Six Books that predict Civil War II
dckom
On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:38:12 GMT c.e., dle...@accesscomm.net (Dan Leonik)
wrote :
>
>www.natvan.com
>www.natall.com
>In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave,
>hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him,
>for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain
Mark Twain? Wasn't he the guy who wrote the book about the White boy who
placed personal loyalty above society's racial distinctions?
For more on what Twain _really_ thought about race and racial war, see
http://www.rochester.ican.net/~fjzwick/twain/index.html#EssaysBy
David
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Land and liberty without obstacles.
Ricardo Flores Magon
James A. Donald
nazi scum wrote:
>> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
> Americans.
You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews. What
makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
http://www.jim.com/jamesd/ James A. Donald jam...@echeque.com
Hansjoerg Walther
Hello Michael,
"John Oden" <nabu...@voicenet14.com14> wrote:
>Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
><878140...@augur.demon.co.uk>...
[...]
>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>>
>Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>that support racial separation.
Make a deal with Louis Farrakhan? Ideologically it is really
almost indistinguishable.
Best regards,
Hansjoerg Walther.
Michael
On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 23:35:43 GMT, jam...@echeque.com (James A. Donald) wrote:
Who is currently cowering and slinking away from debating me!!
>nazi scum wrote:
>>> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
>Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>> Americans.
>You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews. What
>makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
WANT TO DEBATE THAT SUBJECT COWARD??
<sig sliced with laser beam>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Michael
natio...@juno.com
"http://www.natall.com"
"http://www.natvan.com"
National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330
Hillsboro, WV 24946
"No man has come to true greatness who has not felt
in some degree that his life belongs to his race."
----Phillips Brooks
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
dckom
On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:19:11 GMT c.e., natio...@juno.com (Michael) wrote
:
>On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 05:26:25 GMT, dc...@atlcom.net (dckom) wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:38:12 GMT c.e., dle...@accesscomm.net (Dan Leonik)
>>wrote :
>
>
>>>www.natvan.com
>>>www.natall.com
>>>In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man and brave,
>>>hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him,
>>>for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain
>
Michael, Michael, Michael, aren't you the one who complains constantly
about un-provoked ad hominems?
>>Mark Twain? Wasn't he the guy who wrote the book about the White boy who
>>placed personal loyalty above society's racial distinctions?
>>For more on what Twain _really_ thought about race and racial war, see
>
>race in the quote by Twain. Or are you of a mind that you can't use a quote by
>someone unless you are in thrall down to the very last detail with their views?
When one uses a quote, particularly to cap a bit of, shall we say,
controversial political journalism, it implies, unless obviously ironic, a
certain amount of agreement.
Mr. Leonik's post was a prediction, and apparently an advocacy, of racial
war in the United States. Twain's racial views were at times contradictory,
but there is more than adequate literary evidence to think he would have
found such advocacy repugnant.
>
>>http://www.rochester.ican.net/~fjzwick/twain/index.html#EssaysBy
>> David
>
>Read Twain's "Letters From the Earth."
Sure, good idea, particularly for Christians. Then read the works at the
url, and consider the moral crisis in "Huckelberry Finn". Then ask yourself
what Twain's reaction would have been to be associated with Leonik's
writings.
David
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free thought, neccessarily involving freedom of
speech and press, I may tersely define thus:no
opinion a law-no opinion a crime.
Alexander Berkman
John Oden
> dle...@accesscomm.net "Dan Leonik" writes:
>
> > Most people beyond the ball game fans and six pack guzzelers are aware
> > that something is amiss in this country, that we are headed down the
> > wrong path. When a draft dodging piece of filth that organized
> > communist demonstrations in a foreign country can become President,
> > then we know the systen is rotten to the core.
>
> We also know that you are exagurating Bill Clinton's anti-Vietnam
> activities.
>
What was an exaggeration? Clinton did demonstrate against America in
England and was welcomed as a guest in Communist Soviet Union when the Cold
War was going on.
> Dan Quale didn't serve in Vietnam either, however few right-wingers
> attack him for that.
