduced to IMPERSONATING his master: The Peeler!
LOL

Sure sign of this degenerate abnormal troll's endless suffering and defeat
online! <G>

--
Recent quotes about The Retard:
Jimbo: "You're an abortion that should have happened."
Attila: "Are you a corpse that has not died yet?"
Virgil: "The world would be a better place if we could go
back in time and abort some idiots like formby before they were hatched."
Ejercito:"If he believed in racial hygiene, he would gas himself."
Ray Fischer: "We're not interested in your sexual fantasies, pervert."
Doug: "Pitiful diarrhea is the Revd's real name."
The Chief Instigator: "You've all the strength of wet toilet paper."
W.T.S.: "You are a liar. You are an obvious liar. You are a liar who has no
talent for making a lie believable."

drahcir

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 7:57:21 AM6/21/10
to

Um, ok, why don't you cite where, in this thread, I say that "i know
better than others"? DO IT OR BE PROVEN A LIAR.

How long have you been completely without
>morals or ethics?

See what the moron does? He's been caught in hypocrisy by me, and now
wants to float the conversation away from that, preferring to focus on
some statement he imagines I made. We'll just have to correct that,
asshole. This subthread started with your challenge:

>>> >>>> >> I see that you can't actually refute his statement.

to which I replied

>>> >>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
>>> >>>statement you're defending,

Because of that, I suggested that you're a racist, hypocritical
asshole. You've yet to respond to that, preferring to try improvisiing
your way away from it. It won't work. By your inability to refute, my
proof that you're a racist, hypocritical asshole stands. And no one
gives a shit what a racist, hypocritical asshole like you has to say.


Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 21, 2010, 11:02:51 PM6/21/10
to
drahcir <sg...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Jun 20, 6:10 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> drahcir  <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
>>>> > rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> >>drahcir  <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>On Jun 19, 3:32 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> >>>> drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> >>>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
>>>> >>>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>>>>
>>>> >>>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>>>>
>>>> >>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
>>>> >>>statement you're defending,
>>>>
>>>> >>Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.
>>>>
>>>> >yes, it has, you moron. I explained how above.
>>>>
>>>> All you do insist that you know better than others.  
>>>
>>>No, I've done that nowhere -
>>
>>And now you're lying.
>
>Um, ok, why don't you cite where, in this thread, I say that "i know
>better than others"? DO IT OR BE PROVEN A LIAR.

Just above. Top quoted comment.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

drahcir

unread,
Jun 24, 2010, 10:12:04 PM6/24/10
to
On Jun 21, 11:02 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> drahcir  <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> > rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>drahcir  <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On Jun 20, 6:10 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> drahcir  <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >>>> > rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> >>drahcir  <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>>On Jun 19, 3:32 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >>>> >>>> drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>>> >Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
> >>>> >>>> >ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his
>
> >>>> >>>> Insisting that you're right isn't any kind of evidence.
>
> >>>> >>>Couldn't help but notice you had no need for evidence for the
> >>>> >>>statement you're defending,
>
> >>>> >>Thus far it hasn't even been challenged.
>
> >>>> >yes, it has, you moron. I explained how above.
>
> >>>> All you do insist that you know better than others.  
>
> >>>No, I've done that nowhere -
>
> >>And now you're lying.  
>
> >Um, ok, why don't you cite where, in this thread, I say that "i know
> >better than others"? DO IT OR BE PROVEN A LIAR.
>
> Just above.  Top quoted comment.

Well, here's my top quoted comment:

> Well, since he makes the point that his statement is the product of an
> ignorance of history, he implies that history contradicts his

> statement, thus refutes it.

And you, in your unfathomable stupidity, interpret that to mean
"I know better than others." You know something? Very occasionally on
these boards, a jackass like you says something so unbelievably stupid
it requires no further comment. This is one of those rare occasions.
> --
> Ray Fischer      

If you weren't too stupid to know how stupid you are, you wouldn't
dare sign your name to your posts.
 
> rfisc...@sonic.net  

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 25, 2010, 2:38:43 AM6/25/10
to

Since you offer no facts, no evidence, no cites, but insist only that
you know better than others, then yes, you insist that you know better
than others.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

drahcir

unread,
Jun 25, 2010, 9:00:56 AM6/25/10
to

You pitiful moron, repeating your mirage doesn't make it any more
substantial. Let's just let readers decide whether your IQ is greater
or less than your age based on the above, shall we?

*us*

unread,
Jun 25, 2010, 10:10:15 AM6/25/10
to
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:00:56 -0400, drahcir <sg...@sgscc.com> wrote:

>... pitiful moron...

You voted for the "Heir to the Holocaust" twice, didn't you.

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jun 25, 2010, 1:21:39 PM6/25/10
to

Run along, idiot. Keep insisting that you're always right. See who
is impressed.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

drahcir

unread,
Jun 25, 2010, 3:28:20 PM6/25/10
to
On Jun 25, 10:10 am, * US * wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:00:56 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >... pitiful moron...
>
> You voted for the "Heir to the Holocaust" twice, didn't you.

Next time, take your meds BEFORE posting, please.

*us*

unread,
Jun 27, 2010, 6:56:16 AM6/27/10
to
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:28:20 -0700 (PDT), drahcir <justrich...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Jun 25, 10:10 am, * US * wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:00:56 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
>> >... pitiful moron...
>>
>> You voted for the "Heir to the Holocaust" twice, didn't you.
>

>...meds...

Rush Limbaugh, is that you?

drahcir

unread,
Jun 27, 2010, 11:02:29 AM6/27/10
to
On Jun 27, 6:56 am, * US * wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:28:20 -0700 (PDT), drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jun 25, 10:10 am, * US * wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:00:56 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >> >... pitiful moron...
>
> >> You voted for the "Heir to the Holocaust" twice, didn't you.
>
> >...meds...
>
> Rush Limbaugh, is that you?

Yes. It's me. Except, it's not.

Topaz

unread,
Jun 27, 2010, 11:18:43 AM6/27/10
to

The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder

'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.

Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
average man 'knows' the Holocaust exists because:

1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'

In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no
logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.
'Holocaust' is a loaded, dishonest term. You can't debate with
undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man
does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by
mass media, to disable his thinking so that he's worse positioned to
defend himself because he can't understand how he is manipulated to
accept the illogical. Debate in the mass media of a democracy is
nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms.

'Holocaust' is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at
the head of the West and the rest. Give them their money and their
pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will
notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to
deconstruct the Zionist Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the
designer label 'Holocaust.' Worship the Zionists and submit to their
demands - that is what the term Holocaust means.

A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history;
that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the
'Holocaust,' taking at face value the term's pretension to historical
designation, is the claim that six million Jews were murdered by Nazi
Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is
never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord
wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing
them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any
ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation
advanced. That Jews were gassed is treated as though it were already
proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the
practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to
smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all
know that Jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are
deniers driven by hate. But it ain't so just because "everybody knows"
it is.

We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.

There are men who can prove the 'Holocaust' is a Big Lie. You can find
them in jail. Their imprisonment is scarcely mentioned in the mass
media. Their imprisonment goes unlamented by the mass columnists. To
discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propa-sphere the
media construct. They must disappear. But we know, mass media. And
we're not going away. We're getting louder and stronger. And there's
nothing you can do to stop us.

http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/

*us*

unread,
Jun 27, 2010, 8:30:13 PM6/27/10
to
The Bush crime family never has been on the same side
as the USA. See "Reichstag Fire".

*us*

unread,
Jun 27, 2010, 8:30:12 PM6/27/10
to

Any difference?

drahcir

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 11:18:37 AM6/28/10
to

Nothing. And everything.

*us*

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 1:41:14 PM6/28/10
to

Your idols of the Bush crime family never
renounced their fealty to Nazism.

plainolamerican

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 2:54:05 PM6/28/10
to
On Jun 17, 10:56 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>
> Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>
> by Bill Levinson
>
> Godwin’s Law says that, if you have to compare your opponent to Hitler
> or Nazis, you lose the argument. The exception consists of situations
> in which actual Nazis are involved, and this is true of Radio Islam’s
> “The Blood Orgy of the Jewish Devils” (credit to Lee Kaplan for the
> tip).
>
>       This is a great site! Your struggle [Radio Islam´s] is an
> honorable and righteous one; one that actually touches us all since
> the filthy hand of the Jews (Zionists if you prefer) has a
> stranglehold on so many of our countries.

>
>       My country, the USA, is actually nothing more than a lap dog of
> the Jewish state (Israel) now occupying Palestine. It is refreshing to
> see the blame for so many of the world’s ills laid in the lap of those
> where it belongs…the Jews; not just the zionists but the Jews.
>
>       Pastor Ray Redfeairn
>       USA
>
> The Stormfront White Nationalist Community refers to Ray Redfeairn as
> “Pastor Ray,” so it is almost certainly the same GENUINE Nazi
> hatemonger. See also this Web page from another white supremacist
> group.

Genuine Nazis
----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcDpptCdYY0&feature=related

Topaz

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 8:15:38 PM6/28/10
to

Franklin Roosevelt did some things to help people. But he didn't
really upset the money bag parasites who rule over us. Only Hitler did
that.


Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.

"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."

The money system we have today is called the debt-money
system. It is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes
into existence today is when it is borrowed. There is no freely
existing money supply, but only borrowed money that needs to be paid
back to bankers with interest. If all the money that was owed to
bankers was ever paid back there would be no money left in circulation
and this would be a great depression. What makes matters even worse is
that when money is created only the principle of the loan is created.
The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For this reason
it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on all of
the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.

