WHY did Trayvon Martin chase down, assault, beat and attempt to murder George Zimmerman?

[Jack Skolasky]

Martin had eluded Zimmerman, who had been attempting to follow Martin at
a safe distance in order to tell police where Martin was. Zimmerman
says he lost sight of Martin, and Martin's girlfriend says that Martin
told her he had lost Zimmerman. There's no doubt Martin had ditched
Zimmerman. Martin was practically in the door at his father's
girlfriend's house, then abruptly went back to confront Zimmerman. Why?
Did his girlfriend encourage him to do it and egg him on? Was he just
a thug punk who would have done it anyway without anyone's suggestion?

[*us*]

Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist.

[Fred E Brown]

"* US *" wrote in message news:b5l1s71lvkh605o81...@4ax.com...

> Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist.

And he's going to get away with it and it will set a precedent
for future cases where whites cap black criminals.

[Sid9]

"Fred E Brown" <frede...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4fc10a90$0$96717$bb4e...@newscene.com...

Fool, blacks got guns, too.

You people say , "Guns make a polite society"

[linuxgal]

Paul Revere'd the right to bear arms too.

[John]

Sid9 wrote:

>
> "Fred E Brown" <frede...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:4fc10a90$0$96717$bb4e...@newscene.com...
>
>>
>> "* US *" wrote in message
>> news:b5l1s71lvkh605o81...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist.
>>
>>
>> And he's going to get away with it and it will set a precedent
>> for future cases where whites cap black criminals.
>
>
> Fool, blacks got guns, too.

Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.

[C...@prayforme.com]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:15:05 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John <john...@oldwest.net>
>wrote:

>
>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>>
>>Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>

>Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
>violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
>back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.

Looks backed up by demonstrated, historical proof and ignored by media
in order to be politically correct for reasons of cowardice.

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ekotaas4dtkfqphe65l@
4ax.com:

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John <john...@oldwest.net>
> wrote:
>

>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>>
>>Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>

> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
> back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.
>

Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.

--

Road Kill!! It's what's for dinner.......


Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman)

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>>Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>

>And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we stopped a
>lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings, intimidation by whites
>(such as yerself) by Brown v Board and the Civil RIghts Act?

When did you become a Republican?

Because it was Republicans that voted in the CRA more than Democrats.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2010/may/25/republicans-and-civil-rights-act/

"The degree of Republican support for the two bills actually exceeded
the degree of Democratic support, and it's also fair to say that
Republicans took leading roles in both measures, even though they had
far fewer seats, and thus less power, at the time. "

Oh wait- aren't you the guy who claims that those republicans were
actually Democrats and vice versa?

[chuckle]

[Harold Burton]

In article <uoGdnXvngKYeDVzS...@earthlink.com>,

Even though they constitute only about 10% of the population.


What a pair of inconvenient facts. :-)

[Harold Burton]

In article <2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ek...@4ax.com>,

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John <john...@oldwest.net>
> wrote:
>

> >> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
> >
> >Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>

> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational

> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations . . .


. . . from other blacks.


"Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of
the time, the murderer is another black person."


<http://bossip.com/589437/race-matters-over-7000-black-people-are-murdere
d-each-year-94-of-the-time-the-murderer-is-black/>

[Harold Burton]

In article <0825s7hvp1tecpf9g...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:37:18 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ekotaas4dtkfqphe65l@
> >4ax.com:
> >
> >> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John <john...@oldwest.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
> >>>
> >>>Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
> >>
> >> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
> >> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
> >> back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.
> >>
> >
> >Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>

> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we stopped a
> lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings, intimidation by whites
> (such as yerself) by Brown v Board and the Civil RIghts Act?

Are you saying that it runs against yer grain to admit that the biggest
threat to blacks is OTHER blacks?



