Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Is this piece of trash yours?
132 views
Skip to first unread message
Boghammer 73
Jun 13, 2018, 8:40:02 PM6/13/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>a British officer and the troops were British
>is just inconvenient facts right?
>
>You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
wrote:
>Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>a British officer and the troops were British
>is just inconvenient facts right?
>
>You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
*Hemidactylus*
Jun 13, 2018, 8:50:02 PM6/13/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
properly done keelhaul...old school. Then chum for sharks while he’s under.
Wolffan
Jun 14, 2018, 7:05:02 AM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 13 Jun 2018, Boghammer 73 wrote
(in article<u5e3idp36b78gck3q...@4ax.com>):
Hell no, it ain’t ours. It managed to do the impossible: it spewed crap
which was so off-topic for t.o. (do you know how difficult it is to find
something that’s off-topic for t.o.? Until recently I thought that there
wasn’t anything too far out. It proved me wrong.) that the moderator had a
word. Several words. Lots of words. It nearly joined the very short list of
posters banned from t.o. over the last 20+ years. It now manages to keep
close to on-topic here. It seems to have come here from there. Y’all keep
him. We don’t want him, but unfortunately the mod applies the ban-hammer
very rarely, and only after issuing warnings. Y’all need a moderator. HTH.
HAND.
(in article<u5e3idp36b78gck3q...@4ax.com>):
which was so off-topic for t.o. (do you know how difficult it is to find
something that’s off-topic for t.o.? Until recently I thought that there
wasn’t anything too far out. It proved me wrong.) that the moderator had a
word. Several words. Lots of words. It nearly joined the very short list of
posters banned from t.o. over the last 20+ years. It now manages to keep
close to on-topic here. It seems to have come here from there. Y’all keep
him. We don’t want him, but unfortunately the mod applies the ban-hammer
very rarely, and only after issuing warnings. Y’all need a moderator. HTH.
HAND.
Boghammer 73
Jun 14, 2018, 11:25:03 AM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:00:07 -0400, Wolffan <akwo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 13 Jun 2018, Boghammer 73 wrote
>(in article<u5e3idp36b78gck3q...@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan<WriteI...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>> > a British officer and the troops were British
>> > is just inconvenient facts right?
>> >
>> > You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>> > Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
>>
>> This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
>>
>> Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
>
>Hell no, it ain’t ours. It managed to do the impossible: it spewed crap
>which was so off-topic for t.o. (do you know how difficult it is to find
>something that’s off-topic for t.o.? Until recently I thought that there
>wasn’t anything too far out. It proved me wrong.) that the moderator had a
>word. Several words. Lots of words. It nearly joined the very short list of
>posters banned from t.o.
What good is a moderator if after "Several words. Lots of words" the
person or persons disrupting your newsgroup are still allowed to
participate? What does your moderator do? Check everyone's spelling?
Look into your lunch boxes for healthy food? What?
wrote:
>On 13 Jun 2018, Boghammer 73 wrote
>(in article<u5e3idp36b78gck3q...@4ax.com>):
>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan<WriteI...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>> > a British officer and the troops were British
>> > is just inconvenient facts right?
>> >
>> > You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>> > Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
>>
>> This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
>>
>> Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
>
>Hell no, it ain’t ours. It managed to do the impossible: it spewed crap
>which was so off-topic for t.o. (do you know how difficult it is to find
>something that’s off-topic for t.o.? Until recently I thought that there
>wasn’t anything too far out. It proved me wrong.) that the moderator had a
>word. Several words. Lots of words. It nearly joined the very short list of
>posters banned from t.o.
person or persons disrupting your newsgroup are still allowed to
participate? What does your moderator do? Check everyone's spelling?
Look into your lunch boxes for healthy food? What?
Byker
Jun 14, 2018, 2:10:03 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
"Wolffan" wrote in message
news:0001HW.20D2823702...@news.supernews.com...
point of Usenet. It's unmoderated, with no holds barred...
news:0001HW.20D2823702...@news.supernews.com...
>
> that the moderator had a word. Several words. Lots of words.
Having a "moderator" is a sure-fire way to kill an NG. That's the whole
> that the moderator had a word. Several words. Lots of words.
point of Usenet. It's unmoderated, with no holds barred...
