Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bob Officer - A Stupid, Ignorant, Dumb-Ass!
3 views
Skip to first unread message
John H. Gohde
May 17, 2013, 4:08:24 AM5/17/13
to
On May 16, 6:32 pm, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
See Bob make a fool of himself in his original post at:
http://tinyurl.com/c4sp46g
> On 16 May 2013 21:09:48 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
> wrote:
> >In fact the entire earth was radioactive before atom bombs. Radioactive
> >decay is a normal process,, which is the so called "background" radioactive
> >level.
> The human body naturally accumulates radioactive potassium.
> http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/old%20physics%2010/physics%2...
> <cite>
> A typical human body contains approximately 40 grams of potassium.
> About 1/1000 of this is potassium-40, a radioactive isotope. This
> means that you contain 0.04 grams = 40 milligrams of a radioactive
> cancer-producing isotope in your body. This is not an artificial
> radioactivity, but it is left over from the formation of potassium in
> the supernova that gave birth to our solar system. The half life of
> potassium-40 is 1.26 billion years. The solar system was created
> about 5 billion years ago. That is not enough time for all of the
> radioactive potassium to decay, and that is why there is so much in
> our bodies.
> Atoms of radiopotassium in your body explode approximately 12,000
> times every second. Your body is radioactive. Only 11% of the
> radioactive decays yield a gamma ray, so there are 1,300
> self-inflicted gammas per second from your own body. (This is not
> easy to see in a geiger counter, because gammas are hard to detect.)
> This results in an exposure of approximely 0.00018 Sieverts over a 50
> year period. If the linear hypothesis is correct, this is responsible
> on average for 7 millionths of a cancers per individual. Since 0.2 of
> us die from cancer, this self-inflicted radiation is responsible for
> 1/28000 of our cancers.
> </cite>
> http://www.marts100.com/Natural.htm
> <cite>
> A number of radioactive materials occur naturally in the earth
> itself. These radioactive materials all have very long half lives,
> and have been present in the earth since its creation. At the
> creation of the earth during the Big Bang, perhaps about 15 billion
> years ago, virtually all possible atoms were created. Most of the
> radioactive atoms will have decayed away, but there are three
> important radionuclides that have such long half lives that even
> after 15 billion years, they are still present in the earth. These
> radionuclides are:
> Uranium-238 half life = 4.46 billion years;
> Thorium-232 half life = 14 billion years
> Potassium-40 half life = 1.3 billion years
> </cite>
> and
> <Cite>
> An important radionuclide that can be found in the human body is
> potassium-40 (it is also found in soils and rocks, and contributes to
> the doses considered in the previous section). The human body of a
> 70 kg man contains about 140 g of potassium, most of which is located
> in muscle. Of this potassium, about 0.018% is radioactive
> potassium-40. This corresponds to a mass of potassium-40 of about
> 0.03 g. It can be shown by calculation that the decay of this
> potassium-40 produces about 6000 radioactive decays every second, and
> therefore body tissues will acquire a radiation dose. The dose
> arising from potassium-40 in the body (and a contribution due to
> naturally occurring potassium-40 in rocks and soils) is about 0.1
> mSv/yr.
> </cite>
> I wonder how many bananas and other potassium rich foods 'odd john'
> eats daily.
> --
> Bob Officer
Did Bob's I.Q. just drop 50 points?
In the soft sciences, that phenomena is called the Baseline Radiation
Level.
No Shit Sherlock, ... there is a Radiation Baseline.
Sorry Bob, but YOU are WRONG while MOI is Correct. Radiation released
during the World War II era made 100% of Europe radioactive. In other
words, the atomic bomb associated radiation contamination rose
Europe's Radiation Level above the previous Baseline level.
In other words, Dumb Dumb, scientists zero out the baseline level,
whatever it might be, in order to measure increases in whatever you
are measuring.
Here endeth Bob Officer's Science Lesson for today.
Boy Bob Officer, YOU are quite the Ignorant Dumb-Ass. :)
See Bob make a fool of himself in his original post at:
http://tinyurl.com/c4sp46g
> On 16 May 2013 21:09:48 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
> wrote:
> >In fact the entire earth was radioactive before atom bombs. Radioactive
> >decay is a normal process,, which is the so called "background" radioactive
> >level.
> The human body naturally accumulates radioactive potassium.
> http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/old%20physics%2010/physics%2...
