Re: To all our resident anti-gun posters
keithr
> On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
> What "keefy" refuses to accept is it's his anti-gun mates who are
> trying to enforce their belief system onto others.
Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
John-Melb
> Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
Don't be a total dick-head.
Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
nothing.
As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
like me.
Yeah right................
keithr
> On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
>
> Don't be a total dick-head.
No problem, I don't see you as a role model
> Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
> said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
> nothing.
Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.
> As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
> friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
yada yada yada - nothing new here.
> You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.
> Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?
> And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
> like me.
Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
arsehole.
Simple enough for you?
John-Melb
Thanks
> Simple enough for you?
John-Melb
> > On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
>
> > Don't be a total dick-head.
>
> No problem, I don't see you as a role model
>
> > Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
> > said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
> > nothing.
>
> Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.
>
> > As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
> > friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
>
> yada yada yada - nothing new here.
>
> > You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
>
> your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.
>
> > Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
>
> Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?
>
On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
> Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
> countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?
keithr
> On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>> John-Melb wrote:
>>> On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>>>> Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
>>> Don't be a total dick-head.
>> No problem, I don't see you as a role model
>>
>>> Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
>>> said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
>>> nothing.
>> Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.
>>
>>> As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
>>> friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
>> yada yada yada - nothing new here.
>>
>>> You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
>> your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.
>>
>>> Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
>> Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?
>>
>
> On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
>> countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?
That is a comment on US attitudes not US laws, try and keep up
John-Melb
> John-Melb wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 8:33 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
> >> John-Melb wrote:
> >>> On Nov 24, 6:53 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
> >>>> Don't be so egotistical as to believe that anti-john means anti-gun.
> >>> Don't be a total dick-head.
> >> No problem, I don't see you as a role model
>
> >>> Trevor Tosspot posted his O/T anti-gun rants on aus.electronics, you
> >>> said nothing, no criticism, no advice to take it where it's relevant,
> >>> nothing.
> >> Yada yada yada - repeated ad nauseum.
>
> >>> As soon as alternative viewpoint appeared, you and a couple of your
> >>> friends over on aus.electronics went feral.
> >> yada yada yada - nothing new here.
>
> >>> You even followed it up by childishly questioning my sexuality
> >> your reaction would seem to indicate that that is a sore point.
>
> >>> Now you're over here making inane comments about US laws.
> >> Exactly what comments have I made about US laws?
>
> > On Nov 24, 12:24 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> Well the US seems to believe that it's laws should be followed by other
> >> countries so why shouldn't the reverse be true?
>
> That is a comment on US attitudes not US laws, try and keep up
>
Yes, Trevor Tosspot doesn't appear to like Americans much
either.........
Funny about that
>
>
> >>> And others are supposed to believe you're not anti-gun, you just don't
> >>> like me.
> >> Yep, its not so hard really, guns are OK in their place, but you are an
> >> arsehole.
>
> >> Simple enough for you?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Trevor Wilson
**Not that you'll pay any attention, nor even understand my words, I will
now place on the record my feeling in this matter.
* Some Americans are bad.
* Some Americans are good.
* Some Americans are stupid.
* Some Americans are smart.
* Some Americans are delusional paranoid.
* Some Americans are sane, well balanced humans.
* I like some of the Americans I've met (funnily enough, I liked the ones
from NYC and Texas).
* I dispise some Americans I've met (I was not all that enamoured with LA
residents).
* IMO, American gun control laws are stupid, haphazard and poorly policed.
Clear.
jf...@ix.netcom.com
And we, the citizens of the United States, could care less what your
opinions are of our laws. You worry about your country and laws and
we will worry about ours. Clear?
keithr
And what is the relevance of that?
Actually, I quite like America, I lived there for five and a half years,
and have spent 3 - 6 weeks a year there in the 6 years since I returned
to Australia. Liking the place though does not mean that I like all
American attitudes any more than being anti-john means that I am anti-gun.
You really do have trouble grasping even the simplest of concepts don't you?
John-Melb
wrote:
> **Not that you'll pay any attention, nor even understand my words, I will
> now place on the record my feeling in this matter.
>
> * Some Americans are bad.
> * Some Americans are good.
> * Some Americans are stupid.
> * Some Americans are smart.
> * Some Americans are delusional paranoid.
> * Some Americans are sane, well balanced humans.
> * I like some of the Americans I've met (funnily enough, I liked the ones
> from NYC and Texas).
> * I dispise some Americans I've met (I was not all that enamoured with LA
> residents).
> * IMO, American gun control laws are stupid, haphazard and poorly policed.
>
> Clear
Not the sort of thing's you've said in the past
---------------------------------------------------------------
On May 21, 11:08 am, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> **Perhaps you're smarter than mostAmericans. Most of them think that Hugh
> Lawrie is an American.
----------------------------------------------------------------
On Jun 16, 7:03 pm, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
> > Lock 'em up. Unless, of course, you'd prefer to
> > live in a state of paranoia, like mostAmericansdo.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Oct 25 2004, 4:36 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> **That much is abundantly clear to the entire planet. After, all the
> majority of you clowns voted for a brain dead, religious nutter for your
> President. That fact, alone, is evidence that at least 50% of the US
> population doesn't have a clue.
> **Sure. None of us ever expectAmericansto be smarter than we orginally
> figured. You'll just confirm your own lack of critical thinking ability.
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec 6 2006, 2:21 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> ** I've met quite a fewAmericanswho live well above the poverty line and are as dumb as a pile of
> rocks.
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Mar 10 2006, 1:38 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
> **Don't forget: Fat, lazy-arsedAmericans.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Do you change your underpants as often as you change your assertions?
John-Melb
I was an onservation that you're getting more and more like your
"Newest, bestest friend every day, they'll soon be refering to you two
as "bookends"
keithr
Wrong john "They" is plural, you are only singular. You're on your own boy
>> Actually, I quite like America, I lived there for five and a half years,
>> and have spent 3 - 6 weeks a year there in the 6 years since I returned
>> to Australia. Liking the place though does not mean that I like all
>> American attitudes any more than being anti-john means that I am anti-gun.
>>
>> You really do have trouble grasping even the simplest of concepts don't you?
No answer eh? Not surprising, your postings are limited to a few
catchphrases no real intelligence displayed.
Trevor Wilson
<jf...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:veiog590uv495pcr7...@4ax.com...
**It's clear that you care enough to respond. Additionally, it was not I
that crossposted this thread.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au