Snicker

[C...@prayforme.com]

Dims 'is' what Dims a'do

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:0825s7hvp1tecpf9g6kcanid7mrmguue21@
4ax.com:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:37:18 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>

>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ekotaas4dtkfqphe65l@
>>4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John <john...@oldwest.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>>>>
>>>>Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>>>
>>> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
>>> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
>>> back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.
>>>
>>
>>Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>

> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we stopped a
> lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings,

Nope. A couple of my relatives got lynched.

intimidation by whites
> (such as yerself) by Brown v Board and the Civil RIghts Act?

I see you have no idea who you are posting to.

[RD Sandman]

Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote in news:hal.i.burton-
E5823B.162...@news.newsguy.com:

They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
black.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

There's nothing as satisfying as a leftist revealing their racist
roots.

Ahhhhhhhhh!

:>

[RD Sandman]

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:qh55s7h0r2ru3o0o8...@4ax.com:

That and making assumptions.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/26/2012 1:34 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

[...]

He didn't. Mr. Zimmerman didn't do any of those.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/26/2012 6:06 AM, * US * wrote:
> [shit]

Mr. Zimmerman didn't do any of that.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/26/2012 9:15 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John<john...@oldwest.net>
> wrote:
>

>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>>
>> Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>

> Blacks are a small minority

Which makes the fact that they commit the overwhelming majority of
firearms offenses all that much more remarkable.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 1:06 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:37:18 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>

>> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ekotaas4dtkfqphe65l@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John<john...@oldwest.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>>>>
>>>> Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>>>
>>> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
>>> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
>>> back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.
>>>
>>
>> Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>

> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because

He's saying that most murders of blacks are done by other blacks. Most
murders of whites are committed by blacks, too.

[RD Sandman]

Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in
news:jZWdnWb7O6OHBl_S...@giganews.com:

First sentence is correct......second sentence isn't. I would be
interested in a cite that show different. The one I am looking at is:

Race (and Sex) of victim by race (and sex) of the offender - 2009

Race of Victim Total Race of Offender
White Black Other Unkown

White Victims 3,518 2,963 454 40 61
Black Victims 2,867 209 2,604 13 41
Other Race 181 50 26 104 1
Unknown race 65 27 22 1 15

Total 6,631 3,249 3,494 158 118

http://tinyurl.com/6rhlch6

[Too_Many_Tools]

On May 27, 4:22 pm, Randal Scripter <kick.dwee...@SouthTeats.conn>
wrote:

> On 5/27/2012 1:06 PM, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:37:18 -0500, RD Sandman
> > <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>  wrote:
>

> >> Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2ba3s7ptjobo4i1ekotaas4dtkfqphe65l@
> >> 4ax.com:
>
> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2012 21:25:01 -0500, John<johnwa...@oldwest.net>

> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>
> >>>> Yes they do, and they do 90% of the shootings.
>
> >>> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
> >>> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations,---and when they fight
> >>> back---a small number against a huge number always "looks" bad.
>
> >> Huh??  Most blacks kill other blacks.
>
> > And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because
>
> He's saying that most murders of blacks are done by other blacks.  Most

> murders of whites are committed by blacks, too.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Wrong..most murders are done by the spouse.

With your own gun.

Get rid of the gun and you will live safer.

TMT

[Too_Many_Tools]

On May 25, 11:34 pm, Jack Skolasky <kick.dwee...@SouthTeats.con>
wrote:
> Martin had eluded Zimmerman, who had been attempting to follow Martin at
> a safe distance in order to tell police where Martin was.  Zimmerman
> says he lost sight of Martin, and Martin's girlfriend says that Martin
> told her he had lost Zimmerman.  There's no doubt Martin had ditched
> Zimmerman.  Martin was practically in the door at his father's
> girlfriend's house, then abruptly went back to confront Zimmerman.  Why?
>   Did his girlfriend encourage him to do it and egg him on?  Was he just
> a thug punk who would have done it anyway without anyone's suggestion?

Nope...Tiggerman is a conservative pedophile who stalks children and
then kills them.

