TOP HOUSE NEGROES - Rack Jite
Rack Jite
TOP "HOUSE NEGROS" IN AMERICA
Gary "I'm White" Franks (Rep R-CT)
J C "I'm Whiter than Gary Franks" Watts (Rep R-OK)
Uncle Clarence "Long Dong" Thomas (Supreme Court-MD)
O J Simpson (Murderer - CA)
Alan Keyes (Disgusting Piece of Human Dung - DE)
Ken Hamblin (Rabid Right-wing Talk Show Host - CO)
Charles Barkley (Right-wing NBA millionaire - TX)
Walter Williams (Right-wing Limbaugh Sub Host - VA)
James Merideth (Nitwit Jesse Helms employee - NC)
Armstrong Williams (Right-wing Talk Show Host - C0)
Ward Connerly (California voice of ending Affirmative Action - CA)
Thomas Sowell (Rabid Right-wing intellectual - USA)
Tony Brown (Conservative Commentor of PBS’s Tony Brown’s Journal -
USA)
The term "House Negro" evolved from the pre Civil War vernacular
"house nigger" which was used to define those black slaves who kissed
the slave owners butt for personal gain so they could live in the big
house rather than suffer in the fields. The term was used along with
"Uncle Tom" throughout that Century and into this one. The most
popular term today is "Oreo" from the black cookie with the white
filling.
In doing some research to get the states right for the above little
ditty, I used the AltaVista search engine on the net. When I typed in
"Walter Williams" up came one of the most glowing articles ever
written about this repellent right-wing gunloon from Hell. I mean, it
was like he was a God to these people. When I got to the end of the
article I decided to hit the GO MAIN icon to see the organization and
author of the piece. A gigantic confederate flag popped up on the
screen. It was The Southern Defense Initiative website who authored
the article. The preface of the site stated that the organization was
in no way racist or bigoted, that they were only concerned with
Southern Heritage. So I clicked on the SDI CONTRACT icon to learn just
how absurd I knew that preface to be. Here are just a few of their
commandments:
I. Incorporation of the Confederate Battle Flag in the state flags of
the eleven ex-Confederate states.
VII. Repeal of the Voting Rights Act.
XII. A national holiday on Robert E. Lee's birthday or as an
alternative, repeal of laws making the birthdays of Columbus and
Martin Luther King, Jr. holidays.
Next I hit their SDI HEROES icon, five were listed.
Nathan Bedford Forrest
Stonewall Jackson
Robert E. Lee
Denmark Vesey
Clarence Thomas [NO KIDDING! Gosh!]
What a yuck! :)
---
While Political Correctness concerns nonjudicial, nonbinding
moaning and groaning, Conservative Correctness concerns the
click of safeties and jail cell doors.
--->Conservatively Incorrect - http://www.c2.org/~ccrj/<---
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
Joel <joe...@ix.netcom.com> was saying...
*x-no-archive: yes
*
*rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite) wrote:
*>TOP "HOUSE NEGROS" IN AMERICA
*>
*>Gary "I'm White" Franks (Rep R-CT)
*>J C "I'm Whiter than Gary Franks" Watts (Rep R-OK)
*>Uncle Clarence "Long Dong" Thomas (Supreme Court-MD)
*>O J Simpson (Murderer - CA)
*>Alan Keyes (Disgusting Piece of Human Dung - DE)
*>Ken Hamblin (Rabid Right-wing Talk Show Host - CO)
*>Charles Barkley (Right-wing NBA millionaire - TX)
*>Walter Williams (Right-wing Limbaugh Sub Host - VA)
*>James Merideth (Nitwit Jesse Helms employee - NC)
*>Armstrong Williams (Right-wing Talk Show Host - C0)
*>Ward Connerly (California voice of ending Affirmative Action - CA)
*>Thomas Sowell (Rabid Right-wing intellectual - USA)
*>Tony Brown (Conservative Commentor of PBS’s Tony Brown’s Journal -
*>USA)
*>
*>The term "House Negro" evolved from the pre Civil War vernacular
*>"house nigger" which was used to define those black slaves who kissed
*>the slave owners butt for personal gain so they could live in the big
*>house rather than suffer in the fields. The term was used along with
*>"Uncle Tom" throughout that Century and into this one. The most
*>popular term today is "Oreo" from the black cookie with the white
*>filling.
*
*How can you write this racist crap? Are you jealous of these peoples' *success? This just proves that it's really the left that's racist.
Okay Joel, calmly and LOGICALLY explain how any of that above is
racist. Keep in mind also, that the above mentioned Blacks advocate
policies no different than the public policies of David Duke and the
Ku Klux Klan.
Your turn, no go ahead.
What is at issue here is not racism. Its what you call political
incorrectness and what I call conservative incorrectness.
So you going around defining others as racist I presume you are
a strong advocate of the Civil Rights movement and Affirmative Action.
Right?