The United States government borrows money from the Federal
Reserve Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private
stockholders. It is in the business section of the phone book, not the
government section. Other banks also create the money in our money
supply. They are allowed to loan out much more money then they
actually have. Thus they create new money. No one else is allowed to
create money, only bankers have this privilege. All of our money is
debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the interest.

In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come
from the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by
the banks. And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of
the name. Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the
Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly
created money to the government in exchange for government bonds. To
simplify: The United States does not make its own money. Bankers
create the money and loan it to the United States with an interest
charge.

The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:

"If there is only $10 in existence, and you lend it to someone
under the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he
has agreed to the impossible."

The book The Struggle for World Power put it this way:

"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which
was legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and ,
therefore, the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not
only renounced its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to
borrow the privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the
thing being done, but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and
deception to conceal the essence of the deed. To create money out of
nothing is to make valid and effective claim on all goods and services
for no return, which is fraud and theft, made worse by the
circumstances that the money is lent out at interest...it follows that
those who have the power to 'create' out of nothing all the money in
each country and the whole world and lend it as stated, have total
power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press, individuals and
so on. Therefore the power of Parliament in general, and especially
with regard to money, is non-existent, and all the true sovereignty is
in the hands of those private individuals who issue all money"

Topaz

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 8:23:50 PM6/28/10
to

Here is part of Hitler's speech at Rheinmetall-Borsig Works, Berlin,
on December 10, 1940:

"In this Anglo-French world there exists, as it were, democracy, which
means the rule of the people by the people. Now the people must
possess some means of giving expression to their thoughts or their
wishes. Examining this problem more closely, we see that the people
themselves have originally no convictions of their own. Their
convictions are formed, of course, just as everywhere else. The
decisive question is who enlightens the people, who educates them? In
those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing
more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and,
as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are
more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.'
By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an
uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to
make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national
control or control by the people both in the acquisition of capital
and in its employment. This is really what they mean when they speak
of liberty. These capitalists create their own press and then speak of
the 'freedom of the press.'

In reality, every one of the newspapers has a master, and in every
case this master is the capitalist, the owner. This master, not the
editor, is the one who directs the policy of the paper. If the editor
tries to write other than what suits the master, he is ousted the next
day. This press, which is the absolutely submissive and characterless
slave of the owners, molds public opinion. Public opinion thus
mobilized by them is, in its turn, split up into political parties.
The difference between these parties is as small as it formerly was in
Germany. You know them, of course - the old parties. They were always
one and the same. In Britain matters are usually so arranged that
families are divided up, one member being a conservative, another a
liberal, and a third belonging to the labor party. Actually, all three
sit together as members of the family, decide upon their common
attitude and determine it. A further point is that the 'elected
people' actually form a community which operates and controls all
these organizations. For this reason, the opposition in England is
really always the same, for on all essential matters in which the
opposition has to make itself felt, the parties are always in
agreement. They have one and the same conviction and through the
medium of the press mold public opinion along corresponding lines. One
might well believe that in these countries of liberty and riches, the
people must possess an unlimited degree of prosperity. But no! On the
contrary, it is precisely in these countries that the distress of the
masses is greater than anywhere else. Such is the case in 'rich
Britain.'

She controls sixteen million square miles. In India, for example, a
hundred million colonial workers with a wretched standard of living
must labor for her. One might think, perhaps, that at least in England
itself every person must have his share of these riches. By no means!
In that country class distinction is the crassest imaginable. There is
poverty - incredible poverty - on the one side, and equally incredible
wealth on the other. They have not solved a single problem. The
workmen of that country which possesses more than one-sixth of the
globe and of the world's natural resources dwell in misery, and the
masses of the people are poorly clad.. In a country which ought to
have more than enough bread and every sort of fruit, we find millions
of the lower classes who have not even enough to fill their stomachs,
and go about hungry. A nation which could provide work for the whole
world must acknowledge the fact that it cannot even abolish
unemployment at home. For decades this rich Britain has had two and a
half million unemployed; rich America, ten to thirteen millions, year
after year; France, six, seven, and eight hundred thousand. Well, my
fellow-countrymen - what then are we to say about ourselves?
It is self-evident that where this democracy rules, the people as such
are not taken into consideration at all. The only thing that matters
is the existence of a few hundred gigantic capitalists who own all the
factories and their stock and, through them, control the people. The
masses of the people do not interest them in the least. They are
interested in them just as were our bourgeois parties in former times
- only when elections are being held, when they need votes. Otherwise,
the life of the masses is a matter of complete indifference to them.

To this must be added the difference in education. Is it not ludicrous
to hear a member of the British Labor Party - who, of course, as a
member of the Opposition is officially paid by the government - say:
'When the war is over, we will do something in social respects'?
It is the members of Parliament who are the directors of the business
concerns - just as used to be the case with us. But we have abolished
all that. A member of the Reichstag cannot belong to a Board of
Directors, except as a purely honorary member. He is prohibited from
accepting any emolument, financial or otherwise. This is not the case
in other countries.

They reply: 'That is why our form of government is sacred to us.' I
can well believe it, for that form of government certainly pays very
well.. But whether it is sacred to the mass of the people as well is
another matter.

The people as a whole definitely suffer. I do not consider it possible
in the long run for one man to work and toil for a whole year in
return for ridiculous wages, while another jumps into an express train
once a year and pockets enormous sums. Such conditions are a disgrace.
On the other hand, we National Socialists equally oppose the theory
that all men are equals. Today, when a man of genius makes some
astounding invention and enormously benefits his country by his
brains, we pay him his due, for he has really accomplished something
and been of use to his country. However, we hope to make it impossible
for idle drones to inhabit this country.

I could continue to cite examples indefinitely. The fact remains that
two worlds are face to face with one another. Our opponents are quite
right when they say: 'Nothing can reconcile us to the National
Socialist world.' How could a narrow-minded capitalist ever agree to
my principles? It would be easier for the Devil to go to church and
cross himself with holy water than for these people to comprehend the
ideas which are accepted facts to us today. But we have solved our
problems.

To take another instance where we are condemned: They claim to be
fighting for the maintenance of the gold standard as the currency
basis. That I can well believe, for the gold is in their hands. We,
too, once had gold, but it was stolen and extorted from us. When I
came to power, it was not malice which made me abandon the gold
standard. Germany simply had no gold left. Consequently, quitting the
gold standard presented no difficulties, for it is always easy to part
with what one does not have. We had no gold. We had no foreign
exchange. They had all been stolen and extorted from us during the
previous fifteen years. But, my fellow countrymen, I did not regret
it, for we have constructed our economic system on a wholly different
basis. In our eyes, gold is not of value in itself. It is only an
agent by which nations can be suppressed and dominated.
When I took over the government, I had only one hope on which to
build, namely, the efficiency and ability of the German nation and the
German workingman; the intelligence of our inventors, engineers,
technicians, chemists, and so forth. I built on the strength which
animates our economic system. One simple question faced me: Are we to
perish because we have no gold; am I to believe in a phantom which
spells our destruction? I championed the opposite opinion: Even though
we have no gold, we have capacity for work.

The German capacity for work is our gold and our capital, and with
this gold I can compete successfully with any power in the world. We
want to live in houses which have to be built. Hence, the workers must
build them, and the raw materials required must be procured by work.
My whole economic system has been built up on the conception of work.
We have solved our problems while, amazingly enough, the capitalist
countries and their currencies have suffered bankruptcy.

Sterling can find no market today. Throw it at any one and he will
step aside to avoid being hit. But our Reichsmark, which is backed by
no gold, has remained stable. Why? It has no gold cover; it is backed
by you and by your work. You have helped me to keep the mark stable.
German currency, with no gold coverage, is worth more today than gold
itself. It signifies unceasing production. This we owe to the German
farmer, who has worked from daybreak till nightfall. This we owe to
the German worker, who has given us his whole strength. The whole
problem has been solved in one instant, as if by magic.
My dear friends, if I had stated publicly eight or nine years ago: 'In
seven or eight years the problem of how to provide work for the
unemployed will be solved, and the problem then will be where to find
workers,' I should have harmed my cause. Every one would have
declared: 'The man is mad. It is useless to talk to him, much less to
support him. Nobody should vote for him. He is a fantastic creature.'
Today, however, all this has come true. Today, the only question for
us is where to find workers. That, my fellow countrymen, is the
blessing which work brings.

Work alone can create new work; money cannot create work. Work alone
can create values, values with which to reward those who work. The
work of one man makes it possible for another to live and continue to
work. And when we have mobilized the working capacity of our people to
its utmost, each individual worker will receive more and more of the
world's goods.

We have incorporated seven million unemployed into our economic
system; we have transformed another six millions from part-time into
full-time workers; we are even working overtime. And all this is paid
for in cash in Reichsmarks which maintained their value in peacetime.
In wartime we had to ration its purchasing capacity, not in order to
devalue it, but simply to earmark a portion of our industry for war
production to guide us to victory in the struggle for the future of
Germany...

One thing is certain, my fellow-countrymen: All in all, we have today
a state with a different economic and political orientation from that
of the Western democracies.
Well, it must now be made possible for the British worker to travel.
It is remarkable that they should at last hit upon the idea that
traveling should be something not for millionaires alone, but for the
people too. In this country, the problem was solved some time ago. In
the other countries - as is shown by their whole economic structure -
the selfishness of a relatively small stratum rules under the mask of
democracy. This stratum is neither checked nor controlled by anyone.

