What will guntards do when their hero is gone?
Siva
time in their existence, here was a figure w/national prominence who
exemplified the central tenet of guntard ideology: that all conflicts
can be solved with guns.
IN spite of the uproarious laughter doled at them by the left, guntards
were 100% confident of their new leader, for he embodied their way of
thinking, which they always believed was infallible, as opposed to the
ideology of the left--which mandated logic and thinking prior to
engaging in any war--a philosophy which guntards have always dismissed
as sheer cowardice. To the guntards, thought is for sissies.
And, as expected, the pride and joy of the guntards--their newly
appointed leader, made an complete ass of himself the world,
significantly reducing America's global reputation. And consequently,
as expected, guntards were humiliated and forced into hiding in their
barns, for their favorite Messiah, the guy who was supposed to deliver
the world from the "evil" of the left, had amounted to nothing more than
a laughing stock.
Fortunately, the left was able to affect some means of damage control, a
fact clearly reflected in the 2006 Congressional election results and
the fall of the bush dynasty. Although there is much work still to be
done, it's clear that what the guntards intended to be a significant
ground-breaking chapter in US history has instead become an annoying ink
blot.
And soon, that guntard hero--the Messiah and GREAT LEADER of the their
cause--will be gone, and dismissed from American history as silly and
irrelevant. So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do
now that their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over? Will
they be content to merely being barn dwellers with no apparent
significance in the story of the country?
The $1 million question. . .
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Scout
"Siva" <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote in message
news:723e7$480bb93e$29...@news.teranews.com...
> When bush was appointed Pres, guntards were overjoyed--for the first time
> in their existence, here was a figure w/national prominence who
> exemplified the central tenet of guntard ideology: that all conflicts can
> be solved with guns.
Let' see.
1......2.....3....4.....
Four strawmen in a single sentence. I think we have a new record for use of
straw in a usenet post.
Buck Mulligan
>So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do
>now that their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
Who is going to do that?
No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about gun control, lest
they lose precious votes.
No leftist gun control group has the money of the NRA.
It's over. We won.
_______________
"The FACT is that the majority of criminals, even in the
the good, old US of A, DO obey gun control laws. This is
proven by most criminals NOT being charged with any firearm
offenses, ergo they have broken no gun control laws."
-Phil Smythe, demonstrating what
passes for proof and logic in
Australian debate circles.
Siva
> In talk.politics.guns Siva <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote:
>
>> So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do
>> now that their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
>
> Who is going to do that?
>
> No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about gun control, lest
> they lose precious votes.
Why would the left waste time talking about gun control when there are a
zillion other unpopular rightard-sponsored anti-freedom measures,
i. e. Patriot's Act, warrantless spying, extrajudicial detainment, . . .
to mock them with? Another guntard LOL--their insistence on us hitting
them below the belt when their head is wide open for attack
>
> No leftist gun control group has the money of the NRA.
>
> It's over. We won.
a trip to the hospital.
> _______________
>
> "The FACT is that the majority of criminals, even in the
> the good, old US of A, DO obey gun control laws. This is
> proven by most criminals NOT being charged with any firearm
> offenses, ergo they have broken no gun control laws."
>
> -Phil Smythe, demonstrating what
> passes for proof and logic in
> Australian debate circles.
Felix D.
> Buck Mulligan wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Siva <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote:
>>
>>> So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do now that their
>>> ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
>>
>> Who is going to do that? No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about
>> gun control, lest
>> they lose precious votes.
>
> Why would the left waste time talking about gun control when there are a
> zillion other unpopular rightard-sponsored anti-freedom measures,
>
> i. e. Patriot's Act, warrantless spying, extrajudicial detainment,
Really? Name one of your idiot leftie pals who've been arrested and
confined under "extrajudicial detainment" thing you've harped on. Go ahead,
just one of the handwringing nitpicking busybodies ... which one of them, or
any one of them, has been arrested and detained or is this just a figment of
your fevered imagination?
tankfixer
leftie...@liberal.org says...
