Rasmussen Lying Cocksucker

LIMPY

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 2:58:27 PM1/5/10

to

Wait, Maybe Those Ominous Poll Numbers For Dems Are Because Rasmussen Is A
Secret Republican Polling Firm

ThinkProgress has discovered, by way of a cool new invention known as The
Internet, that Scott Rasmussen has in fact been conducing polling on behalf
of partisan clients, in particular the RNC and the Bush re-election
campaign, both during 2003-04.

This appears to contradict all but the most absurdly lawyerly readings of a
statement on Rasmussen Reports' website, which reads: "Scott Rasmussen
maintains his independence and has never been a campaign pollster or
consultant for candidates seeking office." The statement was also repeated
word-for-word in a Politico article without any qualification.

OK, so we'll score this The Internet 1, Politico's fact-checking department
0, and Rasmussen a negative something for posting a blatantly misleading
statement on their website.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/04/politico-rasmussen/

Bwah bwah bwah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.......

Repubs - busted again with their carnival barker mentality. What's next,
snake oil?

Rasmussen tell these ass clowns what they want to hear, so it's gospel -
like Limpballs and FOX Noise. It's all they have now that Bush wrecked the
Nation playing Reagan and everyone hates Republicans.

Anyone see a Rasmussen poll from Dec of '07 that accurately predicted the
Democratic presidential and congressional landslide of Nov '8?

This is a great "gotcha" because Rasmussen CAN'T respond while maintaining
his image. Let's hope more media sources pick up on it.

Not Sure

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 4:18:36 PM1/5/10

to

Can't stand how accurate they were in 2008, eh? Continue crying and
sobbing :)

Fux Noise

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 4:23:18 PM1/5/10

to

"Not Sure" <fred1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f34a3b35-d746-4e04...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

====

Oh?

bvallely

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 4:24:21 PM1/5/10

to

On Jan 5, 11:58 am, "LIMPY" <li...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Wait, Maybe Those Ominous Poll Numbers For Dems Are Because Rasmussen Is A
> Secret Republican Polling Firm
>
> ThinkProgress has discovered, by way of a cool new invention known as The
> Internet, that Scott Rasmussen has in fact been conducing polling on behalf
> of partisan clients, in particular the RNC and the Bush re-election
> campaign, both during 2003-04.

.
This reminds me of MoveOn.org's attempt to delegitimize the venerable
Gallup organization in 2004, after one of its polls, a bit of an
outlier, showed George W. Bush on course to win the 2004 election
easily. As a way of venting frustration, they went so far as to waste
$68,000 running this ad in The New York Times alleging a poll
conspiracy. The ad even attacked the founder of Gallup for being a
Christian.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/The-Left-whines-about-Rasmussen-In-2004-they-whined-about-Gallup-80693357.html

Fux Noise

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 4:33:31 PM1/5/10

to

"bvallely" <bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9bd9375d-05a5-490d...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/The-Left-whines-about-Rasmussen-In-2004-they-whined-about-Gallup-80693357.html

washington examiner? No such newspaper.

Killing, Inc.

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 8:23:42 PM1/5/10

to

On Jan 5, 3:33 pm, "Fux Noise" <f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "bvallely" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message

>
> news:9bd9375d-05a5-490d...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 5, 11:58 am, "LIMPY" <li...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:> Wait, Maybe Those Ominous Poll Numbers For Dems Are Because Rasmussen Is A
> > Secret Republican Polling Firm
>
> > ThinkProgress has discovered, by way of a cool new invention known as The
> > Internet, that Scott Rasmussen has in fact been conducing polling on
> > behalf
> > of partisan clients, in particular the RNC and the Bush re-election
> > campaign, both during 2003-04.
>
> .
> This reminds me of MoveOn.org's attempt to delegitimize the venerable
> Gallup organization in 2004, after one of its polls, a bit of an
> outlier, showed George W. Bush on course to win the 2004 election
> easily. As a way of venting frustration, they went so far as to waste
> $68,000 running this ad in The New York Times alleging a poll
> conspiracy. The ad even attacked the founder of Gallup for being a
> Christian.
>

> http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/...

>
> washington examiner? No such newspaper.

Wrong. It's the Examiner.com (not washingtonexaminer) that is not a
newspaper, only a news imposter where any leftwing retard can post
anything he wants.

WashingtonExaminer.com is legit.

bvallely

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 9:29:04 PM1/5/10

to

.
> washington examiner? No such newspaper.

.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/

Fux Noise

unread,

Jan 5, 2010, 10:46:17 PM1/5/10

to

"bvallely" <bval...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:f43c9c87-eed8-41d6...@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

.
> washington examiner? No such newspaper.
.

http://www.washingttonexaminer.com/

401

nobody

unread,

Jan 6, 2010, 6:33:58 AM1/6/10

to

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:46:17 -0800, "Fux Noise" <f...@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

Looks like a mistype. It's http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/
>

Lamont Cranston

unread,

Jan 6, 2010, 10:21:35 AM1/6/10

to

"bvallely" <bval...@aol.com> wrote:

No.

bvallely

unread,

Jan 7, 2010, 1:23:33 AM1/7/10

to

On Jan 6, 7:21 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
wrote:
> "bvallely" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> No.

Sucks living in the age of the Internet and search engines, doesn't
it. Democrats can't lie about what they did or didn't do.