It is therefore understandable if an Englishman says: 'We do not want
our world to be subject to any sort of collapse.' Quite so. The
English know full well that their Empire is not menaced by us. But
they say quite truthfully: 'If the ideas that are popular in Germany
are not completely eliminated, they might become popular among our own
people, and that is the danger. We do not want this.' It would do no
harm if they did become popular there, but these people are just as
narrow-minded as many once were in Germany. In this respect they
prefer to remain bound to their conservative methods. They do not wish
to depart from them, and do not conceal the fact.

They say, 'The German methods do not suit us at all.'
And what are these methods? You know, my comrades, that I have
destroyed nothing in Germany. I have always proceeded very carefully,
because I believe - as I have already said - that we cannot afford to
wreck anything. I am proud that the Revolution of 1933 was brought to
pass without breaking a single windowpane. Nevertheless, we have
wrought enormous changes.

I wish to put before you a few basic facts: The first is that in the
capitalistic democratic world the most important principle of economy
is that the people exist for trade and industry, and that these in
turn exist for capital. We have reversed this principle by making
capital exist for trade and industry, and trade and industry exist for
the people. In other words, the people come first. Everything else is
but a means to this end. When an economic system is not capable of
feeding and clothing a people, then it is bad, regardless of whether a
few hundred people say: 'As far as I am concerned it is good,
excellent; my dividends are splendid.'

However, the dividends do not interest me at all. Here we have drawn
the line. They may then retort: 'Well, look here, that is just what we
mean. You jeopardize liberty.'
Yes, certainly, we jeopardize the liberty to profiteer at the expense
of the community, and, if necessary, we even abolish it. British
capitalists, to mention only one instance, can pocket dividends of 76,
80, 95, 140, and even 160 per cent from their armament industry.
Naturally they say: 'If the German methods grow apace and should prove
victorious, this sort of thing will stop.'

They are perfectly right. I should never tolerate such a state of
affairs. In my eyes, a 6 per cent dividend is sufficient. Even from
this 6 per cent we deduct one-half and, as for the rest, we must have
definite proof that it is invested in the interest of the country as a
whole. In other words, no individual has the right to dispose
arbitrarily of money which ought to be invested for the good of the
country. If he disposes of it sensibly, well and good; if not, the
National Socialist state will intervene.

To take another instance, besides dividends there are the so-called
directors' fees. You probably have no idea how appallingly active a
board of directors is. Once a year its members have to make a journey.
They have to go to the station, get into a first-class compartment and
travel to some place or other. They arrive at an appointed office at
about 10 or 11 A.M. There they must listen to a report. When the
report has been read, they must listen to a few comments on it. They
may be kept in their seats until 1 P.M. or even 2. Shortly after 2
o'clock they rise from their chairs and set out on their homeward
journey, again, of course, traveling first class. It is hardly
surprising that they claim 3,000, 4,000, or even 5,000 as compensation
for this: Our directors formerly did the same - for what a lot of time
it costs them! Such effort had to be made worth while! Of course, we
have got rid of all this nonsense, which was merely veiled
profiteering and even bribery.
In Germany, the people, without any doubt, decide their existence.
They determine the principles of their government. In fact it has been
possible in this country to incorporate many of the broad masses into
the National Socialist party, that gigantic organization embracing
millions and having millions of officials drawn from the people
themselves. This principle is extended to the highest ranks.

For the first time in German history, we have a state which has
absolutely abolished all social prejudices in regard to political
appointments as well as in private life. I myself am the best proof of
this. Just imagine: I am not even a lawyer, and yet I am your Leader!
It is not only in ordinary life that we have succeeded in appointing
the best among the people for every position. We have
Reichsstatthalters who were formerly agricultural laborers or
locksmiths. Yes, we have even succeeded in breaking down prejudice in
a place where it was most deep-seated -in the fighting forces.
Thousands of officers are being promoted from the ranks today. We have
done away with prejudice. We have generals who were ordinary soldiers
and noncommissioned officers twenty-two and twenty-three years ago. In
this instance, too, we have overcome all social obstacles. Thus, we
are building up our life for the future.

As you know we have countless schools, national political educational
establishments, Adolf Hitler schools, and so on. To these schools we
send gifted children of the broad masses, children of working men,
farmers' sons whose parents could never have afforded a higher
education for their children. We take them in gradually. They are
educated here, sent to the Ordensburgen, to the Party, later to take
their place in the State where they will some day fill the highest
posts....

Opposed to this there stands a completely different world. In the
world the highest ideal is the struggle for wealth, for capital, for
family possessions, for personal egoism; everything else is merely a
means to such ends. Two worlds confront each other today. We know
perfectly well that if we are defeated in this war it would not only
be the end of our National Socialist work of reconstruction, but the
end of the German people as a whole. For without its powers of
coordination, the German people would starve. Today the masses
dependent on us number 120 or 130 millions, of which 85 millions alone
are our own people. We remain ever aware of this fact.

On the other hand, that other world says: 'If we lose, our world-wide
capitalistic system will collapse. For it is we who save hoarded gold.
It is lying in our cellars and will lose its value. If the idea that
work is the decisive factor spreads abroad, what will happen to us? We
shall have bought our gold in vain. Our whole claim to world dominion
can then no longer be maintained. The people will do away with their
dynasties of high finance. They will present their social claims, and
the whole world system will be overthrown.'
I can well understand that they declare: 'Let us prevent this at all
costs; it must be prevented.' They can see exactly how our nation has
been reconstructed. You see it clearly. For instance, there we see a
state ruled by a numerically small upper class. They send their sons
to their own schools, to Eton. We have Adolf Hitler schools or
national political educational establishments. On the one hand, the
sons of plutocrats, financial magnates; on the other, the children of
the people. Etonians and Harrovians exclusively in leading positions
over there; in this country, men of the people in charge of the State.
These are the two worlds. I grant that one of the two must succumb.
Yes, one or the other. But if we were to succumb, the German people
would succumb with us. If the other were to succumb, I am convinced
that the nations will become free for the first time. We are not
fighting individual Englishmen or Frenchmen. We have nothing against
them. For years I proclaimed this as the aim of my foreign policy. We
demanded nothing of them, nothing at all. When they started the war
they could not say: 'We are doing so because the Germans asked this or
that of us.' They said, on the contrary: 'We are declaring war on you
because the German system of Government does not suit us; because we
fear it might spread to our own people.' For that reason they are
carrying on this war. They wanted to blast the German nation back to
the time of Versailles, to the indescribable misery of those days. But
they have made a great mistake.

If in this war everything points to the fact that gold is fighting
against work, capitalism against peoples, and reaction against the
progress of humanity, then work, the peoples, and progress will be
victorious. Even the support of the Jewish race will not avail the
others.

I have seen all this coming for years. What did I ask of the other
world? Nothing but the right for Germans to reunite and the
restoration of all that had been taken from them - nothing which would
have meant a loss to the other nations. How often have I stretched out
my hand to them? Ever since I came into power. I had not the slightest
wish to rearm.
For what do armaments mean? They absorb so much labor. It was I who
regarded work as being of decisive importance, who wished to employ
the working capacity of Germany for other plans. I think the news is
already out that, after all, I have some fairly important plans in my
mind, vast and splendid plans for my people. It is my ambition to make
the German people rich and to make the German homeland beautiful. I
want the standard of living of the individual raised. I want us to
have the most beautiful and the finest civilization. I should like the
theater - in fact, the whole of German civilization - to benefit all
the people and not to exist only for the upper ten thousand, as is the
case in England.

The plans which we had in mind were tremendous, and I needed workers
in order to realize them. Armament only deprives me of workers. I made
proposals to limit armaments. I was ridiculed. The only answer I
received was 'No.' I proposed the limitation of certain types of
armament. That was refused. I proposed that airplanes should be
altogether eliminated from warfare. That also was refused. I suggested
that bombers should be limited. That was refused. They said: 'That is
just how we wish to force our regime upon you.' ...

*us*

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 9:11:07 PM6/28/10
to
The Bush crime family never has been on the same side
as the USA. See "Reichstag Fire". 9/11 was an inside job.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 28, 2010, 10:56:35 PM6/28/10
to

They're not my idols I voted for Gore and Kerry. Have you always been
this confused, or is it a recent occurence?

*us*

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 7:37:58 AM6/29/10
to

You'll need to get an actual vote if you don't want
the neocons to keep betraying you.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

drahcir

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 7:49:44 AM6/29/10
to

Perhaps you are not aware that you are insane.

plainolamerican

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 8:31:44 AM6/29/10
to

your point?

Smiler.

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 6:44:49 PM6/29/10
to
plainolamerican wrote:
> On Jun 28, 7:23 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> your point?

Atop his head.

--
Smiler
The godless one.
a.a.# 2279
All gods are bespoke. They're all made to perfectly
fit the prejudices of their believers.


Smiler.

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 6:46:25 PM6/29/10
to
Michael Ejercito wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23971
>
> Radio Islam = Genuine Nazis
>
<snip>

Please tell me who the fake Nazis are and how to tell them from the genuine
ones.