TMT

[Oglethorpe]

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>black.
>

> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>

How do Star Parker, Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams figure into your
racist rant?

[Oglethorpe]

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:41f5s7ln24oohoid2...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:30:59 -0400, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
>>> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations . . .
>>
>>
>> . . . from other blacks.
>

> The prisons full of prisoners weren't put there by blacks
>


They're full of blacks who committed crimes - mostly against other blacks.
When a black person is murdered 94% of the time the murderer was also black.

[Benny Fishhole]

You know, that could have been you, if only your mommies had the money
to give you for some skittles and iced tea.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Sun, 27 May 2012 13:15:03 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>

>>>>Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>>>

>>>And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we stopped a

>>>lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings, intimidation by whites

>>>(such as yerself) by Brown v Board and the Civil RIghts Act?
>>

>>When did you become a Republican?
>>
>>Because it was Republicans that voted in the CRA more than Democrats
>

>Very childish evasion of the facts

I agree you've been childishly evading the facts. That's why I'm
pointing them out to you.

>Republians who voted for the DEMOCRATIC legislation (the civil rights
>act)---were all northern progressives.

Republicans voted for Democratic Legislation when Democrats wouldn't.

>So we can FACTUALLY say: "The civil rights Act was passed with a
>coalition of PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL legislators from Both Sides.

We can factually say, Republicans pushed through the Democrat
legislation when Democrats- proud of their racist roots- balked at
voting in favor of it, like the scum they are.

_______________________________
http://tinyurl.com/Scum-and-villany-wav
-Obi-Wan Kenobi
speaking about the
Democratic Party

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Mon, 28 May 2012 05:20:55 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>When did you become a Republican?
>>>>
>>>>Because it was Republicans that voted in the CRA more than Democrats
>>>
>>>Very childish evasion of the facts
>>
>>I agree you've been childishly evading the facts. That's why I'm
>>pointing them out to you.
>

>I could tell what your "facts" were by the smell. Lot's of it lying
>around the prairie where the buffalo roam

Keep dancing. You can't deny the FACT that more Republicans' voted for
your "democratic" legislation than Democrats.

>>>Republians who voted for the DEMOCRATIC legislation (the civil rights
>>>act)---were all northern progressives.
>>
>>Republicans voted for Democratic Legislation when Democrats wouldn't.
>

>And you can't read either.
>
>The Civil Rights Act was a DEMOCRATIC sponsored and introduced
>legislation.

That's not disputed.


>Over the objection sof the CONSERVATIVE Southern states
>representatives.

Democrats.


>Passage of the DEMOCRATIC legislation required Northern REPUBLICAN
>Progressives in order to pass it.

You can try to divvy it up any way you like. But the fact remains....

More REPUBLICANS voted for it than DEMOCRATS.

So keep trying to revise history. Why not try telling us Lincoln was a
gay progressive..

[chuckle]

>>>So we can FACTUALLY say: "The civil rights Act was passed with a
>>>coalition of PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL legislators from Both Sides.
>>
>>We can factually say, Republicans pushed through the Democrat
>>legislation
>

>Exactly.


Thanks for admitting that Democrats belong to the Party of Racism.

Still do.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 4:40 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:35:43 -0400, "C...@PrayForMe.com"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>> "The degree of Republican support for the two bills actually exceeded
>>> the degree of Democratic support,
>
> The Legislation was introduced by Democrats.

Republicans voted for it at higher percentages than Democrats.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 4:42 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 14:22:31 -0700, Randal Scripter
> <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:
>
>>>> Huh?? Most blacks kill other blacks.
>>>
>>> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because
>>
>> He's saying that most murders of blacks are done by other blacks.
>

> When they're segregated

They aren't.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 4:43 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>> black.
>
> Common excuse and evasion

None, except by leftists too humiliated to face the facts.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 4:44 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:30:59 -0400, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Blacks are a small minority--taking the brunt of generational
>>> violence, lychings, beatings, intimidations . . .
>>
>>
>> . . . from other blacks.
>
> The prisons full of prisoners weren't put there by blacks

Blacks put themselves in prison.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/27/2012 4:40 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:35:43 -0400, "C...@PrayForMe.com"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>> "The degree of Republican support for the two bills actually exceeded
>>> the degree of Democratic support,
>
> The Legislation was introduced by Democrats.

