S. Shawn Smith returns? Keith "Bow Wow" Jackson Howls In Fear!
Patrick L. Humphrey
In article <33ebbd70...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net> volt...@worldnet.att.net (Jim Kennemur) writes:
>On 17 Jul 1997 22:35:59 GMT, hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E.
>KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:
>>Keith Jackson (s...@sig.I.hate.spam) wrote:
>>: Sounds like S. Shawn Smith, 36 year old high school dropout attending
>>: UT Austin, has returned.
>>Do you have something against high school dropouts getting an education
>>later in life? Perhaps he wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth
>>like you country club Republicans.
>"Poor Keith, He cain't hep it. He was born with a silver spoon up his
>tight ass."
Ah, yes...you *can't* resist the opportunity to show everyone that you still
can't debate at any level above that of an eight-year-old. Is that all you
can do, Jimbo?
>Didn't Ann Richards say that about Aggies?
No, that was a manufactured quote by a certifiable idiot in the Fort Bend
County suburbs of Houston named Jim Kennemur. See how easy that was?
>>If you want to be an elitist snob, you should probably go to some other
>>school. Aggies aren't exactly known to be intellectual giants. There's
>>more of them at UT-Austin.
>Yep. Those Tea-Sips are a lot smarter than the dog dumb Aggies.
What's the matter, Jimbo...get turned down by both schools? (And to think
you're less than 30 miles from a school that's got a better track record than
either of those two...matter of fact, this particular school has two Nobrl
Prize winners sitting on the faculty right now. :-)
--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
sa...@allophone.com
>On 17 Jul 1997 22:35:59 GMT, hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E.
>KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:
>
>>Keith Jackson (s...@sig.I.hate.spam) wrote:
>>
>>: Sounds like S. Shawn Smith, 36 year old high school dropout attending
>>: UT Austin, has returned.
>>
>>Do you have something against high school dropouts getting an education
>>later in life? Perhaps he wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth
>>like you country club Republicans.
Keeffy can't stand the fact that I went to school, got a degree and am
now working as a programmer. Look at Keeffy, he is still playing the
professional student game.
>"Poor Keith, He cain't hep it. He was born with a silver spoon up his
>tight ass."
Partly true, from what Farmer John told me them donkeys got Keeffy a
bit loosened up, if you know what I mean.
>Didn't Ann Richards say that about Aggies?
>
>>If you want to be an elitist snob, you should probably go to some other
>>school. Aggies aren't exactly known to be intellectual giants. There's
>>more of them at UT-Austin.
Aggies are known for, what was it? Oh yeah, dogs, well sex with dogs
that is.
>Yep. Those Tea-Sips are a lot smarter than the dog dumb Aggies.
>
> Jim
>
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
§abo
±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±
"The surest guide to the correctness of the
path that women take is joy in the struggle.
Revolution is the festival of the oppressed."
Germaine Greer (Australian feminist writer)
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
Been peeking in his windows again?
---
I suppose I can understand the selfish callous disregard
of conservatives, it's their pride in it that passes me by.
--------------------------------------------
Conservatively Incorrect http://www.dragonfire.net/~RJ/
Patrick L Humphrey
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>Been peeking in his windows again?
No, that's YOUR m.o., Dave. It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had
FOUR phone lines listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually an
apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire family
from a house to a cracker-box apartment...
--PLH, in other words, an educated conjecture
Patrick L Humphrey
In article <33dca5aa...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@allophone.com writes:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:13:43 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>Jite) wrote:
>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>>Been peeking in his windows again?
>Problem is Pat is proud of his stalking.
So tell me, S. Shawn -- how am I supposed to be proud of something that never
existed, again?
I'm having trouble trying to figure that little detail out.
--PLH, guess it's just not my day
Christopher Morton
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:13:43 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>Jite) wrote:
>
>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>
>>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>>
>>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>>Been peeking in his windows again?
>
>It appears he's been peeking through the wrong windows. My wife is in
>the next room reading.
Is her Asatru name "Bekkhild"?
Is the National Alliance web page still your "ideological source"?
---
Gun control, the theory that Black people will be
better off when only Mark Fuhrman has a gun.
