Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anti-vaxx health rationing.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

a322x1n

unread,
Sep 26, 2021, 5:09:58 AM9/26/21
to
<https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/health-care-rationing-is-a-real
-possibility/ar-AAOPcnp?ocid=msedgntp>

<https://tinyurl.com/39kf93p4>

Health care rationing is a real possibility.
From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 5 hrs ago.

A year and a half into the pandemic, the long-feared specter of rationed
health care — that is, the delay or denial of medical treatment to some
patients who need it because there simply aren’t enough resources to go
around — is perilously close to becoming reality. As unvaccinated
coronavirus victims overwhelm hospitals, some states are edging toward
allowing doctors to decide which patients get immediate care and which
don’t. It could affect not just coronavirus patients but also medical
care across the board.

Frustrated calls to put the willfully unvaccinated at the end of the
medical line are understandable, but medical ethics don’t allow that
kind of comeuppance. That means some who refuse vaccination (thus
contributing to the crisis) could end up getting lifesaving treatment
before those who behaved more responsibly but who are deemed less likely
to survive.

The anti-vaccination holdouts should think hard about whether this is a
scenario they’re prepared to live with.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

It’s ironic that misguided conservatives are largely the ones driving
hospitals toward the rationed-care cliff. These are many of the same
folks who falsely alleged a decade ago that the Affordable Care Act
would lead to “death panels” and other forms of rationing. That danger
was never real, but this time it is.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

As The Washington Post reported last week in a sobering roundup,
hospitals in Alaska, Idaho and Montana were recently given latitude to
move to what are called crisis standards of care.

It’s not an official declaration of rationing but the granting of
flexibility to doctors if it comes to that. Think of it as the Defcon 4
of health care: a state of readiness that could ultimately portend the
worst of worst-case scenarios.

The severe shortage of hospital beds and equipment is the direct result
of the current national surge in coronavirus deaths, which in turn is
the direct result of vaccination resistance.

About 62% of eligible Americans have received at least one dose of the
vaccine. That’s one of the worst vaccination rates in the industrialized
world. Virtually all those sick or dying today are unvaccinated, by
choice.

If and when rationed care comes, these people will be taking down others
with them. Anyone who needs medical care for any reason could find it
unavailable.

It’s infuriating that those who have worsened this pandemic might
ultimately benefit from dwindling medical resources while others die
from lack of them — but medical standards leave little room to mitigate
that.

Rationing must be based primarily on which patients are most likely to
be helped by the available resources.

Using rationing to punish unwise behavior is a path down which society
must not go.

Which leaves it to the vaccine resisters to decide, in consultation with
their consciences, just how many lives they’re willing to risk for their
misplaced notions of “freedom.”
0 new messages