Topaz

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 9:12:54 PM6/29/10
to

"We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in
1933 to the particular attention of the leading politicians of the
U.S.A. and of the international Jews who stand behind them. Our
defensive measures against international Jewry have aroused increasing
tirades against Germany in America. Sometimes it seemed as if it would
be impossible to increase the flood of hatred and lies...

After leading politicians such as the American Secretary of the
Interior Harold Ickes and Senator Pittman attacked the German
government in the foulest manner, President Roosevelt did even more in
his New Year address. He tried to persuade the American people that
world peace was not assured, and that it was the duty of the American
people to defend three vital principles: those of religion, democracy
and international good will. Roosevelt did not believe these
principles were threatened by Soviet Russia or Soviet Spain, rather by
authoritarian Germany and Italy.

Millions are dead in Soviet Russia and Spanish priests estimate that a
half million people have been murdered there only because of their
faith, but that is not important and proves nothing. The dead do not
trouble the American President's conscience, indeed they did not stop
him from being the single world statesman to congratulate the Soviet
Russian government on the anniversary of the Bolshevist Revolution. No
other statesman did this, which explains why no other statesman
received such praise from the Soviet press. The Soviet press praised
the "noble efforts of the great American statesman."

Roosevelt also ignored the murder of millions of people when it was
called to his attention by a letter from the former Spanish ambassador
in Great Britain, the Marquis de Merry del Wal. The ambassador told
Mr. Roosevelt the following:

Your country's press tells the world of Your Excellency's protests
against the "persecution of the Jews" in Germany. According to the
press, you are deeply distressed by these events. How is it then that
the murder and massacre of 400,000 defenseless men, women and children
in Spain has not resulted in the slightest distress on your part?
These unfortunate people did not die on the battlefields of a civil
war. They were torn from their homes and murdered in public not only
because of their political, but also their religious, beliefs. Their
murderers openly declared their goal of destroying the very
civilization that Your Excellency defends. They have intentionally
destroyed thousands of churches and monuments along with uncounted
works of art and private homes. They have torn the clothes from nuns
and revealed them to everyone's eyes. They raped women and looted to a
degree unknown in the annals of the Christian era.

Your own ambassador, Your Excellency, against all the laws, norms and
customs of international law, has been forced to live away from the
government to which he is accredited, since as he said his personal
security would otherwise be in danger. I further know, Your
Excellency, that you have received certain proof of my assertions, for
I have made efforts to ensure that you have received reports that
support what I have said. Despite that, Your Excellency, you complain
about events in Germany, events that cannot be compared with what is
happening in Spain-and you have not given even the slightest sign of
disapproval at the death of hundreds of thousands of people who have
18 million fellow believers who are among the best citizens of your
country, far more than the two million Jews.

These people have been murdered solely because of their beliefs. Mr.
Roosevelt however has never spoken of a threat to faith or religion.
But they were only believers in a Christian church, after all. Mr.
Roosevelt is conducting a crusade against the authoritarian states
under the banner of religion only because the religious compatriots of
his closest friends have been put in their place in the authoritarian
states.

If President Roosevelt believes that he has to take the field to
defend democracy, we may ask where and when we have ever threatened or
attacked democracy. In the past years Germany has done nothing more
than to partially undo the injustices inflicted on it by the
predecessor of the current president of the U.S.A. Germany has not
arbitrarily altered the map of Europe as he did, creating states
against the will of their peoples only for purposes of power politics.
It has only reclaimed its citizens who suffered a decade long under
governments foreign or hostile to Germany...

In a closed session, he told the Defense Committee of the Senate that
the United States must be ready to support England and France in the
event of a European war. The President reportedly even suggested that
definite agreements already existed to this effect. He further
proposed the unrestricted sale of war materials to Western Europe. The
only restriction was that they had to be able to pay for it. When a
member of the American Senate asked how this policy could be squared
with the law demanding strict neutrality over against Europe,
Roosevelt replied: "We'll cross that bridge when we come to it."
These revelations naturally were a sensation throughout the world. The
impact was greater than the master of the White House in Washington
wanted. He therefore denied the reports. The force of his denial was
somewhat weakened by excited reports in the American press in which
various members of Congress refused to be called liars, and
furthermore suggested that Roosevelt had said even more during the
session than has been reported. The force of the denial was also
weakened by a cynical article in a French newspaper that noted that
"the strength of the claim has not been weakened, for it is not a
matter of the letter of the law, but of the spirit."...

Roosevelt is acting as the mouthpiece and puppet of international
Jewry when he attacks the authoritarian states. They want to use every
means to destroy the newly awakened nations...

The leaders of the Soviet Union tried to persuade their people that
true communism could only develop after all the other states of the
world were allies of the powers in Moscow, and the Red rulers in
Soviet Spain tried and tried to conceal their governmental
incompetence by unleashing a world conflict. We are not surprised to
see the American President in such company. The real rulers of the
Soviet Union are the same as in the United States: international
Jewry.

The truth of this claim is confirmed by the behavior of the wife of
the American President. Mrs. Roosevelt, as a sign of her support for
the Spanish Bolshevist rulers, accepted a gift of stolen etchings by
Spanish masters. Mrs. Roosevelt chaired an exhibition of busts of
Spanish Communist leaders, made by the Jew Josef Davidson. She also
invited the well-known top Bolshevist Toller to lunch. She surrounds
herself with wounded bigwigs of Soviet Spain under whose orders
500,000 Spaniards were killed only because they were faithful to their
beliefs and their religion...

America today is not governed by men like Roosevelt, Ickes, etc.,
rather its fate is determined by the Jews who stand behind them, Jews
like Baruch, Frankfurter, Morgenthau, etc. They are the real rulers of
America, and Roosevelt, Ickes, etc., are only their tools. The fact
that this is known in America is evident from a variety of newspaper
articles. The "New York Daily News," for example, wrote that "the wave
of anti-Semitism in America has increased significantly in recent
weeks and months." The fact that the Jew Bernard Baruch, the
President's closest adviser, is called the unofficial president of the
United States is proof of this fact.

But enough of that. We refuse to interfere in the affairs of other
nations. We think that every country gets the Jews that it deserves.
But we demand the same principle be extended to us. Let Mr. Roosevelt
carry out his reforms and crusades in his own country. He will not
live long enough to do it all. We do not think we have yet seen
anything on the other side of the ocean that is worth imitating. We
think it not a sign of ability, rather of incompetence, that a nation
with such enormous resources and space, with all modern methods, finds
itself in such mass misery and is unable to do anything to alleviate
that misery.

Where would Roosevelt be if he had had to deal with the situation the
Führer faced when he took power in Germany? Mr. Roosevelt has
agricultural resources more than sufficient to feed the country, yet
his people are starving. His country has enormous resources, yet
millions are unemployed. There is only one conclusion to be drawn."

Topaz

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 9:14:11 PM6/29/10
to

Here is a quote from an article by Julius Streicher in 1944:

Der Stürmer, #23/1944, What is Americanism

"The family ties between hundreds of thousands of German families and
their American relatives led many to think that America would never
join a second war against Germany. Now that that has happened, many
Germans still believe that America will never allow Bolshevism to
conquer and destroy Germany. Recent events have proven how false and
dangerous this idea is. One has to be be foolish or irredeemably
stupid to believe that anything good can come to Europe from the land
of presumed opportunity. That did not happen after the First World
War, and will not happen after the second. The Jews have made America
what it is today: a nation raped by the Jews , a nation whose
130,000,000 people of many colors and races have been forced into
helping the Jews achieve world domination!"

Topaz

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 9:15:33 PM6/29/10
to

The Germans removed the Jews from ruling over them. That is what
America needs to do:


Here are some quotes from a German pamphlet titled "Why the Aryan
Law?"

"In 1793 the famous philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte, author of
"Speeches to the German Nation," wrote a pamphlet titled "A
Contribution to Correcting Judgments about the French Revolution." It
contained the following significant sentence:

"In nearly all the nations of Europe, a powerful, hostile government
is growing, and is at war with all the others, and sometimes oppresses
the people in dreadful ways: It is Jewry!"

The French Revolution, with its "ideas for the improvement of
humanity" thundered past, and in the noise the people who had believed
in world brotherhood entirely missed this serious warning. What Fichte
warned the word about then has today become fact in nearly all the
nations of the world. The Jewish people, once only tolerated, knew how
to raise a hue and cry about discrimination and persecution, winning
the sympathy of the world for the "poor Jews." They increasingly
infiltrated deep within our national organism, growing to have power
over every single area of our national life. The old saga, the "Edda,"
observes that one blocks a river at its source. The failure to do that
was the great mistake of the German people. Thank God, it is not too
late. Our Fuehrer Adolf Hitler recognized the importance of the
problem for Germany's rebirth, and outlined its solution in his
program.

Martin Luther wrote this of the Jews in his book "The Jews and their
Lies": "They hold we Christians captive in our own land. They have
seized our goods by their cursed usury, they mock and insult us
because we work. They are our lords, and we and our goods belong to
them." If in the coming days the Jewish race is driven out of the
non-Jewish world, it will have at least this consolation: It has made
clear to them for all time the value of maintaining the purity of race
and blood in clear, understandable and unforgettable ways.

National Socialist racial legislation has reduced the influence of
Jewry in all professions, and above all excluded them from the leading
offices of the nation. That is an important step in the relationship
between Germans and Jews, but one cannot ignore the fact that we have
not yet fully eliminated the influence of the Jewish foreign body in
German national life. It is not a question of German-Jewish
coexistence, rather of making as great as possible a separation
between blood and blood.
Three things are involved here:

A knowledge of the basic principles of National Socialist racial
thinking,
An understanding of the growth and expansion of Jewry,
The dominant sociological position of Jewry, to show how it dominated
the German people economically, intellectually and politically..."

