OH! My God! Hitler Was RIGHT! HELP HELP HELP HELP
Paminifarm
Dear God, what have we done!
The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
Oh! Please! Oh! Please! Forgive us sweet Jesus.
We shouldhave listened to Hitler.
When they take our guns, they will do the same to us as they
are doing to Palestinians. Please Help us! Help us! Help us!
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Truth Will Set You Free (John 8:32),
So Get Some At The Famous "urls" Page:
http://paminifarm.bravepages.com/urls.html
Also Add Your Link To The "urls" Page
Andy Carol
<nos...@newsranger.com> wrote:
> What have we done!
> Dear God, what have we done!
>
> The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
>
> Oh! Please! Oh! Please! Forgive us sweet Jesus.
> We shouldhave listened to Hitler.
>
> When they take our guns, they will do the same to us as they
> are doing to Palestinians. Please Help us! Help us! Help us!
Those monsters! They've descrated the birth place of the Lord of Peace
and Charity. How much more about love and forgiveness could we have
learned if not for them?
May they writh in eternal damnation for doubting his words about Grace
and Love.
His gentle peace-filled message should be a rallying call so that we
can utterly destroy them and their kind. They should be whipped until
they accept his gift of forgiveness and salvation.
Death to those who will not love!
<sarcasm mode off>
--- Andy
betweentheeyes
Chris Morton
>
>What have we done!
>Dear God, what have we done!
>
>The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
You don't have a saviour, just a fuehrer.
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
Che'Gu Maru
news:Xxjs8.11021$15....@www.newsranger.com...
> What have we done!
> Dear God, what have we done!
>
> The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
>
> Oh! Please! Oh! Please! Forgive us sweet Jesus.
> We shouldhave listened to Hitler.
>
> When they take our guns, they will do the same to us as they
> are doing to Palestinians. Please Help us! Help us! Help us!
> HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
Now, don't pee in your pants. By the way, supposed a man who'd raped and
murdered a 5 year-old girl ran into a church while being pursued by police.
Would you expect the cops to stop and say, "Well, he's in a church so we
can't touch him." Or would you expect them to follow and blow his ass away
if he resisted?
Same thing. You're conveniently (and deliberately) ignoring the Palestinian
gunmen who ran into the church and in effect took the other people inside
hostage (otherwise, why aren't those other people leaving?). And the
Israelis aren't bombing the church; they are simply shooting at the gunmen
inside.
Oh, yeah. In case you forgot, when you condemn ALL Jews, you are also
condemn the person you claim to worship as an avatar of god. Jesus was
born, lived, and died as a Jew. (He actually was named Yeshua, usually
directly transliterated into "Joshua" in English. The Greeks didn't have a
"Yuh" sound at the beginning of words, and didn't end male names with an
"a", so they changed the "Yuh" into a "Juh" and dropped the "a" at the end.
In that way "Yeshua" became "Jesu," and by the time it arrived in England,
"Jesus.")
Bet you didn't know you were a Jew-worshipper, did you, boy?
Chris Morton
It's what Nazis always do.
After over ten years of total failure in recruitment here, they STILL waste
their time.
M. L. Davis
Dear God, what have we done!
The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
I did not know they were bombing Hitler's birthplace.
-*MORT*-
Chris Morton
Maybe he means they're bombing the home (or jail cell as the case may be) of Roy
Radow? : )
ken...@shangrila.net
Paminifarm wrote:
Gee, maybe if someone takes the top couple of hundred feet off it
we'll find something useful like a coal seam.
Douglas Berry
> What have we done!
> Dear God, what have we done!
>
> The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
LOL! You mean the place that sharp operators have being fleecing
tourists with for a few centuries. The town of Bethlehem didn't even
exist in that spot 2000 years ago!
> Oh! Please! Oh! Please! Forgive us sweet Jesus.
> We shouldhave listened to Hitler.
Hitler hated Christianity, too.
> When they take our guns, they will do the same to us as they
> are doing to Palestinians. Please Help us! Help us! Help us!
IT'S TOO LATE!! DO THE HONORABLE THING, LIKE HITLER DID IN THE
BUNKER, BEFORE THEY GET YOU!!!
*snicker*
talk.politics,guns snipped by request.
--
Douglas E. Berry grid...@mindspring.com
http://gridlore.home.mindspring.com/
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
Bo
where do you see these people ?
These people are Gods people.
May they wake up ten generations after the slaughter.
so the Jews will wake up soon. I hope so!
<ken...@shangrila.net> wrote in message
news:3CB20EB6...@bellatlantic.net...
William Mullin
Reread your Bible - Jesus was born in a stable, not a church.
The fact that armed criminals are holed up inside requires an
armed response.
>HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
The Lord helps those who help themselves. Stop snivelling.
Michael Ejercito
> In article <X6ms8.195806$af7.99007@rwcrnsc53>, "M. says...
