Guntard anthropology question
Mike Shetfield
Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
Midwestern US"
My question concerns the significance to Midwestern guntards of their
guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've researched extensively, yet
there seems to be a lack of definitive evidence to conclude which of
the two is considered more important from the point of view of a guntard.
As I understand it, a guntard uses his gun to defend his barn. This
establishes the importance of the gun. Yet, given this importance, the
guntard would surely need to store his gun in a safe location--that
location being the barn. Therefore, a barn must be of higher importance
since it contains the gun.
Yet, a barn cannot exist if it is not defended with a gun, which must
precede the barn as it being built so as to ward off competing factions
that may attempt to hijack and take over the barn. This would indicate
that the gun itself is of greater importance, since without it, the barn
could not be built.
As you can see, I've arrived at an impasse and require some
clarification. Any ideas are appreciated, so long they're backed up
with citations.
Thank you,
Mike
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Peter Franks
What in the hell is a "disseration"?
If you are really a Ph.D. candidate, then you are definitive proof that
our educational system is completely broken and worthless on oh so many
levels.
gud luk wif yer disseration!
Scout
"Mike Shetfield" <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:b995f$48b08597$32...@news.teranews.com...
> Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield,
Another fucking liberal liar........
Justin Case
deep for your limited qualifications. You should study pedicure
technology and shelf stocking. WalMart probably has a career part time
pedicurists job with your name on it. But don't get too hopeful, WalMart
sells guns to those of us that don't have a police record. Although that
probably leaves you and your mother out as customers, you could still
work on people's feet without being allowed near the gun section.
The Lone Weasel
> Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D.
> candidate in the Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is
> titled "Guntard culture in the Midwestern US"
>
> My question concerns the significance to Midwestern
> guntards of their guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've
> researched extensively, yet there seems to be a lack of
> definitive evidence to conclude which of the two is
> considered more important from the point of view of a
> guntard.
Maybe there's no evidence because you're confusing urban
gunloons with rural gun owners. Rural gun owners do have
barns but have no association of barns to guns, because they
aren't generally loons.
It's the urban gunloon who does associate his guns - almost
always a dozen or more - with his bunker. An interesting
footnote to this phenomenon is that the "bunker mentality"
associated with gunloons & guns is the origin of the name
"Archie Bunker" from the CBS tv program "All In The Family".
Just cite me as "The Lone Weasel".
> As I understand it, a guntard uses his gun to defend his
> barn. This establishes the importance of the gun. Yet,
> given this importance, the guntard would surely need to
> store his gun in a safe location--that location being the
> barn. Therefore, a barn must be of higher importance since
> it contains the gun.
>
> Yet, a barn cannot exist if it is not defended with a gun,
> which must precede the barn as it being built so as to ward
> off competing factions that may attempt to hijack and take
> over the barn. This would indicate that the gun itself is
> of greater importance, since without it, the barn could not
> be built.
>
> As you can see, I've arrived at an impasse and require some
> clarification. Any ideas are appreciated, so long they're
> backed up with citations.
First, it's a bunker not a barn.
Second, the gunloon is defending a fake right to have guns
under the Second Amendment (even though he has ultra-liberal
gun rights under state law). Which makes the defense even
more nonsensical.
That's really all there is to being a ridiculous gunloon, aka
"guntard". And they'd frequent titty bars if they had a spare
dollar.
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel
Mike Shetfield
Interesting. The guntard practice of appointing an out-world man to
venture to Wal-Marts in the city to acquire new guns has been
well-documented.
However, this passage clearly explains yet another phenomena which Carl
Reisling has described as a "intriguing phenomena"--the ability of
guntards to secure the money they need to buy their guns, by working as
shoe shiners in department stores.
It is likely that shoe shining is an art form passed on to successive
generations in guntard communities, though further research may be
required to confirm this hypothesis. Nevertheless, Nelson's theory
about bottle-collecting as the primary source of guntard income seems to
be debunked.
bigdog
I doubt this fucking moron even graduated high school.
Morton Davis
"Mike Shetfield" <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:b995f$48b08597$32...@news.teranews.com...
> of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
> Midwestern US"
The only "guntard" I see is a FUCKTARD named Mike Shetfield.
@comcast.net Klaus Schadenfreude
>Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
>Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
>Midwestern US"
Don't you have to finish high school before getting your doctorate?
@comcast.net Klaus Schadenfreude
That's when you "desert" elementary school at the fifth grade level,
never to return.
