Eisenhower Warns of ‘Scientific-Technological Elite’ Coup in Farewell Speech

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

Eisenhower Warns of ‘Scientific-Technological Elite’ Coup in Farewell
Speech.

Dumb low IQ western whites DON'T KNOW that it's the MIC + Scientific
Technological Banking Elites WHO RUN US, UK and Aus, and NOT the
demented puppets biden, bojo and scomo.

Western jokers DELUDE THEMSELVES that their countries are FREE WORLD
DEMOCRACIES because they have the FoS right to humiliate their PMs,
Presidents, MPs and Senators, WITHOUT REALIZING all these politicians
are just POWERLESS PUPPETS "cunningly PROJECTED" to the world as VERY
POWERFUL.

Fundamental problem with WHITES is, they DON'T UNDERSTAND their own DNA
and MODUS OPERANDI of "Smile, Shake Hands, Back Stab and KILL" and
INFINITE DECEPTION.


==========================================================================



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-04-14/eisenhower-warns-scientific-technological-elite-coup-farewell-speech

Eisenhower Warns of ‘Scientific-Technological Elite’ Coup in Farewell Speech

by Ben Bartee via The Daily Bell

Once-overlooked prescient warnings, conveyed through black-and-white
grainy footage, reach through history like that dead girl in Carrie.
They haunt all the more forcefully given the foresight it took to make them.

We’ve all heard of the military-industrial complex (MIC) – the
escalating intertwining of the national security apparatus and the
private weapons industry. It produces an irresistible economic/political
incentive for reckless, endless war.

Its characteristics are unique in many ways, but in others, the MIC is
merely another iteration of the essential problem of intersecting
corporate and state interests — their chief mutual interest being the
accumulation of greater and greater concentrations of power for themselves.

Mussolini described the phenomenon like this in the early 20th century:

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it
is a merger of state and corporate power.”
-Benito Mussolini

The gears of private industry are lavishly oiled with public money. In
turn, the public decision-makers (bureaucrats), who are theoretically
tasked with acting in the public’s interests, receive innumerable
benefits — both while in office and especially after leaving, including
appointments to lucrative board positions, gifted stock options, etc.

Interests across the two domains (state and private sector) – which
theoretically remain separate in liberal ideology — become so
intertwined that distinguishing one from the other is impossible.

To set the context of the MIC’s inaugural insertion into public
consciousness, in 1961, the United States had just recently risen over
the ashes of war-ravaged Europe to claim the throne as the global hegemon.

The industrial-scale arms industry remained a relatively new advent, and
so the MIC was largely a new phenomenon in human history. If all of its
elements weren’t entirely new, the MIC was at least a new incarnation of
the inherent and ancient issue of state usurpation of power by private
interests for personal and in-group gain.

Eisenhower introduced the MIC into the American psyche, coining the term
in his farewell address from the Oval Office:

Via the president’s January 17, 1961 farewell speech:

“This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large
arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not
fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of
government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted
influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial
complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists
and will persist.”

We’ve previously covered the most recent glaring example of the MIC in
action – US generals dutifully crying on television about the
Afghanistan pullout. Their defense industry sponsors/owners directed
them to fear-monger about ending a 20-year losing war – to keep the
gravy train rolling, for at least another year – and they complied.

The Afghanistan war, incidentally, produced no tangible outcome of value
for any American except the defense contractors who paid Jack Keane to
promote it on cable news. Defense contractors, in addition to buying
spokesmen like Keane, also purchase advertising on said corporate media
channel in exchange for war propaganda that favors healthy stock prices.

It’s all very incestuous, and, at the core, it’s all funded at the
public’s expense via the US treasury.

As we will see — as Eisenhower explains himself in the portion of the
speech that often goes overlooked in favor of the famous line about the
MIC — the same types of public-private mechanisms are currently playing
out in the biomedical context:

“Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our
industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution
during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes
more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is
conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been
overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing
fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the
fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a
revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs
involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for
intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds
of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal
employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever
present–and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we
should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that
public policy could itself become the captive of a
scientific-technological elite.”

If you’ve been paying attention to the last two years’ events, that
excerpt should send shivers down your spine.

The MIC and the biomedical state – administered by the
“scientific-technological elite” — are a single entity. They’re one and
the same, different feathers of the same bird. They each conduct the
business of technocratic social management in their own way. One
produces kinetic and chemical weaponry; the other, biological weaponry.

Their methods differ, but their interests are the same.

Here’s a case study:

EcoHealth Alliance tried to entice DARPA – the scientific arm of the
Pentagon — to join in on the same Wuhan coronavirus gain-of-function
that the organization illicitly conducted in China in partnership with
the CCP. (EcoHealth Alliance being the organization Fauci funneled
government money to for gain-of-function research in that same Chinese
WIV government-run lab.)

Via DRASTIC Research:

“EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert with the Wuhan Institute of
Virology (WIV) attempted to carry out advanced and dangerous human
pathogenicity Bat Coronavirus research that would clearly qualify as
Gain of Function (GoF), in a grant proposal submitted to the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018.”

What we’re looking at is a transnational, public-private grant proposal
involving multiple state and private actors collaborating to engineer
deadly new viruses.

The application actually proposed spraying aerosolized viruses into wild
bat caves – just to see what happened:

“The grant proposal includes some elements of research that are
already public via scientific papers, as well as other elements that
have never been made public, including vaccinating wild bats using
aerosolized viruses and further work on published and unpublished
strains that could have directly produced SARS-CoV-2.”

The Pentagon apparently, according to the leaked documents, shot down
the proposal – not on the grounds that this was a ludicrous and
dangerous project, and, in practice, would constitute an act of war
against China, but on a technicality.

Two years later, by mere coincidence, if you believe the official
narrative, a deadly bat coronavirus naturally emerged from a Wuhan wet
market – the exact type of virus that EcoHealth Alliance proposed
spraying into the wild in the exact geographical area.

Whether DARPA was involved or not in the eventual release of SARS-CoV-2
into the wild is largely irrelevant for this point. The mere fact that
Peter Daszak, Fauci and Co. knew this kind of activity to be in DARPA’s
wheelhouse demonstrates the deep ties between the various arms of the
now-transnational biomedical technocratic complex.

Eisenhower’s warning from six decades ago begs the question: what are
the prescient warnings offered today that coming generations will look
back on in awe?

Ben Bartee is a Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs.
Follow his stuff via Armageddon Prose, Substack, Patreon, Gab, and
Twitter. Please support his independent operations however you can.