> >
> > What have we done!
> >Dear God, what have we done!
> >
> >The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
> >
> >I did not know they were bombing Hitler's birthplace.
>
> Maybe he means they're bombing the home (or jail cell as the case may be) of Roy
> Radow? : )
What would Roy Radow do to pass the time in jail?
Michael
Ninure Saunders
-"Paminifarm" <nos...@newsranger.com><snip>
-Why did you crosspost to Talk Politics Guns?
Because you will not get an answer from him/her, he/she posted to t.p.h
because he/she is a Troll.
Troll: Comes from the verb "to troll," which means to fish by trailing a
baited linefrom behind a slowly moving boat.
A troll is someone who makes a post deliberately intended to generate more
heat than light, baiting readers and seeing who will respond
intemperately.
+--------------+
| PLEASE |
| DO NOT |
| FEED THE |
| TROLL |
+--------------+
| |
| |
..\|..|/..
Usenet troll
------------
Climate/Terrain: Any Usenet newsgroup (Also "Any IRC channel", as they
frequent IRC as well.)
Frequency: Common
Organization: Thread
Activity cycle: Any
Diet: Lusers
Intelligence: Low (3-5)
Treasure: None
Alignment: Chaotic evil (neutral)
No. Appearing: 1
Armour Class: n/a
Movement: 'c'
Hit Dice: 100
THAC0: n/a
No. of Attacks: n/a
Damage/Attack: n/a
Special Attacks: See below
Special Defenses: See below
Magic Resistance: 100%
Size: Exists as mental force only
Morale: Elite (14)
XP Value: 1,800
The Usenet troll (Trollicus useneticus bloodyirritatingus) is an
evil mental parasite found in all areas of Usenet, where it preys upon the
brains of lusers (Homo stultissimus). Most clueful people avoid these
creatures, since Usenet trolls know no fear and attack unceasingly,
demanding responses from their prey.
Usenet trolls, unlike most trolls, are immune to flames (Flammae
useneticae), which is unfortunate, as most will try to attack them with
these first. In fact, when a troll is attacked with flames, it will
actually be able to use these flames to create more, which it
will hurl back at its unfortunate attacker. Long-lived trolls may be able
to render an entire newsgroup uninhabitable with all the flames it
creates.
The only form of attack a troll has is its ability to incite
responses, which it needs to feed from; hence, the best way to defend
yourself against a troll is simply to ignore it. Deprived of nourishment,
it will soon starve.
Ancient legends (found in The Book of 1036) hint that a Usenet troll
may be vulnerable to the Spell of Cancellation, but this powerful
incantation would have to be applied swiftly after the troll's birth; once
engaged in battle, few survive unscathed.
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/ninure
The world's second most subversive document
http://www.geocities.com/ninure/declaration.html
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
Chris Morton
meje...@marvelonline.net says...
I think he spent a lot of time policing up hygene products from the shower
floor. : )
Paul Thomas Ivy
Addressing only the points below.....
> <snipped>
>
> Now, don't pee in your pants. By the way, supposed a man who'd raped and
> murdered a 5 year-old girl ran into a church while being pursued by police.
> Would you expect the cops to stop and say, "Well, he's in a church so we
> can't touch him." Or would you expect them to follow and blow his ass away
> if he resisted?
>
At many points in religious history the answer is "Yes", the cops
would stop and not enter the church.
The only exception might be if the rapist started shooting from the
church.
> Same thing. You're conveniently (and deliberately) ignoring the Palestinian
> gunmen who ran into the church and in effect took the other people inside
> hostage (otherwise, why aren't those other people leaving?). And the
> Israelis aren't bombing the church; they are simply shooting at the gunmen
> inside.
>
If the Palestinians were not shooting (or killing the other persons in
the church), then it would be reasonable to surround the church, but
not enter.
> <snipped>
Note - I have NO sympathy for the Palestinian terrorists, and disagree
with the original poster's anti-Jewish sentiments.
Andy Carol
Thomas Ivy <seco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@mail.hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> news:<a8sm2e$2pse$1...@news.hal-pc.org>...
>
> Addressing only the points below.....
>
> > <snipped>
> >
> > Now, don't pee in your pants. By the way, supposed a man who'd raped and
> > murdered a 5 year-old girl ran into a church while being pursued by police.
> > Would you expect the cops to stop and say, "Well, he's in a church so we
> > can't touch him." Or would you expect them to follow and blow his ass away
> > if he resisted?
> >
>
> At many points in religious history the answer is "Yes", the cops
> would stop and not enter the church.
>
> The only exception might be if the rapist started shooting from the
> church.
>
> > Same thing. You're conveniently (and deliberately) ignoring the Palestinian
> > gunmen who ran into the church and in effect took the other people inside
> > hostage (otherwise, why aren't those other people leaving?). And the
> > Israelis aren't bombing the church; they are simply shooting at the gunmen
> > inside.