I would imagine the "impasse" he's arrived at will be no more
difficult to break through than impasse his mother's sphincter muscles
challenged him with when he was born.
Reality_CheckŠ
'Citations? We ain't got no citations. We don't need no citations! I don't
have to show you any stinkin' citations!!'
Mr. Albritton
> of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
> Midwestern US"
Hello. My name is Mike Albritton, and I don't give a rat's ass if you're
the Pope.
You're just another gun grabbing liar.
The one and only thing that makes you any different than the rest of them is
that you (for some unknown reason) believe that you have an extended
vocabulary.
Wanna call me a liar?
Ph.D candidates know how to correctly do research.
Research this:
Vermont, gunlaws, and violent crime.
Washington DC, LA, New York, Great Britian, Australia, "gun free zones," gun
laws, and violent crime.
How many gun laws directly dictates how much violent crime a community has.
More restrictive gun laws = more crime.
Next to zero gun laws = a damn safe community.
Mr. Albritton
> gun laws, and violent crime.
Correct spelling is "Great Britain."
Bama Brian
> Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
> Dept. of Anthropology.
Sorry, was that Make Shit field, Piled Higher and Deeper candidate?
> My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the Midwestern US"
Your 'disseration' is misspelled.
>
> My question concerns the significance to Midwestern guntards of their
> guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've researched extensively, yet
> there seems to be a lack of definitive evidence to conclude which of
> the two is considered more important from the point of view of a guntard.
Why ask gun owners? Go ask a 'guntard' - whatever that is.
>
> As I understand it, a guntard uses his gun to defend his barn.
You don't understand it - which invalidates your premise.
> This
> establishes the importance of the gun. Yet, given this importance, the
> guntard would surely need to store his gun in a safe location--that
> location being the barn. Therefore, a barn must be of higher importance
> since it contains the gun.
Are you implying that only barn owners own guns? So only cops and
military own barns? If that's so, who is farming food in the US?
> Yet, a barn cannot exist if it is not defended with a gun, which must
> precede the barn as it being built so as to ward off competing factions
> that may attempt to hijack and take over the barn. This would indicate
> that the gun itself is of greater importance, since without it, the barn
> could not be built.
Must be them hostile Piutes in the AZ area hijacking them barns and the
settler wimmen.
> As you can see, I've arrived at an impasse and require some
> clarification. Any ideas are appreciated, so long they're backed up
> with citations.
I hereby award my writing a Blue Ribbon.
BTW, here's my Troll-O-Meter(tm) reading re your post: [0\...5....10]
>
> Thank you,
Stop by any time.
> Mike
> ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
--
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana, 1863 - 1952
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
pyotr filipivich
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote on Sat, 23 Aug 2008
22:13:00 GMT in talk.politics.guns :
Oh, don't be so judgmental. He could be just a clueless liberal,
and repeating only what his handlers have been told him.
On a scale of e to pi, he's i.
pyotr
( i is the square toot of negative one. Which makes "mike" here
irrational and imaginary.)
--
pyotr filipivich
"Quemadmoeum gladuis neminem occidit, occidentis telum est. "
Lucius Annaeus Seneca, circa 45 AD
(A sword is never a killer, it is a tool in the killer's hands.)
pyotr filipivich
<ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:48:39 -0600 in
talk.politics.guns :
>Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
>Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
>Midwestern US"
>
>My question concerns the significance to Midwestern guntards of their
>guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've researched extensively, yet
>there seems to be a lack of definitive evidence to conclude which of
>the two is considered more important from the point of view of a guntard.
You really need to stick with the Animal Husbandry, Although it
really doesn't mean what it is obvious that you seem to believe it
does.
br...@pobox.com
<Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>Mike Shetfield wrote:
>> Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
>> Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in
>> the Midwestern US"
Sound like a typical professional student. Long on parrating things
back at their left wing "teachers" and short on intelligence.
>>
>> My question concerns the significance to Midwestern guntards of their
>> guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've researched extensively, yet
>> there seems to be a lack of definitive evidence to conclude which of
>> the two is considered more important from the point of view of a
>> guntard.
>> As I understand it, a guntard uses his gun to defend his barn. This
>> establishes the importance of the gun. Yet, given this importance,
>> the guntard would surely need to store his gun in a safe
>> location--that location being the barn. Therefore, a barn must be of
>> higher importance since it contains the gun.
>>
>> Yet, a barn cannot exist if it is not defended with a gun, which must
>> precede the barn as it being built so as to ward off competing
>> factions that may attempt to hijack and take over the barn. This
>> would indicate that the gun itself is of greater importance, since
>> without it, the barn could not be built.
