info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Dems Veto Red Flag Law for Gangbangers
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Mattb
Sep 22, 2019, 3:34:26 PM9/22/19
to
Dems Veto Red Flag Law for Gangbangers
If Democrats were serious about using red flag laws to keep guns out
if the hands of people who might use them to senselessly murder others
and therefore are danger to society, and not just as a gun-control
tool to disarm law-abiding citizens, then why did they kill an attempt
to use compiled lists of known gang members, which many police
departments and law enforcement agencies possess? Why did they kill a
measure to red flag gang members? And if Beto O’Rourke is going to
come and take our guns, particularly our AR-15s, is he going to start
on the south side of Chicago? As the Washington Examiner noted on
September 14:
House Democrats this week advanced a new measure to encourage states
to pass “red flag” laws, known as extreme risk protection orders, that
authorize removing guns and ammunition from dangerous individuals.
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee amended the measure during
a Wednesday mark-up to authorize the federal government to issue
extreme risk protection orders in some instances, but they rejected an
amendment that would have red-flagged anyone who law enforcement lists
as a gang member
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/dems_veto_red_flag_law_for_gangbangers.html
Why do the Dems cover for the number one killers in America???
If Democrats were serious about using red flag laws to keep guns out
if the hands of people who might use them to senselessly murder others
and therefore are danger to society, and not just as a gun-control
tool to disarm law-abiding citizens, then why did they kill an attempt
to use compiled lists of known gang members, which many police
departments and law enforcement agencies possess? Why did they kill a
measure to red flag gang members? And if Beto O’Rourke is going to
come and take our guns, particularly our AR-15s, is he going to start
on the south side of Chicago? As the Washington Examiner noted on
September 14:
House Democrats this week advanced a new measure to encourage states
to pass “red flag” laws, known as extreme risk protection orders, that
authorize removing guns and ammunition from dangerous individuals.
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee amended the measure during
a Wednesday mark-up to authorize the federal government to issue
extreme risk protection orders in some instances, but they rejected an
amendment that would have red-flagged anyone who law enforcement lists
as a gang member
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/09/dems_veto_red_flag_law_for_gangbangers.html
Why do the Dems cover for the number one killers in America???
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 3:35:31 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
> As the Washington Examiner noted
Not a valid source.
> As the Washington Examiner noted
Mattb
Sep 22, 2019, 3:47:41 PM9/22/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 3:48:16 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 12:47 PM, Mattb wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>
>> Not a valid source.
>
> Is the information false?
Yes, obviously.
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>
>> Not a valid source.
>
> Is the information false?
Mattb
Sep 22, 2019, 3:54:03 PM9/22/19
to
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:48:14 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>On 9/22/2019 12:47 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>
>>> Not a valid source.
>>
>> Is the information false?
>
>Yes, obviously.
Then you support placing 'Red Flag' laws on gangbangers?
>On 9/22/2019 12:47 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>
>>> Not a valid source.
>>
>> Is the information false?
>
>Yes, obviously.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 4:40:40 PM9/22/19
to
max headroom
Sep 22, 2019, 7:15:31 PM9/22/19
to
In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> As the Washington Examiner noted
> Not a valid source.
Not a valid 'nym, Rudy.
> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> As the Washington Examiner noted
> Not a valid source.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 7:34:56 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed:
> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>> Not a valid source.
>
> Not a valid 'nym
It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>> Not a valid source.
>
> Not a valid 'nym
max headroom
Sep 22, 2019, 7:42:31 PM9/22/19
to
In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>> typed:
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>> Not a valid source.
>> Not a valid 'nym
> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>> Not a valid source.
>> Not a valid 'nym
> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 7:44:56 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
Indeed!
> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>> typed:
>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
Indeed!
max headroom
Sep 22, 2019, 8:07:41 PM9/22/19
to
In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
That's amusing *and* sad.
> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>> typed:
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
> Indeed!
That's amusing *and* sad.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 22, 2019, 8:15:44 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
Yes.
> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> typed:
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
>
>> Indeed!
>
> That's good.
>
>> Indeed!
>
Yes.
max headroom
Sep 22, 2019, 9:11:09 PM9/22/19
to
In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>> Indeed!
>> That's amusing *and* sad.
>>> Indeed!
>> That's amusing *and* sad.
> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
Don't use UseNet for commercial purposes.
