Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Federal court strikes down Texas voter ID law

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Lookout

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 12:52:58 AM8/31/12
to
One down and how many to go?????

http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/30/politics/texas-voter-id-law/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

Washington (CNN) -- A federal appeals court in Washington Thursday
struck down the Texas voter ID law requiring photos for voters at the
polls, calling it racially discriminatory.

The decision is a major victory for the Obama administration and its
Democratic allies, which had challenged the law.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott promptly announced the state will
appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Republican Gov. Rick Perry signed the voter ID measure into law last
year, but it had yet not gone into effect because the federal Voting
Rights Act requires changes in Texas voting laws to be pre-cleared by
the U.S. Justice Department.

Attorney General Eric Holder denied the pre-clearance of the measure
in March, concluding that Texas failed to show the law will not have
"the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of
race."

The three-judge panel agreed.

Although the law provides for approved voter registration certificates
with no photo as acceptable for voting in certain circumstances, the
court said the law imposes "strict unforgiving burdens on the poor."
The court noted the requirements will fall heavily on
African-Americans and Hispanics, who make up a disproportionate
percentage of the poor in Texas.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 7:15:49 AM8/31/12
to
>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>One down and how many to go?????

Too bad. Anyone too stupid to be able to get an ID should be denied
the right to vote.

deep

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 8:39:18 AM8/31/12
to
And here you have the gall to claim you support the Constitution when
you cleary are against everything it stands for.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 8:40:24 AM8/31/12
to
>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
You clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

The insane and the mentally retarded don't have the right to vote.

You, for instance.

Scout

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 5:00:39 PM8/31/12
to


"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
news:d2c148lhb16hv96ni...@4ax.com...
ROFL....that's funny coming from someone that has shown they don't even
understand the Constitution.


Lookout

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 3:37:52 AM9/2/12
to
He's never proven that, dumbass.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 6:47:34 AM9/2/12
to
>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:00:39 -0400, "Scout"
><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>news:d2c148lhb16hv96ni...@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 04:15:49 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>> <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>One down and how many to go?????
>>>>
>>>>Too bad. Anyone too stupid to be able to get an ID should be denied
>>>>the right to vote.
>>>
>>> And here you have the gall to claim you support the Constitution when
>>> you cleary are against everything it stands for.
>>
>>ROFL....that's funny coming from someone that has shown they don't even
>>understand the Constitution.
>>
>He's never proven that, dumbass.

Um, yeah, he has.

deep

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 10:32:16 AM9/2/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:00:39 -0400, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>
>
The Constitution was written by liberals who wanted to ensure that ALL
people were able to vote.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 10:48:32 AM9/2/12
to
>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>The Constitution was written by liberals who wanted to ensure that ALL
>people were able to vote.

No, it wasn't.

ANOTHER lie.

RD Sandman

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 2:38:10 PM9/2/12
to
deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:ner648tdq21o8amflmm4itelivnh3asg29@
4ax.com:
That must be why they limited voting to landed gentry.

--

If you see a bomb technician running....
Do try to keep up with him.


Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman)

Scout

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 9:11:06 PM9/2/12
to


"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
news:ner648tdq21o8amfl...@4ax.com...
And thus we establish that Dudu really doesn't understand the Constitution
or the need for Amendments to ensure that all people, or at least most,
could vote.


Scout

unread,
Sep 2, 2012, 9:12:09 PM9/2/12
to


"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA0C276602...@216.196.121.131...
> deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:ner648tdq21o8amflmm4itelivnh3asg29@
> 4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:00:39 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>news:d2c148lhb16hv96ni...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 04:15:49 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>> <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>
>>>>>>One down and how many to go?????
>>>>>
>>>>>Too bad. Anyone too stupid to be able to get an ID should be denied
>>>>>the right to vote.
>>>>
>>>> And here you have the gall to claim you support the Constitution when
>>>> you cleary are against everything it stands for.
>>>
>>>ROFL....that's funny coming from someone that has shown they don't even
>>>understand the Constitution.
>>>
>> The Constitution was written by liberals who wanted to ensure that ALL
>> people were able to vote.
>
>
> That must be why they limited voting to landed gentry.