>
I'm not a big fan of Quayle (or any politician for that matter) but I
don't recall reading a letter written by Quayle in which he write that he
loathes the American military as Clinton did.
> >
> > Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
>
> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>
Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
that support racial separation.
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Email address: Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk
> "A full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty
> stomach" - Franklin D Roosevelt
> "In the long run, we are all dead" - John Maynard Keynes
> ----------------------------------------------------------
--
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
http://www.usaor.net/users/ipm/
http://www.stormfront.org
http://www.ddc.net/ygg
take out the 14's to reply
Subscribe to our mailing list by sending an e-mail message to:
ADV...@ListServe.com which contains the word "subscribe" as the
subject of your message. (Don't type the " marks.)
Michael
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:14:07 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
(Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
HEY WALTHER! HOW COME YOU KEEP PLAYING WITH THE FOLLOWUPS WITHOUT TELLING ANYONE??
NOT A VERY 'UPFRONT' THING FOR A JEW TO DO IS IT???
>Hello Michael,
<so much for the sincerity of 'mr. screw with the followups'>
>"John Oden" <nabu...@voicenet14.com14> wrote:
>>Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
>><878140...@augur.demon.co.uk>...
>[...]
>>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>>> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>>> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>>> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>>Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>>that support racial separation.
>Make a deal with Louis Farrakhan? Ideologically it is really
>almost indistinguishable.
Is this a racist remark being made toward the Nation of Islam?
ARE YOU JEWISH??
>Best regards,
<If you really meant that you would leave the followups alone or at least warn
people.>
>Hansjoerg Walther.
pseudonym, too??
Hansjoerg Walther
Hello Vincent,
natio...@juno.com (Michael) wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:14:07 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
>(Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
>HEY WALTHER! HOW COME YOU KEEP PLAYING WITH THE FOLLOWUPS WITHOUT TELLING ANYONE??
It was meant as a surprise. I wanted to give you a chance to
get a positive feedback. Moreover, these newsgroups are
relevant to the topic (and t.p.l is not) and should not miss
your debating skills.
>NOT A VERY 'UPFRONT' THING FOR A JEW TO DO IS IT???
I assumed you can read. Was that too much to expect?
>>Hello Michael,
><so much for the sincerity of 'mr. screw with the followups'>
>>"John Oden" <nabu...@voicenet14.com14> wrote:
>>>Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
>>><878140...@augur.demon.co.uk>...
>>[...]
>>>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>>>> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>>>> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>>>> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>
>>>Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>>>that support racial separation.
>>Make a deal with Louis Farrakhan? Ideologically it is really
>>almost indistinguishable.
> Is this a racist remark being made toward the Nation of Islam?
Do you see it as such?
>ARE YOU JEWISH??
Still not of any importance to this discussion.
>>Best regards,
><If you really meant that you would leave the followups alone or at least warn
>people.>
Okay, done herewith.
>>Hansjoerg Walther.
>pseudonym, too??
You mean 'Michael' is a pseudonym? How uncreative of you.
Best regards,
Hansjoerg Walther.
Anton Sherwood
: nazi scum wrote:
: >> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
: Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
: > I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
: > Americans.
James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> writes
: You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews.
: What makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
We don't know what they plan (as if their plans can ever have meaning),
but we can know what they advocate; and by his choice of language
above, our nazi here implies that he advocates expulsion, which was
discussed during the Late Unpleasantness while genocide (as far as I
know) wasn't.
--
Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685 *\\* DASher at netcom point com
"How'd ya like to climb this high WITHOUT no mountain?" --Porky Pine 70.6.19
Michael
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 05:44:41 GMT, tims...@netcom.com (Tim Starr) wrote:
>In article <638hfe$asd$2...@nntp2.ba.best.com>,
>James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote:
>>nazi scum wrote:
>>>> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
>>Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>>> Americans.
>>You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews. What
>>makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
>Well, that's what they SAY they're gonna do. Can't believe everything they
>say, of course.