Christopher Morton
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:04:11 GMT, volt...@worldnet.att.net (Jim
Kennemur) wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 05:45:26 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:13:43 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>>Jite) wrote:
>>
>>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>>
>>>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>>>
>>>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>>>Been peeking in his windows again?
>>
>>Problem is Pat is proud of his stalking.
>>
>>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>§abo
>>±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±
>
>Rack. I would like to request a repost of your excellent essay on
>Patti Humphrey, "The Spandex Biker."
Klansman, I would like to request a repost of your despicable
endorsement of the Nazi gun control law, in which you cited the
National Alliance web page as your "ideological source".
>Could you do that for us?
Could you do that for us?
Christopher Morton
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 05:45:26 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:13:43 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>Jite) wrote:
>
>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>
>>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>>
>>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>>Been peeking in his windows again?
>
>Problem is Pat is proud of his stalking.
As proud as you are to pretend to be a Black woman so that you can
advocate racial discrimination and police brutality against Black
people Shawn?
How long will it take before you turn tail and run THIS time Shawn?
You're a coward.
You'll run.
You always do.
Christopher Morton
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>
>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>
>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>Been peeking in his windows again?
Didn't you send him email about it?
Do you still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
and "honest"?
What do you find "polite" about calls to deport all Jews?
What do you find "honest" about Holocaust revisionism?
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
*>PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
*>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
*>Been peeking in his windows again?
*No, that's YOUR m.o., Dave. It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had
*FOUR phone lines listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
*sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually an
*apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire family
*from a house to a cracker-box apartment...
How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
move? Gosh, if you are going to deny being the USENET SQUEALER AND
STALKER, yer gonna have to do a better job of it.
Patrick L. Humphrey
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@brazos.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) was saying...
>*>PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>*>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>*>Been peeking in his windows again?
>*No, that's YOUR m.o., Dave. It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had
>*FOUR phone lines listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
>*sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually an
>*apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire family
>*from a house to a cracker-box apartment...
>How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
>move? Gosh, if you are going to deny being the USENET SQUEALER AND
>STALKER, yer gonna have to do a better job of it.
How do I know about his phone lines? Well, Dave, there's this little thing
called a phone book. You ought to have your wife show you how to use it some
time. The size of his apartment? I can't say for sure how big it is -- but
the address at which your pal Kennemur was listed just happens to be one I've
seen a few times before, from having come back from the beach that way...and
it ain't exactly the high-rent part of the metro area.
I'm *never* going to convince you that I'm not some stalker, Dave -- but then,
you made your mind up about that years ago, and it's pretty obvious that you
don't want to be bothered by facts to the contrary. I'll let you handle the
work of proving that you're just a raving loon out in the suburbs who's trying
to get back at me for no other reason than that I remember you using your real
name -- David Dahlman, ya know? :-) -- on a BBS we were both on *fourteen
years* ago. For crying out loud, no one gives a damn about your mental
problems, Dave. Get over it and get on with your life, whatever it may be.
--PLH, or get run over...you make the call.
Patrick L. Humphrey
In article <33dbde6a...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@allophone.com writes:
>On 20 Jul 1997 11:51:30 -0500, pat...@brazos.rice.edu (Patrick L
>Humphrey) wrote:
>>In article <33dca5aa...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@allophone.com writes:
>>>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:13:43 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>>>Jite) wrote:
>>>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>>>*--PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>>>>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>>>>Been peeking in his windows again?
>>>Problem is Pat is proud of his stalking.
>>So tell me, S. Shawn -- how am I supposed to be proud of something that never
>>existed, again?
>>I'm having trouble trying to figure that little detail out.
>Gosh Pat, who other than you knows how many phone lines Jim has and
>where he lives, where he moves, if one home is a house and another is
>an apartment. Yer soooooooo fucking sick it is scary.
You're so predictable -- and just plain *lame* -- it's boring. I'll have to
give you credit for NOT forging quotes from me this time, though.
Anyone who has a phone book and lives in Houston (i.e., who has any
familiarity with certain parts of the metropolitan area) can deduce what I
have -- and there are four and a half million people here, so maybe I wasn't
the first one to put two and two together, eh?
