| ...
| The decision by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon was a hot
| mess, as we and others detailed when she handed it down,
| and the grounds for an almost-inevitable appellate court
| intervention were obvious at the time. That said, the
| 29-page opinion is important in a number of respects.
|
| For one thing, its unanimity and speed emphasize the fact
| that Judge Cannon's interference in the Justice
| Department's investigation was a gross impropriety, not a
| plausible legal position. That two of the panel members
| were, like Judge Cannon, appointed by President Trump
| further emphasizes that this is a matter of
| professionalism, not a matter of ideology or the sort of
| judicial philosophy that reasonably separates conservative
| from liberal jurists.
|
| So too does the fact that the court ruled within 24 hours
| of the government's final brief--and wrote in a per curiam
| opinion, that is, in the voice of the court itself, not of
| its individual judges. In short, giving the government
| relief from Judge Cannon's injunction was a very easy
| call--one that required neither time nor any significant
| deliberation. Rather, the rate-limiting step in issuing
| this opinion was the speed with which judges of diverse
| political stripes could type.
| ...
<
https://www.lawfareblog.com/eleventh-circuit-cleans-mess>
--bks