>Still, I figure that would be a pretty good repeat of the forced expulsion of
>15 million Germans from Poland right after WWII, which Rummel says led to the
>death of 10%, or 1.5 million, of 'em. Since blacks are about 30 million in
>the USA, I figure that means they consider 3 million of 'em dead in the process
>to be acceptable losses.
Enjoying playing with yourself?
<sig last seen hitchhiking on Abbey Road>
Michael
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 04:50:52 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
(Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
>Hello Vincent,
>natio...@juno.com (Michael) wrote:
>>On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:14:07 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
>>(Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
>>HEY WALTHER! HOW COME YOU KEEP PLAYING WITH THE FOLLOWUPS WITHOUT TELLING ANYONE??
>It was meant as a surprise. I wanted to give you a chance to
>get a positive feedback. Moreover, these newsgroups are
>relevant to the topic (and t.p.l is not) and should not miss
>your debating skills.
Oh, gee, I take it all back what I had been thinking. I thought you were being a
deceptive, petty little hypocrite. I see now that I was, er,.........was.
>>NOT A VERY 'UPFRONT' THING FOR A JEW TO DO IS IT???
>I assumed you can read. Was that too much to expect?
Not anymore than you being upfront.
>>>Hello Michael,
>><so much for the sincerity of 'mr. screw with the followups'>
>>>"John Oden" <nabu...@voicenet14.com14> wrote:
>>>>Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
>>>><878140...@augur.demon.co.uk>...
>>>[...]
>>>>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>>>>> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>>>>> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>>>>> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>>>>Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>>>>that support racial separation.
>>>Make a deal with Louis Farrakhan? Ideologically it is really
>>>almost indistinguishable.
>> Is this a racist remark being made toward the Nation of Islam?
>Do you see it as such?
Have problems answering simple questions?
>>ARE YOU JEWISH??
>Still not of any importance to this discussion.
But if you are you may have a blind spot of racism towards Muslims. You wouldn't want
that would you. Racism is problem that must be rooted out and exposed. No one (even
you) is above such a thing. Now confess. You are jewish and you resent Muslims.
>>>Best regards,
>><If you really meant that you would leave the followups alone or at least warn
>>people.>
>Okay, done herewith.
Which?
>>>Hansjoerg Walther.
>>pseudonym, too??
>You mean 'Michael' is a pseudonym?
Does it sound like a pseudonym to you?
>How uncreative of you.
What?
>Best regards,
>Hansjoerg Walther.
Michael
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:46:31 +0100, Hansjoerg Walther <wal...@nineties.com> wrote:
>Hello Michael,
>Michael wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 04:50:52 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
>> (Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
>> >Hello Vincent,
>> >natio...@juno.com (Michael) wrote:
>> >>On Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:14:07 GMT, wal...@nineties.remove-this-to-email-me.com
>> >>(Hansjoerg Walther) wrote:
>> >>HEY WALTHER! HOW COME YOU KEEP PLAYING WITH THE FOLLOWUPS WITHOUT TELLING ANYONE??
>> >It was meant as a surprise. I wanted to give you a chance to
>> >get a positive feedback. Moreover, these newsgroups are
>> >relevant to the topic (and t.p.l is not) and should not miss
>> >your debating skills.
>> Oh, gee, I take it all back what I had been thinking. I thought you were being a
>> deceptive, petty little hypocrite. I see now that I was, er,.........was.
>I want to help you, can't you see? Bei Fuss, Michael,
>sitz.
Yadda, yadda.
>> >>NOT A VERY 'UPFRONT' THING FOR A JEW TO DO IS IT???
>> >I assumed you can read. Was that too much to expect?
>> Not anymore than you being upfront.
>Michael, sei ein braver Hund. Wo ist das Stoeckchen?
>> >>>Hello Michael,
>> >><so much for the sincerity of 'mr. screw with the followups'>
>> >>>"John Oden" <nabu...@voicenet14.com14> wrote:
>> >>>>Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
>> >>>><878140...@augur.demon.co.uk>...
>> >>>[...]
>> >>>>> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>> >>>>> Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>> >>>>> would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>> >>>>> a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>> >>>>Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>> >>>>that support racial separation.
