Re: Franken won Minnesota
Aratzio
���hw��f <snuh...@netscape.net> got double secret probation for
writing:
>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>of<ltlr455nrle5slrai...@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:35:14 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
>>alt.usenet.kooks, Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> got double
>>secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Jul 2, 10:56�pm, "Pig Brick" <pigbr...@pigbrick.com> wrote:
>>>> "Aratzio" <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:n2uq45pe4fru5adph...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:00:59 -0500, in the land of
>alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>> > "Pig Brick" <pigbr...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation
>for
>>>> > writing:
>>>>
>>>> >>"Aratzio" <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >>news:f4oq45prsdkleccpf...@4ax.com...
>>>> >>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:16:34 -0700, in the land of
>alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>> >>> Fred Fredburger <Fred.Fredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos> got
>double
>>>> >>> secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>> >>>>Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Yes, hold hands and even skip if you want. Yes, we lost, all
>of us.
>>>> >>>>> May
>>>> >>>>> I introduce your next lib Senator:
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>http://eatitorwearit.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/franken-
>794120bmp.jpg
>>>>
>>>> >>>>Damn! If only he were a Republican, then he'd be presidential
>material.
>>>>
>>>> >>> He is precluded from being Republican, he graduated Cum Laude
>from
>>>> >>> Harvard.
>>>>
>>>> >>Laude = Sucker, in his case
>>>>
>>>> > And another wingnut weighs in with his favorite projected sexual
>>>> > fantasy.
>>>>
>>>> LOL, are you a Cum Sucker too Aratzio?http://patdollard.com/wp-
>content/uploads/al-franken.gif
>>>
>>>I too have noticed that conservatives always like to play the
>>>perverted sex card.
>>>
>>>Is that a requirement for being Republican?
>>>
>>>TMT
>>
>>To be part of the "base", yes. The suspension of critical thinking and
>>the limitation of argument to specific talking points as delivered by
>>the radio bloviators is the common denominator of the "base".
>>
>>I doubt William F. Buckley would be proud of the Republican party and
>>the Conservative movement these days. The simple minded leading their
>>sheep to electoral slaughter and the "purity" tests that are required
>>to be a member of the sheep would appall him.
>>
>I'm predicting the demise of the GOP as it is now. THey're going the
>way of the Whigs. Some third party will rise to replace them. Perhaps
>libertarian-led?
Libertarian would have a populist feel, but for the most part the
people that currently identify themselves as libertarians are the
anti-immigration/ant-gubbermint/teabagger types. Which for the most
part are the current "base". Much more reactionary than the true
libertarian.
Ron Paul is as close to a true libertarian as is in federal government
now days and he is almost as crazy as Bachmann or Tancredo. While he
had (and has) a certain grass roots following, his more insane
policies will always prevent him from being elected beyond his
congressional district.
I like him for his outspoken nature and he is a pretty entertaining
person, he just is too far out on the limb.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:21:48 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> §ñühw¤£f <snuh...@netscape.net> got double secret probation for
How is Ron Paul "crazy" and what "insane policies"?
> I like him for his outspoken nature and he is a pretty entertaining
> person, he just is too far out on the limb.
Lots of ad homenims and assertions without an iota of evidence.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/lpcbrm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pig Brick
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07...@live.com...
Maybe he's like your crazymother and likes to crazyfuck Mormons.
Cliff
>Ron Paul is as close to a true libertarian as is in federal government
>now days and he is almost as crazy as
a bedbug?
a loon?
a shithouse rat?
a sack full of ferrets out to lunch?
a March Hare?
a peach orchard boar?
a pair of waltzing mice?
a betsy bug?
a rabid monkey ripping off the face of your neighbor?
a sheepherder?
a Iunatic?
a soup sandwich?
a hatter?
a jay bird?
a wombat?
a guy getting convicted of corruption charges and then get elected to the
Senate?
a corn dog?
a Iunatic?
a fruitcake?
a bodack?
a $54 trillion IOU?
a nanner?
a bat?
a Catholic wedding?
a Coconut?
a schizophrenic homeless guy?
a stinging lizard?
a pogo stick?
a banquer?