> >
>
> If the Palestinians were not shooting (or killing the other persons in
> the church), then it would be reasonable to surround the church, but
> not enter.
Now, instead of a church imagine it was a music store. Would the same
rule apply?
--- Andy
betweentheeyes
Beg to differ ...by posting to all reply NGs a simple question, 'why did you
cross post' makes the other news groups aware of the cross posting (most
don't look at the headers when they reply). This has a beneficial two fold
effect.
Some will immediately recognize the trolling activity based on the amount of
crossposting and will not join in the flame war. This would be a success if
just one person who would other wise post decides not to post. My
experience says it is more successful than just one.
Second win is if the question is posed early enough in the thread, it has at
times distracted the troll to engage me as to the reason for the off topic
post and effectively killed the thread with only three posts (the original
one, my question and then the troll's response). Big Big win for you and I,
no win for the troll.
As I have stated before, the best would be for everyone to ignore the troll,
but some can not resist engaging in a flame war, which is exactly what the
troll wants.
How do you kill a flame war? So far I consider my successful at it.
Feel free to test my hypothesis, it works better than half the time.
Joseph Lovell
Paminifarm wrote:
<<large snip of strange post>>
> http://paminifarm.bravepages.com/urls.html
> Also Add Your Link To The "urls" Page
What an excentric performance!
Joseph
Allan Lindsay-O'Neal
>
> The jews are bombing the CHURCH, the birth-place of my Saviour.
>
Once again you missed it, fool. WHO broke into the church? WHO took
hostages in the church? WHO is using the church as cover?
THE PALESTINIANS, you idiot.
Alex Vange
http://stormfront.org http://www.natvan.com/
www.spearhead-uk.com www.whitecivilrights.com
"Douglas Berry" <grid...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:ici4bustpsacrr21l...@4ax.com...
>
> Hitler hated Christianity, too.
>
One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that the
party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
"The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
" But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest
antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged-the nation, because it was held
to be an invention of the 'capitalist' class (how often I had heard that
phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in the
hands of the bourgeosie for the exploitation of the working masses; the
authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the
proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the people, so as to exploit
them afterward; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish docility. There
was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.
"At first I remained silent; but that could not last very long."
"And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the
will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am
defending the handiwork of the Lord."
"Was not the Press instrumental in bringing in a state of moral
degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to
look ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally our
people also became modernized?"
"It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic principles
underlying ecclesiastical teaching increased steadily in violence. And yet
this human world of ours would be inconceivable without the practical
existance of a religious belief. The great masses of a nation are not
composed of philosophers. For the masses of the people especially, faith is
absolutely the only basis of a moral outlook on life."
"And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His
estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those
enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God"
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity in
getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began gradually to control
public life in its entirety."
Of religion he (the Jew) makes a mockery. Morality and decency are
described as anti-quated prejudices"
"Anyhow, the Jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and
Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts content, while the
enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up his sleeve."
"the Jew trafficked in the freedom of the nation and sold our country
to the masters of international high finance. So in our day he has succeeded
again, this time by raising ructions between the two German religious
denominations while the foundations on which both rest are being eaten away
and destroyed through the poison injected by the international and
cosmopolitan Jew."
"The most devoted Protestant could stand side by side with the most
devoted Catholic in our ranks"
"The National Socialist Movement must see to it that at least in our
own country the mortal enemy is recognized and that the fight against him
may be a beacon light pointing to a new and better period for other nations
as well as showing the way of salvation for Aryan humanity in the struggle
for its existance."
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist Party
Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism in
Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham, Dr.
Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of a notary
public, members were requested to register their declaration of withdrawal
from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the fight for atheism was
carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the withdrawals from the German
Evangelical Churches alone amounted to two-and-a-half million persons in
Germany. The programme which these atheistic societies laid down in regard
to sexual matters is amply charcterized in the following demands publicly
expressed at meetings and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with the
crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of charge in
State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard to
marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be educated by
the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to be
granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the wilful
destruction of the nations and their civilization and the substitute of
barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world movement?
Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted this ensemble
into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it prevail in other
countries? The answer to these question discloses the actual secret of our
anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight against Jewry; for the
Bolshevic International is in reality nothing less than a Jewish
International."
VOELKISCHER BEOBACHTER, 24 March 1933, Page 1
[Hitler's Speech at second meeting of the Reichstag of 1933, on
23 March 1933, asking for the adoption of the Enabling Act.]
"While the Government is determined to carry through the political and
moral purging of our public life, it is creating and insuring
prerequisites for a truly religious life. The Government sees in both
Christian confessions the most important factors for the maintenance of our
folkdom. It will respect agreements concluded between them and the States.
However, it respects that its work will meet with a similar appreciation.
The Government will treat all other denominations with equal objective
justice.