Of course, I also know something else that you don't -- my information is only
current to about April of last year, so for all I know, your little buddy
Kennemur could have moved somewhere else by now, and even kissed and made up
with the wife, who knows? It sure is fun just mentioning what I *did* know
about him back then, though, just to watch idiots like you and Kennemur give
yourselves away everytime you can't control your knees jerking in lockstep.
>>--PLH, guess it's just not my day
>For stalking, no.
Not too surprising, since I don't stalk. I can see where you'd have trouble
figuring that out, though.
--PLH, who'll still be in Dallas next weekend, for reasons having nothing to
do with S. Shawn and his mental problems
Christopher Morton
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 22:01:47 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
Jite) wrote:
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@brazos.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) was saying...
>
>*>PLH, life's been downhill for Kennemur since the wife dumped him, I guess
>
>*>How do you know his wife dumped him Stalker?
>*>Been peeking in his windows again?
>
>*No, that's YOUR m.o., Dave. It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had
>*FOUR phone lines listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
>*sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually an
>*apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire family
>*from a house to a cracker-box apartment...
>
>How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
Do you still consider the neo-Nazis of the National Alliance "polite"
and "honest"?
---
Patrick L Humphrey
In article <33f1f46d...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@allophone.com writes:
>On 20 Jul 1997 23:40:02 -0500, pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
>wrote:
>>--PLH, who'll still be in Dallas next weekend, for reasons having nothing to
>>do with S. Shawn and his mental problems
>Go to any town my dial up is in, but stay the fuck out of Austin, and
>stay the fuck away from my home or your ass is toast.
Or you'll do what? Whine some more?
Real clever, S. Shawn -- trying to convince people you call a Dallas dial-up
from Austin. Dale and I will visit Austin when we feel like it, and since we
won't know where you lived, when you *did* live there, we're not going to
worry about the ravings of a 36-year-old who hasn't gotten it into his pointy
little head yet that he has *no* ability at telling believable lies.
--PLH, I foresee a couple of trips just in October
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
*>How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
*>move? Gosh, if you are going to deny being the USENET SQUEALER AND
*>STALKER, yer gonna have to do a better job of it.
*
*How do I know about his phone lines? Well, Dave, there's this little thing
*called a phone book. You ought to have your wife show you how to use it some
*time. The size of his apartment? I can't say for sure how big it is -- but
*theaddress at which your pal Kennemur was listed just happens to be one I've
*seen a few times before, from having come back from the beach that way...and
*it ain't exactly the high-rent part of the metro area.
Why would you be looking up his address? And are you saying you just
happened to drive by the same address one day by chance? :)
See it from I45 did ya... What a disgusting little squealer/stalker
you are... Got any friends left at all Squealer? Well besides Keith
Jackson! :)
Patrick L Humphrey
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>*>How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
>*>move? Gosh, if you are going to deny being the USENET SQUEALER AND
>*>STALKER, yer gonna have to do a better job of it.
>*How do I know about his phone lines? Well, Dave, there's this little thing
>*called a phone book. You ought to have your wife show you how to use it some
>*time. The size of his apartment? I can't say for sure how big it is -- but
>*theaddress at which your pal Kennemur was listed just happens to be one I've
>*seen a few times before, from having come back from the beach that way...and
>*it ain't exactly the high-rent part of the metro area.
>Why would you be looking up his address? And are you saying you just
>happened to drive by the same address one day by chance? :)
>See it from I45 did ya... What a disgusting little squealer/stalker
>you are... Got any friends left at all Squealer? Well besides Keith
>Jackson! :)
Why would I look up anyone's address, Dave? You may now proceed to whine that
I continuously post his address and phone number multiple times a day, never
mind that I've never done that to anyone -- and if I saw it from the Gulf
Freeway, that only proves how little you *do* read when it comes to what I
say. Where did I say I'd seen where Jimbo lives from I-45, again? (Hint: I
don't live on YOUR side of town, Dave...therefore, I have more options of
getting to and from the Island than you do.)
Your delusions notwithstanding, I've more friends than you'll ever be able to
stand, and what you think about it is, at best, irrelevant. If you want to
continue to show all of Usenet what a petty, vindictive little man you are,
that's your choice.