The light at the end of the tunnel is a film crew from Faux
egging on the rabid mob of wingers trying to burn it down.
Film at 11.
--
Cliff
���hw��f
of<pan.2009.07...@live.com>:
Some of his tax ideas seemed pretty crazy to me.
>> I like him for his outspoken nature and he is a pretty entertaining
>> person, he just is too far out on the limb.
>
>Lots of ad homenims and assertions without an iota of evidence.
>
Grepping for Ron Paul links is *so* ten minutes ago!
^_^
--
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Aratzio
���hw��f <snuh...@netscape.net> got double secret probation for
writing:
Curly gets all panty wadded when you make fun of his crazy heros.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:attu45dakbjnq3a1j...@4ax.com...
I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
Aratzio
"Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
No, you cretin, contrary to you bizarre dreams about a the clothing
someone chooses to wear, the paraphrasing of "panties in a bunch" has
nothing actually to do with clothing.
What is with people these days that the best they can come up with for
*flames* are their own projections of pseudo-sexual fetishes and/or
variations upon "yer gay".
AndyWest
> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
Stop thinking.
You are not good at it.
Pig Brick
"AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you should try
it sometimes.
HH&C
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:46:31 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:21:48 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> > writing:
>
> >>Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
> >>of<ltlr455nrle5slraihpti7htsujeouq...@4ax.com>:
>
> >>>On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:35:14 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
Yikes! His incessant need to call in to the Alex Jones show for
starters.
Aratzio
"Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>
>
Another classic:
"I know you are but what am I?"
§ñühw¤£f
Ok...I grepped...I was right..."Dr No" wants to elimninate the income
tax. So how the fuck do you pay for public services?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul&action=edit§ion=16
No military? No EPA? No NSA? Taxes fund government. People cant be sane
without some laws & regulation.
Discuss.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S39MhPrLQz4
www.snuhwolf.9f.com | http://www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
_..._ ___ ___ ___ ___ _..._
,' `::. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,' `::.
: `::: `:: `:: `:: `:: `:::
: .::: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:::
: .:::`. .;' `. .;' `. .;'.`. .;': .:::
: .::: `.' .`.'.: `.' ::`.' :. .:::
:. .::' ::: : `: .:::
`: .:: : : .::'
: .:: . :. .::
: ::' `: .::.
.\ `: ,: :. : .::.:
:.\ :. :.: :`: .' .::.:
::`. : :':: : `: : .;'.:
: `.; :'.:: : :: ;:' ::
. :' .::. .: .:: :
: :' ::: :' .:: .
: `:: : .::
:' .::. .: .:::
: .::: ,:. .:. :' .:::
: .:::,' `:. ,' `:.: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
`._ .::'.`._.::' `._.::'.`._ .::' _ Seal _
~~~ :: :: ~~~
Scout
���hw��f wrote:
> Aratzio pinched a steaming load of this:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:18:24 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>
>>> "AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
>>>>
>>>> Stop thinking.
>>>> You are not good at it.
>>> Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you
>>> should try it sometimes.
>>
>> Another classic:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>
> Ok...I grepped...I was right..."Dr No" wants to elimninate the income
> tax. So how the fuck do you pay for public services?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul&action=edit§ion=16
>
>
> No military? No EPA? No NSA? Taxes fund government. People cant be sane
> without some laws & regulation.
>
> Discuss.
Simple. There is more than income tax as a means to fund public
services. You are an idiot.
Discuss.
Gray Ghost
news:d4-dncJuW90MStLX...@centurytel.net:
> Aratzio pinched a steaming load of this:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:18:24 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>
>>> "AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
>>>>
>>>> Stop thinking.
>>>> You are not good at it.
>>> Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you should
>>> try it sometimes.
