Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Is the NRA responsible for Las Vegas shooting as Libs say?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
benj
Oct 3, 2017, 6:45:23 PM10/3/17
to
So here's another mass shooting and right on cue all the people who want
an American police state start screaming for "sensible" gun control
laws. And along with that comes the usual nonsense that it is the NRA
which is funded by gun manufacturers that was the cause of this shooting.
Well, The media libs have done a pretty good job of fooling gullible
Americans. They've reversed all of history. While Democrats founded the
Klan, they've convinced everybody that it is republicans who are all
klan members. While fought to keep slavery tooth and nail as well as
fought the vote for women, they've somehow managed to convince the
gullible that republicans are all sexist bigot racists. They've even
managed to reverse the meanings of Liberal and conservative. Jefferson
and the founders were called liberals back then. No surprise that the
NRA is their target.
Hey, I'm an NRA member and I know a thing or two about just what kind of
things NRA would start to shoot at. Who used an "assault weapon" to
shoot republican Congressmen? Why a flaming liberal socialist Bernie
supporter, natch. If you told me that a PETA convention was shot up and
the NRA did it, I might be inclined to think that was possible. If you
told me the aging hippies doing "occupy Wall Street" was sprayed with
bullets, yeah, that actually COULD happen. NOT very likely but COULD
happen.
But when you tell me that a country music concert was shot up with
machine gun fire, and blame the NRA, there is only one possibility. YOU
ARE LYING! Simply can't happen. Country music fans ARE then NRA.
Face it country music fans represent all the inbred, uneducated, cousin
marrying deplorables that libs would order killed in a heartbeat! They
represent EVERYTHING liberals hate. They represent conservatives and
they represent Trump supporters. Lefty Libs machine gunning the Trump
base? Now that reeks of being plausible.
NRA shooting up a country music concert? The only people who would
propose that idea are people ignorant enough that they call cartridges
"bullets".
an American police state start screaming for "sensible" gun control
laws. And along with that comes the usual nonsense that it is the NRA
which is funded by gun manufacturers that was the cause of this shooting.
Well, The media libs have done a pretty good job of fooling gullible
Americans. They've reversed all of history. While Democrats founded the
Klan, they've convinced everybody that it is republicans who are all
klan members. While fought to keep slavery tooth and nail as well as
fought the vote for women, they've somehow managed to convince the
gullible that republicans are all sexist bigot racists. They've even
managed to reverse the meanings of Liberal and conservative. Jefferson
and the founders were called liberals back then. No surprise that the
NRA is their target.
Hey, I'm an NRA member and I know a thing or two about just what kind of
things NRA would start to shoot at. Who used an "assault weapon" to
shoot republican Congressmen? Why a flaming liberal socialist Bernie
supporter, natch. If you told me that a PETA convention was shot up and
the NRA did it, I might be inclined to think that was possible. If you
told me the aging hippies doing "occupy Wall Street" was sprayed with
bullets, yeah, that actually COULD happen. NOT very likely but COULD
happen.
But when you tell me that a country music concert was shot up with
machine gun fire, and blame the NRA, there is only one possibility. YOU
ARE LYING! Simply can't happen. Country music fans ARE then NRA.
Face it country music fans represent all the inbred, uneducated, cousin
marrying deplorables that libs would order killed in a heartbeat! They
represent EVERYTHING liberals hate. They represent conservatives and
they represent Trump supporters. Lefty Libs machine gunning the Trump
base? Now that reeks of being plausible.
NRA shooting up a country music concert? The only people who would
propose that idea are people ignorant enough that they call cartridges
"bullets".
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 6:51:27 PM10/3/17
to
snip
No it was some loon with easy access to guns
No it was some loon with easy access to guns
Just Wondering
Oct 3, 2017, 7:38:47 PM10/3/17
to
On 10/3/2017 4:51 PM, de chucka wrote:
>
> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>
A loon who passed NICS background checks with flying
>
> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>
colors. A loon with a clean criminal background and
a clean mental health background. A loon who would
not have been impeded by just about any gun control
legislation you can imagine.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Oct 3, 2017, 8:11:34 PM10/3/17
to
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:51:20 +1100, de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>snip
>
>No it was some loon with easy access to guns
Cite that it was easy.
wrote:
>snip
>
>No it was some loon with easy access to guns
!Jones
Oct 3, 2017, 8:22:53 PM10/3/17
to
x-no-idiots: yes
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:51:20 +1100, in talk.politics.guns de chucka
<Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>No it was some loon with easy access to guns
Oh... is that different?
--
How's my posting?
Direct Complaints to the Usenet Abuse Hotline:
Please Dial: 1-800-328-7448
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:51:20 +1100, in talk.politics.guns de chucka
<Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>No it was some loon with easy access to guns
--
How's my posting?
Direct Complaints to the Usenet Abuse Hotline:
Please Dial: 1-800-328-7448
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 8:25:22 PM10/3/17
to
benj <be...@nobody.net> wrote in news:59d41301$0$11129$b1db1813$f9722a78
@news.astraweb.com:
> So here's another mass shooting and right on cue all the people who
want
> an American police state start screaming for "sensible" gun control
> laws. And along with that comes the usual nonsense that it is the NRA
> which is funded by gun manufacturers that was the cause of this
shooting.