--PLH, should I tell him about those folks in North Dakota who think Dahlman
needs a stay in the room with rubber walls? :-)
Christopher Morton
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>
>*>How do you know about his phone lines? Size of his apartment, and his
>*>move? Gosh, if you are going to deny being the USENET SQUEALER AND
>*>STALKER, yer gonna have to do a better job of it.
>*
>*How do I know about his phone lines? Well, Dave, there's this little thing
>*called a phone book. You ought to have your wife show you how to use it some
>*time. The size of his apartment? I can't say for sure how big it is -- but
>*theaddress at which your pal Kennemur was listed just happens to be one I've
>*seen a few times before, from having come back from the beach that way...and
>*it ain't exactly the high-rent part of the metro area.
>
>Why would you be looking up his address? And are you saying you just
Why would Jim KKKennemur mailbomb my postmaster trying to have my
service cut off?
Do you still consider neo-Nazis "polite" and "honest"?
Christopher Morton
On Mon, 21 Jul 1997 03:57:54 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:43:38 GMT, cm...@nwohio.com (Christopher
>Morton) wrote:
>
>>I a Klansman, would like to counter that with my repost of
>>an endorsement of the Nazis, also I cite the
>>National Alliance web page as my "ideological source".
>
>Mort is one sick white man.
I figure after about the 20th attempt, you'd be able to successfully
fake a quote... if you had human intelligence, Skinhead Shawn.
Did the Japanese-Americans have a duty to go into those racial
concentration camps?
Christopher Morton
On Mon, 21 Jul 1997 05:33:50 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>On 20 Jul 1997 23:40:02 -0500, pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
>wrote:
>
>
>>--PLH, who'll still be in Dallas next weekend, for reasons having nothing to
>>do with S. Shawn and his mental problems
>
>Go to any town my dial up is in, but stay the fuck out of Austin, and
>stay the fuck away from my home or your ass is toast.
How quaint, an impotent threat from a eunuch.
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
*Real clever, S. Shawn -- trying to convince people you call a Dallas dial-up
*from Austin.Dale and I will visit Austin when we feel like it, and since we
*won't know where you lived, when you *did* live there, we're not going to
*worry about the ravings of a 36-year-old who hasn't gotten itinto his pointy
*little head yet that he has *no* ability at telling believable lies.
*--PLH, I foresee a couple of trips just in October
Why is it so important to you to pinpoint the city people are from?
What difference does it make if the guy is from Austin or Dallas TO
YOU. And why is every message you type either squealing someone's
name, the city they are from, how many phones they may have, what
their neighborhood is like, threats of visiting them or where you
travel around the state?
Every message I see from you just reeks of LOSER & STALKER.
Why is it so important to you to have people believe you are a
stalker? Are stalkers really that cool?
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
*Of course,I also know something else that you don't--my information is only
*current to about April of last year, so for all I know, your little buddy
*Kennemur could have moved somewhere else by now, and even kissed and made up
*with the wife, who knows? It sure is fun just mentioning what I *did* know
*about him back then, though, just to watch idiots like you and Kennemur give
*yourselves away everytime you can't control your knees jerking in lockstep.
All that is being given away is you and your decade long obsession
with squealing, invasion of privacy and stalking other users.
I fail to understand why you think doing those things are so CUTE...
Who else thinks its cute? A couple deranged right-wing lunatics like
Beck, Morton, Giwer, Discipio and Jackson...
HAVE YOU A CLUE SQUEALER?
But I suppose there is a bit of logic in what you do. Being the abject
loser you are, you can only attract other abject losers to be pals
with... You do a swell job of that at least Squealer...
Remember SOAPBOX ROCK?? :) You jumped in bed with the most disgusting
right-wing gang of fascist loonies and netscabs to every grace a
modem! Giwer, Gentile, Laverty, Grynspan, Majewski. You jumped naked
in bed with this gang of fascists and what did you get? After they got
done banning and deleting all the liberals, the DELETED YER ASS TOO!
After ya sucked up to them for a year! Yer just so damn STUPID! :)
The dangdest stupidest dang nitwit I ever did come across. Really, you
are... Sometimes I actually fall off my chair reading yer dumb
travelogues, bikings and staking threats...