>>
>> Another classic:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>
> Ok...I grepped...I was right..."Dr No" wants to elimninate the income
> tax. So how the fuck do you pay for public services?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul&
> action=edit§ion=16
>
> No military? No EPA? No NSA? Taxes fund government. People cant be sane
> without some laws & regulation.
>
> Discuss.
>
>
I agree no EPA. There is plenty the government does that it should not be
doing. Maybe if we cut back on trillion dollar espenditures, pared back
regulation, let the greatest economic engine in the world take off and tax at
a modest rate...
--
Always remember:
Bull Connor was a Democrat!
Aratzio
���hw��f <snuh...@yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>Aratzio pinched a steaming load of this:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:18:24 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>
>>> "AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
>>>>
>>>> Stop thinking.
>>>> You are not good at it.
>>> Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you should try
>>> it sometimes.
>>
>> Another classic:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>
>Ok...I grepped...I was right..."Dr No" wants to elimninate the income
>tax. So how the fuck do you pay for public services?
>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul&action=edit§ion=16
>
>No military? No EPA? No NSA? Taxes fund government. People cant be sane
>without some laws & regulation.
>
>Discuss.
Libertarians are selfish fuckwits.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:29gv455hb01l11uqv...@4ax.com...
That depends, do you wear panties too?
Aratzio
>
>
>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>news:29gv455hb01l11uqv...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:18:24 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
>>>news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stop thinking.
>>>> You are not good at it.
>>>
>>>Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you should try
>>>it sometimes.
>>
>> Another classic:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>That depends, do you wear panties too?
Wow, yer like sum sorta falme gawd.
Do yourself a favor, stop being such an embarrassment to human kind.
Curly Surmudgeon
> Aratzio pinched a steaming load of this:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:18:24 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>> "Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> got double secret probation for
>> writing:
>>
>>
>>> "AndyWest" <Dixie...@bass.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4a4fa1ce$0$31284$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> Pig Brick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought he said he doesn't wear his panties. Just his man bra.
>>>>
>>>> Stop thinking.
>>>> You are not good at it.
>>> Au contraire. I'm quite good at it. Practice makes perfect, you should
>>> try it sometimes.
>>
>> Another classic:
>> "I know you are but what am I?"
>
>
> Ok...I grepped...I was right..."Dr No" wants to elimninate the income
> tax. So how the fuck do you pay for public services?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul&action=edit§ion=16
Read more for a fuller understanding.
> No military? No EPA? No NSA?
Good idea! Add no FDA or HUD and you're well on the road to a rational
federal government.
> Taxes fund government.
In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
government by the rules of this model of government isn't a rational
comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two wheels
is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea that Ron
Paul wants no regulation or law?
> Discuss.
Not while you're floating straw men.
Curly Surmudgeon
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
You are too kind, I was going to make him struggle with his own blindness.
> Discuss.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:32:42 -0600, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> §ñühw¤£f <snuh...@yahoo.com> got double secret probation for writing:
Humans are so stupid...
"The Honest One"
"Pig Brick" <pigb...@pigbrick.com> wrote in message
news:4a4ff935$1...@news.x-privat.org...
Do you want to look up that dress to find out ??
http://www.ren.org/rafil/gpc/gpcpics/DSCF0002a.jpg
--
HJ
p.s. Roz is kinda "hard ta-look-at".......
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:il0055111jsknke53...@4ax.com...
Compared to you I must look like Einstein.
Pig Brick
""The Honest One"" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:QpOdnd2_cIhfiM3X...@centurytel.net...
It was a rhetorical question, I've seen the picture previously.
Aratzio
Must be rerun season for weak lamers.
Next up, another IKYABWAI.
���hw��f
>On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:05:08 -0700, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
If you guys don't start poasting some disagreable statements I'll have
nothing to argue against!
:(
--
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
���hw��f
>On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:32:42 -0600, §ñühw¤£f <snuh...@yahoo.com>
So when the drugs kill you, who gives a shit, right?
Big Pharma is your *friend*
:)
>> Taxes fund government.
>
>In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
>government by the rules of this model of government isn't a rational
>comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two
wheels
>is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
>
What example of a functional gubmint that dosnt tax have ye?