Ha ha ha ha ha!

The Civil Rights Act -- which is best known for barring
discrimination in public accommodations -- passed the House on
Feb. 10, 1964 by a margin of 290-130. When broken down by party,
61 percent of Democratic lawmakers voted for the bill (152 yeas
and 96 nays), and a full *80 percent* of the Republican caucus
supported it (138 yeas and 34 nays).

When the Senate passed the measure on June 19, 1964, -- nine days
after supporters mustered enough votes to end the longest
filibuster in Senate history -- the margin was 73-27. Better than
two-thirds of Senate Democrats supported the measure on final
passage (46 yeas, 21 nays), but an even stronger *82 percent* of
Republicans supported it (27 yeas, 6 nays).


The bill in the House was initially bottled up in the rules committee,
chaired by Howard Smith, a Democrat and - of course - a segregationist.
It was only when a petition for discharge, an extremely rare maneuver,
began to circulate that the segregationist Democrat Smith allowed the
bill to come to a vote and pass in the rules committee, sending it to
the full House.

In the Senate, the bill would have normally gone to the judiciary
committee, headed by James Eastland, a Democrat and - of course - a
segregationist. The Senate leadership came up with a maneuver to bypass
sending the bill to the judiciary committee, and naturally Democrat
segregationists mounted a filibuster. The filibuster ended when the
segregationist Democrats decided to oppose the bill itself (rather than
the committee bypass vote) on the Senate floor. *18 Democrats* along
with one Republican filibustered for 54 days. Two prominent
Republicans, Everett Dirksen and Thomas Kuckel, eventually saved the day
by working out a compromise bill with Mike Mansfield and Hubert
Humphrey. That garnered enough support to end the filibuster, and the
bill passed the Senate and then was sent to a conference committee with
the House.

Opposition to the bill came *principally* from Democrats. Republican
opposition was *not* to the idea of civil rights for blacks, but rather
was to the amount of government power that could be brought to bear on
private business.

Republican support was crucial for overcoming the segregationist
Democrats' last-ditch effort to keep Jim Crow laws in place.

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857r3ds1niumj9i88qv7@
4ax.com:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>black.
>

> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>
>

Fuck you.

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:dse5s71bsi00g3m85hhc4ekmi8iuiel068@
4ax.com:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:39:59 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we stopped
a
>>> lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings,
>>

>>Nope. A couple of my relatives got lynched.
>
> Judging from your character---I can see why.

You know nothing about my character. That's is just about the same as
any other subject you comment on.

[RD Sandman]

"Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com> wrote in
news:l7-dnZOl5KRif1_S...@mchsi.com:

Bullshit.

[de...@dudu.org]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman

<rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857r3ds1niumj9i88qv7@
>4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>>black.
>>
>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>>
>>
>
>Fuck you.

Good answer with someone with no facts. So before you quote your
misleading numbers and attempt to blame violent crime on being black,
maybe you should look up "correlation", "causation", and "does not"
and let's see if you can put them together in a sensible manner. Then
take your crime numbers and correlate against poverty and tell me what
you think is the real cause of violent crime. Oh, and look up "white
collar crime" and apply some of your racial numbers to that one. Then
maybe even correlate white collar crime against socio-economic status,
then tell us who you think is to blame for all our present economic
problems. Hint: it sure the hell isn't poor blacks.

[JamesHutchinson]

DooDoo wrote in message news:50c7s79taqoc27tge...@4ax.com...