What a hoot you are... Yer gonna be like this till ya die too aina ya
Squealer? hehe... Gosh... Well its not so dark for ya I guess... You
got Morton (hehe) and Jackson (geesh) and BECK! (WOW!)
Patrick L. Humphrey
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@brazos.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) was saying...
>*Real clever, S. Shawn -- trying to convince people you call a Dallas dial-up
>*from Austin.Dale and I will visit Austin when we feel like it, and since we
>*won't know where you lived, when you *did* live there, we're not going to
>*worry about the ravings of a 36-year-old who hasn't gotten itinto his pointy
>*little head yet that he has *no* ability at telling believable lies.
>*--PLH, I foresee a couple of trips just in October
>Why is it so important to you to pinpoint the city people are from?
It isn't. You're the one that thinks I *must* attach some importance to it.
Where they live isn't going to make any difference to me, unless they're
somewhere near where I am -- meaning, for 50 weeks of the year, the greater
Houston area. Then, it *might* mean something to me. It very rarely does,
though, save in a few cases that even you are aware of by now. :-)
>What difference does it make if the guy is from Austin or Dallas TO
>YOU. And why is every message you type either squealing someone's
>name, the city they are from, how many phones they may have, what
>their neighborhood is like, threats of visiting them or where you
>travel around the state?
Dave, those are only the messages you allow yourself to see. You've spent
FOURTEEN YEARS convincing yourself that that's all I do, and despite my
repeated attempts to convince you that you're nuttier than a fruitcake, your
mind's already made up, and you're not going to let anyone confuse you with
facts. I'd suggest, though, that if you're going to continue trying to
impotently libel me by claiming things about me that even you know aren't
true, please provide some actual, documentary PROOF. Not your usual bullshit
that you try to pass off as proof, either -- I'm talking proof that would
stand up in a court of law. Since you're accusing me of criminal actions,
wouldn't it make sense to know just what you're setting yourself up for?
I suspect that's why you've NEVER followed through on any of your
not-so-subtle threats to get "the police" involved -- because you *know*
you're talking out the other end of your alimentary canal, and maybe because
your local PD is already well aware of your reputation.
>Every message I see from you just reeks of LOSER & STALKER.
You seem to think that everyone else thinks just like you, Dave. Be extremely
thankful that not everyone shares your mental problems.
>Why is it so important to you to have people believe you are a
>stalker? Are stalkers really that cool?
YOU believe I'm a stalker, Dave. You have consistently refused to provide any
proof of your claim for fourteen years, now. Therefore, I'm not threatened by
the actions of an admitted liar named David F. Dahlman, because it's quite
obvious that you know you're lying.
I don't stalk, but I *do* mock -- and that's what you can't stand, you
miserable little 51-year-old. Grow the hell up and start acting your age,
will you?
--PLH, tired of Dahlman's obsession with me, to say nothing of his fourteen
years of psychotic bullshit
Rack Jite
Hey Shawn, note this reply from Squealing Humphrey the Stalker:
*Whywould I look up anyone's address, Dave? You may now proceed to whine that
*I continuously post his address and phone number multiple times a day, never
*mind that I've never done that to anyone -- and if I saw it from the Gulf
*Freeway, that only proves how little you *do* read when it comes to what I
*say. Where did I say I'd seen where Jimbo lives from I-45, again? (Hint: I
*don't live on YOUR side of town, Dave...therefore, I have more options of
*getting to and from the Island than you do.)
*
*Your delusions notwithstanding,I've more friends than you'll ever be able to
*stand, and what you think about it is, at best, irrelevant. If you want to
*continue to show all of Usenet what a petty, vindictive little man you are,
*that's your choice.
*--PLH, should I tell him about those folks in North Dakota who think Dahlman
*needs a stay in the room with rubber walls? :-)
See, all anyone has to do is tweek him enough to get him to post, and
whatever he does post is so lame, so stupid, and has LOSER blinking
out at about 200 decibels, nothing else really needs to be done! :)
Its the same with most of these little right-wing or looneytarian
netscabs, just get em to POST and they are just such godawful 2pid
asocial little ying-yangs, they havent a clue as to what they sound
like...
This guy sure is top notch, in all my time at this I have never seen
anyone who does such a good job of showing himself to be an abject
loser... Boggles the mind... How could he not see it????