>>
>> As you can see, I've arrived at an impasse and require some
>> clarification. Any ideas are appreciated, so long they're backed up
>> with citations.
The only impasse is the question of which orfice you are speaking out
of -- your mouth or your ass. That is easily resolved with the
knowledge that the two parts are identical and interchangeable on a
liberal.
Maxmillian Grabbensheis, Obersturmfuerer, Ret.
Birdog
"Mike Shetfield" <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:b995f$48b08597$32...@news.teranews.com...
I see a great future for you in politics!!
Kerry Ladd
> "Mike Shetfield" <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote in message
> news:b995f$48b08597$32...@news.teranews.com...
>
>>Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the Dept.
>>of Anthropology.
"Candidate" being the key word here! :)
> I see a great future for you in politics!!
Only if he has Pat Paulson as a side kick.
Peace and Justice
.....snip
Why are so many homosexuals like yourself afraid of guns? It would seem
that you would identify guns as a phallus that you could sit on in the
privacy of your fisting club.
tankfixer
says...
> Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
> Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
What mail order school approved a dissertation title that ignorant ?
>
> My question concerns the significance to Midwestern guntards of their
> guns vs. their barns. It is a topic I've researched extensively, yet
> there seems to be a lack of definitive evidence to conclude which of
> the two is considered more important from the point of view of a guntard.
>
> As I understand it, a guntard uses his gun to defend his barn. This
> establishes the importance of the gun. Yet, given this importance, the
> guntard would surely need to store his gun in a safe location--that
> location being the barn. Therefore, a barn must be of higher importance
> since it contains the gun.
>
> Yet, a barn cannot exist if it is not defended with a gun, which must
> precede the barn as it being built so as to ward off competing factions
> that may attempt to hijack and take over the barn. This would indicate
> that the gun itself is of greater importance, since without it, the barn
> could not be built.
>
> As you can see, I've arrived at an impasse and require some
> clarification. Any ideas are appreciated, so long they're backed up
> with citations.
>
> Thank you,
> Mike
Dear Starbucks employee,
I wish you well in your educational endeavors.
Now, a croissant and a large coffee please, black, no sugar..
--
Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste
Goode with Ketchup.
tankfixer
@comcast.net says...
Don't you mean shouldn't he ENTER high school before attempting to get
his docotate ?
David Moffitt
"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.comm> wrote in message
news:MPG.231bb55bb...@nntp.earthlink.net...
| In article <u8f1b497ntdescbk8...@4ax.com>, kschadenfreude
| @comcast.net says...
| > In talk.politics.guns Mike Shetfield <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote:
| >
| > >Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
| > >Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in
the
| > >Midwestern US"
| >
| > Don't you have to finish high school before getting your doctorate?
|
| Don't you mean shouldn't he ENTER high school before attempting to get
| his docotate ?
Actually guntards are those from the left that know nothing about firearms
except that that have an irrational fear of them.
"Im ba l'hargekha, hashkem l'hargo," "If someone comes to kill you, rise up
and kill him (first)." ----The Talmud
pyotr filipivich
<paul.c...@gmail.comm> wrote on Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:14:19 -0700 in
talk.politics.guns :
>In article <u8f1b497ntdescbk8...@4ax.com>, kschadenfreude
>@comcast.net says...
>> In talk.politics.guns Mike Shetfield <ms...@u.arizona.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello, my name is Mike Shetfield, and I'm a Ph. D. candidate in the
>> >Dept. of Anthropology. My disseration is titled "Guntard culture in the
>> >Midwestern US"
>>
>> Don't you have to finish high school before getting your doctorate?
>
>Don't you mean shouldn't he ENTER high school before attempting to get
>his docotate ?
I fear that the original poster has finished High School - a
Public School associated with a major university Education Department
no doubt, which has done wonders for his self-esteem, but nothing for
increasing his knowledge base - as well as college (with a BA in
Victim Studies) and is now in graduate school. That's the only
explanation for him being so stupid - he's spent far too much time in
a University. Any sense he may have had as a child got washed away in
the decades spent in the fever swamps of Academia.
What was it Orwell is suppose to have said "There are some ideas
which are so preposterous, only an Intellectual would believe them."
Mike is just such an intellectual - all book learning, no smarts.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
"With Age comes Wisdom. Although more often, Age travels alone."
tankfixer
ph...@mindspring.com says...
Even worse for him Starbucks is closing stores around the country.