Bob Casanova
Jun 14, 2018, 3:25:03 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:38:19 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Boghammer 73 <not...@gmail.com>:
Thanks, but we don't want his crap here either; it's as
off-topic here as there, and he's obviously as much a jerk
there as here. Please exercise a bit of netiquette and just
killfile the moron instead of inflicting him on others.
Thanks.
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in talk.origins, posted by Boghammer 73 <not...@gmail.com>:
off-topic here as there, and he's obviously as much a jerk
there as here. Please exercise a bit of netiquette and just
killfile the moron instead of inflicting him on others.
Thanks.
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
Bob Casanova
Jun 14, 2018, 3:35:02 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:20:43 -0400, the following appeared
T.o is robomoderated, one of the few (if not the only) group
so moderated; the moderator only maintains the 'bot software
and the server. The 'bot rejects messages crossposted to
more than 4 groups, and there are a *very* few individuals
banned for cause, some at the request of other groups for
being assholes *there*, and some for repeated nymshifting to
avoid killfiles. Jonathan is just an asshole, and such are
welcome here (in a sense) as a means of keeping them out of
the serious "sci" groups, a job which is obviously not
perfect.
That said, it's the responsibility of each group to "shoot
their own dogs"; good luck, and keep your killfile active.
so moderated; the moderator only maintains the 'bot software
and the server. The 'bot rejects messages crossposted to
more than 4 groups, and there are a *very* few individuals
banned for cause, some at the request of other groups for
being assholes *there*, and some for repeated nymshifting to
avoid killfiles. Jonathan is just an asshole, and such are
welcome here (in a sense) as a means of keeping them out of
the serious "sci" groups, a job which is obviously not
perfect.
That said, it's the responsibility of each group to "shoot
their own dogs"; good luck, and keep your killfile active.
jonathan
Jun 14, 2018, 7:15:02 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
You're posting here under two handles, Boghammer 73
and your usual handle Panthera Tigres.
How can I tell? You post under those two handles
during the same times of day, all day long
from 9am to 5 pm. It's hard to believe you
can't get a job with unemployment under 4%.
Jonathan
s
jonathan
Jun 14, 2018, 7:35:02 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
of stuck up women.
'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
win a debate with reason or facts.
*Hemidactylus*
Jun 14, 2018, 7:50:02 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
>
> 'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
> win a debate with reason or facts.
>
It is so much better to copypaste a bunch of poorly integrated crap.
> 'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
> win a debate with reason or facts.
>
I made a major mistake in a previous post. It made little sense. One should
first chum the fuck out of the waters to attract sharks. Only then should
the proper keelhauling commence. Hopefully there are sufficient barnacles
to make it worthwhile.
Fred J. McCall
Jun 14, 2018, 9:20:02 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote on Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:32:30
-0700:
There are very few folks that make me miss the days of robo-cancel
(back when servers honored cancellation messages). Jonathan has the
distinction of being one of them.
--
"Then tomorrow we may all be dead. But how is that different
from every other day?"
-- Morpheus
-0700:
(back when servers honored cancellation messages). Jonathan has the
distinction of being one of them.
--
"Then tomorrow we may all be dead. But how is that different
from every other day?"
-- Morpheus
jonathan
Jun 14, 2018, 11:00:03 PM6/14/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 6/14/2018 9:17 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>
> There are very few folks that make me miss the days of robo-cancel
> (back when servers honored cancellation messages). Jonathan has the
> distinction of being one of them.
>
>
Man oh man people are just following me around
>
> There are very few folks that make me miss the days of robo-cancel
> (back when servers honored cancellation messages). Jonathan has the
> distinction of being one of them.
>
>
wherever I go, this is so flattering.
s
--
Bob Casanova
Jun 15, 2018, 2:15:03 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 19:33:11 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
Whine, whine...
Maybe you should read your original post ( still shown above
in all its repulsive glory) in order to understand the
complaint lodged against you.
And hint to the clueless: I was discussing how t.o's
robomoderation works, not "gossiping" about you; the
reference to you was ancillary. And if you have any
"groupies" they should get a life. And a clue.
>'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
>win a debate with reason or facts.