They sure like to dish out the lies and libel but they sure go nuts
when it someone kicks it back hey! :) Fun to watch... That hypocrisy,
that double standard, that one way street they all so happily live on
is one of the predominate features of.... THE NATURE OF THE BEAST. :)
See you in the ngs, good to have you back kicking these bozos... :)
Christopher Morton
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:55:25 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>Our arguments for libearl politics is so correct and strong that some
>gunnut libertarians seem to react with such threats. I consider it
Your arguments for White supremacism are stupid and inept. Your
mailbombing and harrassment of postmasters buys you nothing save the
need to find new ISPs periodically.
>My new hangout "Soc.Culture.African.American.Moderated"
And will you be portraying there a Black woman who wants to join the
Aryan Nations?
Christopher Morton
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:54:12 GMT, sa...@allophone.com wrote:
>Yeah, he has a white supremacist who pretends to be black, he has a
>pathological liar, and a freaked out LSD casualty, as pals. Whew.
What are you going to pretend to be in scaa-mod, Schutzstaffel Shawn,
a human being?
You surrendered. Now run away, coward.
Christopher Morton
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>
>*Of course,I also know something else that you don't--my information is only
>*current to about April of last year, so for all I know, your little buddy
>*Kennemur could have moved somewhere else by now, and even kissed and made up
>*with the wife, who knows? It sure is fun just mentioning what I *did* know
>*about him back then, though, just to watch idiots like you and Kennemur give
>*yourselves away everytime you can't control your knees jerking in lockstep.
>
>All that is being given away is you and your decade long obsession
So, David Dahlman of Seabrook, Texas (Rack Jite, Muy Groso,
Curmudgeon, Stratosfear, Outman), do you still consider the neo-Nazis
of the National Alliance "polite" and "honest"?
---
Patrick L. Humphrey
>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>*Of course,I also know something else that you don't--my information is only
>*current to about April of last year, so for all I know, your little buddy
>*Kennemur could have moved somewhere else by now, and even kissed and made up
>*with the wife, who knows? It sure is fun just mentioning what I *did* know
>*about him back then, though, just to watch idiots like you and Kennemur give
>*yourselves away everytime you can't control your knees jerking in lockstep.
>All that is being given away is you and your decade long obsession
>with squealing, invasion of privacy and stalking other users.
Yep, same old Dave Dahlman robotic response. Looks more to me like someone
across town from me has a fourteen-year obsession with getting *anyone* to
believe his outright hallucinations about me.
Boy, Dave, all I can say is, it must really suck to be you. I'm glad I'm
*not* you.
>I fail to understand why you think doing those things are so CUTE...
I fail to understand why you think you know I'm bothering with you. You
haven't been right once yet, and this time is no exception, either.
>Who else thinks its cute? A couple deranged right-wing lunatics like
>Beck, Morton, Giwer, Discipio and Jackson...
>HAVE YOU A CLUE SQUEALER?
You obviously don't, Dave. You're *still* trying to dictate to me who my
friends are, after all these years, and you still act (yes, it's only an act,
Dave; I know what you're trying to do) pissed when I ignore your malicious
speculations and go on with my life.
>But I suppose there is a bit of logic in what you do. Being the abject
>loser you are, you can only attract other abject losers to be pals
>with... You do a swell job of that at least Squealer...
...says the obsessed fanatic who, by his own admission, has never made *any*
attempt to contact me (yeah, right), yet feels he knows more about my personal
life than I do. Got any other fairy tales to tell the kids tonight, Dave?
>Remember SOAPBOX ROCK?? :) You jumped in bed with the most disgusting
>right-wing gang of fascist loonies and netscabs to every grace a
>modem! Giwer, Gentile, Laverty, Grynspan, Majewski. You jumped naked
>in bed with this gang of fascists and what did you get? After they got
>done banning and deleting all the liberals, the DELETED YER ASS TOO!
Of course, you went to a lot of effort to present your carefully-edited
version of the whole story -- funny how you carefully erased any identifying
details like dates and times, eh? -- and you *still* use it to beat on when
you think I'm not acting as you believe I should.
>After ya sucked up to them for a year! Yer just so damn STUPID! :)
I know why I was there. You still don't, and never will. Get over it.
