@ Stalking Pat: Evidence
Patrick L. Humphrey
S. Shawn S. <ka...@DasKapital.ccsi.com> wrote:
>On 11 Mar 1996, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>
>> In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.96030...@nimbus9.ccsi.com>,
>> S. Shawn S. <tr...@nimbus9.ccsi.com> wrote:
>> >On 5 Mar 1996, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.96030...@nimbus9.ccsi.com>,
>> >> S. Shawn S. <tr...@nimbus9.ccsi.com> wrote:
>> >> >On 4 Mar 1996, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >On stalking pat sez:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Can't grow out of something I never did in the first place.
>> >> >
>> >> >Now you are going to take back the claim you tracked down where Rack lives
>> >> >and have hung out in front of his home 3 times? Gosh you really expect us
>> >> >to forget what you say one week from the next.
>> >>
>> >> No more than I expect you to actually make a claim in good faith -- just when
>> >> have I ever posted about _hanging out_ in front of Dave's house? You _do_
>> >> have the post in question, don't you, "Shawn"? I've pedaled by his house
>> >> three or four times, and one time, just by dumb luck, he and his family
>> >> happened to be outside. It's fun to mention that later and watch him foam at
>> >> the mouth, if you ask me. (Besides, I'm going to be pedaling by, less than
>> >> five miles away, on the morning of March 30 -- let's see how paranoid your
>> >> mentor really is.)
>> >
>> >Gosh Pat can you find one, mind you just one, other poster here who
>> >tracks down adversaries on the net and rides over to their house? Come on
>> >Pat just one other nut. Better yet find me one liberal. Bet ya can't
>> >cause not only is it not a liberal trait but its something most normal
>> >folk just don't do: stalking.
>>
>> I guess you can't comprehend the possibility that maybe I'm mocking you and
>> your village-idiot buddy Dahlman, can you? And kindly answer the question,
>> please. When have I ever posted anything of what you claim above? Quit
>> trying to deflect the discussion.
>>
>> >Here is one pat quote:
>>
>> ...that you can't seem to provide any actual citation for.
>
>Any one, any one, any one go look on deaja news, deaja vu it is there :)
Yeah, "Shawn", don't actually do the work to back up your assertions, just
whine "anyone can look at DejaNews". Answer the question, you cowardly little
bastard: when have I _ever_ posted David Dahlman's address? You won't find
that by using DejaNews, or anything else -- because I never posted it, and I
think even morons like you know it.
>> >***********************************************************************
>> >
>> >--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit to
>> >Austin :-) Humphrey
>> >
>> >***********************************************************************
>> >
>> >Who else on the net warns folk to hide cause they are coming to town.
>> >Then smiles about it? Who else posts anything like this? Oh if there is
>> >any question about context go to deja news the post is there.
>>
>>We're not discussing whether anyone else posts anything like it, "Shawn", as
>>you well know -- I'm asking you to support your fantasy assertions with
>>something more than your insistence that it's so, and you're tapdancing all
>>around that question, trying your damnedest not to answer it. Now, why could
>>you be putting on that act, eh?
>
>I got a lot of posts pat. Just the other day from deja news. I am gonna
>make a new Pat the stalker post. Here a just a few of the ones I got.
You have a lot of posts, I'm sure - and you demonstrate daily that you have no
idea what they mean. And then you have the gall to keep repeating stories
that you've already admitted you were lying about - and you expect anyone to
believe you?
Why do you repeat your lies about me and Keith, if for no other reason than
that you're hoping that someone will maybe fall for your act and try and
silence us?
I think Keith's right on about you, and Dahlman, and Kennemur - you're all
hiding behind what you think is a cloak of anonymity not because you're
concerned for your safety (especially since your mentor Dahlman has been
pulling this same bullshit act for *twelve years* now), but because you're
just the Usenet equivalent of the crank caller, and you don't feel like being
responsible for your own actions.
(Meanwhile, digest this fact: I will be in Austin April 21, and there is
nothing you can do about it. I don't know where you live, and I have no
interest in knowing - so go right ahead and convince anyone that you're being
stalked. Be honest enough to mention, though, that you are an admitted liar.)
--Patrick L. "come on, Shawn, jerk that knee!" Humphrey
S. Shawn S.
> and you don't feel like being responsible for your own actions.
Like getting shot Pat? Tell ya what you stalkers start announcing your
visits ahead of time and I will my real name. Deal?