> <cite>
> A typical human body contains approximately 40 grams of potassium.
> About 1/1000 of this is potassium-40, a radioactive isotope. This
> means that you contain 0.04 grams = 40 milligrams of a radioactive
> cancer-producing isotope in your body. This is not an artificial
> radioactivity, but it is left over from the formation of potassium in
> the supernova that gave birth to our solar system. The half life of
> potassium-40 is 1.26 billion years. The solar system was created
> about 5 billion years ago. That is not enough time for all of the
> radioactive potassium to decay, and that is why there is so much in
> our bodies.
> Atoms of radiopotassium in your body explode approximately 12,000
> times every second. Your body is radioactive. Only 11% of the
> radioactive decays yield a gamma ray, so there are 1,300
> self-inflicted gammas per second from your own body. (This is not
> easy to see in a geiger counter, because gammas are hard to detect.)
> This results in an exposure of approximely 0.00018 Sieverts over a 50
> year period. If the linear hypothesis is correct, this is responsible
> on average for 7 millionths of a cancers per individual. Since 0.2 of
> us die from cancer, this self-inflicted radiation is responsible for
> 1/28000 of our cancers.
> </cite>
> http://www.marts100.com/Natural.htm
> <cite>
> A number of radioactive materials occur naturally in the earth
> itself. These radioactive materials all have very long half lives,
> and have been present in the earth since its creation. At the
> creation of the earth during the Big Bang, perhaps about 15 billion
> years ago, virtually all possible atoms were created. Most of the
> radioactive atoms will have decayed away, but there are three
> important radionuclides that have such long half lives that even
> after 15 billion years, they are still present in the earth. These
> radionuclides are:
> Uranium-238 half life = 4.46 billion years;
> Thorium-232 half life = 14 billion years
> Potassium-40 half life = 1.3 billion years
> </cite>
> and
> <Cite>
> An important radionuclide that can be found in the human body is
> potassium-40 (it is also found in soils and rocks, and contributes to
> the doses considered in the previous section). The human body of a
> 70 kg man contains about 140 g of potassium, most of which is located
> in muscle. Of this potassium, about 0.018% is radioactive
> potassium-40. This corresponds to a mass of potassium-40 of about
> 0.03 g. It can be shown by calculation that the decay of this
> potassium-40 produces about 6000 radioactive decays every second, and
> therefore body tissues will acquire a radiation dose. The dose
> arising from potassium-40 in the body (and a contribution due to
> naturally occurring potassium-40 in rocks and soils) is about 0.1
> mSv/yr.
> </cite>
> I wonder how many bananas and other potassium rich foods 'odd john'
> eats daily.
> --
> Bob Officer
Did Bob's I.Q. just drop 50 points?
In the soft sciences, that phenomena is called the Baseline Radiation
Level.
No Shit Sherlock, ... there is a Radiation Baseline.
Sorry Bob, but YOU are WRONG while MOI is Correct. Radiation released
during the World War II era made 100% of Europe radioactive. In other
words, the atomic bomb associated radiation contamination rose
Europe's Radiation Level above the previous Baseline level.
In other words, Dumb Dumb, scientists zero out the baseline level,
whatever it might be, in order to measure increases in whatever you
are measuring.
Here endeth Bob Officer's Science Lesson for today.
Boy Bob Officer, YOU are quite the Ignorant Dumb-Ass. :)
John H. Gohde
May 17, 2013, 4:16:30 AM5/17/13
to
might yet get up to speed? Nah! I rather doubt that peon will be
able to see past his own nose.
What is a baseline study?
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_baseline_study
Baseline studies
http://tinyurl.com/am76clh
methodological guide to conducting a baseline study
http://tinyurl.com/bd5eccs
John H. Gohde
May 18, 2013, 4:56:55 AM5/18/13
to
Clayton
May 18, 2013, 4:32:55 PM5/18/13
to
alzheimers.
My interpretation of this is that the people with skin cancer have
possibility that they are excreting more toxins through their skin and
in the process develop skin disorder.
The people with alzheimers perhaps retain the toxins which then go on
to develop alzheimers.
Clayton
Clayton
May 18, 2013, 4:39:06 PM5/18/13
to
and curlies merely by pointing out that we were coming from a
background that was scientifically illiterate.
Good to see somebody who can catch him out.
Keep up the good work John.