It can never condone, though, that belonging to a certain denomination
or to a certain race might be regarded as a license to commit or tolerate
crimes. The Government will devote its care to the sincere living together
of Church and State."
Hitler said in a speech in Berlin on March 23, 1933 "The Reich
government sees in Christianity the unshakable foundation of the ethics and
morality of the folk."
In a speech delivered April 12, 1922, published in "My New Order," and
quoted in "Freethought Today" (April 1990), Hitler said:
"For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on
my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the
week they have only for their wages wretchedness and misery. "When I go out
in the morning and see these men
standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe
I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I
did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom
today this poor people are plundered and exploited."
Ninure Saunders
<aaca...@apple.com> wrote:
-In article <8540bffc.02040...@posting.google.com>, Paul
-Thomas Ivy <seco...@hotmail.com> wrote:
-
-> "Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@mail.hal-pc.org> wrote in message
-> news:<a8sm2e$2pse$1...@news.hal-pc.org>...
->
-> Addressing only the points below.....
->
-> > <snipped>
-> >
-> > Now, don't pee in your pants. By the way, supposed a man who'd raped and
-> > murdered a 5 year-old girl ran into a church while being pursued by police.
-> > Would you expect the cops to stop and say, "Well, he's in a church so we
-> > can't touch him." Or would you expect them to follow and blow his ass away
-> > if he resisted?
-> >
->
-> At many points in religious history the answer is "Yes", the cops
-> would stop and not enter the church.
->
-> The only exception might be if the rapist started shooting from the
-> church.
->
-> > Same thing. You're conveniently (and deliberately) ignoring the
Palestinian
-> > gunmen who ran into the church and in effect took the other people inside
-> > hostage (otherwise, why aren't those other people leaving?). And the
-> > Israelis aren't bombing the church; they are simply shooting at the gunmen
-> > inside.
-> >
->
-> If the Palestinians were not shooting (or killing the other persons in
-> the church), then it would be reasonable to surround the church, but
-> not enter.
-
-Now, instead of a church imagine it was a music store. Would the same
-rule apply?
No.
There is no historical precedent.
-
---- Andy
Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>http://stormfront.org http://www.natvan.com/
>www.spearhead-uk.com www.whitecivilrights.com
>
>"Douglas Berry" <grid...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:ici4bustpsacrr21l...@4ax.com...
>>
>> Hitler hated Christianity, too.
>>
>
> One of the points on the National Socialist party platform was that the
>party was for positive Christianity. This is what it said:
>
> "The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
>itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
Well, the party's actions were far from Christian.
> Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
>
> " But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest
>antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged-the nation, because it was held
>to be an invention of the 'capitalist' class (how often I had heard that
>phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in the
>hands of the bourgeosie for the exploitation of the working masses; the
>authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the
>proletariat; religion, as a means of doping the people, so as to exploit
>them afterward; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish docility. There
>was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.
> "At first I remained silent; but that could not last very long."
>
> "And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the
>will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am
>defending the handiwork of the Lord."
Hitler was such a liar. When you meet him, you will find out that
his work was not the work of the Lord.
> "Was not the Press instrumental in bringing in a state of moral
>degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to
>look ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally our
>people also became modernized?"
Well, Hitler did more to morally degrade the people than any
reporter.
> "It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic principles
>underlying ecclesiastical teaching increased steadily in violence. And yet
>this human world of ours would be inconceivable without the practical
>existance of a religious belief. The great masses of a nation are not
>composed of philosophers. For the masses of the people especially, faith is
>absolutely the only basis of a moral outlook on life."
>
> "And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His
>estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those
>enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God"
Then that means trhe founder of Christianity WAS an enemy of the
human race.
> "Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
>secured. This was the press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity in
>getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began gradually to control
>public life in its entirety."
Well, Nazis do not have that sklill. That is why they will forever
be at the bottom.
> Of religion he (the Jew) makes a mockery. Morality and decency are
>described as anti-quated prejudices"
Like Moses, who brought down the Ten Commandments?
Michael
_
_
Paul Thomas Ivy
> <snipped>
>
> Now, instead of a church imagine it was a music store. Would the same
> rule apply?
>
> --- Andy
As Ninure said - "No. There is no historical precedent."
Alex Vange
"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@csulb.edu> wrote in message
news:3cb50895...@news.csulb.edu...
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 18:08:32 -0500, "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
> >
> > "The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
> >itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
> Well, the party's actions were far from Christian.
That is the opposite of the truth.
The Nazis outlawed abortion. They outlawed homosexual perversion and
feminism. They outlawed pornagraphy and prostitution. They removed the race
of anti-Christs from controlling the media. They rejected both the madness
of Communism and the greed of Capitalism.
> Hitler was such a liar. When you meet him, you will find out that
> his work was not the work of the Lord.