Norman Nithman
In article <330E18...@ibm.net>, Al Ridemfi <a...@ibm.net> wrote:
>> From rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite)
>> Organization Conservatively Incorrect
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> TOP "HOUSE NEGROS" IN AMERICA
>>
>>
>> The term "House Negro" evolved from the pre Civil War vernacular
>
>Without a doubt this is one of the most racist posts I have seen on
>the usenet (and I've seen some real whoppers here, from those on the
>left and those on the right). The idea that blacks cannot and should
>not be conservative is as bigoted as any. Does this mean that blacks
>must not think for themselves and not wander from the reservation?
>THAT is racism.
>
Blacks can and do think for themselves. But there's something about
a black "conservative" sucking up to the most racist elements in the
country - such as Hamlin and WEW. I wouldn't put all these guys in that
category. The real black conservatives are people like Farrakhan.
>Clearly, the author of this post has TOO MUCH free time on his
>hands.
>
Indeed.
Here's another "House Negro" you'll be hearing about. Keith B.
Richburg apparently is an overseas correspondent for the Washington
Post. He's just come out with a book, "Out of America," that's
just loaded with hateful rhetoric directed at black Africans
_and_ black Americans. Here's a "sample."
Co-conspirators. In Africa, there's a lot of that same backward-looking
attitude. In both cases, you're left with black people wallowing in a
safety net of dependency. In that sense, I guess some of the old African
tyrants are right--there really is a white conspiracy that keeps black
people down. Only it's not the conspiracy they're thinking of, but it's even
broader and more insidious. What I'm talking about is the grand
conspiracy of silence, a collective willingness, of white people in the
West to bury their heads when the talk turns to Africa. Of course blacks,
too, are unindicted co-conspirators. Here I'm talking about those
self-anointed spokesmen who purport to represent all of black America. They
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
make their ritual demands for ever increasing foreign aid to these
corrupt little black potentates. They have even now begun trumpeting the
call for "reparations" to African countries for the past crime of
slavery--even though the traditional African rulers of the time were the ones
rounding up the slaves for the white traders. All of this talk skirts
the real issue--the need for a critical re-examination of independent
Africa's internal failings.
What's missing is the straight talk.
Don't worry, Keith. Ruth Shalit will be your friend now.
>"Why does it seem that the more laws we pass, the less love we
> have?" -- Rev.JC Watts, Response to the State of the Union, 2/4/97
>
I wub you, Julius.
--
r /tmp/x
Norman Nithman n...@tezcat.com http://www.tezcat.com/~nrn
"Colleges cannot succeed by becoming circus tents or psychiatric centers
for over-privileged, under-disciplined, irresponsible children of the
well-to-do blase permissivists." - Spiro Agnew
Joel
rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite) spewed:
>
>Okay Joel, calmly and LOGICALLY explain how any of that above is
>racist.
>Keep in mind also, that the above mentioned Blacks advocate
>policies no different than the public policies of David Duke and the
>Ku Klux Klan.
Oh they do? I'm sure you're right, why last night I saw Thomas Sowell and Charles Barkley burning a cross in a black family's yard. And do you really think Thomas Sowell is rabid?
>Your turn, no go ahead.
>
>What is at issue here is not racism. Its what you call political
>incorrectness and what I call conservative incorrectness.
>
>So you going around defining others as racist I presume you are
>a strong advocate of the Civil Rights movement and Affirmative Action.
>Right?
You can assume I'm against discrimination based on race and thus opposed to affirmative action.
Joel
Joel
x-no-arhicve: yes
Sh...@GayPride.com wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Feb 1997 00:32:45 GMT, Joel <joe...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>>You can assume I'm against discrimination based on race and thus opposed to affirmative action.
>
>O.K. how about this, will you support making racial discrimination a
>felony punishable by 5yrs in prison? I support AA but will trade it
>for making racial discrimination a felony. Will you join me?
>
>Shawn Smith
I'll favor making it easier to sue for damages
in civil court for racial discrimination. Making
discrimination a felony with a 5 year sentence is
out of line with the severity of the offense.
Joel
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
Joel <joe...@ix.netcom.com> was saying...
*>Okay Joel, calmly and LOGICALLY explain how any of that above is
*>racist.
*>Keep in mind also, that the above mentioned Blacks advocate
*>policies no different than the public policies of David Duke and the
*>Ku Klux Klan.
*Oh they do? I'm sure you're right, why last night I saw Thomas Sowell and Charles Barkley burning a cross in a black family's yard. And do you really think Thomas Sowell is rabid?
No no no. You are a poor reader. I said the PUBLIC policies of David
Duke and the Klan. Not what they talk about in private, but what they
say in their public position papers. Now try it again using your head
rather than your teeny weeny.
---
While Political Correctness concerns nonjudicial, moaning and groaning,
Conservative Correctness concerns the click of safeties and jail cell doors.
-----------------------------
Cyndi Bakke
Don't you think this is a little out of line? What about freedom of
association? Why can individuals not be allowed to make whatever
judgement about employing whatever individuals (or housing them) as they
see fit? It seems to me that this would eventually work out to putting
out of business those who would deny their business associations on the
basis of irrational prejudices about skin color, as such businesses are
put at a disadvantage when competeing with other businesses which have
more rational hiring practices?