Clayton
Clayton
May 18, 2013, 4:40:10 PM5/18/13
to
Clayton
clark
May 18, 2013, 4:58:56 PM5/18/13
to
medicine in a ng that is supposed to be PRO alternative.
What is this guy doing posting here anyway - is he being paid by big
pharma or what?
Clark
Bob Officer
May 18, 2013, 8:04:42 PM5/18/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 06:58:56 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, clark
<.@.> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 May 2013 01:08:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
><john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 6:32 pm, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>
>>See Bob make a fool of himself in his original post at:
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/c4sp46g
>>
>>> On 16 May 2013 21:09:48 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
>>> wrote:
>>> >In fact the entire earth was radioactive before atom bombs. Radioactive
>>> >decay is a normal process,, which is the so called "background" radioactive
>>> >level.
>>> The human body naturally accumulates radioactive potassium.
>>> http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/old%20physics%2010/physics%2...
>>> <cite>
>>> A typical human body contains approximately 40 grams of potassium.
<snip>
<.@.> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 May 2013 01:08:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
><john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 6:32 pm, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>
>>See Bob make a fool of himself in his original post at:
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/c4sp46g
>>
>>> On 16 May 2013 21:09:48 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
>>> wrote:
>>> >In fact the entire earth was radioactive before atom bombs. Radioactive
>>> >decay is a normal process,, which is the so called "background" radioactive
>>> >level.
>>> The human body naturally accumulates radioactive potassium.
>>> http://muller.lbl.gov/teaching/physics10/old%20physics%2010/physics%2...
>>> <cite>
>>> A typical human body contains approximately 40 grams of potassium.
>
>Yes, I get tired of listening to people mouthing off about alternative
>medicine in a ng that is supposed to be PRO alternative.
carole, you need to be reminded again exactly what the charter says?
>Yes, I get tired of listening to people mouthing off about alternative
>medicine in a ng that is supposed to be PRO alternative.
http://www.newsdemon.com/newsgroup-info/misc.health.alternative
<cite>
CHARTER
-------
misc.health.alternative is a newsgroup for general non-technical
discussion (pro *and* con) of health care and therapies which are
alternative, complementary, or not commonly accepted by Western
scientific medicine.
[Carole, Did you read the words pro and con above?]
Appropriate topics include (but are not limited to): acupuncture,
Alexander technique, alternative cancer therapies, aromatherapy,
ayurveda, chiropractic, color therapy, healing, herbalism, holistic
dentistry, holistic medicine, homeopathy, hypnosis, iridology,
macrobiotics, meditation, megavitamin therapy, midwifery,
naturopathy,
natural vision improvement (Bates method, etc.), osteopathy,
radiesthesia, reflexology, shiatsu and do-in, traditional medicine
(Arab, Chinese, Native American, etc.), and yoga.
Flames, name-calling, and abusive behavior in general (from either
side) are not welcome, but constructive criticisms and arguments are
encouraged, with the caveat that misc.health.alternative is to be a
generally non-technical consumer level discussion group.
May happiness and health be with you!
--
Peter Kaminski
kami...@netcom.com
71053...@compuserve.com
</cite>
>What is this guy doing posting here anyway - is he being paid by big
>pharma or what?
>Clark
as a poor of a memory which you seem to have?
--
Bob Officer
"Whoops .... now where did I put that other braincell?
It make it very hard to work things out.
Oh, I'll check up my arse ...get back to ya."
carole hubbard in Message-ID: <f3b680d9-da69-4c7e...@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
John H. Gohde
May 18, 2013, 9:19:08 PM5/18/13
to
natural inborn talent to be a scum bag.
clark
May 18, 2013, 11:46:00 PM5/18/13
to
I also don't see anywhere where it says it is ok to support
pharmaceutical medicine Jack.
I don't see any of the allopaths here discussing these topics - all I
see is them supporting 100% conventional medicine.
I come here to find out about ALTERNATIVE medicine since I've come to
realise that establishment medicine doesn't deliver.
So buzz off!!
Clark
Bob Officer
May 19, 2013, 12:31:49 AM5/19/13
to
On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:46:00 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, clark
Just who is jack?
Thus you show the same lack of reading comprehension which carole
shows.
>
>I don't see any of the allopaths here discussing these topics - all I
>see is them supporting 100% conventional medicine.
>
>I come here to find out about ALTERNATIVE medicine since I've come to
>realise that establishment medicine doesn't deliver.