>> >>>Make a deal with Louis Farrakhan? Ideologically it is really
>> >>>almost indistinguishable.
>> >> Is this a racist remark being made toward the Nation of Islam?
>> >Do you see it as such?
>> Have problems answering simple questions?
>No,
Nice dodge.
Is it a racist remark that you made toward the Nation of Islam?
Are you Jewish?
> Louis Farrakhan praises Hitler.
So?
>So do the kids of
>National Alliance.
Yes most of them do. Hitler is not central to the NA philosophy but certainly is
revered and respected by most of the NA parents.
>Ideologically you're almost the
>same. Etc.
In what way are we ideologically 'almost' the same, exactly?
>> >>ARE YOU JEWISH??
>> >Still not of any importance to this discussion.
>> But if you are you may have a blind spot of racism towards Muslims.
>If you haven't noticed, Islam is a religion and not a race.
So?
>> You wouldn't want
>> that would you. Racism is problem that must be rooted out and exposed. No one (even
>Personally, I think we should have a few exemplars of
>it. Would care to be the racist fool furthermore? You're
>really funny.
<Incoherent, thus ignored>
>> you) is above such a thing. Now confess. You are jewish and you resent Muslims.
>I don't resent Muslims. I only think that Louis Farrakhan
>is a disgrace to Islam.
And his organization??
>Countries like Turkey were always
>very friendly towards Jews (e. g. when they were expulsed
>from Spain in the Middle Ages, or during WWII).
Is their 'friendliness toward jews' importatant to you for some reason?
Why were the jews expelled from Spain?? What had they done, exactly??
>What's the question, whether I am Jewish or not, got to
>do with it?
Already answered this.
>> >>>Best regards,
>> >><If you really meant that you would leave the followups alone or at least warn
>> >>people.>
>> >Okay, done herewith.
>> Which?
>Done herewith.
Sputtering out at the end, eh?
Which? (Case you missed it the first time)
>> >>>Hansjoerg Walther.
>> >>pseudonym, too??
>> >You mean 'Michael' is a pseudonym?
>> Does it sound like a pseudonym to you?
>Well, Michael is a name coming from the Hebrew, isn't it?
I don't know. Is it?
>> >How uncreative of you.
>> What?
>So einen Allerweltsnamen als Pseudonym sich zu
>waehlen.
>Zum Schluss werfe ich jetzt wieder das Stoeckchen
>weit in Deine Gruppen hinein. Michael, schau, da
>ganz hinten ist es, such, und bring es zum Herrchen.
<sig snipped>
Caesar
In article <01bce49e$8b136100$4306...@nabucks.voicenet.com>
nabu...@voicenet14.com14 "John Oden" writes:
> >
> > I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
> > Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
> > would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
> > a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
> >
> Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
> that support racial separation.
IIRC there weren't black separatist movements in the 1860s. (If
there were any, they were very small and insignificant).
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Email address: Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk
"A full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty
stomach" - Franklin D Roosevelt
"In the long run, we are all dead" - John Maynard Keynes
This article was posted on 30 October 1997
----------------------------------------------------------
Caesar
In article <3464e37f...@news.hollinet.com>
natio...@juno.com "Michael" writes:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 23:35:43 GMT, jam...@echeque.com (James A. Donald) wrote:
>
> Who is currently cowering and slinking away from debating me!!
>
>
> >nazi scum wrote:
> >>> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
>
> >Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
> >> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
> >> Americans.
>
> >You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews. What
> >makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
>
> WANT TO DEBATE THAT SUBJECT COWARD??
You are the only coward I can see on this newsgroup. You refuse
to engage in private debate via email and insist on posting
your filth to every newsgroup under the sun.
>
>
> <sig sliced with laser beam>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Michael
> natio...@juno.com
> "http://www.natall.com"
> "http://www.natvan.com"
>
> National Vanguard Books
> P.O. Box 330
> Hillsboro, WV 24946
>
> "No man has come to true greatness who has not felt
> in some degree that his life belongs to his race."