On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman
<rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857r3ds1niumj9i88qv7@
>4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>>black.
>>
>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>>
>>
>
>Fuck you.

Good answer with someone with no facts.

<^^^^^

So says the PROVEN RETARDED LIAR that concocts his own "facts" , pulled from
his =known= RACIST ASS!

Did you EVER find France yet, you retard?

[RD Sandman]

de...@dudu.org wrote in news:50c7s79taqoc27tge...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857r3ds1niumj9i88qv7@
>>4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
>>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>>>black.
>>>
>>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Fuck you.
>
> Good answer with someone with no facts. So before you quote your
> misleading numbers and attempt to blame violent crime on being black,

Just where have I done that? Produce or show everyone in here you are no
more than a liar. I said, "Fuck you" simply because I don't like you.
You are an immature piece of trash.

> maybe you should look up "correlation", "causation", and "does not"
> and let's see if you can put them together in a sensible manner. Then
> take your crime numbers and correlate against poverty and tell me what
> you think is the real cause of violent crime. Oh, and look up "white
> collar crime" and apply some of your racial numbers to that one. Then
> maybe even correlate white collar crime against socio-economic status,
> then tell us who you think is to blame for all our present economic
> problems. Hint: it sure the hell isn't poor blacks.
>

You wasted a lot of time erecting a strawman. You put your argument
against something I have never said. I guess you really are that stupid.

[Phling Pu Yu]

In article <doi3s7dpmj4qbf1r5...@4ax.com>
Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
>
> Because he was a junior Thug-Wannabe ....
>
> With a predictable result.

Note how the liberals have dropped this story like a hot rock
since the MSM admitted they misrepresented the facts about
Zimmerman.

[Randal Scripter]

On 5/28/2012 10:07 AM, de...@dudu.org wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857r3ds1niumj9i88qv7@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman
>>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>>> black.
>>>
>>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Fuck you.
>
> Good answer

As good as an ignorant lying Marxist cocksucker like Yeaserghourghooofus
deserves.

[Randal Scripter]

He not only is that stupid - beyond it, actually - he's just the biggest
fucking crybaby in Usenet. You can just tell how emotionally
overwrought he always is.

[George Plimpton]

...as well as having misrepresented Martin. First they were running
three year old pictures of Martin, making look like a really young kid.
Then they got caught running the Photoshopped picture of him in the
hoodie, the one in which his skin has been lightened, his face narrowed,
in which he looks not terribly menacing at all - except it's a fake.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/03/why-was-trayvon-martin-photo-altered.html

Here's what's really funny about the Photoshopped Trayvon: the MSM, by
running with the fake, essentially *admit* that brooding dark blacks in
hoodies look menacing! The left-wing narrative - that Martin was "just
an unarmed kid with Skittles and iced tea" - is a lot easier to sell
with the Photoshopped version.

[RD Sandman]

Randal Scripter <kick.d...@SouthTeats.conn> wrote in
news:aP2dnWgcs5Y9Kl7S...@giganews.com:

I know. I don't think his parents ever let him out of the house on his
own.

[George Plimpton]

What's that? Let's hear it! Did Scheisskopf fail a basic geography test?

[JamesHutchinson]

"George Plimpton" wrote in message
news:ULWdnTmtW6RsJV7S...@giganews.com...

<^^^

As far as he knows, France is VERY close to "Little Italy", which is next
door to "China Town" ....right outside the Holland Tunnel.

Therefore, it's a small world after all!

[Oglethorpe]

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:pf47s7do0rd5uf51m...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 28 May 2012 05:20:55 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>When did you become a Republican?
>>>>
>>>>Because it was Republicans that voted in the CRA more than Democrats
>>>
>>>Very childish evasion of the facts
>>
>>I agree you've been childishly evading the facts. That's why I'm
>>pointing them out to you.
>

> I could tell what your "facts" were by the smell. Lot's of it lying
> around the prairie where the buffalo roam
>

>>>Republians who voted for the DEMOCRATIC legislation (the civil rights
>>>act)---were all northern progressives.
>>
>>Republicans voted for Democratic Legislation when Democrats wouldn't.
>

> And you can't read either.
>
> The Civil Rights Act was a DEMOCRATIC sponsored and introduced
> legislation.
>

> Over the objection sof the CONSERVATIVE Southern states
> representatives.
>
>

That's a lie.