>
> The $1 million question. . .
is when you will get back to the clinic and get your medications
adjusted..
--
"Oh Norman, listen! The loons are calling!"
- Katherine Hepburn, "On Golden Pond"
Jim Alder
@news.teranews.com:
> Buck Mulligan wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Siva <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote:
>>
>>> So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do now that
>>> their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
>>
>> Who is going to do that?
>>
>> No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about gun control, lest
>> they lose precious votes.
>
> Why would the left waste time talking about gun control when there are a
> zillion other unpopular rightard-sponsored anti-freedom measures,
to which the obvious question is...
> i. e. Patriot's Act, warrantless spying, extrajudicial detainment, . . .
>
> to mock them with?
Oh! You meant a 'zillion' other leftwing lies to distract them with.
> Another guntard LOL--their insistence on us hitting
> them below the belt when their head is wide open for attack
I think most people think that for people like you, below the belt is
just more your style.
>> No leftist gun control group has the money of the NRA.
>>
>> It's over. We won.
>
> a trip to the hospital.
to visit you on the psych ward.
--
"Life isn't about waiting for the storm
to pass... it's about learning to dance
in the rain."
Jim Alder
@news.teranews.com:
> When bush was appointed Pres, guntards were overjoyed--for the first
> time in their existence, here was a figure w/national prominence who
> exemplified the central tenet of guntard ideology: that all conflicts
> can be solved with guns.
Note if you will, the "absolutism" that the leftwing zealot uses to
constantly reassure himself that he is right. Not just in this paragraph, but
throughout this entire... what, screed?... you can see that there is no shade
of grey, no half measure, not the slightest doubt, that the other guy is
absolutely wrong and Siva is 100% right. Every word and every aspect is
another absolute. Bush was 'appointed.' We were 'overjoyed.' "The first time"
in our existence. "Exemplified the central tenet". Right down to "All
conflicts."
And on he goes below. We are '100% confident in' Bush. Our thinking was
'infallible.'
I only accentuate this to show the reader why it is that, when they are
proven to be so very very wrong, why Leftwing zealots like this just go bug-
eyed nuts. We saw them in droves in the years following 2000 and we still see
it today. What Siva hears as 'uproarious laughter' is actually the background
noise of millions of straitjacketed giggling leftwing true believers.
Buck Mulligan
>Buck Mulligan wrote:
>> In talk.politics.guns Siva <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote:
>>
>>> So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do
>>> now that their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
>>
>> Who is going to do that?
>>
>> No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about gun control, lest
>> they lose precious votes.
>
>Why would the left waste time talking about gun control when there are a
>zillion other unpopular rightard-sponsored anti-freedom measures,
They shouldn't. Thanks for admitting gun control is a lost cause for
you freaks.
Topp@Work
> > In talk.politics.guns Siva <leftie...@liberal.org> wrote:
> >
> >> So the big question, naturally, is what guntards will do
> >> now that their ideology has been discredited a zillion times over?
> >
> > Who is going to do that?
> >
> > No leftist candidate has the balls to talk about gun control, lest
> > they lose precious votes.
>
> Why would the left waste time talking about gun control when there are a
> zillion other unpopular rightard-sponsored anti-freedom measures,
>
> i. e. Patriot's Act, warrantless spying, extrajudicial detainment, . . .
Proof yer a retard.
The patriot act does nothing but Amend a previous set of laws...
RSweeney
> When bush was appointed Pres, guntards were overjoyed--for the first time
> in their existence, here was a figure w/national prominence who
> exemplified the central tenet of guntard ideology: that all conflicts can
> be solved with guns.
Bush has NEVER been pro-gun rights.
Gun rights advocates were very suspicious of Bush Jr, like Bush daddy, from
the beginning.
Peddle your pathetic revisionism elsewhere.