>
>So buzz off!!
>
>Clark
clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
unique Message IDs.
--
Bob Officer
Carole Hubbard stuns the world showing her belief that 2+2 = 3 or 5 says to me
"And one day they might find a cause for your lack of cognitive ability in
putting 2+2 together and coming up with 4 instead of 3 or 5."
in Message-ID:
<f61b82a3-85de-43b2...@p7g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Thus you show the same lack of reading comprehension which carole
shows.
>
>I don't see any of the allopaths here discussing these topics - all I
>see is them supporting 100% conventional medicine.
>
>I come here to find out about ALTERNATIVE medicine since I've come to
>realise that establishment medicine doesn't deliver.
>
>So buzz off!!
>
>Clark
made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
unique Message IDs.
--
Bob Officer
Carole Hubbard stuns the world showing her belief that 2+2 = 3 or 5 says to me
"And one day they might find a cause for your lack of cognitive ability in
putting 2+2 together and coming up with 4 instead of 3 or 5."
in Message-ID:
<f61b82a3-85de-43b2...@p7g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
John H. Gohde
May 19, 2013, 6:10:24 AM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> unique Message IDs.
Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> unique Message IDs.
Liar.
Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?
clark
May 20, 2013, 1:13:39 AM5/20/13
to
Clark
Genelle
May 20, 2013, 1:15:50 AM5/20/13
to
He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
Genelle
Health & Beauty expert
"Beauty is as beauty does"
John H. Gohde
May 20, 2013, 7:54:52 AM5/20/13
to
On May 20, 1:15 am, Genelle <gene...@chenelle.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>
> <john.h.go...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>
> >> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> >> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> >> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> >> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> >> unique Message IDs.
>
> >Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
> >Liar.
>
> >Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>
> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
Bob Officer is a dated has-been who does NOT have a clue as to what he
> >On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>
> >> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> >> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> >> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> >> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> >> unique Message IDs.
>
> >Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
> >Liar.
>
> >Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>
> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
is talking about.
So says so? Somebody in the know, that is who!
Woody
May 20, 2013, 1:21:13 PM5/20/13
to
for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
--
"Men are bullies, they start and conduct all the wars.
All pedophiles and rapists are men. Practically all
murderers and criminals are men. All secret societies
that plot against the world are populated by men. All
big corporations that rob and loot the world's resources
are run by men." - carole hubbard the misandrist
Message-ID: <5tehl.16405$cu....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Bob Officer
May 20, 2013, 5:25:33 PM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:13 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
<wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>
>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>
>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>
>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
What's really funny is the only person Carole is fooling with her use
<wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>
>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>
>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>
>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
of socks is the person that claims to be smarter than everyone else.
John H. Gohde
May 20, 2013, 5:35:06 PM5/20/13
to
On May 20, 1:21 pm, Woody <wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
> > <john.h.go...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>
> >>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> >>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> >>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> >>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> >>> unique Message IDs.
>
> >> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
> >> Liar.
>
> >> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>
> > He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
> > intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>
> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
Wrong! Bob Officer was INCORRECT, IMHO.
> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
> > <john.h.go...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>
> >>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
> >>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
> >>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
> >>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
> >>> unique Message IDs.
>
> >> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
> >> Liar.
>
> >> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>
> > He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
> > intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>
> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
Further, his input is NEVER welcome here.
YOU and YOUR gang of Quacks need to get a life, as well as a brain
transplant.
Who says so? I do. :)
Woody
May 20, 2013, 10:06:23 PM5/20/13
to
On 5/20/2013 5:25 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:13 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
> <wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>>
>>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>>
>>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>
>> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
>
> What's really funny is the only person Carole is fooling with her use
> of socks is the person that claims to be smarter than everyone else.
carole hubbard <-- stupid
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:13 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
> <wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>>
>>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>>
>>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>
>> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
>
> What's really funny is the only person Carole is fooling with her use
> of socks is the person that claims to be smarter than everyone else.
Bob Officer
May 20, 2013, 11:12:21 PM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:06:23 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
Nearly unbelievable, isn't it?
<wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>On 5/20/2013 5:25 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:13 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
>> <wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>>>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>>>
>>>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>>>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>>
>>> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>>> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
>>
>> What's really funny is the only person Carole is fooling with her use
>> of socks is the person that claims to be smarter than everyone else.