Don't yet understand Usenet group structure or the concept
of netiquette? No problem; they're not the only things you
fail to understand.
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
Maybe you should read your original post ( still shown above
in all its repulsive glory) in order to understand the
complaint lodged against you.
And hint to the clueless: I was discussing how t.o's
robomoderation works, not "gossiping" about you; the
reference to you was ancillary. And if you have any
"groupies" they should get a life. And a clue.
>'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
>win a debate with reason or facts.
of netiquette? No problem; they're not the only things you
fail to understand.
Bob Casanova
Jun 15, 2018, 2:20:03 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 18:17:55 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by "Fred J. McCall"
<fjmc...@gmail.com>:
Killfiles work OK. I don't use one for him; he's not really
worth the effort (3 mouse clicks; 4 if I want to remove the
"expire after" option). And I've successfully cancelled
messages in the past couple of months; it may work because
t.o is "moderated".
AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
in talk.origins, posted by "Fred J. McCall"
<fjmc...@gmail.com>:
worth the effort (3 mouse clicks; 4 if I want to remove the
"expire after" option). And I've successfully cancelled
messages in the past couple of months; it may work because
t.o is "moderated".
AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
Bob Casanova
Jun 15, 2018, 2:25:02 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:58:34 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
People used to follow horses around, for much the same
reason.
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
reason.
Ernest Major
Jun 15, 2018, 2:35:03 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 15/06/2018 19:19, Bob Casanova wrote:
> AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of*others* was never an
environment, and not foreseeing the abuse of the cancel mechanism they
didn't enforce a restriction that you could only cancel your own
messages. The feature was pressed into service as a despamming mechanism
- bots were written to "robocancel" excessively crossposted posts.
I can't say offhand whether the mechanism explicitly allowed you to
cancel other peoples' posts, or only implicitly as a consequence of the
lack of a reliable authentication mechanism (as seen by the ease of
forging moderator approvals).
--
alias Ernest Major
> AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of*others* was never an
> option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
As I understand and recall, the early Usenet was a much more collegial
environment, and not foreseeing the abuse of the cancel mechanism they
didn't enforce a restriction that you could only cancel your own
messages. The feature was pressed into service as a despamming mechanism
- bots were written to "robocancel" excessively crossposted posts.
I can't say offhand whether the mechanism explicitly allowed you to
cancel other peoples' posts, or only implicitly as a consequence of the
lack of a reliable authentication mechanism (as seen by the ease of
forging moderator approvals).
--
alias Ernest Major
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Jun 15, 2018, 3:10:03 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, jonathan wrote:
> On 6/13/2018 8:38 PM, Boghammer 73 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
> >> a British officer and the troops were British
> >> is just inconvenient facts right?
> >>
> >> You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
> >> Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
> >
> > This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
> >
> > Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
> >
>
>
>
>
> What are you doing reposting my rants here?
>
> You're posting here under two handles, Boghammer 73
> and your usual handle Panthera Tigres.
I am not Boghammer 73.
> On 6/13/2018 8:38 PM, Boghammer 73 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
> >> a British officer and the troops were British
> >> is just inconvenient facts right?
> >>
> >> You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
> >> Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
> >
> > This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
> >
> > Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
> >
>
>
>
>
> What are you doing reposting my rants here?
>
> You're posting here under two handles, Boghammer 73
> and your usual handle Panthera Tigres.
>
> How can I tell? You post under those two handles
> during the same times of day, all day long
> from 9am to 5 pm.
> It's hard to believe you
> can't get a job with unemployment under 4%.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> s
Fred J. McCall
Jun 15, 2018, 3:15:02 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote on Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:19:36
It varies based on the server you're posting through and how far the
message has gotten.
>
>AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
>option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
>
We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
like Jonathan...
--
"Oooo, scary! Y'know, there are a lot scarier things
in the world than you ... and I'm one of them."
-- Buffy the vampire
message has gotten.
>
>AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
>option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
>
a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
like Jonathan...
--
"Oooo, scary! Y'know, there are a lot scarier things
in the world than you ... and I'm one of them."