>
> Well, The media libs have done a pretty good job of fooling gullible
> Americans. They've reversed all of history. While Democrats founded the
> Klan, they've convinced everybody that it is republicans who are all
> klan members. While fought to keep slavery tooth and nail as well as
> fought the vote for women, they've somehow managed to convince the
> gullible that republicans are all sexist bigot racists. They've even
> managed to reverse the meanings of Liberal and conservative. Jefferson
> and the founders were called liberals back then. No surprise that the
> NRA is their target.
>
> Hey, I'm an NRA member
As am I, Endowment.
and I know a thing or two about just what kind of
> things NRA would start to shoot at. Who used an "assault weapon" to
> shoot republican Congressmen? Why a flaming liberal socialist Bernie
> supporter, natch. If you told me that a PETA convention was shot up and
> the NRA did it, I might be inclined to think that was possible. If you
> told me the aging hippies doing "occupy Wall Street" was sprayed with
> bullets, yeah, that actually COULD happen. NOT very likely but COULD
> happen.
>
> But when you tell me that a country music concert was shot up with
> machine gun fire, and blame the NRA, there is only one possibility. YOU
> ARE LYING! Simply can't happen. Country music fans ARE then NRA.
> Face it country music fans represent all the inbred, uneducated, cousin
> marrying deplorables that libs would order killed in a heartbeat! They
> represent EVERYTHING liberals hate. They represent conservatives and
> they represent Trump supporters. Lefty Libs machine gunning the Trump
> base? Now that reeks of being plausible.
>
> NRA shooting up a country music concert? The only people who would
> propose that idea are people ignorant enough that they call cartridges
> "bullets".
>
>
>
>
>
--
RD The Sandman
If you see a munitions guy running, do try to
keep up with him.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
@news.astraweb.com:
> So here's another mass shooting and right on cue all the people who
want
> an American police state start screaming for "sensible" gun control
> laws. And along with that comes the usual nonsense that it is the NRA
> which is funded by gun manufacturers that was the cause of this
shooting.
>
> Well, The media libs have done a pretty good job of fooling gullible
> Americans. They've reversed all of history. While Democrats founded the
> Klan, they've convinced everybody that it is republicans who are all
> klan members. While fought to keep slavery tooth and nail as well as
> fought the vote for women, they've somehow managed to convince the
> gullible that republicans are all sexist bigot racists. They've even
> managed to reverse the meanings of Liberal and conservative. Jefferson
> and the founders were called liberals back then. No surprise that the
> NRA is their target.
>
> Hey, I'm an NRA member
and I know a thing or two about just what kind of
> things NRA would start to shoot at. Who used an "assault weapon" to
> shoot republican Congressmen? Why a flaming liberal socialist Bernie
> supporter, natch. If you told me that a PETA convention was shot up and
> the NRA did it, I might be inclined to think that was possible. If you
> told me the aging hippies doing "occupy Wall Street" was sprayed with
> bullets, yeah, that actually COULD happen. NOT very likely but COULD
> happen.
>
> But when you tell me that a country music concert was shot up with
> machine gun fire, and blame the NRA, there is only one possibility. YOU
> ARE LYING! Simply can't happen. Country music fans ARE then NRA.
> Face it country music fans represent all the inbred, uneducated, cousin
> marrying deplorables that libs would order killed in a heartbeat! They
> represent EVERYTHING liberals hate. They represent conservatives and
> they represent Trump supporters. Lefty Libs machine gunning the Trump
> base? Now that reeks of being plausible.
>
> NRA shooting up a country music concert? The only people who would
> propose that idea are people ignorant enough that they call cartridges
> "bullets".
>
>
>
>
>
RD The Sandman
If you see a munitions guy running, do try to
keep up with him.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 8:25:37 PM10/3/17
to
statement is BS. Could Australian laws by implemented in the US, no.
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 8:26:06 PM10/3/17
to
de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:rdmdnbDGFIL3iUnEnZ2dnUU7-
Wud...@westnet.com.au:
> snip
>
> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>
That I can believe......the twit was a loon, but nothing showed up on his
background check.
Wud...@westnet.com.au:
> snip
>
> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>
background check.
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 8:26:14 PM10/3/17
to
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 8:43:28 PM10/3/17
to
de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:o_adnf8MZpbht0nEnZ2dnUU7-
K-d...@westnet.com.au:
You flat ass do not know that. Are you telling me that no one in OZ
could ever own that many guns? Even if he never registered them?
Could Australian laws by implemented in the US, no.
>
K-d...@westnet.com.au:
could ever own that many guns? Even if he never registered them?
Could Australian laws by implemented in the US, no.
