Ye Old One the Plagiarist.
Nashton
Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
nuisance.
Grandbank
"tooth bone".
Moron.
KP
All-Seeing-I
His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
remarkable.
But what is even more remarkable are the amount of evolutionists that
overtly came to his defense after his dastardly deed. Some even tried
to mitigate what he had done and even trivialize it.
Is it any wonder that they have such an emotional attachment to
evolution when they find it so easy to lie to themselves and others?
Many of them claim to be scientists, chemists, even teachers like YOO
does. A frightening prospect to say the very least. Because if YOO is
a teacher then is no wonder at all that the educational system is in
a shambles.
The double standards are quite apparent.
The deceit is apparent.
The post of the month is nothing more then a joke.
Even the tradition of the 'Chez Watt' is used to further their agenda
of applying of double standards.
Pathetic.
John Harshman
nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
Ray Martinez
Now you know why he posts under a pseudonym.
He is also a person who has slandered me relentlessly.
Ray (Creationist)
Burkhard
> On Jan 5, 6:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>
> > Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> > Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> > he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> > Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> > disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> > OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
> > nuisance.
>
> His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
> remarkable.
>
> But what is even more remarkable are the amount of evolutionists that
> overtly came to his defense after his dastardly deed.
0 is indeed a remarkable number
,
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Nashton <na...@na.ca>:
>Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
Well, since the only thing that happened was that you posted
a bunch of baseless charges, and that only you and
Non-Seeing-Idiot seem to be "ridiculing" him, that's not too
surprising. What, you expect anyone to pay any attention to
your rants?
>Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
Maybe you should follow your own advice. Of course, given
the content of nearly all of your posts it's obvious that
you lack the necessary prerequisites as you stated them.
>OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>nuisance.
Mote. Beam. Eye.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
John Harshman
> On Jan 5, 6:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>
>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>
>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>> nuisance.
>
> His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
> remarkable.
>
> But what is even more remarkable are the amount of evolutionists that
> overtly came to his defense after his dastardly deed. Some even tried
> to mitigate what he had done and even trivialize it.
Not that I don't unquestioningly believe every single thing you say, but
name one.
> Is it any wonder that they have such an emotional attachment to
> evolution when they find it so easy to lie to themselves and others?
Says the fellow who just posted Onyate Man.
> Many of them claim to be scientists, chemists, even teachers like YOO
> does. A frightening prospect to say the very least. Because if YOO is
> a teacher then is no wonder at all that the educational system is in
> a shambles.
Agreed. Do you have any evidence, however, that any evolutionist is
anything other than what he claims to be?
> The double standards are quite apparent.
How so?
> The deceit is apparent.
How so?
> The post of the month is nothing more then a joke.
>
> Even the tradition of the 'Chez Watt' is used to further their agenda
> of applying of double standards.
>
> Pathetic.
If you're done whining for now, perhaps you'd like to address some of
the flaws in your various claims, remaining from all the threads you
have run from.
Eric Root
> On Jan 5, 6:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>
> > Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> > Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> > he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> > Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> > disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> > OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
> > nuisance.
>
> His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
> remarkable.
>
> But what is even more remarkable are the amount of evolutionists that
> overtly came to his defense after his dastardly deed.
What's vastly more remarkable is your avoidance of recognizing that it
was pro-science people that outed him as a plagiarists and that the
number of people that condemned him was vastly greater than the number
(if any) that overtly defended him. So, to pretend that we good guys
"remarkably" defended him is totally indefensible.
> Some even tried
> to mitigate what he had done
Which only a scumball would ;pretend there is anything wrong with. Of
course, decent people will recognize that plagiarism is very minor
compared to the kind of hatefulness exhibited by Nashton or the rank
dishonesty of ASI.
> and even trivialize it.
And, of course, it is trivial compared to being hgateful and
insulting, or making up bizarre accusations about abuse of women.
Someone who would pretend otherwise is a lowlife. Someone who
honestly thinks otherwise reveals an intellectual disability that
renders theri opinions nonsense.
>
> Is it any wonder that they have such an emotional attachment to
> evolution when they find it so easy to lie to themselves and others?
>
We are emotionally attached to any cause that is in the right and
unjustly being attacked for bad reasons.
> Many of them claim to be scientists, chemists, even teachers like YOO
> does. A frightening prospect to say the very least.
Because smart people are frightening to people with an unjust hatred
of them?
> Because if YOO is
> a teacher then is no �wonder at all that the educational system is in
> a shambles.