>
>carole hubbard <-- stupid
john gohde <--- more stupid than carole
>On 5/20/2013 5:25 PM, Bob Officer wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:13 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
>> <wo...@woodworks-nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/20/2013 1:15 AM, Genelle sock of carole hubbard wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT), "John H. Gohde"
>>>> <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On May 19, 12:31 am, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> clark/carole. nearly everyone has seen the errors where carole has
>>>>>> made the errors of signing or making errors while posting as her many
>>>>>> socks. IP address and CPU ID numbers do not make errors. Maybe you
>>>>>> just do not understand how the program you are using generates the
>>>>>> unique Message IDs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob's own words proves that he at best is OFF-TOPIC or at worst a
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Liar. Now, can this fool kindly get lost?'
>>>>
>>>> He's almost as bad as chung with his one track mind and desire to
>>>> intrude himself where he isn't wanted.
>>
>>> Bob Officer is correct and his input is always welcome here. The problem
>>> for carole hubbard and her socks is that she can never prove Bob wrong.
>>
>> What's really funny is the only person Carole is fooling with her use
>> of socks is the person that claims to be smarter than everyone else.
>
>carole hubbard <-- stupid
Nearly unbelievable, isn't it?
clark
May 21, 2013, 2:51:32 AM5/21/13
to
current establishment position. So he calls being right as holding an
approved position. No unapproved thoughts pass through his mind.
Clark
John H. Gohde
May 21, 2013, 4:39:32 AM5/21/13
to
Reminds me of a physician that I once had the misfortune to visit who
thought it was his job in life to insult me. There is nothing about
the entire process of seeing a physician, that I remotely look forward
to. Everyone of them are slime buckets, as far as I am concerned.
Tell you the truth, don't be ridiculous!
I recently saw this video about how all oncologists are nothing but
sociopaths. Bob strikes me as a sociopath since Officer is
fundamentally just a piece of shit.
The Bob Officers of this World should rot in hell as far as I am
concerned. I certainly will NEVER ever give Bob a penny of my money.
His kind can rot as far as I am concerned, because he fundamentally
likes to see all his self perceived lessers around him rot.
Reg Griswold
May 21, 2013, 7:06:59 PM5/21/13
to
consistency in his replies. The world is run by idiots, sociopaths and
morons and bob and his ilk rate success in life as making lots of
money. I've seen him say so. The way he runs people down for not
having money shows it. This is the same as many of the allopaths who
are in it for the money. Medicine is rated as one of those
"respectable" professions where there is money and status involved.
>
>The Bob Officers of this World should rot in hell as far as I am
>concerned. I certainly will NEVER ever give Bob a penny of my money.
>His kind can rot as far as I am concerned, because he fundamentally
>likes to see all his self perceived lessers around him rot.
There are certain things they do well such as diagnose illness and
emergency care. But you're right John, I wouldn't take anything they
say seriously as regards treatment for chronic disease. Advice to such
people is do your own research, don't rely on "experts".
Reg
"Trust us, we're experts!"
Bob Officer
May 21, 2013, 7:54:26 PM5/21/13
to
projection. carole often posts nonsense she doesn't understand
> - there isn't much
>consistency in his replies. The world is run by idiots, sociopaths and
>morons and bob and his ilk rate success in life as making lots of
>money. I've seen him say so. The way he runs people down for not
>having money shows it. This is the same as many of the allopaths who
>are in it for the money. Medicine is rated as one of those
>"respectable" professions where there is money and status involved.
>
>>
>>The Bob Officers of this World should rot in hell as far as I am
>>concerned. I certainly will NEVER ever give Bob a penny of my money.
>>His kind can rot as far as I am concerned, because he fundamentally
>>likes to see all his self perceived lessers around him rot.
>
>I wouldn't take anything an alloapthis doctor told me too seriously.
>There are certain things they do well such as diagnose illness and
>emergency care.
you to stop seeing a qualified doctor for your real illness?
>But you're right John, I wouldn't take anything they
>say seriously as regards treatment for chronic disease. Advice to such
>people is do your own research, don't rely on "experts".
>
>
>Reg
>
>"Trust us, we're experts!"
Tell us how many times you have actually added 2 + 2 and arrived at
an answer of 3 or 5?
John H. Gohde
May 22, 2013, 12:32:31 AM5/22/13
to
Makes him a stupid sociopath in my book.
Bob's game is up, and he is too stupid to realize it. :)
0 new messages