Re: 42 Questions.
Rolf
"spintronic" <spint...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7776492c-07f8-4faa...@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Bacterium Flagellum?
>
Fracterial Blagellum?
spintronic
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by spintronic
<spint...@hotmail.com>:
>Bacterium Flagellum?
42 is the answer, not the question.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Desertphile
<spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Bacterium Flagellum?
No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Earle Jones
Desertphile <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT), spintronic
> <spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Bacterium Flagellum?
*
No thanks. I'm trying to quit.
earle
*
er...@swva.net
> On 5 Jul, 22:29, "Rolf" <rolf.aalb...@tele2.no> wrote:
You forgot to put any content in your post.
Eric Root
spintronic
> No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
That was question 3 btw.
Seems you got your orderin all mixed up. Then again, so many theories,
so few proteins.
Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer?
Because that really fucks things up.
You see you got all these engines wizzin, wastin atp energy, with no
propellant. Or you got a wiggly tail, with no motor capacity. Or...
Or...Or...Or
So whats "your" view?
Hint at question 4), When you "associate" (God that's so subtle) your
first protein with your next. Dont you at the same time need Other
proteins to put them in place?
Little buggers dont just jump in on que you know.
Ye Old One
<spint...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>On 7 Jul, 00:51, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
>
>> No, thank you: I have a type three secretory system.
>
>That was question 3 btw.
Was it? We would never have known.
>
>
>Seems you got your orderin all mixed up. Then again, so many theories,
>so few proteins.
And, in your case, so few working brain cells.
>
>Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer?
It would have to, otherwise it would not be a secretory system you
moron.
>Because that really fucks things up.
For you, sure - all science does that.
>
>You see you got all these engines wizzin, wastin atp energy, with no
>propellant. Or you got a wiggly tail, with no motor capacity. Or...
>Or...Or...Or
>
>So whats "your" view?
That you are a complete idiot.
>
>Hint at question 4), When you "associate" (God that's so subtle) your
>first protein with your next. Dont you at the same time need Other
>proteins to put them in place?
>
>Little buggers dont just jump in on que you know.
How would you know?
--
Bob.
Earle Jones
<aaf20f18-ef9a-4e81...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
spintronic <spint...@hotmail.com> wrote:
*
I think you mean "on cue". Or are you speaking Spanish?
earle
*
Earle Jones
Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT), spintronic
> <spint...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
*
Spintronics Question No 1: "Bacterial Flagellum!"
I have only two things to say: "Balls!"
earle
*
spintronic
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT), spintronic
> <spintro...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> And, in your case, so few working brain cells.
>
>
>
> >Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer?
>
> It would have to, otherwise it would not be a secretory system you
> moron.
Really?
You know best! NOT!
Ye Old One
Yes, really.
>
>You know best!
Well, just about everyone knows better than you.
--
Bob.
John Wilkins
Try tetracycline.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
spintronic
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:05:16 -0700 (PDT), spintronic
>
> >On Jul 8, 6:19 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT), spintronic
> >> <spintro...@hotmail.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>
> >> And, in your case, so few working brain cells.
>
> >> >Tell me does your "secretory system" penetrate the outer layer?
>
> >> It would have to, otherwise it would not be a secretory system you
> >> moron.
>
> >Really?
>
> Yes, really.
>
>
>
> >You know best!
>
> Well, just about everyone knows better than you.
>
> --
> Bob.
So sad. You dont even know why you are so thick.
The Last Conformist
Are you sure? I saw as much content in that one as in any other
spintronic post.
Ye Old One
I'm not, you are, and it is easy to see why.
--
Bob.
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Earle Jones
<earle...@comcast.net>:
He'll just have to wait in line like the rest of us...