It is your side that lies. Here is proof:
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The Jewish
media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was in favor of
big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here
is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for
falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsiblity for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a
superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he
had forseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and
shame. By placing responsiblity for the loss of the world war on the
shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the
only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the
betrayers of the Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the
principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is
always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation
are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional
nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than the
small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but
would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come
into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe
that others could have the impudence to distort truth so infamously. Even
though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their
minds, they still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may
be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces
behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all
expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in tha art of
lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any
others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very
existance founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious
community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the
greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all
time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He
(Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of Lies'. Those who do not
realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will
never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail."
> Well, Hitler did more to morally degrade the people than any
> reporter.
That is the opposite of the truth. Here are the facts:
By Dr. William Pierce
http://www.natvan.com
"The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World
War. They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking,
in advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice,
in publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the
spirit of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and
literature. They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe that
it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were promoting the
same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.
That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
World War some important government business, including the ratification
of a new German constitution, took place in the city of Weimar. The Jews
loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the most degenerate period
in Germany's history. The Jews, of course, didn't think of it as
degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and "cool."
Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was considered a
virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been written by Jews
in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to the skies and
looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the so-called
"Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to
the Weimar period.
There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar
Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It
depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the
flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the
communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the one
hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of
course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the
Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews
outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from
their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles
under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the
Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a normal,
healthy White person would view things differently. Check it out for
yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores.
The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World War,
the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to America
after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the healthiest
elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as many Americans
have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany the Jews were a
bit premature. Although they had much of the media under their control,
they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The
healthiest Germans resisted and beat them.
In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control before
they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully. In America
they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in America. It's
still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to be a lot tougher
this time. We'd better get started. The first step is to regain at least
partial control of our media, so that we can begin contradicting the
lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a part of that first
step."
> Then that means trhe founder of Christianity WAS an enemy of the
> human race.
No, he was not a Jew.
The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are mostly
Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of Judaism
and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
Jews claim to be God's chosen people because they have the Jewish
religion. This proves nothing. People change their religion. The Edomites
and the Khazars became Jewish but they are not Israelites by race. The real
Israelites changed their religion and became Christians.
Christ said in Mathew 15:24 "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of
the house of Israel."
He came for the chosen race and sheep are a symbol for the chosen race, but
this is what He said to the Jews:
John 10:26+27 "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I
said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me"
This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This explains
why Europe became known as Christendom.
The Israelites were direct descendants of Adam, who was the first
White man. The Hebrew word "adam" describes a White man. We are not the
color white like milk. We are a light skinned race and the light skin allows
blood, the color red to show in the cheeks. This is the definition of the
word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today and see
which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White people. The
Israelites were White.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the Hebrew
word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a typical
Jew.
The Bible says the Israelites would be a blessing to the world. It is
the White race that invented all the great things and advanced civilization
on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
Many verses tell us that Jews are our enemies. Here is one example:
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee; for he would not
walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
The Jews have been expelled from every Christian nation in Europe at
one time or another. Many people know that they are enemies of White
civilization. But not everyone knows the reason. It is because they are not
the chosen race and they hate those who really are the chosen race.
> >getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began gradually to control
> >public life in its entirety."
> Well, Nazis do not have that sklill. That is why they will forever
> be at the bottom.
> > Of religion he (the Jew) makes a mockery. Morality and decency are
> >described as anti-quated prejudices"
> Like Moses, who brought down the Ten Commandments?
>
Moses was not a Jew either. Christ and Moses were Israelites, and they
were White people not Jews.
Jim Asherman
A link tour:
http://www.tau.ac.il/taunews/97spring/edom.html
http://www.khazaria.com/mountainjews.html
http://www.loras.edu/~REL/mcdermot/origins.htm
http://www.religioustolerance.org/cr_ident.htm
http://www.kingidentity.com/
http://www.acts1711.com/identity.htm
http://atheism.about.com/library/legal/megiddo/bl_meg_conclusion.htm?IAM=sherlock_abc&terms=christian+identity
http://www.americanreligion.org/cultwtch/identity.html
Maybe alwex would like a T-shirt:
http://www.mychristiandepot.com/
Meeet a nice girl:
http://christiancrowd.com/
Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>http://stormfront.org http://www.natvan.com/
>www.spearhead-uk.com www.whitecivilrights.com
>
>"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@csulb.edu> wrote in message
>news:3cb50895...@news.csulb.edu...
>> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 18:08:32 -0500, "Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > "The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind
>> >itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession."
>> Well, the party's actions were far from Christian.
>
> That is the opposite of the truth.
>
> The Nazis outlawed abortion. They outlawed homosexual perversion and
>feminism. They outlawed pornagraphy and prostitution. They removed the race
>of anti-Christs from controlling the media. They rejected both the madness
>of Communism and the greed of Capitalism.
And they exterminated six million Jews, but don't let that get in
your way, shorteyes.
>> Hitler was such a liar. When you meet him, you will find out that
>> his work was not the work of the Lord.