Non sequitur.
>
> The double standards are quite apparent.
Yeah, creationists demand all sorts of evidence from pro-science
people, even though they never have any evidence ;for theirown
position. What could be more hypocritical?
>
> The deceit is apparent.
apparent=hallucinatory in ASI's idiolect
.
>
> The post of the month is nothing more then a joke.
>
Really? Can you name one winner that wasn't well written and
informative?
> Even the tradition of the 'Chez Watt' is used to further their agenda
> of applying of double standards.
>
Just a lie on your part. Most Chez Watts go out to us pro-science
people.
> Pathetic.
You will never persuade normal people that your side is not the evil
one by making such dishonest, lying, and insulting posts as the one
above. Your mother should be ashamed of you.
Eric Root
Nashton
I haven't seen you actively admonishing your fellow activist for the
countless errors he has made.
Activist, I have already retracted my statement about teeth, an honest
mistake that I acknowledged.
Let it go, you've gotten all the mileage you can get out of that one,
ignoramus.
>
>
> KP
>
Nashton
Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
each other.
Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
times I've ignored him.
heekster
<allse...@usa.com> wrote:
>On Jan 5, 6:38�am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>
>> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>
>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>> nuisance.
>
>His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
>remarkable.
>
Still falling for that Onyate man April fools joke, eh, sucker?
How many times is that now, five, six?
Damn, you are one stupid cretinist.
Ye Old One
>On Jan 5, 6:38�am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>
>> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>
>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>> nuisance.
>
>My inability to successfully lie to myself and others is indeed
>remarkable.
>
Text corrected.
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
Science causes disease.
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited
some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of
rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me
laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle
East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah
and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
The [Dropa] stone is real, the troglodytes exist, the graves are
there, many books have been written on the subject...
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
Certainly I don't.
--
Bob.
Ye Old One
Grow up NashtOff, and learn some real science.
--
Bob.
NashtOff - the moron who claimed "All drugs are derived from the ToE."
Ye Old One
You really are an illiterate liar!.
>
>Ray (Creationist)
--
Bob.
Your IQ score is 2 (it takes 3 to grunt).
bpuharic
>On Jan 5, 6:38�am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>
>> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>
>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>> nuisance.
>
>His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
>remarkable.
says the guy who thinks scientists are a threat to humanity; that gays
are a threat to humanity; and that jews killed christ
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Ray Martinez
<pyram...@yahoo.com>:
>On Jan 5, 4:38�am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>
>> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>
>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>> nuisance.
>
>Now you know why he posts under a pseudonym.
You mean like Non-Seeing-Idiot, spintronic, et al?
>He is also a person who has slandered me relentlessly.
It's impossible to slander you in Usenet. And he hasn't
libeled you, either.
>Ray (Creationist and Scientific Illiterate)
Fixed it; you're welcome.
Baron Bodissey
> On Jan 5, 6:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>
> > Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> > Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> > he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> > Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> > disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> > OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
> > nuisance.
>
> His ability to successfully lie to himself and others is indeed
> remarkable.
>
> But what is even more remarkable are the amount of evolutionists that
> overtly came to his defense after his dastardly deed. Some even tried
> to mitigate what he had done and even trivialize it.
>
> Is it any wonder that they have such an emotional attachment to
> evolution when they find it so easy to lie to themselves and others?
>
> Many of them claim to be scientists, chemists, even teachers like YOO
> does. A frightening prospect to say the very least. Because if YOO is
> a shambles.
>
> The double standards are quite apparent.
>
> The deceit is apparent.
>
> The post of the month is nothing more then a joke.
>
> Even the tradition of the 'Chez Watt' is used to further their agenda
> of applying of double standards.
>
> Pathetic.
I did not read all the posts in reference to YOO's plagiarism but I
read many of them and I don't recall anybody "overtly" coming to his
defense. Did you really mean "overtly"? Could you perhaps supply
specifics.
Speaking of thick skins, Onyate Man was only a couple hours ago.
Baron Bodissey
When science is on the march, nothing stands in its way.
� Amazon Women on the Moon
John Harshman
> Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
> Certainly I don't.
Me neither. Then again, I don't give any credence to you either.
John Harshman
> John Harshman wrote:
>> Nashton wrote:
>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and
>>> plagiarism, he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing
>>> happened.
>>>
>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>
>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
>>> supreme nuisance.
>>>
>> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
>> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>
>
> Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
> each other.
Agreed. You have to be stalking him too. Which you are.
> Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
> many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
> times I've ignored him.
And how many threads have you started purely to attack him? Go away,
both of you.
Inez
> John Harshman wrote:
> > Nashton wrote:
> >> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> >> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> >> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> >> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> >> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> >> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
> >> supreme nuisance.
>
> > And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
> > nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>
> Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
> each other.
No, but the fact that you post whining insult threads about him means
you are stalking him.
> Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
> many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
> times I've ignored him.
But here you are failing to ignore him. If you find him to be a
nuisance then why don't you just killfile him and get on with your
life, rather than complaining about him?
Ye Old One
group when s/he wrote:
>John Harshman wrote:
>> Nashton wrote:
>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>>
>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>
>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
>>> supreme nuisance.
>>>
>> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
>> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>>
>
>
>Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
>each other.
You really are a moron NashtOff.
>
>Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
>many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
>times I've ignored him.
--
Ye Old One
You really are a very nasty person NashtOff.
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Nashton <na...@na.ca>:
>John Harshman wrote:
>> Nashton wrote:
>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>>
>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>
>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
>>> supreme nuisance.
>>>
>> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
>> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>>
>
>
>Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
>each other.
No, that's demonstrated every time you start a thread
attacking him.
>Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
>many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
>times I've ignored him.
"...gone out of his way to post an answer..."? Are you
really that clueless?
How many times has he started a thread attacking you?
Answering your idiocies doesn't count as "stalking".
el cid
> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:19:53 -0400, the following appeared
>
>
>
>
>
> >John Harshman wrote:
> >> Nashton wrote:
> >>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> >>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> >>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> >>> Anybody with �modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> >>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> >>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
> >>> supreme nuisance.
>
> >> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
> >> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>
> >Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are stalking
> >each other.
>
> No, that's demonstrated every time you start a thread
> attacking him.
>
> >Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
> >many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
> >times I've ignored him.
>
> "...gone out of his way to post an answer..."? Are you
> really that clueless?
>
> How many times has he started a thread attacking you?
> Answering your idiocies doesn't count as "stalking".
Oh he's guilty of stalking alright, as surely as he is
guilty of plagiarism and rather spineless/delusional
avoidance of any remorse for the well documented crime.
His stalking is clearly evident in the way he will
seek out any Nashton post and not only reply with
useless vitriol but also often append some list of
remembered crimes.
They clearly deserve and feed off each other.
I note a few others with similar habits of stalking
creationists to often do little more than call them
liars seem to be anxious to give YOO a pass on his
plagiarism. And that one-sided behavior is very short-sighted.
Ye Old One
Your loss, not mine.
--
Bob.
Glenn
You're responding to one, and who also likes to "fix" or "correct"
others actual words. One has to wonder how their detractors would fare
if they had the power to change OPs.
But my favorite "stalk" is the dozens if not hundreds of posts by YOO
proclaiming his "shunning". IMO, spamming a la troll at it's finest.
All-seeing-I
Ye Old Boob = a fake. a phony. a fraud. and a plagiarist
--
This has been another enlightening moment, with:
Adman.
Ye Old One
<ap...@email.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>On Jan 6, 4:18�pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:16:31 -0800, John Harshman
>> <jharsh...@pacbell.net> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>
>> >Ye Old One wrote:
>>
>> >> Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
>> >> Certainly I don't.
>>
>> >Me neither. Then again, I don't give any credence to you either.
>>
>> Your loss, not mine.
>>
>> --
>> Bob.
>
>Ye Old Boob = a fake. a phony. a fraud. and a plagiarist
Still well above you Mudbrain. At least I have a working brain and
know how to use it.
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
Science causes disease.
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited
some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of
rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me
laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle
East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah
and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
The [Dropa] stone is real, the troglodytes exist, the graves are
there, many books have been written on the subject...
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
Certainly I don't.
--
Bob.
Nashton
> Nashton wrote:
>> John Harshman wrote:
>>> Nashton wrote:
>>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>>>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and
>>>> plagiarism, he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing
>>>> happened.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>>
>>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
>>>> supreme nuisance.
>>>>
>>> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
>>> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>>
>>
>> Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are
>> stalking each other.
>
> Agreed. You have to be stalking him too. Which you are.
You have a difficult time with circular argumentation, I see.
I have started less than can be counted by the fingers of one hand.
>
>> Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
>> many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
>> times I've ignored him.
>
> And how many threads have you started purely to attack him? Go away,
> both of you.
Be my guest and kill file me.