Rudy Canoza
Sep 22, 2019, 10:08:13 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,maxipad oozed and lied:
>
> Yes.
Yes.
You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>
>
> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>>>> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
>
>>>> Indeed!
>
>
>>> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
>
>> Indeed!
>>> I suck. I also blow. I suck and I blow.
>
>
> Yes.
Yes.
You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>
>
Mattb
Sep 22, 2019, 11:26:59 PM9/22/19
to
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:40:38 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
They are no worse than CNN or Vox or MSNBC,
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>On 9/22/2019 12:54 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:48:14 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:47 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>
>>>> Is the information false?
>>>
>>> Yes, obviously.
>>
>> Then you support placing 'Red Flag' laws on gangbangers?
>
>I support not using bullshit sources like "washingtonexaminer"
You did not answer my question. Answer the question??
>On 9/22/2019 12:54 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:48:14 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/22/2019 12:47 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:35:29 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>
>>>> Is the information false?
>>>
>>> Yes, obviously.
>>
>> Then you support placing 'Red Flag' laws on gangbangers?
>
>I support not using bullshit sources like "washingtonexaminer"
They are no worse than CNN or Vox or MSNBC,
Mattb
Sep 22, 2019, 11:27:37 PM9/22/19
to
>
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 23, 2019, 12:23:52 AM9/23/19
to
John Carlson
Sep 23, 2019, 12:24:16 AM9/23/19
to
Mattb
Sep 23, 2019, 1:58:28 AM9/23/19
to
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
wrote:
You play liberal childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd
say it is just stupid.
>
>
>>
>>
wrote:
say it is just stupid.
>
>
>>
>>
Mattb
Sep 23, 2019, 1:59:36 AM9/23/19
to
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:23:50 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Do you support placing 'Red Flag' laws on gangbangers? Yes or No
Rudy Canoza
Sep 23, 2019, 9:45:14 AM9/23/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 23, 2019, 9:46:40 AM9/23/19
to
they must not be placed on social classes of people. They must be applied
on a case by case basis.
max headroom
Sep 23, 2019, 10:24:37 AM9/23/19
to
In news:emngoe50n873f1dd4...@4ax.com, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act sophisticated and erudite, but then he turns
around calls me "maxipad", the kind of thing a sixth-grader would find clever.
Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker" what
Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
around calls me "maxipad", the kind of thing a sixth-grader would find clever.
Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker" what
Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
max headroom
Sep 23, 2019, 10:24:37 AM9/23/19
to
In news:gOVhF.99777$hp5....@fx14.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>> typed:
>>>> typed:
>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>> typed:
>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>> typed:
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>>>> Indeed!
>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>>>>> Indeed!
>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>>> Indeed!
>> Yes.
> Yes.
> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
Your 'nym is showing, little man.
>> Yes.
> Yes.
> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
Rudy Canoza
Sep 23, 2019, 10:31:47 AM9/23/19
to
On 9/23/2019 7:21 AM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
Write *you're*, not "your," you illiterate fuckstain.
> In news:gOVhF.99777$hp5....@fx14.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>
>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>
>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Klaus Schadenfreude <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>
>>>>>> Indeed!
>
>>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>
>>>> Indeed!
>
>>> Yes.
>
>> Yes.
>
>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>
> Your right.
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>
>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>
>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>
>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>
>>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>
>>>>>> Indeed!
>
>>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>
>>>> Indeed!
>
>>> Yes.
>
>> Yes.
>
>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>
Write *you're*, not "your," you illiterate fuckstain.
John Carlson
Sep 23, 2019, 10:33:08 AM9/23/19
to
On 9/23/2019 7:23 AM, maxipad oozed and lied:
Little mattiebee can't define liberal. He's only swearing.
>
> It's both stupid and childish.
It's neither, maxipad.
>
> It's both stupid and childish.
bigdog
Sep 23, 2019, 10:47:32 AM9/23/19
to
means a court hearing BEFORE the guns are taken away and the accused is allowed
to face his accusers and defend himself against the accusations.
"No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". --- Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
max headroom
Sep 23, 2019, 11:12:31 AM9/23/19
to
In news:mH4iF.99782$hp5....@fx14.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
> On 9/23/2019 7:21 AM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza
> On 9/23/2019 7:21 AM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:gOVhF.99777$hp5....@fx14.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time>
>>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>>>>> Indeed!