>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>
>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea that
Ron
>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>
He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior.
FYI
>> Discuss.
>
>Not while you're floating straw men.
>
I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
<checks flotation device>
Oh yeah, all set :)
--
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
How do you get from "no FDA" to "drugs kill you"?
>>> Taxes fund government.
>>
>>In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
>>government by the rules of this model of government isn't a rational
>>comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two
> wheels
>>is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
>>
>>
> What example of a functional gubmint that dosnt tax have ye?
Why don't you read the policies that you are against first? If you'd
educate yourself before denigrating the position you wouldn't have to ask.
>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>
>>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea that
> Ron
>>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>
> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your mind
which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>>> Discuss.
>>
>>Not while you're floating straw men.
>>
>>
> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>
> <checks flotation device>
> Oh yeah, all set :)
--
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:07h05594ah7si1eip...@4ax.com...
We know what you are, we saw the picture.
Aratzio
As predicted.
"The Honest One"
TRANSLATION: I'm such a Loser and lead a "Sad Life" <boo hoo>
End it all Ratz.....next time "Pull the Trigger" !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
"The Honest One"
Don't let the door hit you and "snag your hose"........
--
HJ
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:c5t155h792pv9u2mr...@4ax.com...
You're a regular Kreskin, you are.
���hw��f
How do you presume the drug companies wont make unsafe products?
Under *your* imaginary gubmint am I allowed to kill people whos
products harm me? Cause if thats the case; COUNT ME IN!
^_^
>>>> Taxes fund government.
>>>
>>>In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
>>>government by the rules of this model of government isn't a rational
>>>comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two
>> wheels
>>>is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
>>>
>>>
>> What example of a functional gubmint that dosnt tax have ye?
>
>Why don't you read the policies that you are against first? If you'd
>educate yourself before denigrating the position you wouldn't have to
>ask.
>
Translation: I cant provide an example.
Got it.
^_^
>>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>>
>>>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea
that
>> Ron
>>>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>>
>> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
>> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
>
>You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
>regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your mind
>which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
>
Laws control behavior via punitive measures, duh.
Your point?
^_^
>Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>
He wants no taxes. No tax laws necessary.
Bada fuckin bing!
I win :)
>>>> Discuss.
>>>
>>>Not while you're floating straw men.
>>>
>>>
>> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>>
>> <checks flotation device>
>> Oh yeah, all set :)
>
LAND HO!!!!!!!!!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!
The Island of Imaginary Gubmints...
^_^
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
What newsgroup are you reading from? I've explained how the lack of
understanding you represent is false in misc.survivalism.
>>>>> Taxes fund government.
>>>>
>>>>In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
>>>>government by the rules of this model of government isn't a rational
>>>>comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two
>>> wheels
>>>>is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What example of a functional gubmint that dosnt tax have ye?
>>
>>Why don't you read the policies that you are against first? If you'd
>>educate yourself before denigrating the position you wouldn't have to
>>ask.
>>
>>
> Translation: I cant provide an example.
>
> Got it.
> ^_^
No, you don't "got it". You're insisting that I republish what I've
explained in this newsgroup recently and exists on lp.org. Information
that you're too lazy to look up or read. It is not my responsibility to
cater to your sloth.
>>>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>>>
>>>>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea
> that
>>> Ron
>>>>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>>>
>>> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
>>> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
>>
>>You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
>>regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your mind
>>which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
>>
>>
> Laws control behavior via punitive measures, duh. Your point?
> ^_^
Cooperation is vastly superior to coercion. Coercion inevitably results
in resistance.
>>Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>>
>>
> He wants no taxes. No tax laws necessary. Bada fuckin bing!
> I win :)
Perhaps a prize for willful ignorance. Taxes are neither the "law" nor
the only source of governmental revenue. You fail on both issues.
>>>>> Discuss.
>>>>
>>>>Not while you're floating straw men.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>>>
>>> <checks flotation device>
>>> Oh yeah, all set :)
>>
>>
> LAND HO!!!!!!!!!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!