>
> It is your side that lies. Here is proof:
>
>
> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The Jewish
>media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was in favor of
>big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here
>is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
So then you are saying you are Jewish?
Shalom!
Michael
Paul Gooding
> >media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was in favor
of
> >big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right.
So, if it weren't for the media, we'd all realize what a truly good guy
Hitler was?
Wow. Just when you think you've seen everything in this nutfarm newsgroup!
Jim Asherman
Michael Ejercito wrote:
Yup, That's what he is saying.
Love
Jim
Alex Vange
"As you may be aware, the mass media in
Canada are as much under Jewish control as in the United States. The
undisputed top media mogul in Canada is Israel Asper, who is commonly
known by his nickname "Izzy." With his sons Leonard and David and
other family members, Izzy Asper owns CanWest Global Communications
Corporation.
A Gentile, Conrad Black, also used to be a major player in the
Canadian media, but a little over a year ago Black's Southam News,
Inc., was bought out by Izzy. CanWest now owns more than 60 per cent
of Canada's newspapers and other media outlets. That's more than 60
per cent of all of Canada's mass media in the hands of one Jew.
Included are 14 metropolitan dailies and 128 local newspapers across
the country, including the Vancouver Sun, the Vancouver Province, the
Calgary Herald, and the Montreal Gazette. CanWest also owns the
National Post, which is distributed throughout Canada. In addition
Izzy owns media in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and
Northern Ireland.
Last month Izzy issued a written directive to his newspapers,
instructing them that from now on they must print nothing critical of
Israel or of Israeli actions or policies. This is a rare thing.
Usually directives of this sort are oral only, and great care is taken
to keep them from coming to the attention of the public. But Izzy,
with even more brass than is customary for his tribe, made his
directive public. He announced that, beginning three weeks ago,
December 12, the editorial content of all of his newspapers would be
homogenized, and they all would be pro-Israel.
Now here's the interesting part: if all of Izzy's Gentile underlings
were simply corrupt -- were simply paid mercenaries who wrote what
they were told to write -- then there would be no controversy; all of
the local editors and reporters and columnists simply would follow
orders. But there is a controversy. A group of reporters and writers
at the Montreal Gazette have rebelled, at least for the moment. One of
them, Bill Marsden, an investigative reporter, revealed on a Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation radio program called "As It Happens" that his
editor at the Gazette had instructed him never to report anything that
might reflect badly on Israel. Paraphrasing Izzy's directive, Marsden
said, and I quote: "We do not run in our newspaper op-ed pieces that
express criticism of Israel and what it is doing in the Middle East."
--end of quote -- Marsden and 54 other reporters at the Montreal
Gazette went on strike in protest at what they describe as undue
corporate interference with freedom of the press.
Their strike has infuriated Izzy. Izzy's son David characterized the
striking reporters as "childish" and "self-righteous." He said, and I
quote: "Why don't they just quit and have the courage of their
convictions? Maybe they should go out and, for the first time in their
lives, take a risk, put their money where their mouth is, and start
their own newspaper." -- end of quote --
How's that for chutzpah, as the Jews like to call it? One can read in
David Asper's reaction to the reporters the thought, "How dare these
mere Gentiles, these mere goyim, question what we, God's Chosen
People, decide should be the party line for Canada's newspapers! How
dare they!" I mean it's not just that Izzy owns the Montreal Gazette,
and so he is entitled to set the editorial policy, and other
newspapers can set different policies. Izzy thinks that he is entitled
to set the editorial policy for all of Canada's newspapers and
determine what all Canadians think.
The man chosen by the Aspers to write the editorials for all of their
newspapers is Murdoch Davis. When asked by "As It Happens" whether or
not one of CanWest's newspapers would be permitted to buck the party
line on Israel, Davis replied, and I quote: "No. It is clearly the
intent that the newspapers will speak with one voice on certain issues
of overarching national or international importance." -- end of quote
-- When asked specifically whether or not one of the Asper newspapers
would be permitted to raise the question of Israel's long-standing
violation of international law and its defiance of UN resolutions
calling for withdrawal from illegally occupied Palestinian territory,
Davis again responded in the negative.
So that's the present situation with freedom of the press in Canada:
not really very different from the situation in the United States. So
what about the mentality of journalists? The fact that the reporters
at the Montreal Gazette are protesting Izzy's directive that they can
report nothing negative about Israel indicates that they are not
entirely mercenary. To me, however, it does not indicate that they are
independent thinkers. I believe that they are as much lemmings as the
dullest couch potato or sports fan. What caused their protest was the
arrogant and contemptuous way in which the Aspers went about
reconciling two conflicting elements in the Jewish party line.