>
> ----Phillips Brooks
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Email address: Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk
"A full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty
stomach" - Franklin D Roosevelt
*Attn: A thread with 'APWP' in its subject line has been
posted to *both* talk.politics.libertarian and
alt.politics.white-power
----------------------------------------------------------
Michael
On Fri, 31 Oct 97 11:13:03 GMT, Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>In article <3464a3d1...@news.hollinet.com>
> natio...@juno.com "Michael" writes:
>[snip]
>> >>ARE YOU JEWISH??
>> >Still not of any importance to this discussion.
>> But if you are you may have a blind spot of racism towards Muslims. You
>> wouldn't want
>> that would you.
>How can someone be racist to Muslims? Islam is a religion, not
>a race.
Good point. I stand corrected.
>There are white Muslims (such as those in Albania), black Muslims
>(Uganda) and Arabic Muslims (much of the Middle East).
The question should be amended to: You wouldn't want to be racist toward Arabic
Muslims would you?
Note: The Jews are not just practicing a 'religion'. Jews are a race, nation and a
religion. For Jews there is no distinction between the 3. That is how jews are able
to give us oxymorons's like being a jewish atheist. (Alien concept to you? You
betcha')
Michael
On Fri, 31 Oct 97 11:11:08 GMT, Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>In article <3464e37f...@news.hollinet.com>
> natio...@juno.com "Michael" writes:
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 23:35:43 GMT, jam...@echeque.com (James A. Donald) wrote:
>> Who is currently cowering and slinking away from debating me!!
>> >nazi scum wrote:
>> >>> Race relations - a problem that could have been solved 132 years ago
>> >Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>> >> I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>> >> Americans.
>> >You are too generous to the nazis. They did not expel the jews. What
>> >makes you think they are planning to expel the blacks?
>> WANT TO DEBATE THAT SUBJECT COWARD??
>You are the only coward I can see on this newsgroup. You refuse
>to engage in private debate via email and insist on posting
>your filth to every newsgroup under the sun.
What is your problem with a *public* debate??
I want it public so that everyone can see how bankrupt your ideals of equality and
world-wide racial harmony are. You are (apparantly) to fearful of that exposure.
<other shot ignored>
>> <sig sliced with laser beam>
<sig snipped>
Omri Schwarz
Anonymous wrote:
>
> There is only one solution to the race problem: the total extermination of
> the negro race from the face of the earth. The Nazis showed that the
> industrial-scale extermination of human beings was possible using
> technologies which were already available half a century ago. A combination
> of these plus innovative technologies such as the genetic manipulation of
> watermelons so that they would be poisonous to negroes and only negroes
> could make the world niggerfree within a generation.
>
> RACE RANGER
Well, Race Ranger, thank you for a shot of honesty
rarely forthcoing from the racists (since their line is
"the Nazis couldn't have done it" and
"the Nazis were these warm n' fuzzy guys who would never have
even thought of doing it")
(sperm donation #20, making another blonde Khazar...)
--
Omri "Jackal" "Onmy" "Hey You" Schwarz
From a brochure of a car rental firm in Tokyo:
When passenger of foot heave in sight, tootle the horn.
Trumpet him melodiously at first, but if he still obstacles
your passage then tootle him with vigor.
Michael
On Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:45:22 -0500, Omri Schwarz <ocsc...@antispam.mapsitna.MIT.EDU>
wrote:
>Anonymous wrote:
>> There is only one solution to the race problem: the total extermination of
>> the negro race from the face of the earth. The Nazis showed that the
>> industrial-scale extermination of human beings was possible using
>> technologies which were already available half a century ago. A combination
>> of these plus innovative technologies such as the genetic manipulation of
>> watermelons so that they would be poisonous to negroes and only negroes
>> could make the world niggerfree within a generation.
>> RACE RANGER
>Well, Race Ranger, thank you for a shot of honesty
>rarely forthcoing from the racists (since their line is
>"the Nazis couldn't have done it" and
>"the Nazis were these warm n' fuzzy guys who would never have
>even thought of doing it")
Thanks for confirming yet again that you really are an idiot.