>The dangdest stupidest dang nitwit I ever did come across. Really, you
>are... Sometimes I actually fall off my chair reading yer dumb
>travelogues, bikings and staking threats...
...which just goes to show that you're way too easy to amuse, Dave, but that's
no surprise.
>What a hoot you are... Yer gonna be like this till ya die too aina ya
>Squealer? hehe... Gosh... Well its not so dark for ya I guess... You
>got Morton (hehe) and Jackson (geesh) and BECK! (WOW!)
No, *you've* got them. I pick my own friends, and I don't give much credence
to the ravings of an angry 51-year-old who thinks he can tell me who I know
and who my friends are.
--PLH, yes, I *will* always be dismissing your bullshit, Dave...so get over it
and get on with life, or continue to be ignored by most of cyberspace. It's
your call.
Patrick L. Humphrey
In article <kj3f903...@news.tamu.edu> s...@sig.I.hate.spam (Keith Jackson) writes:
>In article <szk90yu...@bermuda.io.com>, at 26 Jul 1997 02:24:08 -0500,
>Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> muttered:
>>Nice try, S. Shawn, but it doesn't work. Dave can be mind-bogglingly stupid
>>at times, but I think even he can tell the difference between e-mail and
>>Usenet.
>Too bad for him he couldn't tell the difference between e-mail sent
>to OUTMAN and e-mail sent through the same anonymous service to the
>address ji...@ix.netcom.com -- but of course, we all know that's because
>OUTMAN mapped to ji...@ix.netcom.com and Dave was stupid enough to
>confirm that fact by posting e-mail sent to OUTMAN.
I said even Dave can usually figure out the difference between Usenet and
e-mail...but with as many aliases as he's tried to use, it's not too
surprising that he'd screw up and forget to know which one he was supposed to
be using at any given time. I like to think of it as just one more advantage
of being honest and taking the easy way out -- using one's own real name is a
way of doing that. :-)
>>Otherwise, he'd be posting his e-mail a lot more often than he
>>has...and something tells me he'd be a lot quieter than he is.
>He was certainly quiet for about a month after his OUTMAN fiasco.
>
>:-)
You'll get no argument from me about that...now, if we could but devise
another way to produce a similar response by him, we'd be getting somewhere
towards making Usenet a better place. :-)
--PLH, who's keeping it short after getting home from Dallas at 2:15 this
morning :)
Rack Jite
Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
*You'll get no argument from me about that...now, if we could but devise
*another way to produce a similar response by him, we'd be getting somewhere
*towards making Usenet a better place. :-)
*
*--PLH, who's keeping it short after getting home from Dallas at 2:15 this
*morning :)
Ah, were you up late. Gee... Went to Dallas on your world travels?
Cool. You forget to mention Dale and Hockey! So did you go right to
bed when you got home? Dont leave us hanging like this Squealer! :)
Patrick L. Humphrey
(This post is being slightly hijacked. Deal with it, Dave and S. Shawn.)
In article <33df835e...@news.mindspring.com> sa...@git.com writes:
>On Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:01:26 GMT, rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack
>Jite) wrote:
>>Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
>>pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey) was saying...
>>*You'll get no argument from me about that...now, if we could but devise
>>*another way to produce a similar response by him, we'd be getting somewhere
>>*towards making Usenet a better place. :-)
>>*--PLH, who's keeping it short after getting home from Dallas at 2:15 this
>>*morning :)
>>Ah, were you up late. Gee... Went to Dallas on your world travels?
>>Cool. You forget to mention Dale and Hockey! So did you go right to
>>bed when you got home? Dont leave us hanging like this Squealer! :)
Nah. I like seeing *you* hanging, Dave...preferably from a tree. The cool
thing is, you're doing it to yourself, by yourself. I just get to watch.
>I wonder if they had coffee on the ride home??? God, I really need to
>know. ROTFLOL, at one boring mutha fucka: Pat the Drug Addict
>Stalker.
...who is *so* boring that S. Shawn can't keep from using his pals to find my
posts, so he can respond to them...despite having allegedly killfiled me.
That really takes a whole lot of courage, S. Shawn.
--PLH, who drove home, and doesn't drink coffee, anyway