On the one hand journalists have been taught that the United Nations
is a splendid and admirable organization, whose resolutions should be
obeyed. They also have been taught that all races and ethnic groups
are equal -- in fact, essentially the same -- but that racial
minorities and underdogs generally deserve our special sympathy, and
that in any conflict with a ruling group the underdogs are in the
right. That's standard liberal dogma. You have to believe that in
order to be a journalist. On the other hand, journalists have been
taught that Jews are wonderful people who can do no wrong, and that to
think otherwise is anti-Semitism, which is as bad as or worse than
racism. It's hard enough reconciling the elevated status of Jews with
the concept of racial and ethnic equality, but most journalists by
working at it are able to do it -- except where the conflict between
Jews and Palestinians is concerned. That requires a special effort and
really careful handling by their Jewish bosses. How do you explain to
a journalist who already believes all of the liberal dogma that if
Iraq ignores a UN resolution it should be bombed into the Stone Age
and then starved into submission with a rigid trade embargo, but if
Israel ignores 14 UN resolutions we should respond by sending the
Israelis more military and economic aid?
How do you explain to a journalist who has been taught that when South
Africa used to be a White country and practiced apartheid, and the
South African police sometimes beat information out of captured Black
terrorists, it was a terrible thing and had to be condemned in the
strongest terms, but when Israel practices apartheid, assassinates
Palestinian leaders, and tortures Palestinian prisoners, nothing
should be said about it?
How do you explain to a journalist that it is an intolerable threat to
the security of the world if some Muslim country develops weapons of
mass destruction, and the United States is justified in a preemptive
strike to destroy the weapons production facilities, but when a
psychotic little country like Israel builds an arsenal of chemical,
nuclear, and biological weapons, using materials and technology stolen
from us, it's OK, and we should ignore it?
How do you explain to a journalist steeped in the tenets of feminism
that he shouldn't say anything about Israel's booming slave trade in
girls and women kidnapped from eastern Europe and forced to work as
sex slaves?
How do you explain to a journalist who believes wholeheartedly in
egalitarianism that it's perhaps regrettable but certainly excusable
when Jews rocket Palestinian villages and use Palestinian children for
target practice, but it's "terrorism" and completely unjustifiable
when the Palestinians hit back?
Believe me, explaining these things is tricky, but it can be done, if
it's done with patience and care. It can be done, because when it
comes to matters of faith, a lemming really isn't rational. He's quite
capable of believing two mutually contradictory things at the same
time. The problem that brought on the mini-rebellion at the Montreal
Gazette is that Izzy wasn't patient and careful. He was arrogant and
contemptuous of his Gentile reporters. But they'll get over it, I'm
sure. They always do. They're lemmings.
But, as I said, what is happening now in Canada is interesting. It
gives us insight into the workings of journalists' minds, and it also
brings out into the open not only the monopoly Jewish control of the
Canadian mass media but also the way in which that control is used to
slant the news and Canadian public opinion so as to serve Jewish
interests to the detriment of Canadian interests.
Do you think that any of these revelations will be of benefit to
Canadians? Will the average Canadian say, "Oh, my goodness! I didn't
realize that one man, and a Jew at that, controls more than 60 per
cent of all the mass media in Canada and is using that control to
deceive Canadians as to what is happening in the Middle East. That's
terrible! We'd better have our lawmakers do something to break up this
media monopoly, so that we will have a better chance to learn the
truth about what's happening in the world when we read a newspaper or
watch a television news program."
What do you think? I think that about 98 per cent of Canadians won't
even look up from their ball games. I think that there's not a
politician in Canada who will dare go up against Izzy Asper. This
whole tempest at the Montreal Gazette will blow over in a few days,
and all of Izzy's newspapers and other media will toe the party line
as if nothing had happened.
And now I'm talking only to the two or three or four per cent of
Canadians -- and also to the two or three or four per cent of
Americans -- who aren't so absorbed in their ball games that they
don't notice things like this and don't really care either. I'm
talking to the small portion of the White population in both countries
-- and in fact, in countries around the world -- who do notice and do
care. I want you to understand that this is the way nations lose their
freedom. More than that, this is the way races become extinct.
The majority of the population in Canada and the United States and in
every country in Europe consists of lemmings, who always have been
manipulated by whoever is in power. For approximately the last 100
years the power to manipulate the thinking of the lemmings -- of the
masses, if you prefer -- has been shifting from the authority figures
in the government and in the churches to the people who control the
mass media. These days the people who control the media also control
the government for all practical purposes, and the churches have
become irrelevant, which is why the Canadian government won't try to
break up Izzy's media monopoly and why the politicians in the United
States will never go beyond pretending to be concerned about too much
sex and violence on television when they have a mock fight with the
media.