>
> The Island of Imaginary Gubmints...
>
> ^_^
--
Aratzio
Given the limited repertoire you have demonstrated an Iranian vote
counter could not get it wrong.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:47v455928jcc9e9jj...@4ax.com...
Sucks to be you, huh?
Aratzio
Go ahead, cupcake, take your best stab at explaining how you came to
that conclusion. Seriously, do you imagine that your limited intellect
and inability to display the slightest spark of originality is in some
way deleterious to my life?
Or were you just gobsmacked and tried to pawn off another *falme* you
plagiarized from "Insults for Lamers"?
miguel
wrote:
Isn't it about time for you to work up some new material?
Aratzio
miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
Excessive amounts of Element 26.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4ma555d5pgpt7rk6j...@4ax.com...
I pity you really. Look what you've grown up to be, some poor frustrated old
usenet troll in a dress, yelling at people who are smarter than yourself.
You should quit while you're ahead, sort of. OK, not. But you should quit
anyway, you aren't making any points.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:01e555dpov92pcmuv...@4ax.com...
What's that, some kind of estrogen medicine?
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:29:20 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, "Pig
Do you realize that you're communicating with the troll once known as
"Libby Loo," "Jerry," "Basil" something and various other nyms?
"The Honest One"
IAWTP !!
--
John C.
"The Honest One"
LOL !!
--
John C.
Hu Flung Dung
sore, an embossed carbuncle in my corrupted blood, ye hung crepe:
The bitchslap ratz gave you really must've hurt.
Pig Brick
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07...@live.com...
Call him Curly Albert. See him troll his newsprovider here:
http://tinyurl.com/mfuqkg
Pig Brick
"Hu Flung Dung" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:hc2p5n$blx$6...@alt.politics.stupidity.co.nigeria...
Yeah, he probably won't be coming back any time soon.
���hw��f
AUK...its where the *cool* kids hang, natch :)
>>>>>> Taxes fund government.
>>>>>
>>>>>In this model of government, true. Dissing a different model of
>>>>>government by the rules of this model of government isn't a
rational
>>>>>comparison. "This vehicle is not stable because it only has two
>>>> wheels
>>>>>is an equally valid claim. And irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> What example of a functional gubmint that dosnt tax have ye?
>>>
>>>Why don't you read the policies that you are against first? If
you'd
>>>educate yourself before denigrating the position you wouldn't have
to
>>>ask.
>>>
>>>
>> Translation: I cant provide an example.
>>
>> Got it.
>> ^_^
>
>No, you don't "got it". You're insisting that I republish what I've
>explained in this newsgroup recently and exists on lp.org.
Whats lp.org?
>Information
>that you're too lazy to look up or read. It is not my responsibility
to
>cater to your sloth.
>
<fabulous voice mode>
GUILLLLLLTEEEEEEEEEEE!
>>>>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>>>>
>>>>>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea
>> that
>>>> Ron
>>>>>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>>>>
>>>> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
>>>> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
>>>
>>>You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
>>>regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your
mind
>>>which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
>>>
>>>
>> Laws control behavior via punitive measures, duh. Your point?
>> ^_^
>
>Cooperation is vastly superior to coercion. Coercion inevitably
results
>in resistance.
>
Resistance is futile :)
Plus,it prooves the necessity of rules/LAW to regulate the behavior of
humans in groups.
>>>Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>>>
>>>
>> He wants no taxes. No tax laws necessary. Bada fuckin bing!
>> I win :)
>
>Perhaps a prize for willful ignorance. Taxes are neither the "law"
nor
>the only source of governmental revenue. You fail on both issues.
>
Your shilling for no-bid gubmint contracts now?
Hmmm...
>>>>>> Discuss.
>>>>>
>>>>>Not while you're floating straw men.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS
RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> <checks flotation device>
>>>> Oh yeah, all set :)
>>>
>>>
>> LAND HO!!!!!!!!!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> The Island of Imaginary Gubmints...
