Another View of Petrified Human Skull in the Boulder
Ed Conrad
Some pseudo sez what I insist is a petrified human skull embedded
in a boulder -- found between coal veins -- ain't what I say it is.
The pseudo sez it is TWO-dimentional, with no protrusion, therefore
whatever it is ain't embedded in the boulder.
How wrong he is. And I can prove it.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
==================================================
> SMITHSONIAN -- Its Crime Against Humanity
As some of you know, I have made incredibly strong accusations
about the Smithsonian Institution's total dishonesty in attempting
to protect the falsified, factless theory of the origin of man.
I have accused it of deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy.
It concerns a boulder discovered between anthracite veins in
Pennsylvania's coal fields that contains a petrified human skull.
Here are two photographs:
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
The Smithsonian's Department of Paleobiology, in its National Museum
of Natural History, saw a photo when it was first found and stated
that the object embedded in the boulder "does resemble the outline
of a human skull."
It then added: "First, we must do a microscopic study of the outer
rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
However, six weeks later, it informed me that "an x-ray analysis of
the material reveals it to be quartz, the most abundant mineral of the
earth's crust. So although the enigmatic object exposed in the boulder
may resemble a homind skull, its mineral composition is definitely not
that of bone."
However, x-ray analysis is NOT a test to determine the cellular
structure of bone and has nothing whatsoever to do with such
an investigation.
It was a glaring attempt by the Smithsonian Institution to conceal the
truth.
Such an insulting response would only have been done if the
Smithsonian had performed the proper testing for cellular structure
and realized, indeed, that it IS bone. -- confirming, beyond doubt,
that the object embedded in the boulder is that of a human being who
existed during the formation of anthracite.
That man was on earth when coal was being formed -- the boulder came
from between anthracite veins -- totally destoys the theory that man's
initial emergence on earth occurred multi-millions of years later.
Nowthen, Haversian canals -- the telltale sign of bone, petrified or
otherwise -- DO exist in the "enigmatic object" resembling a human
skull embedded in the boulder.
The cellular structure of bone was visible in "a microscopic study of
the outer rind" -- in the very same granules sent to the Smithsonian
back in 1982 -- and indeed proves that the object embedded in the
boulder is indeed a petrified human skull.
That the Smithsonian Insitution has employed such a sham -- outright
dishonesty -- to deny, and conceal, the phsyical evidence that human
beings existed during the coal formations -- that Man is As Old As
Coal -- is an affront to truth, a crime against humanity and an insult
to school children who are being taught an outright lie about man's
origin and ancestry.
I hereby challange the Smithsonian Institution to defend itself
against my accusations of its deceit, deception, collusion and
conspiracy -- its incredible dishonesty -- in a court of law, or in
front of a Congressional panel.
===================================
Meanwhile, here is another petrified human skull discovered
between anthracite veins, less than 100 yards -- and a year
later -- from where the boulder was found.
I might add that the Smithsonian Institution proved itself unworthy
of examining this petrifiied human skull because of its previous
deceitful unscientific behavior.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-005S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
Here, too, is a petrified human femur, still embedded in slate,
shown in comparison to an unpetrified human femur.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
==============================================
Ed Conrad
> http://www.edconrad.com
As some of you know, I have made incredibly strong accusations
about the Smithsonian Institution's total dishonesty in attempting
to protect the falsified, factless theory of the origin of man.
I have accused it of deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy.
It concerns a boulder discovered between anthracite veins in
Pennsylvania's coal fields that contains a petrified human skull.
Here are two photographs:
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
The Smithsonian's Department of Paleobiology, in its National Museum
of Natural History, saw a photo when it was first found and stated
that the object embedded in the boulder "does resemble the outline
of a human skull."
It then added: "First, we must do a microscopic study of the outer
rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
However, six weeks later, it informed me that "an x-ray analysis of
the material reveals it to be quartz, the most abundant mineral of the
earth's crust. So although the enigmatic object exposed in the boulder
may resemble a homind skull, its mineral composition is definitely not
that of bone."
However, x-ray analysis is NOT a test to determine the cellular
structure of bone and has nothing whatsoever to do with such
an investigation.
It was a glaring attempt by the Smithsonian Institution to conceal the
truth.
Such an insulting response would only have been done if the
Smithsonian had performed the proper testing for cellular structure
and realized, indeed, that it IS bone. -- confirming, beyond doubt,
that the object embedded in the boulder is that of a human being who
existed during the formation of anthracite.
That man was on earth when coal was being formed -- the boulder came
from between anthracite veins -- totally destoys the theory that man's
initial emergence on earth occurred multi-millions of years later.
Nowthen, Haversian canals -- the telltale sign of bone, petrified or
otherwise -- DO exist in the "enigmatic object" resembling a human
skull embedded in the boulder.
The cellular structure of bone was visible in "a microscopic study of
the outer rind" -- in the very same granules sent to the Smithsonian
back in 1982 -- and indeed proves that the object embedded in the
boulder is indeed a petrified human skull.
That the Smithsonian Insitution has employed such a sham -- outright
dishonesty -- to deny, and conceal, the phsyical evidence that human
beings existed during the coal formations -- that Man is As Old As
Coal -- is an affront to truth, a crime against humanity and an insult
to school children who are being taught an outright lie about man's
origin and ancestry.
I hereby challange the Smithsonian Institution to defend itself
against my accusations of its deceit, deception, collusion and
conspiracy -- its incredible dishonesty -- in a court of law, or in
front of a Congressional panel.
===================================
Meanwhile, here is another petrified human skull discovered
between anthracite veins, less than 100 yards -- and a year
later -- from where the boulder was found.
I might add that the Smithsonian Institution proved itself unworthy
of examining this petrifiied human skull because of its previous
deceitful unscientific behavior.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-005S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
Here, too, is a petrified human femur, still embedded in slate,
shown in comparison to an unpetrified human femur.
> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
==============================================
Ed Conrad
> http://www.edconrad.com
David Sienkiewicz
news:3d2e4100...@news.shenhgts.net...
>
>
> Some pseudo sez what I insist is a petrified human skull embedded
> in a boulder -- found between coal veins -- ain't what I say it is.
>
> The pseudo sez it is TWO-dimentional, with no protrusion, therefore
> whatever it is ain't embedded in the boulder.
>
> How wrong he is. And I can prove it.
Then do so.
We haven't seen it yet.
< snip >
gen2rev
>
> Some pseudo sez what I insist is a petrified human skull embedded
> in a boulder -- found between coal veins -- ain't what I say it is.
>
> The pseudo sez it is TWO-dimentional, with no protrusion, therefore
> whatever it is ain't embedded in the boulder.
>
> How wrong he is. And I can prove it.
>
> > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
I'll admit that this is a view I hadn't seen before, but a close
comparison between it and the image at
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg reveals several problems
with your claim that it's a human skull.
There is a dome shape visible, but it doesn't extend as far back as one
would expect if one had just seen skulla.jpg. The lighter colored area
extends much farther back than the dome itself. Why is this? As well,
there would seem to be a depression behind the eye socket of this
supposed skull, and it's much to large and far back to be a temple.
Also, the chin area seems to be composed of different material than the
rest of the lower jaw, something darker in color than the rest. What's
your explanation for this?
Another thing I've noticed is that the surface of the specimen in the
jaw area in skulla.jpg seems different from what's visible in
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg Why is this? Have you
been attempting to remove this purported skull from its boulder? And if
not, why not?
[snip rerun of supposed Smithsonian crimes]