>
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 8:51:25 PM10/3/17
to
On 4/10/2017 11:43 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:o_adnf8MZpbht0nEnZ2dnUU7-
> K-d...@westnet.com.au:
>
>> On 4/10/2017 10:38 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> On 10/3/2017 4:51 PM, de chucka wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>>>
>>> A loon who passed NICS background checks with flying
>>> colors. A loon with a clean criminal background and
>>> a clean mental health background. A loon who would
>>> not have been impeded by just about any gun control
>>> legislation you can imagine.
>>
>>
>> He wouldn't of got that number of guns legally in Australia so your
>> statement is BS.
>
> You flat ass do not know that. Are you telling me that no one in OZ
> could ever own that many guns?
Yes
> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:o_adnf8MZpbht0nEnZ2dnUU7-
> K-d...@westnet.com.au:
>
>> On 4/10/2017 10:38 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> On 10/3/2017 4:51 PM, de chucka wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>>>
>>> A loon who passed NICS background checks with flying
>>> colors. A loon with a clean criminal background and
>>> a clean mental health background. A loon who would
>>> not have been impeded by just about any gun control
>>> legislation you can imagine.
>>
>>
>> He wouldn't of got that number of guns legally in Australia so your
>> statement is BS.
>
> You flat ass do not know that. Are you telling me that no one in OZ
> could ever own that many guns?
Even if he never registered them?
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 9:11:40 PM10/3/17
to
de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:pPednTafbs0VrUnE...@westnet.com.au:
without a background check. Glad we cleared that up.
>> Could Australian laws by implemented in the US, no.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 9:26:32 PM10/3/17
to
On 4/10/2017 12:11 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:pPednTafbs0VrUnE...@westnet.com.au:
>
>> On 4/10/2017 11:43 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:o_adnf8MZpbht0nEnZ2dnUU7- K-d...@westnet.com.au:
>>>
>>>> On 4/10/2017 10:38 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> On 10/3/2017 4:51 PM, de chucka wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>>>>>
>>>>> A loon who passed NICS background checks with flying
>>>>> colors. A loon with a clean criminal background and
>>>>> a clean mental health background. A loon who would
>>>>> not have been impeded by just about any gun control
>>>>> legislation you can imagine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He wouldn't of got that number of guns legally in Australia so your
>>>> statement is BS.
>>>
>>> You flat ass do not know that. Are you telling me that no one in OZ
>>> could ever own that many guns?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> Even if he never registered them?
>>
>> hence the legally
>
> Hence it is basically the same as the US. You can buy a gun in OZ
> without a background check.
Not legally so it is completely different to the US
> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:pPednTafbs0VrUnE...@westnet.com.au:
>
>> On 4/10/2017 11:43 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>> de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:o_adnf8MZpbht0nEnZ2dnUU7- K-d...@westnet.com.au:
>>>
>>>> On 4/10/2017 10:38 AM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> On 10/3/2017 4:51 PM, de chucka wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>>>>>
>>>>> A loon who passed NICS background checks with flying
>>>>> colors. A loon with a clean criminal background and
>>>>> a clean mental health background. A loon who would
>>>>> not have been impeded by just about any gun control
>>>>> legislation you can imagine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He wouldn't of got that number of guns legally in Australia so your
>>>> statement is BS.
>>>
>>> You flat ass do not know that. Are you telling me that no one in OZ
>>> could ever own that many guns?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> Even if he never registered them?
>>
>> hence the legally
>
> Hence it is basically the same as the US. You can buy a gun in OZ
> without a background check.
dr. postalman
Oct 3, 2017, 9:30:13 PM10/3/17
to
On 10/3/2017 6:22 PM, !Jones wrote:
> Oh... is that different?
>
> --
> How's my posting?
Treasonous as always.
> Oh... is that different?
>
> --
> How's my posting?
And you will be found and made to pay for your treason, btw.
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 11:03:55 PM10/3/17
to
de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:BKydnTpAgOhcpUnEnZ2dnUU7-
fud...@westnet.com.au:
You have shrinks that do remote psychoanalysIs without seeing the
patient? You are not only wrong, you are a liar..
fud...@westnet.com.au:
patient? You are not only wrong, you are a liar..
de chucka
Oct 3, 2017, 11:17:23 PM10/3/17
to
certain the arsenal that was used in Vegas wouldn't be possible to
obtain legally in Aus even with a class C license.
RD Sandman
Oct 3, 2017, 11:31:57 PM10/3/17
to
de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:-pCdnechh8Ijz0nE...@westnet.com.au:
>> You are not only wrong, you are a liar..
Klaus Schadenfreude
Oct 4, 2017, 6:52:28 AM10/4/17
to
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 11:26:07 +1100, de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On 4/10/2017 11:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:51:20 +1100, de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> snip
>>>
>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>
>> Cite that it was easy.
>
>You are kidding aren't you?
Inability to cite noted and logged.
>On 4/10/2017 11:11 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:51:20 +1100, de chucka <Dech...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> snip
>>>
>>> No it was some loon with easy access to guns
>>
>> Cite that it was easy.
>
>You are kidding aren't you?
Just Wondering
Oct 4, 2017, 12:31:30 PM10/4/17
to
first sentence BS. But tell us, what Australia law makes it illegal for
someone to own 40 firearms?
0 new messages