>>
>> ^_^
>
>
And only *I* know where the treasure be matey!
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
You're exemplifying your sloth. Does your newsreader not hypertext urls
so you can simply click on them with a mouse? If not then all you need
do is to click and drag to highlight, Cntrl-C to copy, alt-tab to a
browser, cntrl-t for a new tab, cntrl-v to paste, enter and behold!
>>Information
>>that you're too lazy to look up or read. It is not my responsibility
> to
>>cater to your sloth.
>>
>>
> <fabulous voice mode>
>
> GUILLLLLLTEEEEEEEEEEE!
Your intentional ignorance doesn't obligate others to do your research.
>>>>>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea
>>> that
>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>>>>>
>>>>> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
>>>>> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
>>>>
>>>>You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
>>>>regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your
> mind
>>>>which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Laws control behavior via punitive measures, duh. Your point? ^_^
>>
>>Cooperation is vastly superior to coercion. Coercion inevitably
> results
>>in resistance.
>>
>>
> Resistance is futile :)
>
> Plus,it prooves the necessity of rules/LAW to regulate the behavior of
> humans in groups.
Ok, now I understand the direction from which you come,
authoritarianism. That is unAmerican.
>>>>Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He wants no taxes. No tax laws necessary. Bada fuckin bing! I win :)
>>
>>Perhaps a prize for willful ignorance. Taxes are neither the "law"
> nor
>>the only source of governmental revenue. You fail on both issues.
>>
>>
> Your shilling for no-bid gubmint contracts now?
>
> Hmmm...
>
>>>>>>> Discuss.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not while you're floating straw men.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS
> RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> <checks flotation device>
>>>>> Oh yeah, all set :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> LAND HO!!!!!!!!!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> The Island of Imaginary Gubmints...
>>>
>>> ^_^
>>
>>
> And only *I* know where the treasure be matey!
Are you finished trolling yet?
"The Honest One"
"���hw��f" <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:9eidnfuMa4fMzs7X...@centurytel.net...> >On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:42:56 -0500, §ñühw�,�£f
> <snuh...@netscape.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> pinched out a steaming
> pile
> >> of<pan.2009.07...@live.com>:
> >>
That's the same "tired" pick-up line you use with all the boys that you
meet in the local "Gay-Bar".
1. You tell them you know where a "buried" treasure is.
2..You take them to your garage apartment for a "treasure hunt".
3. You tell them the treasure is buried in your ass.
4. You get the sucker to send his "probe" deep down in there to find the
treasure.
5. Take the usual "ass-Kicking" when the guy find's out that you
trolled him to your "Toot-Hole".
Think-up another line that doesn't involve you getting yo "Ass-Kicked",
Wolfus-Puss !!
--
Your Only Usenet Friend,
Hon. John C.
§ñühw¤£f
ILL G00GLE FOR IT!!!!!
Hmmm...coda lp org...ZOMGS!! YER A DWARF!!!!!!!
>>> Information
>>> that you're too lazy to look up or read. It is not my responsibility
>> to
>>> cater to your sloth.
>>>
>>>
>> <fabulous voice mode>
>>
>> GUILLLLLLTEEEEEEEEEEE!
>
> Your intentional ignorance doesn't obligate others to do your research.
>
My handler says otherwise...
>>>>>>>> People cant be sane without some laws & regulation.
>>>>>>> How do laws make people sane and where do you get the false idea
>>>> that
>>>>>> Ron
>>>>>>> Paul wants no regulation or law?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> He wants no tax. Tax is law :)
>>>>>> As for sanity...you cant legislate *sanity* only behavior. FYI
>>>>> You first said that "...people cant be sane without some laws and
>>>>> regulation." then "you cant legislate *sanity...*. Make up your
>> mind
>>>>> which it is. I'd vote for the latter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Laws control behavior via punitive measures, duh. Your point? ^_^
>>> Cooperation is vastly superior to coercion. Coercion inevitably
>> results
>>> in resistance.