-- Buffy the vampire
Wolffan
Jun 15, 2018, 10:35:02 PM6/15/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 14 Jun 2018, Byker wrote
(in article<CrOdncT9dM86M7_G...@supernews.com>):
> "Wolffan" wrote in message
> news:0001HW.20D2823702...@news.supernews.com...
> >
> > that the moderator had a word. Several words. Lots of words.
>
> Having a "moderator" is a sure-fire way to kill an NG.
Interesting. t.o.’s been moderated for 20 years. Looks like the sure-fire
kill missed...
(in article<CrOdncT9dM86M7_G...@supernews.com>):
> "Wolffan" wrote in message
> news:0001HW.20D2823702...@news.supernews.com...
> >
> > that the moderator had a word. Several words. Lots of words.
>
> Having a "moderator" is a sure-fire way to kill an NG.
kill missed...
Oxyaena
Jun 16, 2018, 3:25:02 AM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
all that pain they must go through in order to deal with such a piece of
shit as yourself.
Oxyaena
Jun 16, 2018, 3:30:02 AM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
the infestation in hopes that the parasite will move on and bother
someone else. Worked wonders for me.
jonathan
Jun 16, 2018, 5:20:02 AM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
from 9 am to 5 pm, obviously jobless, and you
post at 3 am on a Friday night.
I'd say both of you lonely hearts need someone
to hate, funny how I gladly play that role.
Anyone ever wonder about that?
Far-from-equilibrium is where nature resides.
Human nature too, but now I'm talking of things
no one in this ng can fathom.
Jonathan
"She dealt her pretty words like Blades
How glittering they shone
And every One unbared a Nerve
Or wantoned with a Bone
She never deemed she hurt
That is not Steel's Affair
A vulgar grimace in the Flesh
How ill the Creatures bear
To Ache is human -- not polite
The Film upon the eye
Mortality's old Custom
Just locking up to Die.
~ E Dickinson
s
--
Bob Casanova
Jun 16, 2018, 1:25:03 PM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Panthera Tigris Altaica
<northe...@outlook.com>:
>On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, jonathan wrote:
>> On 6/13/2018 8:38 PM, Boghammer 73 wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>> >> a British officer and the troops were British
>> >> is just inconvenient facts right?
>> >>
>> >> You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>> >> Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
>> >
>> > This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
>> >
>> > Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> What are you doing reposting my rants here?
>>
>> You're posting here under two handles, Boghammer 73
>> and your usual handle Panthera Tigres.
>I am not Boghammer 73.
Don't expect a retraction; apparently jonathan is as deluded
as SitSlow in his "knowledge" of the *real* identities of
others.
>> How can I tell? You post under those two handles
>> during the same times of day, all day long
>> from 9am to 5 pm.
>
>That is incorrect.
>
>> It's hard to believe you
>> can't get a job with unemployment under 4%.
>
>And I'm not unemployed.
Again, don't expect a retraction.
appeared in talk.origins, posted by Panthera Tigris Altaica
<northe...@outlook.com>:
>On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 7:15:02 PM UTC-4, jonathan wrote:
>> On 6/13/2018 8:38 PM, Boghammer 73 wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 19:37:06 -0400, jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Ya just because it was a British army, commanded by
>> >> a British officer and the troops were British
>> >> is just inconvenient facts right?
>> >>
>> >> You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
>> >> Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths.
>> >
>> > This newsgroup is sci.military.naval
>> >
>> > Redirecting your foul mouthed comments to talk.origins
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> What are you doing reposting my rants here?
>>
>> You're posting here under two handles, Boghammer 73
>> and your usual handle Panthera Tigres.
>I am not Boghammer 73.
as SitSlow in his "knowledge" of the *real* identities of
others.
>> How can I tell? You post under those two handles
>> during the same times of day, all day long
>> from 9am to 5 pm.
>
>That is incorrect.
>
>> It's hard to believe you
>> can't get a job with unemployment under 4%.
>
>And I'm not unemployed.
Bob Casanova
Jun 16, 2018, 3:05:02 PM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 19:34:08 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Ernest Major
<{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>:
OK. I only got involved in Usenet in the mid-'90s, so
anything from the "early days" is out of my experience.
Thanks for the info.
in talk.origins, posted by Ernest Major
<{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>:
anything from the "early days" is out of my experience.
Thanks for the info.