YOO represents the average intelligence of posters in here. He is a
useless activist and posts nothing of quality, like yourself and other
posters which I enjoy reading.
Just look at this thread and tell us who's stalking who.
>
Nashton
Filthy plagiarist.
Get lost.
Nashton
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:37:18 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by Ray Martinez
> <pyram...@yahoo.com>:
>
>> On Jan 5, 4:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
>>> Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
>>> he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>>>
>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>
>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
>>> nuisance.
>> Now you know why he posts under a pseudonym.
>
> You mean like Non-Seeing-Idiot, spintronic, et al?
>
>> He is also a person who has slandered me relentlessly.
>
> It's impossible to slander you in Usenet. And he hasn't
> libeled you, either.
>
>> Ray (Creationist and Scientific Illiterate)
>
> Fixed it; you're welcome.
Casanova, another activist who serves as a goon for the "team."
You can't even accomplish that well, moron.
Ye Old One
Liar! I wrote nothing of the sort.
You, on the other hand, did claim that "All drugs are derived from
the ToE."
You really are brain-dead.
Devils Advocaat
> On Jan 5, 4:38 am, Nashton <n...@na.ca> wrote:
>
> > Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the Usenet.
> > Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and plagiarism,
> > he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing happened.
>
> > Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
> > disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>
> > OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a supreme
> > nuisance.
>
> Now you know why he posts under a pseudonym.
Most people on here post under pseudonyms.
As I am sure you do too.
>
> He is also a person who has slandered me relentlessly.
So you are aware of an oral defamation of you uttered by this person
who posts here under a pseudonym are you?
Care to present evidence or witnesses for that assertion?
>
> Ray (Creationist)
John Harshman
> John Harshman wrote:
>> Nashton wrote:
>>> John Harshman wrote:
>>>> Nashton wrote:
>>>>> Ye Old Plagiarist has the thickest skin of any poster on the
>>>>> Usenet. Having been ridiculed for his abuse of women, idiocies and
>>>>> plagiarism, he continues to copy and paste articles as if nothing
>>>>> happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody with modicum of a conscience or any dignity would have
>>>>> disappeared and taken on a new "hobby."
>>>>>
>>>>> OTOH, given that this ng is his only LIFE, he continues to be a
>>>>> supreme nuisance.
>>>>>
>>>> And you continue stalking each other. Endless regress of supreme
>>>> nuisances. Maybe you could both take it to email?
>>>
>>>
>>> Just because he's stalking me, John, does not mean that we are
>>> stalking each other.
>>
>> Agreed. You have to be stalking him too. Which you are.
>
> You have a difficult time with circular argumentation, I see.
> I have started less than can be counted by the fingers of one hand.
So your defense is that you aren't stalking him very much?
>>> Get your fact straight and take a look at the threads and tell me how
>>> many times he has gone out of his way to post an answer and how many
>>> times I've ignored him.
>>
>> And how many threads have you started purely to attack him? Go away,
>> both of you.
>
> Be my guest and kill file me.
Easier just to ignore you, which I usually do.
> YOO represents the average intelligence of posters in here. He is a
> useless activist and posts nothing of quality, like yourself and other
> posters which I enjoy reading.
That didn't come out quite right, but I appreciate the sentiment.
> Just look at this thread and tell us who's stalking who.
Exactly. What's the title?
Nashton
Bwaahhaahaahahahaaha!
>
Nashton
> Ye Old One wrote:
>
>> Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
>> Certainly I don't.
>
> Me neither.
That's nice. Color me hurt.
> Then again, I don't give any credence to you either.
Now that's a first.
Caranx latus
Would you please stop changing your "email" address, Nashton? You keep
popping out of my killfile.
Ye Old One
group when s/he wrote:
>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:16:31 -0800, John Harshman
>> <jhar...@pacbell.net> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>> Ye Old One wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to?
>>>> Certainly I don't.
>>> Me neither. Then again, I don't give any credence to you either.
>>
>> Your loss, not mine.
>
>Bwaahhaahaahahahaaha!
>>
Demented again NashtOff?
--
Bob.
NashtOff - the moron who claimed "All drugs are derived from the ToE."
Boikat
Gee. That's almost like nym-shifting, isn't it?
Boikat
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Nashton <n...@nana.ca>:
Envy suits you.
heekster
Your entire repertoire of arguments seems to be exclusively of the ad
hominem style, along with a puerile habit of name calling.
Your posts are predominately without any other content, whatsoever.