The whole process seems to create a situation in which everyone is
afraid and offended all of the time.
I certainly think that race-based hiring is generally not very admirable
behavior. But like adultery, although I would not do it as I believe
that it is wrong, I would not legislate against it. It denies the
individual essential freedoms...the freedom to make right choices as
well as wrong ones in ones personal and professional life.
An individual who chooses to do something because it is wrong is much
more admirable than an individual who chooses to do something because it
is illegal. By making such laws, how do we ever judge whether our
society is moral or is just being coerced by laws. And if we cannot
make such distinctions, how can we ever hope to improve our people?
Cyndi Bakke
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
*Don't you think this is a little out of line? What about freedom of
*association? Why can individuals not be allowed to make whatever
*judgement about employing whatever individuals (or housing them) as they
*see fit? It seems to me that this would eventually work out to putting
*out of business those who would deny their business associations on the
*basis of irrational prejudices about skin color, as such businesses are
*put at a disadvantage when competeing with other businesses which have
*more rational hiring practices?
Been there, done that... It was called JIM CROW, it lasted for 100
years... This is not some libertarian fantasy land we are living in,
this is perhaps the most racist nation on Earth. GET A CLUE.
---
*
*The whole process seems to create a situation in which everyone is
*afraid and offended all of the time.
*
*I certainly think that race-based hiring is generally not very admirable
*behavior. But like adultery, although I would not do it as I believe
*that it is wrong, I would not legislate against it. It denies the
*individual essential freedoms...the freedom to make right choices as
*well as wrong ones in ones personal and professional life.
*
*An individual who chooses to do something because it is wrong is much
*more admirable than an individual who chooses to do something because it
*is illegal. By making such laws, how do we ever judge whether our
*society is moral or is just being coerced by laws. And if we cannot
*make such distinctions, how can we ever hope to improve our people?
*
*Cyndi Bakke
*
Cyndi Bakke
Sh...@dis.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 1997 13:17:53 -0600, Cyndi Bakke <cba...@inforel.com>
> wrote:
>
> >An individual who chooses to do something because it is wrong is much
> >
>
> I know lets make it leagal to sell all women named Cyndi to slave
> owners, and then we will know who the good guys are. Ok Cyndi?
I suppose I would have to change my name.
I am not suggesting that the constitutional rights of our citizens be
violated. For federal or state governments to allow slavery to exist
would be a clear violation of our constitutionally guaranteed rights. I
certainly never suggested that anyone be enslaved.
But it is both offensive and incorrect to equate Ignorant Red-neck Joe
Gas Station owner who doesn't like to hire black people 'cause they're
different then us white folks' to an individual who would enslave any
other human being. The latter I think might very well deserve a penalty
of death in a civil society. The former is just a petty ignorant old
guy, from whom I wouldn't choose to buy gas.
-Eleanor Bakke (just to play it safe.)
bwe
rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite) writes:
(snip)
>Been there, done that... It was called JIM CROW, it lasted for 100
>years... This is not some libertarian fantasy land we are living in,
>this is perhaps the most racist nation on Earth. GET A CLUE.
>---
Rack, your efforts are urgently needed in Rwanda. Please keep
us posted on your findings. When you're done there, we have work
for you in a few other countries. We'll look forward to your
report on fantasies when you get back.
Cyndi Bakke
Sh...@dis.com wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 00:22:51 -0600, Cyndi Bakke <cba...@inforel.com>
> result of a few whites who just don't wanna hang with blacks.
You are a pretty bold guy to claim that the only reason that there are
African ghettos in the inner cities is because a few white guys don't
like to spend time around blacks.
The fact is the city, state, and federal governments must claim a large
share of the responsibility for our urban problems.
The American city used to be a very mixed area with poor and rich,
blacks and whites living in a very close vicinity to each other. I
think that there are a number of reasons why this has changed.
The federal govenment provided guaranteed housing loans to middle class
whites who did not want to live in cities near black folks. Some cities
(like Chicago) encouraged through economic policies members of specific
ethnic groups to live in specific areas. The property and business tax
rates combined with the rising crime rates in the cities drove
businesses and people to emigrate to the suburbs. Federally sponsored
welfare programs with perverse incentives afected urban blacks in great
percentages. Generations of hopeless poor were created. (Look at the
black family before government welfare. Though facing prejudice and
oppression from those in power, black families were strong and moral.
Their schools were effective in teaching them skills of reading and
writing; in fact, many were way over-qualified for the few jobs that
were available to them. They were some of the most honest and
hard-working people in the United States; they worked together to
accomplish a great many great things in a very short time. One of the
most significant accomplishments was to convince many in the white
majority that they and their problems were conditions worthy of public
debate.
I truly believe that had the government not become involved blacks and
whites would have come to terms with their prejudices against
eachother. Both groups could have grown beyond the immoral practice of
slavery and race-based judgement. Unfortunately, in the 60s, in an
attempt to hurry the process that was actually already taking place
federal meddling made the problem much worse.
But like they say, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
(is it safe yet to call myself...)
Cyndi Bakke