Have to say, it's rather comforting to point out that Dudu doesn't
understand the Constitution....then he confirms that again by showing he
still really doesn't.


RD Sandman

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 3:07:20 PM9/3/12
to
"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:k2105q
$f2s$1...@dont-email.me:
;)

WangoTango

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 7:55:26 PM9/4/12
to
In article <ekg0481dcm2lmekuj...@4ax.com>, mrLookout1
@yahoo.com says...
> Washington (CNN) -- A federal appeals court in Washington Thursday
> struck down the Texas voter ID law requiring photos for voters at the
> polls, calling it racially discriminatory.

Umm, do they mean photo ID?
I guess if we don't need an ID to vote, we shouldn't need one for any
other rights either, right? (High voiced, leading question...)

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 8:08:08 PM9/4/12
to
>WangoTango <Asga...@mindspring.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
How is it racially discriminatory?

Is the appeals judge saying minorities are too stupid to get an ID?

Lookout

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:21:25 PM9/4/12
to
Actually as I've explained OVER AND OVER again here I think ALL states
should have voter ID laws that include picture ID. What I think is
wrong is for it to be done state by state.

If you had been paying attention you'd know how I felt on this. What's
wrong with your memory? RD and I have had it out over this exact point
repeatedly.

WangoTango

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 11:34:07 AM9/6/12
to
In article <l5hd4895p1a90eu4s...@4ax.com>, mrLookout1
@yahoo.com says...
I was responding to the article. Wasn't that clear? I quoted ONLY a
part of the article. Did you post something?

Lookout

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 12:46:03 PM9/6/12
to
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:34:07 -0400, WangoTango
So you were asking an article a question?
And the lies continue....

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 3:01:10 PM9/6/12
to
>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

Wango: Lookout is not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

WangoTango

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 2:47:24 PM9/10/12
to
In article <cpkh48lk54h9mp5it...@4ax.com>, mrLookout1
Did I quote anything you said?
Did you actually SAY anything or just quote an article?

Lookout

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 4:23:12 PM9/10/12
to
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:47:24 -0400, WangoTango
Spin it all you want. You got nailed.

Alec Fraser

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 5:00:27 PM9/10/12
to


"Lookout" wrote in message
news:31js485i27sobiav0...@4ax.com...
>^^^^^

Lookout? You nailed your own one good foot to the floor years ago, and you
are STILL running around in circles getting dizzy again.
Yer a Loony Toon!

Tell us again how you were, then were not in the military, how you were a
medic, then you were not, how cars did not have alternators, then they did,
and that AMBIEN EXCUSE you always use.'


WangoTango

unread,
Sep 12, 2012, 2:34:51 PM9/12/12
to
In article <31js485i27sobiav0...@4ax.com>, mrLookout1
Did you answer the question?
Did you actually say anything or just repost an article?

Lookout

unread,
Sep 12, 2012, 6:15:51 PM9/12/12
to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:34:51 -0400, WangoTango
You made an ass of yourself again.

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Sep 12, 2012, 8:19:56 PM9/12/12
to
>Lookout <mrLoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :


>You made an ass of yourself again.

Like this?

___________

"What an learn, drunk"
-Lookout drunk-flame fail
8/31/2011

WangoTango

unread,
Sep 13, 2012, 11:16:44 AM9/13/12
to
In article <7c2258d6989e21ph9...@4ax.com>, mrLookout1
I don't know what you think has gone on, but your inability to answer a
simple question, AGAIN, is the only asshole thing going on here.

Lookout

unread,
Sep 14, 2012, 11:30:11 PM9/14/12
to
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:16:44 -0400, WangoTango
I answered.
0 new messages