"In discussing the Jewish Question, even today one encounters
resistance and misunderstandings, especially in intellectual circles.
This can only be explained by the intellectual education of the
political past. This is especially evident when one discusses the
fundamental issues.

Whenever a new thought arises in the world and calls people to
practical action, the old world resists because it feels its
foundations threatened. Its old standpoint has ruled for decades, and
it looks uncomprehendingly at a new idea that does not fit into the
accustomed patterns of thinking. That is natural. When the new idea
and worldview are truly revolutionary, they are on a different level
of human thought and feeling, and there can be no compromise. Its
realization depends on people who support it, and who are ready to
fight to transform the life of the individual and of the nation in
every way..."

"In the long run, no idea is better suited to guarantee peace between
nations than National Socialist racial thinking, which calls for the
furtherance and maintenance of one's own race and one's own people,
and supports similar efforts on the part of other nations..."

"The new Germany that views its own race and ethnicity positively must
therefore distinguish within its territory between one race and
another, between one people and another. Mixing of blood harms both
sides. Race is an issue for every people if they are to live according
to their nature. The German people is not so arrogant as to believe
that is is the chosen people. The familiar quotation from Geibel, "The
world should enjoy German ways," should be understood in the context
of the dreams of world betterment of those past days.

The National Socialist racial viewpoint has clear consequences for the
relationship between Germans and Jews. People have often said that
National Socialism's approach to the racial question is purely
negative and destructive, and that its essential characteristic is
radical anti-Semitism. One must grant that we made the Jewish question
clearer than anyone else, and taught an entire generation that had
been taught to see all people the same to recognize the importance of
the Jewish question not only for our people, but for the entire world.
Our treatment of the Jewish problem in the years before we took power
must be seen as the political education of the German people, which
had lost its racial instincts to a dangerous degree.

The question took on its own nature in Germany, Many citizens had
their eyes opened, and the simultaneous appeal to all the heroic and
manly virtues of the German man resulted in a racial selection of
political fighters who today stand at the head of the new state.
Formerly, the Jewish question, as seen by the state, was a matter of
complete equality and the unhindered immigration of Jews from the
East. This is the best proof of how racial feeling and consciousness
had been lost. Our tone was not purely negative or the simple
rejection of others, rather the emphasis was on the positive values of
our own people. This does require noting that Jewry through its
Marxist class struggle leadership role and its international financial
measures aimed at Germany supported every kind of anti-national action
in the cultural and political fields. Jewry should not complain if its
anti-German activities, which have no counterpart in any other
country, call forth from the people the defensive reaction of
anti-Semitism.

The starting point of the discussion is the scientific fact that the
Jew is different than the German. This is neither arrogant nor
boastful, it simply is the way things are. For us, the Jewish question
is a question between two peoples. Its characteristics are determined
by the racially determined differences between the two, and through
the unusual sociological and numerical development of Jewry in the
course of its history, developments that are particularly evident in
the last decades through a constantly growing process of foreign
infiltration that has reached an intolerable level for the German
people.

More than once over its history, the German people has absorbed
foreign elements, but they were racially identical or similar
population groups, as for example was the case with the Huguenots.
With the Jews, things are fundamentally different. They are seen
everywhere as foreigners, and see themselves that way as well. Walter
Rathenau said it most clearly as early as 1897: "How strange! In the
middle of German life there is a separate, foreign tribe that stands
out in every way with its hot-tempered behavior. An Asiatic horde has
settled on the sands of Mark Brandenburg." Einstein said something in
1931: "I have to laugh when I hear the phrase 'German citizen of the
Jewish faith.' These citizens first of all want nothing to do with my
poor Eastern European brothers, and second do not want to be sons of
my (Jewish) people, but only members of the Jewish cultural community.
Is that honest? Can a non-Jew respect such people? I am not a German
citizen. I am a Jew, and am happy to belong to the Jewish people."

The most remarkable thing about Jewry is that it has not disappeared
over the millennia, even though it lacks its own territory and
language. Even more remarkable is that it lacks the main
characteristic of a minority population, its own pockets of settlement
to which it could if necessary retreat. Only time will tell if
Palestine will someday fill this gap. That question is made more
difficult by the fact that the Arabs maintain their claim on
Palestine. Whatever the twists of history, the Jew has always remained
the same, whether as a grain speculator in ancient Rome or as a bank
or stock exchange potentate in the modern era. They were always able
to control the wealth of whole nations. Nations and peoples once their
contemporaries have vanished, leaving only words and crumbled
monuments behind; only the Jew remains. In ancient days we see him
carrying on his business in the trading centers of the Mediterranean.
In the Middle Ages he provided money for German nobles and free
cities. Today he rules the banks and stock exchanges of the whole
world, forcing the nations under the yoke of financial capitalism. The
power of this people of 15 million rests on these international
relations. This is how they seem to fulfill the commandment of Jehovah
- the world domination of the chosen people.
The secret of the Jewish people, which has enabled them to survive
through all of history's twists and turns, is that it has always
recognized the laws of blood, even anchoring them in the laws of its
religion. The consciousness of blood and family that believing Jews
have has been stronger than all the other forces of history, giving us
a unique example of a people without its own land and language, which
still meets the criteria for being a people, and which has outlasted
many other peoples.

This historic manifestation of Jewry, which is unique, brings to the
fore the question of the relationship between the host and guest
peoples. It has been answered in differing ways throughout history,
depending on the worldview and thinking then predominant.
Since the Jews were dispersed they have been held together by the laws
of their religion and their faith that they were the chosen people.
Until the middle of the 18th Century, Germans and Jews lived apart
from each other. The Jews had no opportunity to become involved in the
religious of political-intellectual life of their host people. On the
other hand, they could practice their own customs without
interference. They had their own religion and their own laws. During
the Middle Ages, the Ghetto was the way Jewry could maintain itself in
the midst of other peoples and fulfill its Jewish duties, which grew
out of its race, origins and laws. The values and ideals of other
peoples were not affected. This separation was only possible because
the views of the host people were as strong as those of the Jews.
According to the writer Grau: "There was no racial defilement or
baptism, no attempt to join a nation that one could never be a member
of, and no attempt to intellectually silence the host people." In the
Ghetto of the Middle Ages, the Jew developed his nature and
characteristics, which were later to become significant, while
maintaining the community of blood and race. The latter is
particularly important, since the strict physical separation between
the host and guest peoples maintained the foreign nature that we daily
see so clearly, now that the barriers between have long since fallen.

Even in the Middle Ages, the most important thing was not the
difference between the Christian and Mosaic faiths. Rather, there was
on the one hand the natural sense that the Jew was of a foreign race,
and on the other hand the strict law of blood which demanded a clear
separation if the Jews were to fulfill Jehovah's mission, which had
guided them from the beginning. Just this has always been kept in the
background by historians, who present the Ghetto as a tolerated asylum
for Jewish martyrs persecuted on account of their faith. There is a
gap to be filled here. The task of historians writing from our new
viewpoint will be to examine the portrait of the Ghetto of the Middle
Ages to discover its importance for the development of Jewry and the
relationship between the guest and host peoples. Even the Jewish side
is demanding that. O. Karbach criticizes historical writing because it
"in significant ways conceals the historical fact that the Jews in the
centuries before their emancipation possessed a legal standing that
was better than the greater part of the rest of the population, namely
complete or partial agricultural freedom. (Ordnung in der Judenfrage,
edited by E. Czermak, Reinhold, Vienna, 1933).

The barriers between Germans and Jews fell as a result of the
Enlightenment and the French Revolution. The path to Jewish world
domination would take a different direction than pious, observant Jews
had expected. Emancipation made it possible to build Jewish dominance
through secular means. With the disappearance of racial consciousness,
only religious differences seemed to remain. It seemed at the time
unjust to give someone a preferred position only because of his
religious beliefs, which are an entirely personal matter. At the time,
this was tied to a belief in human equality and freedom. It was
revolutionary. It shattered the church dogmas that had ruled for
centuries and was the foundation of liberal thinking during the last
two hundred years. The new goal was humanity itself, and nothing stood
in the way of racial mixing. Some had the quiet hope that assimilation
would mean the absorption of Jewry. Jewry itself, however, was more
than willing to use the opportunities of religious assimilation, which
opened the path to all important positions, even to political
leadership. As H. Heine said, "baptism was the ticket to European
culture." Gradually, an intermixing with the German people developed,
particularly in its cultural elite. Foreign blood infiltrated to a
degree that we realize only today now that the "Law to Reestablish a
Professional Bureaucracy" has exposed numerous sources of foreign
blood. This process has greatly accelerated during the last fourteen
years.

Today the age of raceless thinking is being displaced by the ideals of
human variability. Values are rooted in origin and territory, and each
group has a historic mission based on its own unique and eternal
values. Such new racial thinking will of course secure the opposition
of those who either through faith or reason still believe in the unity
of humanity in culture, social order and organization. The Jews will
naturally oppose any discussion of race, since the denial of any
significant differences between people is the foundation of his
infiltration of Western European society. The Jew finds any mention of
the racial question as an attack on his current existence. His leading
role in every anti-national area is characteristic of his mimicry, and
is necessary for his continued existence. That explains the phrase
"German citizen of the Jewish faith."