>>>
>>>
>> Resistance is futile :)
>>
>> Plus,it prooves the necessity of rules/LAW to regulate the behavior of
>> humans in groups.
>
> Ok, now I understand the direction from which you come,
> authoritarianism. That is unAmerican.
>
So the Founding Fathers made *no* laws?
Fascinating, tell me more.
^_^
>>>>> Neither position implies that Ron Paul wants no law.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> He wants no taxes. No tax laws necessary. Bada fuckin bing! I win :)
>>> Perhaps a prize for willful ignorance. Taxes are neither the "law"
>> nor
>>> the only source of governmental revenue. You fail on both issues.
>>>
>>>
>> Your shilling for no-bid gubmint contracts now?
>>
>> Hmmm...
>>
Note: No response.
Have you any OS/2 to discuss, Net Abuser?
>>>>>>>> Discuss.
>>>>>>> Not while you're floating straw men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I WONT BE TEH WON DROWNING MATE WHEN THE OCEANS
>> RISE!!!!!111111!!!!!
>>>>>> <checks flotation device>
>>>>>> Oh yeah, all set :)
>>>>>
>>>> LAND HO!!!!!!!!!111111111111!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> The Island of Imaginary Gubmints...
>>>>
>>>> ^_^
>>>
>> And only *I* know where the treasure be matey!
>
> Are you finished trolling yet?
>
<checks tackle box>
Oh hells no...
^_^
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S39MhPrLQz4
www.snuhwolf.9f.com | http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
_..._ ___ ___ ___ ___ _..._
,' `::. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,' `::.
: `::: `:: `:: `:: `:: `:::
: .::: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:::
: .:::`. .;' `. .;' `. .;'.`. .;': .:::
: .::: `.' .`.'.: `.' ::`.' :. .:::
:. .::' ::: : `: .:::
`: .:: : : .::'
: .:: . :. .::
: ::' `: .::.
.\ `: ,: :. : .::.:
:.\ :. :.: :`: .' .::.:
::`. : :':: : `: : .;'.:
: `.; :'.:: : :: ;:' ::
. :' .::. .: .:: :
: :' ::: :' .:: .
: `:: : .::
:' .::. .: .:::
: .::: ,:. .:. :' .:::
: .:::,' `:. ,' `:.: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
`._ .::'.`._.::' `._.::'.`._ .::' _ Seal _
~~~ :: :: ~~~
Aratzio
Gobsmacked it was then.
Aratzio
Cloaking yourself with ignorance has always been your best defense.
Aratzio
Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> got double secret
probation for writing:
<checks Give A Shit Meter>
Why would I care? Are you some expert on the deckhand on the SS
PeeWee?
Aratzio
Flung Dung" <inv...@invalid.invalid> got double secret probation for
writing:
And that makes it especially sad.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:6ml755dd6d531u7pp...@4ax.com...
That's him! That's him! Bwahahaha! Good one, you tulip!
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:rel755tatuf7hbu2i...@4ax.com...
I understand that you feel threatened by my intelligence. I can't say that I
blame you. But it's making you repeat yourself.
Aratzio
Unlikely.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:lhs755tr8nt6j8r9k...@4ax.com...
That must have really hurt for you to trim my post like that. Loser.
Aratzio
Nah, eventually even you have to get at least one clue if you are fed
enough clues.
Pig Brick
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2at755l26iv7uc4gg...@4ax.com...
>>>>I understand that you feel threatened by my intelligence. I can't say
>>>>that I blame you. But it's making you repeat yourself.
>>>
>>> Most likely.
>>
>>That must have really hurt for you to trim my post like that. Loser.
>
> Yeah, eventually even I have to get at least one clue if I'm fed
> enough clues.
>
Let me know when you get one then.
Aratzio
Glad to see you back so soon, Mr. Herman. Did the theater let out
early?
"The Honest One"
What were they showing, "Dr. Satan Ross Strikes Back with Roz Ratzio" ??
--
HJ
p.s. Where's Whinel Lionel ??