Bob Casanova
Jun 16, 2018, 3:05:03 PM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
And maybe the fact that moderated groups get "first call" on
approvals?
>>AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
>>option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
>>
>
>We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>like Jonathan...
OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
"newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
approvals?
>>AFAIK, cancellation of the posts of *others* was never an
>>option, except for moderators. Am I mistaken?
>>
>
>We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>like Jonathan...
"newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
Bob Casanova
Jun 16, 2018, 3:10:02 PM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 03:20:16 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Oxyaena
<oxy...@invalid.invalid>:
He wrote "groupies", not "friends". I imagine there are
those, probably classifiable as "groupies", who follow drunk
drivers waiting for the inevitable wrecks...
>> 'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
>> win a debate with reason or facts.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
in talk.origins, posted by Oxyaena
<oxy...@invalid.invalid>:
those, probably classifiable as "groupies", who follow drunk
drivers waiting for the inevitable wrecks...
>> 'Off topic' is the song of those that can't
>> win a debate with reason or facts.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
george152
Jun 16, 2018, 4:15:03 PM6/16/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>> like Jonathan...
>
> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>
There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>> like Jonathan...
>
> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>
I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
Works well...
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Fred J. McCall
Jun 17, 2018, 5:10:03 AM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>
>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>> like Jonathan...
>>
>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>
>
>There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>Works well...
>
But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
>On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>
>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>> like Jonathan...
>>
>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>
>
>There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>Works well...
>
That's just you closing your eyes.
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
jonathan
Jun 17, 2018, 9:05:03 AM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On 6/17/2018 5:07 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>
>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>
>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>
>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>
>>
>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>> Works well...
>>
>
> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
> That's just you closing your eyes.
>
>
Typical response when people can't defend
> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>
>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>
>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>
>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>
>>
>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>> Works well...
>>
>
> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
> That's just you closing your eyes.
>
>
their views, shoot the messenger.
Fred you've defended Trump and Putin
at every turn, zero criticism of Putin
just like you hail King Trump at every
opportunity, especially his racist
views.
Like Trump you're a fascist at heart and
like Trump you can't defend a thing he
does without lying or calling everything
fake news.
You're even are parroting Trump's claim
it was Canada that burned down the
White House, that's how brain dead
and dishonest you are.
I'm proud of the criticism of people
like you and your knuckle-dragging
Trumpster comrades-in-lies.
Fred, hearing you praise Kim Jong un
and Putin at every turn is just plain
disgusting and your four letter replies
do nothing to change anyone's mind.
--
Fred J. McCall
Jun 17, 2018, 11:45:03 AM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
jonathan <WriteI...@gmail.com> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 09:02:34
-0400:
>On 6/17/2018 5:07 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>>
>>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>>
>>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>>
>>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>>> Works well...
>>>
>>
>> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
>> That's just you closing your eyes.
>>
>
>Typical response when people can't defend
>their views, shoot the messenger.
>
Typical response when the 'messenger' refuses to follow any rules of
civil discourse.
>
>Fred you've defended Trump and Putin
>at every turn,
>
Liar.
>
>zero criticism of Putin
>
Liar.
>
>just like you hail King Trump at every
>opportunity, especially his racist
>views.
>
Liar.
>
>Like Trump you're a fascist at heart and
>like Trump you can't defend a thing he
>does without lying or calling everything
>fake news.
>
Please come say that to my face, you ballless little cunt.
>
>You're even are parroting Trump's claim
>it was Canada that burned down the
>White House, that's how brain dead
>and dishonest you are.
>
CANADIANS' claim.
>
>I'm proud of the criticism of people
>like you and your knuckle-dragging
>Trumpster comrades-in-lies.
>
Of course you are. Just another example of what a clueless idiot you
are.
>
>Fred, hearing you praise Kim Jong un
>and Putin at every turn is just plain
>disgusting and your four letter replies
>do nothing to change anyone's mind.
>
Liar. And in case you haven't noticed, it's YOU that pretty much
everyone is voicing disgust with.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
-0400:
>On 6/17/2018 5:07 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>>
>>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>>
>>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>>
>>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>>> Works well...
>>>
>>
>> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
>> That's just you closing your eyes.