>>>> Yes.
>>> Yes.
>>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>> That's amusing *and* sad
>>>>> Indeed!
>>>> Yes.
>>> Yes.
>>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>> Your 'nym is showing, little man.
> Write *you're*, not "your," you illiterate fuckstain.
And so it begins-- Rudy's inevitable descent into profane blathering.
max headroom
Sep 23, 2019, 11:12:33 AM9/23/19
to
Rudy summons another 'nym to leap into the fray--
In news:qmal32$fun$1...@dont-email.me, John Carlson <j_ca...@gmx.com> typed:
Yeah, it is, Rudy. In your heart, you know I'm right, and it pisses you off.
In news:qmal32$fun$1...@dont-email.me, John Carlson <j_ca...@gmx.com> typed:
>>> You play liberal childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd say it is just stupid.
> Little mattiebee can't define liberal. He's only swearing.
>> It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act sophisticated and erudite, but then he
>> turns around calls me "maxipad", the kind of thing a sixth-grader would find clever.
>> Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker"
>> what Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
> It's neither, maxipad.
>> turns around calls me "maxipad", the kind of thing a sixth-grader would find clever.
>> Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker"
>> what Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
Yeah, it is, Rudy. In your heart, you know I'm right, and it pisses you off.
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 1:42:31 PM9/24/19
to
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:46:38 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Gangbanger to you are a social class? How and why?
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 1:45:26 PM9/24/19
to
insult yo most sic graders to me he seems to be stuck in the terrible
twos.
%
Sep 24, 2019, 1:45:49 PM9/24/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 24, 2019, 1:49:10 PM9/24/19
to
Rudy Canoza
Sep 24, 2019, 1:50:16 PM9/24/19
to
On 9/23/2019 7:23 AM, maxipad oozed and lied:
empty swearing; nothing more
>> childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd
>> say it is just stupid.
>
> It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act sophisticated and erudite, but then he turns
> around calls me "maxipad"
If fits you like a glove.
>> childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd
>> say it is just stupid.
>
> It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act sophisticated and erudite, but then he turns
> around calls me "maxipad"
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 1:59:05 PM9/24/19
to
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 1:59:26 PM9/24/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:49:07 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
How and why?
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 2:00:49 PM9/24/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
You being "stupid and childish" is factual.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 24, 2019, 2:25:24 PM9/24/19
to
Rudy Canoza
Sep 24, 2019, 2:26:01 PM9/24/19
to
Rudy Canoza
Sep 24, 2019, 3:17:05 PM9/24/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:25:22 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Hey, that makes *ME* a social class! I'm short, and I'm stupid, and I
love sucking cock!
LOL
love sucking cock!
LOL
max headroom
Sep 24, 2019, 3:19:59 PM9/24/19
to
In news:XctiF.89087$R56....@fx23.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>> On 9/23/2019 7:23 AM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>>>>> You play liberal
>>> empty swearing; nothing more
>>>>> childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd
>>>>> say it is just stupid.
>>>> It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act
>>>> sophisticated and erudite, but then he turns around calls me
> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>> In news:emngoe50n873f1dd4...@4ax.com, Mattb
>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:52QhF.179107$423....@fx07.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 12:34 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As the Washington Examiner noted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid source.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a valid 'nym
>>>>>>>>>>>> It sure as fuck is, maxipad.
>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy fools only himself. More amusing than sad.
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>>>>> That's amusing *and* sad.
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>>>> Indeed!
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>> You know I always win at this, maxipad. You know this.
>>>>> You play liberal
>>> empty swearing; nothing more
>>>>> childish headgames and you call that winning. I'd
>>>>> say it is just stupid.
>>>> It's both stupid and childish. Rudy really tries to act
>>>> sophisticated and erudite, but then he turns around calls me
>>>> "maxipad", the kind of thing a sixth-grader would find clever.
>>>> Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker"
>>>> what Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
>>>> Rudy's exchanges invariably end with his descent into profane blathering. He is to "cocksucker"
>>>> what Samuel L. Jackson is to "motherfucker."
>>> If fits you like a glove.
>> You being "stupid and childish"
> Is your worthless, uninformed opinion.
Yet it is universal.
>> You being "stupid and childish"
> Is your worthless, uninformed opinion.