Controlling a country's mass media doesn't mean just being able to
exert a decisive influence on a country's foreign policy, as Izzy
Asper is doing in Canada, and as his fellow Jews long have done in the
United States. It doesn't mean just getting a country involved in
unnecessary wars and subjecting its citizens to retaliatory terrorist
attacks. It means influencing immigration policy. It means influencing
educational policy. It means influencing social policy. It means being
able to control the way most of a country's people think about
everything: about race and morality and lifestyles and other countries
and freedom and the meaning of life. Most of the degenerative changes
that have taken place in America and in Canada since the Second World
War have been consequences of Jewish media influence. As that
influence continues to grow, the chances of our people being able to
throw off the yoke and regain control of our own destiny become
smaller and smaller.
In Canada at the moment, Izzy Asper's surfeit of chutzpah has brought
to the attention of the public -- that is to the attention of that
small portion of the public that cares about such things -- his
monopoly control of Canada's mass media and his intent to use those
media for Jewish propaganda purposes. Light has been cast on this
grave situation because most journalists are lemmings, and a few of
them are chattering excitedly now about things such as "freedom of the
press." Really, the whole debate is silly. Canada had no freedom of
the press even before Izzy got his greedy hands on most of Canada's
newspapers. For years it has been illegal in Canada to publish
anything considered "racist" or "anti-Semitic" or even Politically
Incorrect. When a Canadian buys copies of any of my books and they are
mailed to him, the Canadian secret police confiscate them at the
border. Publicly challenging the details of the Jewish "Holocaust"
story can result in a prison term for a Canadian. Canada's journalists
thought all of that -- stopping "hate," as they called it -- was just
fine. Pretty soon they will realize that requiring all mass media to
say only nice things about what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians
is also part of the noble effort to stop "hate," and that also will be
just fine with them.
We can't change the nature of lemmings. Someone always will manipulate
them. What is of the utmost importance is who it is that manipulates
them, because whoever that is will determine the course taken by the
whole society, by the nation, by the race. In the past, when it was a
king or a pope or a dictator who set the party line, many mistakes
were made, sometimes due to selfishness or irresponsibility, sometimes
due to ignorance or carelessness or stupidity or prejudice. But at
least the people setting the party line for the masses were our
people, members of our own race. Now, increasingly, the arbiters of
the party line are Jews or people wholly under Jewish influence. And
the Jews, as always, are looking out only for their own interests, not
for ours. To them we are merely tools to be used in advancing their
interests.
And that's at best. At worst they are pursuing policies intended not
only to advance their interests, but also to destroy us. Don't try to
debate this matter with the Jews; they will, of course, deny it. Just
look at the policies they have been pushing for the past 50 years and
where those policies have been taking us. Just consider the facts, not
their specious arguments designed to keep you demoralized and
non-resisting.
My fellow Americans and my fellow Canadians: we are in a bad
situation. Let us stop ignoring it. Let us begin deciding what we're
going to do about it. I'm doing what I can do in speaking out about it
and getting others to speak out. You must decide what you are able and
willing to do and then begin doing it.
Thanks for being with me again today."
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.
To subscribe send an e-mail message to: adv-list...@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.
To contact us, write to:
National Vanguard Books
Attention: ADVlist
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
or e-mail: nati...@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.
==> TO BE REMOVED send an e-mail message to:
adv-list...@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Unsubscribe
(c) 2002 National Vanguard Books
Alex Vange
"Paul Gooding" <ppgo...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:a95ltu$gl8$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> So, if it weren't for the media, we'd all realize what a truly good guy
> Hitler was?
>
> Wow. Just when you think you've seen everything in this nutfarm
newsgroup!
>
Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
"The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter to
Mr. Balfour (see page 25), denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan, which if
not checked by the combined action of the European powers, would engulf
Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of that year the red
flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities of Europe. In Hungary the
Jew Bela Kuhn organized and maintained for some time a merciless and bloody
tyranny similar to the one in Russia. In Germany the Jews, Liebknecht,
Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg, etc., made a desperate bid for power.
These and other similar convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its
own way just frustated the onslaughts.
In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in the endeavour to
expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one, however, did a political
leader and group arise, who grasped to the full the significance of these
happenings, and perceived behind the mobs of native hooligans the
organisation and driving power of world Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler,
and his group the National Socialist Party of Germany.
Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organized
revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We
need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded over
these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of supposing that
Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men everywhere from making a
thorough investigation of the facts for themselves. Nevertheless, if any
value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of
personal investigation is one which they cannot shirk.
To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer idleness, if
for no worse reason."
Jim Asherman
canadadadians got some nerve.
However, his employees are no more compliant than their US counterparts.
Jim
Douglas Berry
"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> warmed at our fire and told this tale:
> Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
Gee Alex, are you completely unable to think for yourself? What kind
of ubermench are you?
Silicon Geek
grid...@mindspring.com says...
>
>On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:04:23 -0500, a wanderer, known to us only as
>"Alex Vange" <va...@i1.net> warmed at our fire and told this tale:
>
>> Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
>
>Gee Alex, are you completely unable to think for yourself? What kind
>of ubermench are you?
You misspelled "uberwench". You're welcome.