[George Plimpton]

No, he's right, mainly, but what he omits is they were almost all
Democrats. The Democrats opposed the Civil Rights act because they were
opposed to equal rights for blacks; those Republicans who opposed it,
far fewer in number, were opposed because they thought it gave
government too much power to dictate to businesses, and they were right.

[Harold Burton]

In article <_q6dna4kjKrxWl7S...@mchsi.com>,

Without lies, yoorghis would have nothing to post. :-)

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>THere you go again
>
>Party had nothing to do with the vote.

[chuckle]

More history revision from the Democrats- Party of Racism,

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Mon, 28 May 2012 08:05:07 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>I could tell what your "facts" were by the smell. Lot's of it lying
>>>around the prairie where the buffalo roam
>>

>>Keep dancing. You can't deny the FACT that more Republicans' voted for
>>your "democratic" legislation than Democrats.
>
>Everyone who supported the Civil Rights Legislation was liberal or
>Progressive.

More history revision.

Face it.

The Democratic Party was-- and is-- the Party of Racism.

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:6vm7s75t41me4vfgtaevl4ob278gku2s7u@
4ax.com:

> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:44:13 -0500, RD Sandman

> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:dse5s71bsi00g3m85hhc4ekmi8iuiel068@
>>4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:39:59 -0500, RD Sandman
>>> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> And are you saying that it runs against yer grain because we
stopped
>>a
>>>>> lot of the lynchings and beatings, shootings,
>>>>
>>>>Nope. A couple of my relatives got lynched.
>>>
>>> Judging from your character---I can see why.
>>
>>You know nothing about my character.
>

> Of course I do
>
> You're on a level with Beck, Nicklas and Filedud.
>
> That's one step above Dana, Fuji, Pineasshole, Isopropyl, and
> silvershitbag.

No, you don't know. You are simply one shallow, ignorant, little boy.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Mon, 28 May 2012 13:43:43 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <anti...@go.com>
>wrote:

>
>>> The Civil Rights Act was a DEMOCRATIC sponsored and introduced
>>> legislation.
>>>
>>> Over the objection sof the CONSERVATIVE Southern states
>>> representatives.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>That's a lie.
>

>Pretty stupid (like Filedud was) to call historical things "lies",
>Oglebuttlips.
>
>The Democratic party platform committee came under control of the
>liberal wing----and introduced the legislation
>
>The passage required a lot of liberal/progressive republicans

More history revision.

The Democrats had so many racists in their ranks they couldn't get it
passed. Republicans saw a good thing and voted for it in numbers far
outweighing the Democrats.

And Democrats are STILL racists.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

Maybe Dudu lent him his All Seeing Binoculars so he knows what you
think.

[RD Sandman]

Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:6in7s7lcvenngda28...@4ax.com:

They don't seem to work for Dudu, either. ;)

[RD Sandman]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:ton7s7lbvhvrofia1vl20umbk2h77mhq63@
4ax.com:

> On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman
> <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on
>>>>black.
>>>
>>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.
>
>>Fuck you.
>

> Looks like we did in 1865, 1965 and just now.

I'm sorry....those years were on my side of the ledger. I told you that
you knew nothing about me. ;)

[*us*]

Zimmerman is a violent, hate-filled, racist authoritarian
drug abuser with no regard for the law.