>(sperm donation #20, making another blonde Khazar...)
(you need to leave those little boys alone NAMBLA slime)
<sig run over by a rental car in Tokyo>
Dan Leonik
Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>In article <01bce49e$8b136100$4306...@nabucks.voicenet.com>
> nabu...@voicenet14.com14 "John Oden" writes:
>> >
>> > I assume "solving" the race problem would mean expelling all black
>> > Americans. I don't think the 3+ million blacks in 1860s America
>> > would have been pleased with that. There would have to be
>> > a 2nd civil war to repatriate them all.
>> >
>> Not necessarily. There are quite a few movements within the black ranks
>> that support racial separation.
>IIRC there weren't black separatist movements in the 1860s. (If
>there were any, they were very small and insignificant).
It seems that some of the above posters believe that Abraham Lincoln
had in mind a policy of extermination, or that the only method to
remove blacks from our midst is along the line of 'stuffing them into
gas chambers', etc. I disagree.
It's also amazing how these people can see the ridiculus Hollywood
horror image of 'nazism', while ignoring the all too real horrific
crimes of communism and 'democracy. Clinton, for instance, rolls out
the 'red' carpet for one such relic from China. FDR, Churchill and
Truman lorded over the destruction of millions of Germans and Eastern
Europeans.
Most blacks, when talked to truthfully, as I have, know that the races
on the whole are incompatible. They really do want to separate. The
Jewish controlled media, however, have a powerful weapon against
whites and like to agitate them against us. When blacks are ushered
into an all white area, an economic engine is started because now
whites have to find another house, better transportation, etc. The
bankers are happy to provide us a loan for these expenses. Whites who
don't move become social problems which require public programs, along
with the blacks. The government is happy to tax the surviving white
communities for this expense (minus their fee, of course).
Until whites and blacks can bypass the system and work out an
arrangement to separate, racial anomousity will increase. Any some of
money they request should be given to them as a one time cash payment
for relocation out of the North American continent. The price whites
pay in blood today is far more expensive than any cash payment
tommorrow. Once free of blacks, an economic miracle would happen in
the cleansed USA and the living standards of all whites would jump.
Whites would again be first class citizens who could feel confident
about the future instead of anxious and nervous.
No force, no extermination, no violence. The blacks will not be
interfered with in their tropical 'paradise', only cooly observed.
Much as we do today in watching the havoc they wreak on each other in
Africa.
Recent immigrants should _not_ be given anything. They came here to
take advantage of America's prosperity and should be rounded up and
expelled. So-called 'legal' nonwhite immigrants should be treated less
radically, but encouraged to leave by the state. After expulsion, the
border between Mexico and America should be strewn with land mines.
Surviving invaders caught crossing the border should be shot. The
integrity of a nation must be protected at all costs.
There are many other ways in which the nonwhite population in America
could be shrunk and the white population expanded. Peaceful methods,
psychological methods. The same methods that have been used to shrink
the white population here by as much as 25% in the past thirty years.
Those who insist that this is 'nazism' had best go back and read their
history. America was never intended to be a dumping ground for
nonwhite aliens. No sane country or nation can survive for long as a
multicultural entity. If present trends continue, yes, there will be
another Civil War as the afore books mention.
Ironically, the most violent offenders in this coming war will be
today's fashionable ones who are now yapping mindlessly about
diversity - this is because of human nature. When push comes to
shove, these same people, these slaves to fashion and political
correctness will realize that they've been had; that all their life
savings is kaput; that there is no future for their children and then
they'll be wanting to ring somebody's neck.
In talking to them now, I think I know who they will be gunning for.
Get the test of American Dissident Voices broadcasts by e-mail!
Subscribe to our mailing list by sending an e-mail message to:
ADV...@ListServe.com
which contains the word "subscribe" as the subject of your message.