Shawn
ssh...@ccsi.com
http://www.ccsi.com/~sshawns
**-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-**
"I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution,
the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution."
--Ms. Barbara Jordan, during the Nixon inquiry.
Pat Kelso
>
>> and you don't feel like being responsible for your own actions.
>
>visits ahead of time and I will my real name. Deal?
>
>Shawn
>ssh...@ccsi.com
>http://www.ccsi.com/~sshawns
>**-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-*-*-**-**
>"I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution,
>the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution."
> --Ms. Barbara Jordan, during the Nixon inquiry.
>
"I didn't inhale." Bill Clinton, during the Bush inquiry.
Pat sez: 'Just another cowardly reply. I've seen your type before--
wearing white sheets and making trouble where you are not welcome. The
only difference between you and the Kluxers is a matter of degree. You
burn verbal crosses under an assumed name and while they under a white
mask of anonymity burn homes. Both of you are gutless.
Patrick L. Humphrey
>"S. Shawn S." <ka...@DasKapital.ccsi.com> wrote:
>On 12 Mar 1996, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>
>> and you don't feel like being responsible for your own actions.
>
>Like getting shot Pat? Tell ya what you stalkers start announcing your
>visits ahead of time and I will my real name. Deal?
[...]
"I didn't inhale." Bill Clinton, during the Bush inquiry.
Pat sez: 'Just another cowardly reply. I've seen your type before--
wearing white sheets and making trouble where you are not welcome. The
only difference between you and the Kluxers is a matter of degree. You
burn verbal crosses under an assumed name and while they under a white
mask of anonymity burn homes. Both of you are gutless.
Pretty close to how I put it, though I don't think "Shawn" has enough sense to
be a competent Klansman, either...
--Patrick L. "and that's pretty scary, when you think about it" Humphrey
Patrick L. Humphrey
S. Shawn S. <ka...@DasKapital.ccsi.com> wrote:
>
>> and you don't feel like being responsible for your own actions.
>
>visits ahead of time and I will my real name. Deal?
Riiight, so you can shoot first? Sorry, but I don't make deals with admitted
liars. You're not why I'm going to be in Austin April 21, and nothing can
change that fact, so I suggest you get over your disappointment some other
way.
--Patrick L. "only someone like Shawn would think I could stalk someone whose
address I don't know, and don't *want* to know" Humphrey
S. Shawn S.
> >Like getting shot Pat? Tell ya what you stalkers start announcing your
> >visits ahead of time and I will my real name. Deal?
>
> Riiight, so you can shoot first? Sorry, but I don't make deals with admitted
> liars. You're not why I'm going to be in Austin April 21, and nothing can
> change that fact, so I suggest you get over your disappointment some other
> way.
>
> --Patrick L. "only someone like Shawn would think I could stalk someone whose
> address I don't know, and don't *want* to know" Humphrey
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit to
Austin :-) Humphrey
Sad, but true...but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to encounter
"Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month -- if I'm out at night, just look for
anyone peeking into windows...
--Patrick L. Humphrey
S. Shawn S.
> Pat sez: 'Just another cowardly reply. I've seen your type before--
> wearing white sheets and making trouble where you are not welcome. The
> only difference between you and the Kluxers is a matter of degree. You
> burn verbal crosses under an assumed name and while they under a white
> mask of anonymity burn homes. Both of you are gutless.
I forgive you for calling me nazi when I win the debate. I forgive you
for calling me nazi because I support gun control. When you abandon this
tactic I will gladly win debates with you again. Until then have a nice day.
S. Shawn S.
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit to
Austin :-) Humphrey
Sad, but true...but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to encounter
"Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month -- if I'm out at night, just look for
anyone peeking into windows...
--Patrick L. Humphrey
(on giving info on how to find Rack)
No, it's more like you're in your own little world out there in the Houston
suburbs.
--Patrick L. "17 days and pedaling" Humphrey
Patrick L. Humphrey
[knee-jerk! knee-jerk! knee-jerk!]
Get back to me when you can write something original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go
cower under your bed, since I'm only 37 days away from being in the same city
as you. (I don't really think I should let you know where I'll be, though,
since I don't really feel like being shot by you _or_ your mentor.)
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
S. Shawn S.
> I called him a nazi, me hating Jews, I a nazi.
> I'm standing right here, ready to back up my statements. Why are you
> running away, Shawn?
Keith: Please play with me. Please play the game where I call you a nazi
and you don't call me one back. Please play with me no one else will.
Shawn: Hmmm. Git scamp.