[*us*]

Zimmerman was the actual thug.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:41:30 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:29:10 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antiam...@go.com> wrote:
>>They're full of blacks who committed crimes - mostly against other blacks.
>>When a black person is murdered 94% of the time the murderer was also black.
>
>That's the standard excuse of racists who lynched blacks for
>generations.
>
>Always some excuse to evade the racist beliefs and policy
>conservatives implemented.

No doubt.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:26:57 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antiam...@go.com> wrote:

>racist rant ...

You could avoid doing that if you were better educated.

[*us*]

On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:36:21 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:

>"Fred E Brown" <frede...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:4fc10a90$0$96717$bb4e...@newscene.com...
>> "* US *" wrote in message news:b5l1s71lvkh605o81...@4ax.com...
>>> Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist.
>>
>> And he's going to get away with it and it will set a precedent
>> for future cases where whites cap black criminals.
>
>Fool, blacks got guns, too.
>
>You people say , "Guns make a polite society"

If Martin had only been able to defend himself.

[*us*]

Poverty is always a threat, regardless of other factors.

The racist is too stupid to understand that, of course.

[*us*]

On 26 May 2012 11:55:46 -0500, "Fred E Brown" <frede...@nobrain.com> wrote:

>... he's going to get away with it ...

Your fantasy is unhealthy.

Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist drug addict vigilante.

[*us*]

Blacks are criminalized after being socioeconomically oppressed.

The racist believes that would be appropriate because the racist
is incapable of rational thought.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:29:10 -0700, "Oglethorpe" <antiam...@go.com> wrote:

>...who committed crimes ...

Zimmerman sure did.

[*us*]

Zimmerman should have just left his victim alone.

[*us*]

Zimmerman made racist assumptions about his victim
because he's not capable of clear thinking.

He should never be permitted to have a gun again.

[*us*]

The racist is too stupid to understand "socioeconomic",
or any other multisyllabic word.

[*us*]

Zimmerman is a violent racist.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:44:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>The prisons full of prisoners weren't put there by blacks

Indeed.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:43:19 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>... black crime...

>
>Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.

Indeed.

[*us*]

On Sun, 27 May 2012 14:21:04 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:

>...shit...

Try to avoid your keyboard with that.

Your Messiah Zimmerman's an out-of-control violent racist.

[*us*]

Zimmerman, a total failure at neighborhood watch, didn't know the
neighborhood, and didn't know the neighbor, but knew he wanted
to make sure his innocent victim didn't "get away" ..

[*us*]

Martin also had every right to defend his home and family
from the creepy, obsessed racist who was stalking him.

[*us*]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 08:19:09 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:

>... put themselves in prison.

You sure are stupid.

[*us*]

Zimmerman would have left his victim alone if
Zimmerman had been rational and perceptive.

[*us*]

Zimmerman is a violent, obsessed racist.

[*us*]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 08:18:41 -0700, Randam Schitter <thick....@SouthTeats.conn> wrote:

>... too humiliated to face the facts.

You do need an excuse.

Your Messiah Zimmerman wasn't able to process
the fact that walking home from the store with a
tea and some candy is not a crime.

[*us*]

On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:07:36 -0600, de...@dudu.org wrote:

>On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:22 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:bve5s7d4frlsq2857...@4ax.com:

>>> On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:45:56 -0500, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>They are 13 - 16% of the population and most black crime is black on black.

>>> Common excuse and evasion for what the white power and wealth system
>>> has created after being defeated in the 19th and 20th century.

>>Fuck you.
>
>Good answer with someone with no facts. So before you quote your
>misleading numbers and attempt to blame violent crime on being black,
>maybe you should look up "correlation", "causation", and "does not"
>and let's see if you can put them together in a sensible manner. Then
>take your crime numbers and correlate against poverty and tell me what
>you think is the real cause of violent crime. Oh, and look up "white
>collar crime" and apply some of your racial numbers to that one. Then
>maybe even correlate white collar crime against socio-economic status,
>then tell us who you think is to blame for all our present economic
>problems. Hint: it sure the hell isn't poor blacks.

Indeed.