> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:03:55 -0600, super70s
> <supe...@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On 2024-02-20 13:19:53 +0000, Scout said:
>>
>>> "super70s" <supe...@super70s.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:ur1dd2$2bnce$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 2024-02-20 04:58:31 +0000, Big Trump Failure said:
>>>>
>>>>> He should have sold them slip ons.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not a sneaker freak (usually only teens and those in their 20s
>>>> are) but word is there's some famous shoe designer who has
>>>> trademarked red soles for sneakers and they're talking about the
>>>> possibility of a lawsuit against Trump's shoes, lol.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe if he's lucky he won't lose more than 100 bucks per pair
>>>> after the lawyers are paid.
>>>
>>> Well, given shoes have had red soles before, and still do.. I don't
>>> see how they can trademark something already in the public domain.
>>
>>Well apparently you can, at least with high-end fashion shoes.
>>
>>
https://www.cnn.com/2012/09/06/justice/new-york-red-sole-shoes/index.ht
>>ml
>>
>>All Trump needs to do is sell about 1,140,000 pairs of sneakers at
>>$399 each to pay off that $455 million NY judgement.
>
> If he makes them in China for ten bucks a pair.
>