Rudy Canoza
Sep 24, 2019, 3:32:52 PM9/24/19
to
On 9/24/2019 12:19 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
> Yet it is bullshit.
Yes.
> In news:XctiF.89087$R56....@fx23.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
>
>> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>> On 9/23/2019 7:23 AM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>
>> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>> In news:emngoe50n873f1dd4...@4ax.com, Mattb
>>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,maxipad oozed and lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
Yes.
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 8:01:41 PM9/24/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:25:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
That is exactly what I think of your opinions.
Mattb
Sep 24, 2019, 8:07:08 PM9/24/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:25:22 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
The you believe they are excused for the murders based on these
"social characteristics". What are they?
"social characteristics". What are they?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 24, 2019, 8:44:03 PM9/24/19
to
with the use of "red flag" laws? How can being a member of a group subject
a person to a "red flag" law, rather than something particular to that
individual?
As always, you're not making any sense. Soon enough, you'll start
blabbering something completely stupid about "antifa" - you always do.
max headroom
Sep 24, 2019, 8:52:31 PM9/24/19
to
In news:DbuiF.4$iA...@fx06.iad, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
> On 9/24/2019 12:19 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> Yet it is universal.
> Yes.
Confession is good for your soul, Rudy.
Assuming you had one.
> On 9/24/2019 12:19 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>> In news:XctiF.89087$R56....@fx23.iad, Rudy Canoza
>> <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
>>> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/23/2019 7:23 AM, max the magnificent educated:
>> <c...@philhendrie.con> typed:
>>> On 9/24/2019 11:00 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:50:14 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>> In news:emngoe50n873f1dd4...@4ax.com, Mattb
>>>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 6:10 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>> <trdel...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:08:10 -0700, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>> <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In news:P8UhF.299450$9Z1....@fx41.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 5:06 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>> In news:XHThF.516113$1b5.1...@fx37.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:41 PM, max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In news:yyThF.117937$9J3....@fx11.iad, Rudy Canoza
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/2019 4:02 PM,max the magnificent educated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> typed:
> Yes.
Confession is good for your soul, Rudy.
Assuming you had one.
Mattb
Sep 25, 2019, 12:30:26 PM9/25/19
to
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:44:00 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Look into the number and percentage of shooting not including
suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
"• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over
prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of
those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that
is the root cause."
>
>As always, you're not making any sense. Soon enough, you'll start
>blabbering something completely stupid about "antifa" - you always do.
No antifa while like Mussolini Black Shirts don't to date go around
shooting except in a few cases.
suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
"• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over
prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of
those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that
is the root cause."
>
>As always, you're not making any sense. Soon enough, you'll start
>blabbering something completely stupid about "antifa" - you always do.
shooting except in a few cases.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 25, 2019, 12:42:49 PM9/25/19
to
were specifically due to "gangbangers." You made that up.
>
> So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of
> those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that
> is the root cause."
"gangbaners" is just another swearword for you, like "liberal" and "antifa."
>
>>
>> As always, you're not making any sense. Soon enough, you'll start
>> blabbering something completely stupid about "antifa" - you always do.
>
> No antifa
vehicle ahead of you throws up pebble that cracks your windshield, soon
enough you'll blame "antifa." You always do. Your an illiterate, stupid,
irrational fuckwit. You have already agreed with me on that.
Rudy Canoza
Sep 25, 2019, 3:19:10 PM9/25/19
to
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:42:41 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>"gangbaners" is just another swearword for you, like "liberal" and "antifa."
That's gangBANGER you illiterate dwarf! LOL
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>"gangbaners" is just another swearword for you, like "liberal" and "antifa."
Just Wondering
Sep 25, 2019, 3:39:49 PM9/25/19
to
On 9/25/2019 10:30 AM, Mattb wrote:
in small areas of those cities - areas where those "gangbangers" congregate.
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> On 9/24/2019 5:07 PM, Mattb wrote:
>> On 9/24/2019 5:07 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:59 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:59 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:42 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:42 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't support red flag laws at all. If such laws come into
>>>>>>>> existence, they must not be placed on social classes of people.
>>>>>>>> They must be applied on a case by case basis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gangbanger to you are a social class?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously.
>>>>>
>>>>> How and why?
>>>>
>>>> They share a broad and well defined set of social characteristics.
>>>
>>> The you believe they are excused for the murders based on these
>>> "social characteristics".