The recognition that the Jew is of a foreign and different race along
with the reawakening of German racial consciousness must necessarily
lead to a change in the relations between Germans and Jews.

There is one point to keep in mind before examining the statistics.
Only those people who claimed to be Jews and were members of the
Mosaic faith were counted as Jews, not those who for internal or
external reasons belonged to another religion, or those who claimed to
be dissident Jews and therefore did not belong to the standard groups.
This is regrettable for our purposes, since we are interested not in
the influence of those who still claimed the Jewish religion, rather
those who belonged to the Jewish race! That includes all Jews, whether
of the Mosaic faith or baptized Christians. That is just what the
supporters of the Talmud and the Old Testament always said. They
complained that the state opened all offices to those "without
character," to "Christmas Jews," even admitting them to the officer
corps! The statistics given here must therefore be increased
significantly. The Jews are a race, and baptism does not in any way
change the foreign characteristics that are hostile to the German
people..."

Of course, the intellectual atmosphere that enabled the Jew to
infiltrate the German body politic quickly led the Jew himself to see
that conditions for his advancement were favorable, and that the way
to the top was open. He also realized what the population statistics
meant, indeed they were particularly clear to him, since 2/3 of his
kind lived in the big cities, the centers of the liberal worldview..."

"Nothing shows the differences between our people and the Jews more
clearly than their likes and dislikes for certain occupations. In some
occupations, particularly those that are most important for the nation
as a whole, the foreign influence on German life has reached an
intolerable extent not seen elsewhere in Europe. The preference for
certain occupations also gives us an interesting insight into the
spiritual nature of Jewry.
The following figures show how much critical occupations in Germany
have been infiltrated.

112,188 Jews, or 58.8%, far more than half, are employed in the area
of "commerce and transportation, including restaurants and taverns,"
but only 17.11% (3,248,145) of the population as a whole. In the area
of "industry and craft work, including mining and construction,"
19,318 Jews (25.85%) were employed, including 31.82% of foreigners.
For the population as a whole, the figure was 40.94% (7,771,799).

The figures in the field of "public administration, the judiciary, the
army and navy, churches, legal professionals and the independent
professions." 11,324 Jews were employed there, or 5.94% , over against
921,048 (4.85%) in the general population..."
In 1925, 0.81% of Jews were active as civil servants and the army and
navy, as opposed to 2.3% of the general population. In the church,
religious occupations, the legal system and the other independent
professions, the Jewish percentage is 4.3% as opposed to 2% of the
general population. This shows that the Jews are over-represented when
compared to the general population, particularly in the independent
professions.

The percentage of the Jewish population in government positions may
seem less than that of the general population, but the difference is
not as great as the figures first suggest. The most recent figures,
not yet entirely complete, suggest that a not insignificant number of
them are baptized Jews or dissidents formerly of the Jewish faith who
denied their Jewishness to gain an official position.

4.35% of Jews are employed in the medical and health care system,
including welfare, and 2.0% of foreign Jews. The figure for the
general population is 1.88%. The Jewish percentage is thus 2 1/2 times
as high as that of the general population.

In summary, Jewish occupational patterns differ from those of the rest
of the population. Jewry seems to have an aversion to agricultural
work, industrial labor and crafts. They are greatly over-represented
in commerce and transportation, including the entire banking system.
They are also over-represented in the independent professions and the
health care system. These figures alone demonstrate a clear difference
between the native German population and alien Jewry.

Very similar conditions prevail in all Western European nations and
also in North America, since Jews have spread throughout the world in
areas with growing industry and in cities that are centers of economic
and financial power. It is not true, as is often claimed, that the Jew
was systematically forced into commerce by the laws of the various
nations; rather, commerce particularly suits the Jew's nature. This is
supported by Dr. Arthur Ruppin, a scholar respected by the Jews. He
writes in his book The Jews of the Present (2nd edition, Cologne and
Leipzig, 1911, p. 45):

"Thanks to their significant commercial gifts (!), the Jews soon
enjoyed great success in commerce and industry. For 2000 years they
have seemed predestined to work in commerce. It is false to claim, as
some do, that Jews became merchants primarily because the Christians
denied them other occupations during the Middle Ages. The Jews did not
become merchants in Europe, rather they entered the profession in
growing numbers ever since the Babylonian Captivity in Syria, Egypt
and Babylon [because they dislike labor and prefer to have others work
for them! The Editor]. In Palestine until the dispersion they did live
primarily by agriculture. In the Diaspora, there was hardly anywhere
that the Jews lived by agriculture. The Middle Ages did not make them
into merchants. It only affirmed legally that which history had
already established. It is after all the rule that economic laws
generally do not create new conditions, but only legalize and regulate
that which already exists. The law would never have limited the Jews
to commerce in Europe if they had not already immigrated primarily as
merchants..."

Nearly all national economists agree that the Jews owe their role as
merchants not to chance, but to their excellent abilities as
merchants. As W. Sombart wrote: "The Jewish race is by nature the
incarnation of the capitalism-mercantile spirit." (Der moderne
Kapitalismus, Vol. 2, p. 349. Leipzig, 1902). Many others agree..."

"Similarly differences in the relative proportion of Jews by the
self-employed are evident in the medical field, which employs 0.5% of
the general population but 2.8% of the Jews, nearly six times as many.

Similar statistics are found in the cultural area (theater, film,
radio, education, teaching, etc.). The 0.4% of the general population
are employed there, 2.6% of the Jews, also about six times as many.

In the area of public administration and the judiciary, the percentage
of Jews in high positions is 2.0%, over against 1.3% of the general
population, nearly twice as high. The significance of these figures
becomes clear that when one realizes that the 2.3% of professional
Jews in public administration and the judiciary are in a branch where
the Jewish percentage of employees is only 0.81%. That means that the
Jews are especially represented in the important positions that
influence the whole government and leading branches of the economy.."

"The statistics may be interesting. The Jewish workers included 11,406
in industry, 2,220 in commerce and transportation, and 726 in
agriculture.
The following figures show most clearly the different social structure
of Jewry in Prussia over against the general population, and reveal
clearly Jewry's leading role in public life:.."


"On 19 May 1933 Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler gave an interview to
Bernard Ridder, an American journalist for the New York State
Newspaper. Discussing the Jewish Question in Germany, he said: "Should
I allow thousands of German-blooded people to be destroyed so that the
Jews can live and work in luxury while millions starve, falling victim
to Bolshevism out of desperation?"

Can the justice of his words be doubted when one recalls that,
according to the Prussian census of 16 June 1925 6.9% of all
independent pharmacists, 17.9% of all independent physicians, 4.8% of
all independent artists, 27% of all independent attorneys, 4.6% of
editors, 11% of theater directors, 7.5% of actors, and 14.8% of all
independent dentists were Jews! And these huge figures when the Jews
were only 1% of the population! Is that anything other than a
Jewdification of our entire cultural system?! And what would these
figures look like if one had had the ability to include baptized Jews
and dissidents?..."


"Berlin is the Jewish metropolis in Germany. The process of
Jewdification is considerably further along. That is understandable,
since one is in the immediate vicinity of the protective arms of
democracy and social democracy, where developments can occur
unhindered. Thus in Berlin on 16 June 1925 32.2% of the pharmacists
were Jews, as were 49.9% of the physicians, 7.5 of the graphic
artists, 50.2% of the attorneys, 8.5% of the editors, 14.2% of the
directors and theater heads, 12.3% of the actors and 37.5% of the
dentists.

These figures cry out for legal limitations on Jewry, and it is
surprising that former governments did not take the appropriate action
to tell the Jews "this far and no further."
The Jewish influence gave the rest of the world an entirely false
impression of the nature of the German people. Inside the Reich, they
poisoned the soul of the people, and all social and political
relationships. Until the national uprising, the leaders of the
National Socialist movement were persecuted, defamed and suppressed by
a system that was a willing tool in the hands of a foreign and
different race. The national revolution freed the German people from
this foreign influence, which had also dominated and ruined the German
press and public life in significant ways.
He who wants to understand the German revolution of 1933 must
understand that it had this goal: 'Germany must be governed by Germans
for Germans.' The central idea of the National Socialist revolution
was the longing of the German people to once more be master in every
area of its own life. As a great, confident people, we demand only
this of the other peoples: that they permit us, as their equals, to
govern ourselves as we wish and find our own way to happiness (Reich
Minister of the Interior Dr. Frick)..."


"The Jewdification of our colleges and universities over the years has
reached almost frightening proportions. We begin with a publication
from 1931. Karl Hoppmann, in his volume "On the State of Jewdification
in the Academic professions" found the following figures:

1. University of Berlin:
Medical faculty . . . . over 50%
Philosophical faculty . . . . 25%
2. University of Göttingen, 32% of the professors were Jewish:
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 23.0%
3. University of Breslau
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.0%
4. University of Frankfurt (Main)
Legal Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55.0%
Philosophical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.0%
Mathematics and Natural Sciences . . . 28.0%
Medical faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.0%
Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28.0%

Jewry has a dominating role on the stock exchange. The board of the
Berlin stock exchange is almost exclusively Jewish. In the various
committees, the percentage of the Jewish race is sometimes many times
as high as the Aryan. The committees include:
That means that 117 or 147 members are Jews, or nearly 80%.
The extent of the Jewdification of German theater and film is evident
from 1931 figures. Of 234 theater directors, 118 (50.4%) were Jews, 92
(39.3%) were non-Jewish.
Berlin led in this area as well, with 23 of 29 theater directors (80%)
Jewish.
The situation in film is similar. The Viennese Catholic periodical
"Schönere Zukunft," which certainly cannot be accused of
anti-Semitism, wrote the following in its 3 February 1929 issue:

"The percentage of Jewry in today's film industry is so high, at least
by us in Germany, that there is only a tiny part left for Christian
firms."