>>
>
>Typical response when people can't defend
>their views, shoot the messenger.
>
civil discourse.
>
>Fred you've defended Trump and Putin
>at every turn,
>
>
>zero criticism of Putin
>
Liar.
>
>just like you hail King Trump at every
>opportunity, especially his racist
>views.
>
>
>Like Trump you're a fascist at heart and
>like Trump you can't defend a thing he
>does without lying or calling everything
>fake news.
>
>
>You're even are parroting Trump's claim
>it was Canada that burned down the
>White House, that's how brain dead
>and dishonest you are.
>
>
>I'm proud of the criticism of people
>like you and your knuckle-dragging
>Trumpster comrades-in-lies.
>
are.
>
>Fred, hearing you praise Kim Jong un
>and Putin at every turn is just plain
>disgusting and your four letter replies
>do nothing to change anyone's mind.
>
everyone is voicing disgust with.
--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain
Bob Casanova
Jun 17, 2018, 1:05:02 PM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net>:
>On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>
>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>> like Jonathan...
>>
>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>
>
>There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>Works well...
So does the one in Agent. But the issue was about cancelling
posts made by others, not killfiling.
in talk.origins, posted by george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net>:
>On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>
>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>> like Jonathan...
>>
>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>
>
>There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>Works well...
posts made by others, not killfiling.
Bob Casanova
Jun 17, 2018, 1:10:02 PM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 09:02:34 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
>On 6/17/2018 5:07 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>>
>>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>>
>>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>>
>>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>>> Works well...
>>>
>>
>> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
>> That's just you closing your eyes.
>Typical response when people can't defend
>their views, shoot the messenger.
....says the "messenger" whose "message", the one in
sci.military.naval which started this exchange, was:
"You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths."
I think the "message" got through, and fits quite well into
your usual posting style, but it's not the one you intended.
<snip unsupported rants>
in talk.origins, posted by jonathan
<WriteI...@gmail.com>:
>On 6/17/2018 5:07 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> george152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote on Sun, 17 Jun 2018 08:13:39 +1200:
>>
>>> On 6/17/2018 7:02 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:10:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>>
>>>>> We forged the headers. There was a guy (his name escapes me) who had
>>>>> a Usenet server that had a 'black list' and would automatically issue
>>>>> forged cancellations for anyone egregious enough to make the list.
>>>>> This sort of thing is generally a Bad Idea, but then there are folks
>>>>> like Jonathan...
>>>>
>>>> OK; thanks. Ernest gave me the same info; as a relative
>>>> "newbie" (mid-'90s) I was unaware of that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There was a killfile for Newsgroups away back when.
>>> I just use the one that comes with Thunderbird.
>>> Works well...
>>>
>>
>> But that doesn't remove the idiot from Usenet, which is the goal.
>> That's just you closing your eyes.
>Typical response when people can't defend
>their views, shoot the messenger.
sci.military.naval which started this exchange, was:
"You guys are nutjobs that'll swallow any cum your hero
Trump sees fit to deposit in your mouths."
your usual posting style, but it's not the one you intended.
<snip unsupported rants>
*Hemidactylus*
Jun 17, 2018, 1:45:03 PM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
complexity theorist get his mores from the simpler parasitic beings, the
tapeworms, which lack a mouth or digestive system. Jonathan copypastes
information from other sources instead of attempting to digest it and
process it effectively. He is a simpleton who parasitizes newsgroups as he
is incapable of autonomous and complexified thought or discourse. Freerider
through and through.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cestoda
Ernest Major
Jun 17, 2018, 2:35:03 PM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
come out against Trump; I would have expected both to be supporters.
--
alias Ernest Major
*Hemidactylus*
Jun 17, 2018, 2:50:03 PM6/17/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
qualities. But differences of kind, between the two, not degree.
Bob Casanova
Jun 18, 2018, 3:30:02 PM6/18/18
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 12:41:10 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecph...@allspamis.invalid>:
Cool metaphor, but metaphors are frequently inexact. Actual
references to observed traits, OTOH...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
.... usually aren't.
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecph...@allspamis.invalid>:
references to observed traits, OTOH...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
.... usually aren't.
0 new messages