On 12/30/2015 10:09 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> "jane.playne" <
jane....@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:n60q7r$f0t$
1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 12/30/2015 8:29 AM,
milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 7:58:47 PM UTC-7, jane.playne wrote:
>>>> On 12/29/2015 4:25 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-5, jane.playne
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Actually, the law only goes back to the 60s with the Civil Rights
>>>>>> Act.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Try again, Pretentious Jayne:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. (8 Otto.) 145 (1878)
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._United_States
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> The topic is discrimination by an individual against an
>>>> individual[1], NOT bigamy. Try again Tom.
>>>
>>> Nope, sorry.
>>>
>>> The Kleins did not claim they didn't discriminate.
>>
>>
>> The two customers claimed discrimination; the topic is about
>> discrimination by an individual against another individual.
>
>
>
> Discrimination against a customer by a business.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> They claimed that their religion precluded them from baking a cake.
>>>>
>>>> Please quote the part of the US Constitution protecting an
>>>> individual against discrimination by another individual.
>>>>
>>>
>>> 14th Amendment.
>>>
>>> Section 1.
>>>
>>> All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
>>> the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of
>>> the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law
>>> which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
>>> liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
>>> person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
>>>
>>> ----------------
>>>
>>> See that last part? "equal protection of the laws." Everyone is
>>> entitled to it. Therefore, if one person has the right to walk into
>>> any business and buy any product,
>>
>>
>> Where is it stated that any or every person has a right to walk into
>> any business?
>
>
>
> The Public Accomodations Act of 1964
>
>
>>
>> There is no Constitutionally guaranteed "right" to enter private
>> property.
>
>
>
> Unless that property is opened up to the
> public as a business.
If true then all your constitutional rights are allowed there like the
right to protest and interrupt speeches and meetings which means
hecklers can't be removed for free speech and it also means the right to
carry a gun is protected and also the right to dress any way you please
in any restaurant so Chipotle's is violating people's rights "the same
as the BAKERY that refused to serve the gay wedding cake" by refusing to
allow guns inside there store, a business can't just allow some rights
*if it's considered public property then all our* *rights* *are* *in
force*. The place you have no right to be there, is private property,
which makes all your other rights subject to the owners discretion. But
on public property *all* your rights have a right to *equal protection
of the law*
It's only when you're entering private property that your entry rights
can be subjected to or denied by the whims and property rights of the
owners.
So tell us which is it, can guns be constitutionally carried into any
business, or do the owners have the right to deny service (entry) to
anyone they want.... because trying to force both and allow the owner
to "deny" service to one persons constitutional rights while "allowing"
the other persons constitutional rights is what Jim Crow laws did. The
Government was telling the owners what they could and couldn't do and
that was deemed unconstitutional. SO either the owners "can" deny gays a
wedding cake or the owner can *NOT* constitutionally deny a licensed
gun owner the right to enter with their legally carried gun to buy a
happy ASSAULT WEAPON party cake.
Typical Liberalism you want it both ways so that you get what you want
even when they conflict with each other. The ideology of Liberalism is a
never ending stream of contradictions.
*The ideology of Liberalism is also unsustainable* it will lead to
collapse of Social structure and western civilization. Liberals think
they're elite genius types, but they can't even see what harm they're
doing to our Nation and our way of life. Yet another contradiction. A
genius with their head up their ass, really is *NO* genius at all.