Jewry has long sought political influence as well. This formerly
happened in covert ways, mostly through direct or indirect control of
money matters. Nearly every noble once had his financial Jew. Since
1848, the birth of political parties in Germany, Jewry has openly
sought to become a political power. The Jew Marx was the founder of
Marxist doctrine, the Jew Lassalle was the founder of the Social
Democratic Party. The founders of the Independent Social Democratic
Party of Germany were the Jews Bernstein, Haase, Kautsky, Hilferding,
Cohn, Davidsohn, Simon, Rosenfeld, Eisner, Levi, etc. Carl Liebknecht
and Rosa Luxemberg were the leaders of the Communist Party, and
recently the Jews Rosenfeld and Seydewitz founded the Socialist
Workers Party. Jews sat in the press offices and the various editorial
offices of party newspapers, and above all in the various
parliamentary factions..."

"We think it necessary to mention that the Communist wave that
threatened to destroy Germany politically, economically and
intellectually can primarily be traced back to Jewry.
Is it any wonder that the Jew is arrogant? The greater the Jewish
influence the more secure they feel, and the more ominously and
clearly their character and goals becomes clear: Pride, intolerance
and superiority on the one hand, a drive for world domination on the
other. Several pointed Jewish statements are examples:

Hochmut: The familiar "Dorfgeschichte"-Auerbach says: "We Jews are the
most intelligent race." "We are the chosen ones," says Dr. Berhard
Cohn (Jüdisch-Politische Streitfragen, 20, 22). He continues: "We may
carry our head high and demand particular respect. We must not only be
treated equally, but better. We deserve the particular respect of
other peoples."

Rabbi Dr. Rulf wrote a book ("Aruchas bar-Ammni," Israel's Healing,
Frankfurt a. M. 1883) in which he says: "The Jewish people is a
blessing for all peoples. The blessing has followed on the heels of
the Jews. A whole world lives from the Jews, who feed everyone, and
everywhere spread wealth and pleasure, comfort and prosperity. Only
the commerce of the Jews creates value. Work alone does not do that.
Half of the world's population would starve without the Jews."

The Jew Dr. Duschak wrote: "The world could not exist without the
Jews." The well-known Jew Sacher-Masoch explained the hatred of
anti-Semites against the Jews in this way: It is the same hatred a
Negro feels against the whites because of their superiority.
That the Jews even went so far as to suggest to Bismark that he make
the Jewish Day of Atonement a national holiday is certainly no sign of
modesty.

Intolerance: The Jew Klausner (Society, edited by Conrad, Volume 12)
wrote: "Anti-Semitism and criminality are nearly the same thing. There
are criminals who were not anti-Semites, but no anti-Semites who were
not criminals."

The work by Dr. E. Fuchs. "The Future of the Jews," (Berlin,
Philo-Verlag, 1924) judges our greatest historians, Hartmann and
Treitschke, who see the Jews as our misfortune: "Men blinded by
prejudice and hatred. Small, tiny men."

World Domination: The Jewish attorney Maurthner in Vienna said back in
the 1880's: "It is not just a matter of fighting anti-Semitism. We
want to oppose it with Jewish domination!"

They made the attempt. If the German people had not recovered their
senses at the last moment, and if they had not had a Fuehrer and
Chancellor named Adolf Hitler who recognized the danger and woke the
German people, we would have fallen into slavery. As we have already
noted, the Jew has always known how to rouse sympathy when things were
rough for him. Consider this report from the meeting of the PEN Club
in Ragusa at the end of May of last year: "Schalom Asch in his keynote
address noted that the suffering of the Jews in Germany had aroused
the sympathy of the entire world. Only the German government remained
untouched. He claimed the Jews has given Germany its deepest thoughts,
its most beautiful songs, its greatest poets, artists and
philosophers. Today one had crucified them in Germany and covered them
with their own blood." Mr. Schalom Asch began crying in the midst of
these outrageous lies. He spoke in the hope that his words would be
heard for the sake of justice and humanity throughout the world.
The Jew Asch cries! The German people are not moved. They want no
torture or persecution, but also no unjustified sympathy, only
justice! Remember always the worlds of Field Marshall Moltke: "The Jew
is a state within the state." Remember also the works of our great
historian Mommsen: "In antiquity too the Jew was the ferment of
cosmopolitanism and national decomposition." And remember Goethe: "The
Israelites have never done much; they possess few virtues, and most of
the deficiencies of other peoples!"

The Racial Question has an important role in the laws of other
nations, though other peoples and races are affected than in the
German Reich. It is in no way new or unusual that the German Reich is
active in this area. Contrary to opinions that surface here and there,
our laws are in no way directed against the Jewish religion, its
practice, or the freedom of the Jewish faith.

The German Reich has done nothing but introduce constitutional
legislation to provide the kind of civil service necessary to
guarantee the secure administration of the Reich. The laws do not
render it impossible for a citizen of a foreign state to become a
civil servant. Indeed, if he is appointed to such a position, he
receives full citizenship in the Reich. German civil servants should
however be of Aryan descent. The so-called Aryan Law requires that
each civil servant be of German blood. Since the vast majority of
non-Aryan civil servants were Jews, the first guidelines to the law
paid particular attention to those who were members of the Jewish
race. But we did not simply throw out the non-Aryan civil servants,
but retired them with honor and a pension. The people's state could
hardly proceed in a more legal and mild manner. Germany did not want
to attack Jewry wildly, rather only deal with its results, is clear
from the fact that the Law of 7 April 1933 left untouched all
non-Aryan civil servants who had been appointed before 1 August 1914,
and by the fact that the private sphere not affected. Some complain
that the law extends to half and quarter Aryans. The answer is that
the foreign influence in the civil service had grown to such a
dangerous extent that it was almost impossible for young Germans to
enter these professions." (Reich Minister of the Interior Dr.
Frick..."

*us*

unread,
Jun 29, 2010, 10:11:31 PM6/29/10
to

>... not aware ... insane...

Get well soon.

*us*

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 7:07:22 AM6/30/10
to
The Bush crime family never has been on the same side
as the USA. See "Reichstag Fire". 9/11 was an inside job.

Nobody gained more from 9/11 than Bush and Cheney.

drahcir

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 8:04:03 AM6/30/10
to

You know a big part of your problem is that you're just lonely.
Getting professional help will make you less repulsive to normal
people, and you might actually make a friend.

*us*

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 9:10:16 AM6/30/10
to

>...problem... just lonely.... repulsive to normal
>people...

Get well soon.

Topaz

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 12:36:53 PM6/30/10
to

Bush stated that we must "ensure that anti-Semitism" - that is,
any writings that Jews don't like - "is excluded from school
text books, official statements, official television programming
and official publications...." Thanks, G.W. It's good to know
what your priorities are. Can you imagine Bush or Powell or
Giuliani, as much as they hate free speech, ever calling for laws
to suppress criticism of White people or even of America? It's
not going to happen. Forget it. Yet, in the hushed tones usually
reserved for sacred words spoken in church, they piously intone
that words critical of Jews be eliminated or made illegal. They
intone these words at international conferences, paid for by you
the taxpayers, called into session specifically for the purpose
of ending criticism of Jews. How much more obvious does it have
to be, dear listeners? Powell and Bush and Giuliani have given us
such a crystal clear example of Jewish power over our "leaders"
that even the most dense should be able to 'get it.'

Do you think that the OSCE delegates were mainly concerned with
stopping physical attacks on Jews and not on suppressing freedom
of speech? Think again. The Dutch delegate to the conference,
Daan Everts, specifically cited "[racist] music [and] racist
slogans"-slogans! -- as 'problems' to be addressed by new
laws.

And Israel's chief representative at the conference, Avraham
Toledo, specifically called on member governments to make
'anti-Semitism' a criminal offense. That's where they are going
with this. It can't possibly be any more obvious. A more chilling
nightmare scenario could not have been penned by a science
fiction author characterizing the Jews as a parasitic alien
species who have invaded us and taken over the ruling class in
our societies, and who are slowly programming us to kill or
imprison any 'rebels' who question the new ruling class, worship
of which is gradually being introduced in our schools and
churches as a pseudo-religion to cement their power over us.

[ <http://tinyurl.com/etzr> ]

It's interesting that the Bush administration withdrew its
delegates from the UN-sponsored 'World Conference Against Racism'
held in South Africa in 2001 when it was discovered that Jews
would be criticized for their treatment of Palestinians there.
But they enthusiastically endorse-with the participation of
Powell, Giuliani, and even Bush himself-this conference in
Vienna in which the entire focus is criminalizing criticism of
Jews and Jews alone. Clearly, our captured rulers have no problem
with the concept of conferences on racism. But conferences that
criticize Jews, however mildly, are verboten. And conferences
that denounce critics of Jews and Israel are national and
international priorities. It's Jewish interests that are their
driving force at all places and at all times. Jewish interests.
Not American interests. Not White interests. Any people so
betrayed by its own alleged leaders will not long survive on
Earth.