>>
>> "Excused" for what murders? What does that nonsensical blurt have
>> to do with the use of "red flag" laws? How can being a member of
>> a group subject a person to a "red flag" law, rather than something
>> particular to that individual?
>
> Look into the number and percentage of shooting not including
> suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
> • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
> • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
> • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
> • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase
> over prior years)
> So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.
I bet if the crimes were put on city maps, they would be concentrated
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't support red flag laws at all. If such laws come into
>>>>>>>> existence, they must not be placed on social classes of people.
>>>>>>>> They must be applied on a case by case basis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gangbanger to you are a social class?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously.
>>>>>
>>>>> How and why?
>>>>
>>>> They share a broad and well defined set of social characteristics.
>>>
>>> The you believe they are excused for the murders based on these
>>> "social characteristics".
>>
>> "Excused" for what murders? What does that nonsensical blurt have
>> to do with the use of "red flag" laws? How can being a member of
>> a group subject a person to a "red flag" law, rather than something
>> particular to that individual?
>
> Look into the number and percentage of shooting not including
> suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
> • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
> • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
> • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
> • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase
> over prior years)
> So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.
in small areas of those cities - areas where those "gangbangers" congregate.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 25, 2019, 3:41:12 PM9/25/19
to
Rudy Canoza
Sep 25, 2019, 7:18:27 PM9/25/19
to
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:41:10 -0700, Cock-sucking Rudy
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>On 9/25/2019 12:39 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 9/25/2019 10:30 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Rudy impotently forged:
<I.Suck...@everywhere.all.the.time> wrote:
>On 9/25/2019 12:39 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 9/25/2019 10:30 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>> On 9/24/2019 5:07 PM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Rudy impotently forged:
>>>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:59 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 Rudy impotently forged :
>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2019 10:42 AM, Mattb wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 Rudy impotently forged :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't support red flag laws at all. If such laws come into
>>>>>>>>>> existence, they must not be placed on social classes of people.
>>>>>>>>>> They must be applied on a case by case basis.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gangbanger to you are a social class?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How and why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They share a broad and well defined set of social characteristics.
>>>>>
>>>>> The you believe they are excused for the murders based on these
>>>>> "social characteristics".
>>>>
>>>> "Excused" for what murders? What does that nonsensical blurt have
>>>> to do with the use of "red flag" laws? How can being a member of
>>>> a group subject a person to a "red flag" law, rather than something
>>>> particular to that individual?
>>>
>>> Look into the number and percentage of shooting not including
>>> suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
>>> • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
>>> • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
>>> • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
>>> • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase
>>> over prior years)
>>> So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.
>>
>> I bet if the crimes were put on city maps,
>
>With no source to check, those "crime figures" are worthless.
And what I mean is, it's CRUEL for you to post any figures at all,
>>>>>>>>>> I don't support red flag laws at all. If such laws come into
>>>>>>>>>> existence, they must not be placed on social classes of people.
>>>>>>>>>> They must be applied on a case by case basis.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gangbanger to you are a social class?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How and why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They share a broad and well defined set of social characteristics.
>>>>>
>>>>> The you believe they are excused for the murders based on these
>>>>> "social characteristics".
>>>>
>>>> "Excused" for what murders? What does that nonsensical blurt have
>>>> to do with the use of "red flag" laws? How can being a member of
>>>> a group subject a person to a "red flag" law, rather than something
>>>> particular to that individual?
>>>
>>> Look into the number and percentage of shooting not including
>>> suicide for that group (Gangs) and get back to me.
>>> • 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
>>> • 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
>>> • 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
>>> • 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase
>>> over prior years)
>>> So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities.
>>
>> I bet if the crimes were put on city maps,
>
>With no source to check, those "crime figures" are worthless.
since you KNOW I'm too short to reach the reference books at the
library! [fuming]
Mattb
Sep 25, 2019, 11:31:22 PM9/25/19
to
Mattb
Sep 25, 2019, 11:32:01 PM9/25/19
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Sep 26, 2019, 10:48:31 AM9/26/19
to
Rudy Canoza
Sep 26, 2019, 11:15:20 AM9/26/19
to
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:48:30 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
This looks like a quote that could be used against me!
Mattb
Sep 27, 2019, 2:40:12 PM9/27/19
to
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:48:30 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
They are from FBI data. Feel free to check it.
0 new messages