(Don't type the " marks)
You may also get them from our FTP site at:
Caesar
In article <345a7...@news2.kcdata.com>
dle...@accesscomm.net "Dan Leonik" writes:
>
> It's also amazing how these people can see the ridiculus Hollywood
> horror image of 'nazism', while ignoring the all too real horrific
> crimes of communism and 'democracy. Clinton, for instance, rolls out
If you think the crimes of communism are ignored, you obviously
haven't been reading talk.politics.libertarian for long enough.
BretCahill
We're all mixed race people here on talk.politics.libertarian.
We've all been genetically compromised, and, therefore, only
want to discuss fiscal policy and free markets.
We wouldn't benefit from racial purity theories, *even if they
were correct* so go to talk.racial.purity.
Bret Cahill
All conservatism is based on censorship of
economic information.
-- Bret Cahill
Michael
On Sat, 01 Nov 97 14:04:55 GMT, Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
>In article <345a7...@news2.kcdata.com>
> dle...@accesscomm.net "Dan Leonik" writes:
>> It's also amazing how these people can see the ridiculus Hollywood
>> horror image of 'nazism', while ignoring the all too real horrific
>> crimes of communism and 'democracy. Clinton, for instance, rolls out
>If you think the crimes of communism are ignored, you obviously
>haven't been reading talk.politics.libertarian for long enough.
How about incredibly downplayed if not ignored by the controlled media?
James A. Donald
Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
> If you think the crimes of communism are ignored, you obviously
> haven't been reading talk.politics.libertarian for long enough.
On this one, I have to agree with the nazis. Hitler's murders get far
more publicity than Stalin's murders. (Of course, I, unlike the nazis,
am not weeping that this is terribly unfair to poor dear Hitler.) And
Pol Pot's crimes were pretty much ignored in the west until it was in
the interests of a communist faction to expose them. Pol Pot's crimes
got no significant publicity until the US switched sides, and started
to support Pol Pot against Heng Samrin, whereupon supporters of Heng
Samrin's mass murders, notably Pilger, deluged us with news about Pol
Pot's mass murders, most of it stuff that had been known for many
years but had never got much publicity, and today, even though the US
has been vigorously opposing the Heng Samrin regime, hardly anyone
knows about the crimes of the Heng Samrin regime.
Another point on which I agree with the Nazis: I would like them to
have similar status to the commies. That is to say, I hope to see the
commies reduced to the same insignificant, despised, and uniformly
hated rump that the nazis are today.
Anton Sherwood
Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> writes
: How can someone be racist to Muslims? Islam is a religion, not
: a race.
: There are white Muslims (such as those in Albania), black Muslims
: (Uganda) and Arabic Muslims (much of the Middle East).
Don't forget yellow Muslims (Malaysia).
Caesar
In article <34984565...@news.hollinet.com>
natio...@juno.com "Michael" writes:
>
> >You are the only coward I can see on this newsgroup. You refuse
> >to engage in private debate via email and insist on posting
> >your filth to every newsgroup under the sun.
>
> What is your problem with a *public* debate??
He could ask the question:
"What is *your* problem with a private debate?"
Caesar
In article <dasherEJ...@netcom.com>
das...@netcom.com "Anton Sherwood" writes:
> Caesar <Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk> writes
> : How can someone be racist to Muslims? Islam is a religion, not
> : a race.
> : There are white Muslims (such as those in Albania), black Muslims
> : (Uganda) and Arabic Muslims (much of the Middle East).
>
> Don't forget yellow Muslims (Malaysia).
True.
Michael
On Sun, 02 Nov 97 09:28:19 GMT, Cae...@augur.demon.co.uk (Caesar) wrote:
<Credibility starting to wear thin.>
>In article <34984565...@news.hollinet.com>
> natio...@juno.com "Michael" writes:
>>
>> >You are the only coward I can see on this newsgroup. You refuse
>> >to engage in private debate via email and insist on posting
>> >your filth to every newsgroup under the sun.
>> What is your problem with a *public* debate??
>He could ask the question:
>"What is *your* problem with a private debate?"
One _could_ ask anything.
Here is what you cut out of my post:
I want it public so that everyone can see how bankrupt your ideals of equality and
world-wide racial harmony are. You are (apparantly) to fearful of that exposure.