On June 18th, Giuliani stated that when people characterize Jews
"in inhumane ways, and make salacious statements in parliaments
or the press" about Jews, they are "attacking the defining values
of our societies and our international institutions."

Just as he did in the United States a few years ago, Giuliani
went on to call for special punishment for anyone in Europe found
to have violated his proposed 'hate crime' laws, punishment far
more severe than for similar offenses when the motivation was not
found to be dislike of Jews. He specifically justified this
unequal punishment of those who criticize Jews on the basis that
crimes against Jews are "particularly heinous." Crimes against
Englishmen, crimes against Italians, crimes against Frenchmen,
crimes against Americans-well, they're just crimes. Crimes
against Jews require special punishment. They're "particularly
heinous." Conferences must be held and new laws must be passed.

Giuliani ...continues
as he tells us what the real function of law should be in a
'good' society of obedient goyim: "Yes, some will argue that hate
crimes need not be punished more harshly than similar crimes
committed for different reasons. But the fact is that extra
penalties are used throughout civilized legal systems - in Europe
as well as America - as a way to distinguish acts that are
particularly heinous. One of the functions of the law is to
teach, to draw lines between what's permissible and what's
forbidden."

[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7j3> ]

More chills for your spine, ladies and gentlemen. "...what's
permissible and what's forbidden" as defined by Rudy Giuliani and
his Jewish masters. We don't need Alfred Hitchcock or Stephen
King anymore, now that we've got Rudy and the Jews. Yes,
"...what's permissible and what's forbidden"-truth about the
Jewish criminal conspiracy that is destroying our race and
nations is forbidden. Freedom is forbidden. A free press is
forbidden. Jewish ascendancy in a society often ends this way...

Giuliani continues his sermon, letting us know that there can
only be one point of view and one sacred victim group in World
War II history: "Making sure their citizens have an honest
understanding of the Holocaust is vital, as revisionist
viewpoints put us at risk of a repetition of race-based genocide.
Schools must look at how they educate children regarding
tolerance and fairness. Universities, public officials,
advertisers and the news media should publicize the tremendous
contributions that Jews have made to European societies through
the years."

Giuliani states that his purpose with regard to the rising
awareness of Jewish power and Jewish crimes in Europe is to see
that this increased consciousness is 'turned around.' I quote
from his June 13 address at the State department after accepting
the OSCE 'commission': "Coming from New York City and having had
the experience of being mayor of the world's most diverse city,
you learn... the value of having a focus on hate crimes and hate
incidents.... And then focusing your attention on those places in
which you have to educate people or you have to deal with people
who are wrongdoers. And the fact that this organization is giving
attention to this at this level, I think is a very positive sign
that we will be able to deal with it at this stage and start to
turn it in the right direction."

[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7lu> ]

It's clear that Rudy Giuliani's political ambitions are far from
over. His brown-nosing of the Jews has reached a fever pitch. We
can expect the same from ambitious politicians like Hilary
Clinton and many others as 2004 approaches. Elections in the
United States have become more and more contests between cynical
lying hacks who compete for favorable media coverage by trying to
be more subservient to the Jews and to Israel than the next
cynical lying hack. This guarantees them good coverage and more
votes from the unthinking victims of media manipulation. The
Semitically Sycophantic rhetoric will be more heated than ever in
future elections, as it takes extreme statements to compete for
the Jews' favor with George W., who was willing to slaughter
Arabs and Americans by the thousands for them.

But, as the ambitions and the actions of the Jews become more
extreme, the awareness they are trying to suppress will start to
bloom all over Europe, all over North America, and everywhere
where they have set up their criminal conspiracy to harness our
people for their evil ends and to eventually eradicate our race
from the face of the Earth. That's the historical pattern. Jews
gain power in a society, abuse that power through arrogance and
hate, and eventually the oppressed people expel their oppressors.
But this time, the process is not limited to one country like
20th century Germany or 15th century Spain. The process is now
global. And, as we and the other peoples of the Earth realize
that our mutual needs for self-determination and for freedom from
Jewish domination coincide, the days of the Jewish cryptocracy
will be numbered.

Instead of a government that serves Jewish interests above all,
and serves other minority interests as long as they don't
conflict with Jewish interests, we must have a government that
serves White interests. Under such a government, our labor and
our tax dollars and our blood would be expended only when they
served future generations of Whites, not squandered on the
megalomaniac dreams of the self-Chosen or on breeding the biomass
that threatens to engulf us. The conferences we will convene will
hold lying White politicians like Rudy Giuliani to account, and
will focus on such issues as the genocides against Whites
committed by Jews in Europe during the last century, and on
righting wrongs like the sexual slavery of young White women and
girls being practiced now by Jewish criminal gangs in Israel and
elsewhere.

When we have a government which pursues White interests instead
of Jewish interests, we will be incomparably richer, incomparably
more secure, incomparably more technically advanced and powerful-and,
in terms of Nature's highest commandment, the protection
of our children and our posterity, incomparably more moral than
we are today

drahcir

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 1:12:06 PM6/30/10
to
On Jun 30, 9:10 am, * US * wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:04:03 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:11:31 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:49:44 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:37:58 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:56:35 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:41:14 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:18:37 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:30:12 -0400, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT), drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>On Jun 27, 6:56 am, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:28:20 -0700 (PDT), drahcir <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> >On Jun 25, 10:10 am, * US * wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:00:56 -0400, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> >> >... pitiful moron...
> >>>>>>>>>> >> You voted for the "Heir to the Holocaust" twice, didn't you.
> >>>>>>>>>> >...meds...
> >>>>>>>>>> Rush Limbaugh, is that you?
> >>>>>>>>>Yes. It's me. Except, it's not.
> >>>>>>>>Any difference?
> >>>>>>>Nothing. And everything.
>
> >>>>>>Your idols of the Bush crime family never
> >>>>>>renounced their fealty to Nazism.
>
> >>>>>They're not my idols I voted for Gore and Kerry.
>
> >>>>You'll need to get an actual vote if you don't want
> >>>>the neocons to keep betraying you.
>
> >>>>http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
>
> >>>... not aware ... insane...
>
> >>Get well soon.
>
> >...problem... just lonely.... repulsive to normal
> >people...
>
> Get well soon.

Poor fellow - not even bright enough to find the words to make a post.

*us*

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 1:55:32 PM6/30/10
to
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:36:53 -0500, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Bush stated that

He said that he's "born again", and that
Jews can't go to heaven, and that God
speaks through him.

He lies a lot.

*us*

unread,
Jun 30, 2010, 1:55:31 PM6/30/10
to

>... not even bright enough to find the words to make a post...

You are pitied.

Topaz

unread,
Jul 1, 2010, 8:27:20 PM7/1/10
to


John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."

John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"

2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"

Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."

Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."

John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."

*us*

unread,
Jul 1, 2010, 10:11:29 PM7/1/10
to
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:36:53 -0500, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Bush stated that

He said that he's "born again", and that
Jews can't go to heaven, and that God
speaks through him.

He lies a lot.

His lies get many people harmed.

M_P

unread,
Jul 2, 2010, 2:58:08 PM7/2/10
to
"Then that Samaritan woman saith to him: 'How dost thou, being a Jew,
ask of me
to drink, who am a Samaritan woman?' [...] Jesus saith to her: [...]
'we adore that which we know; for salvation is of the Jews.'" - John
4:9,21-22

Topaz

unread,
Jul 3, 2010, 7:54:46 AM7/3/10
to
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:58:08 -0700 (PDT), M_P <m...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:

John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."

Topaz

unread,
Jul 3, 2010, 7:53:53 AM7/3/10
to

The Riddle of the Jew's Success
F. Roderich-Stoltheim (T. Fritsch)

This rare and valuable book provides a detailed analysis of Jewish
behavior and thinking. A reprint of the English-language edition of
1927. After Germany's defeat in 1945, this book was banned by the
Allied occupation authorities, and nearly all copies were destroyed.
Written by the influential German publicist Theodor Fritsch, it
appeared under a pen name. This book helps in understanding the scope
and intensity of anti-Jewish feeling in Germany during the 1920s and
1930s.


Here are some quotes:

"When in the year 1890, a petition was sent from the anti-Jewish camp
to a number of Imperial and local authorities, containing the request
that a commission of independent savants should be appointed, whose
duty would be to examine carefully the passages in dispute, in not a
single instance was the request granted. The Prussian Ministry of
Culture dismissed any such step as 'impracticable'. If one compares
the thoroughness with which the morality of the Jesuits has been and
is still discussed in public, one if forced to accept the view, that
the zealous friends of truth and opponents of those, who work in an
obscure and devious manner, know how to restrain their zeal for
enlightenment in a truly remarkable way so far as the Jews are
concerned.

The position is thus a very peculiar one. This much is established:
The German national representative bodies and governments have given
the Jews equal civic rights, and have recognized them as a separate
religious community, without making any inquiry whether the moral
instruction of the Jews is compatible with the welfare of the state."


"Many people consider themselves very clever when they impart advice
to the merchant, who complains he is unable to hold his own against
the Jews: do the same as the Jew! In reality this amounts to the
following: do not recognize any religious motives whatever in your
mode of doing business, and descend to the level of a low
money-grubber and voluptary.
The economic principle of the Jew threatens to trample under foot, in
our time, all the higher principles of life."

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages