Re: Pro-Choicers in alt.abortion are liars and hypocrites
RHeishman
> In article
> <690f69d2-e658-44c6-9348-b60cd5218...@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > You don't tell the truth.
>
> "Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
> military service)
> Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
>
> "Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual 'combat';"
> message-d: 1120068324.873041.196...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
wow keegan, I see you still haven't gotten the mental health you
needed.
You really need to cling on to things don't you, and then take things
way out of context.
Of course you will not tell the whole story, you're too much of a
coward and a liar.
I do recall you getting corrected many times about this. Needless to
say, it's a
sad showing of how lonely and pathetic your life is that you have to
cling on to things
like this in order to avoid any direct communication or confrontation.
I do feel sorry for you, but then again, I'm glad I am not like you.
You serve as a
good example of what drugs can do to a person.
RHeishman
>
> RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 1:56 pm, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > In article <2f9aea20-a0fd-4716-87bc-
> > The only proliar in this posting, is you.
> he writes:
>
> "Note: NOWHERE...and I'll repeat..NOWHERE do you see me mentioning
> the New York Times. "
> --scumbag heishman posting as Ospre...@hotmail.com in news:9a845215-
> 1896-47e0-acb9-fca427f2c...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
>
> apparently forgetting he had previously written:
> "New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
> been warned."
> -- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com> innews:2rCdnZNy7LA...@comcast.com
And once again, Keegan demonstrates his abilities and willingness to
lie. Of course he refers to two entirely different postings from two
entirely different topics.
What the hell is a prison clerk? Seriously, have you done some
permanent damage to your brain? Accident maybe?
chris thompson
Just in case you are following the talk.origins thread, a word: this
kind of cross-posting will get you banned very, very quickly.
Chris
james g. keegan jr.
<77ba18f2-cef5-4569...@u24g2000prn.googlegrrroups.com>,
RHeishman <osprr...@hotmail.com> wrrrote:
> On Mar 5, 6:39 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <610ce09e-1e65-4e71-a703-d958d5ce0...@z3g2000prz.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 5, 1:56 pm, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > In article <2f9aea20-a0fd-4716-87bc-
> > > The only proliar in this posting, is you.
> > he writes:
> >
> > "Note: NOWHERE...and I'll repeat..NOWHERE do you see me mentioning
> > the New York Times. "
> > --scumbag heishman posting as Ospre...@hotmail.com in news:9a845215-
> > 1896-47e0-acb9-fca427f2c...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
> >
> > apparently forgetting he had previously written:
> > "New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
> > been warned."
> > -- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
> > innews:2rCdnZNy7LA...@comcast.com
>
> And once again, Keegan demonstrates his abilities and willingness to
> lie.
statements like that be what earned th' corrupt former prrrison guard his
net reputation and resulted in his havin' t' leave newsgroups fer a year
or so.
james g. keegan jr.
<08c12100-1096-4dc4...@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
RHeishman <osprrr...@hotmail.com> wrrrrrote:
> On Mar 5, 6:36 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <690f69d2-e658-44c6-9348-b60cd5218...@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > You don't tell the truth.
> >
> > "Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
> > military service)
> > Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> >
> > "Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual 'combat';"
> > message-d: 1120068324.873041.196...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
>
> wow keegan, I see you still haven't gotten the mental health you
> needed.
it seems that seein' yer own words as upset ye bobby. perrrrhaps yer
year away weren't long enough?
be ye out o' prison now? Yaaarrrrrrrrr!
RHeishman
> RHeishman <osprrrre...@hotmail.com> wrrrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 5, 6:39 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <610ce09e-1e65-4e71-a703-d958d5ce0...@z3g2000prz.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 5, 1:56 pm, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > > In article <2f9aea20-a0fd-4716-87bc-
> > > > The only proliar in this posting, is you.
> > > he writes:
>
> > > "Note: NOWHERE...and I'll repeat..NOWHERE do you see me mentioning
> > > the New York Times. "
> > > --scumbag heishman posting as Ospre...@hotmail.com in news:9a845215-
> > > 1896-47e0-acb9-fca427f2c...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
>
> > > apparently forgetting he had previously written:
> > > "New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
> > > been warned."
> > > -- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
> > > innews:2rCdnZNy7LA...@comcast.com
>
> > And once again, Keegan demonstrates his abilities and willingness to
> > lie.
>
Gotta snip at this part. Because you lied.
First you lied calling me corrupt.
Second you lied calling me a former prison guard.
I did spell it correctly, something you have a hard time doing.
Let me know when you are capable of not lying.
RHeishman
> RHeishman <osprrrrre...@hotmail.com> wrrrrrote:
out o' prison? What are you trying to imply?
Are you smoking that stuff again?
Naa, my words don't upset me at all. I made my point clear back
several years ago. You just can't show the entire story because then
you can't lie about it. Seriously, stop messing with drugs.
james g. keegan jr.
<18089c92-6c9b-4634...@p16g2000vbo.googlegrrrroups.com>,
RHeishman <osprr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 8:08 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <77ba18f2-cef5-4569-987b-fe0090e42...@u24g2000prn.googlegrrroups.com>,
> > > > he writes:
> >
> > > > "Note: NOWHERE...and I'll repeat..NOWHERE do you see me mentioning
> > > > the New York Times. "
> > > > --scumbag heishman posting as Ospre...@hotmail.com in news:9a845215-
> > > > 1896-47e0-acb9-fca427f2c...@x38g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
> >
> > > > apparently forgetting he had previously written:
> > > > "New York Times has all ready sent me a response stating you have
> > > > been warned."
> > > > -- prison clerk heishman lying as "Osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
> > > > innews:2rCdnZNy7LA...@comcast.com
> >
> > > And once again, Keegan demonstrates his abilities and willingness to
> > > lie.
> >
> > statements like that be what earned th' corrupt former prrrison guard ...
>
> Gotta snip at this part. Because you lied.
th' corrrupt former prrrrison guarrrrd claims 'tis a lie when he be quoted. ha
ha ha.
james g. keegan jr.
<f6a56d64-c207-4ac2...@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
RHeishman <ospr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 8:09 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <08c12100-1096-4dc4-888f-68d725b50...@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
> > RHeishman <osprrrrre...@hotmail.com> wrrrrrote:
> >
> > > On Mar 5, 6:36 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <690f69d2-e658-44c6-9348-b60cd5218...@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > You don't tell the truth.
> >
> > > > "Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
> > > > military service)
> > > > Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> >
> > > > "Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual 'combat';"
> > > > message-d: 1120068324.873041.196...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
> >
> > > wow keegan, I see you still haven't gotten the mental health you
> > > needed.
> >
> > it seems that seein' yer own words as upset ye bobby. perrrrhaps yer
> > year away weren't long enough?
> >
> > be ye out o' prison now? Yaaarrrrrrrrr!
>
> out o' prison? What are you trying to imply?
so be ye postin' from prison again, to be sure?
james g. keegan jr.
<a4850b56-281e-44d5...@t13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> You little spat, and this topic, does not belong in Talk.Origins.
> Please keep your trash in the proper trash can and edit your
> newsgroups line.
get a moderrrrrator who isn't corrrrrupt.
elizabeth
> RHeishman <osprrrre...@hotmail.com> wrrrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
So I take it he's no longer employed by the state?
Tee hee . . . .
james g. keegan jr.
<46831942-6437-40a4...@t15g2000prrt.googlegroups.com>,
elizabeth <efra...@hotmail.com> wrrrote:
> So I take it he's no longer employed by the state?
> Tee hee . . . .
he hasn't bragged about that lately, has he? remember how often he used
t' brrrrrag about his prrrison clerk's job?
RHeishman
Wow, news to me? What kind of drugs are you morons taking?
RHeishman
My apologies to the usenet readers in alt.abortion, I had no idea
until I looked that James G. Keegan Jr. was deliberately cross posting
when I responded to him in another newsgroup. I am warning the people
in other newsgroups about Keegans tactics. He deliberately does
this. And I apologize that I didn't catch it on this one.
RHeishman
Chris,
I am catching on to Keegans little trick and I am trying to catch him
when he is trying to get our postings thrown into talk.origins. I can
guarantee you that I am trying not to cross post and I sometimes don't
check the newsgroups. But with Keegan, I am checking more often and
taking talk.origins out. He keeps adding it back.
elizabeth
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oh, the crossposting queen is now so upset!
Just crosspost out of the ng of life already.
Boikat
> In arrrrticle
> <a4850b56-281e-44d5-89d6-3ce05b543...@t13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > You little spat, and this topic, does not belong in Talk.Origins.
> > Please keep your trash in the proper trash can and edit your
> > newsgroups line.
>
> get a moderrrrrator who isn't corrrrrupt.
I asked politely.
Boikat
RHeishman
>
> [...]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm looking forward to one of them slipping and saying the right thing
> > for a huge law suit.
> > Trust me, I have plenty of people watching and waiting for Elizabeth,
> > Keegan, and a few others
> > to just say the right things. People can be sued for liable statements
> > on the internet.
> > I also have plenty of witnesses willing to testify to their liable
> > statements.
> > Elizabeth is close. Keegan is close. Their information is known too,
> > so it wouldn't be hard to
> > do what can easily be done. My bet, Elizabeth will be the first to go
> > down. She doesn't have much to lose though.
> > But enough, she will learn a lesson.
> > Humphrey got smart quickly when he realized he was wrong. He stopped
> > immediately.
> > We don't care for each other, but I think that the stupidity between
> > he and I will hopefully stop.
> > He will goosestep with Keegan and Elizabeth. They all walk along
> > together holding hands.
> > But one of them will go down. All they got to do is just make the
> > right kind of claims.
> > Should be interesting in a court of law, and I don't even have to be
> > present. A lot can be done through
> > video cameras.
>
>,,,
Your post was cut after your first lie.
RHeishman
Your post was cut after your first lie, misandry
David Hare-Scott
add TO into your newsgroups.
David
pnyikos
...in talk.abortion. But, to avoid any misunderstandings, I am
posting this separately to talk.origins and talk.abortion.
> On Mar 5, 7:20 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In arrrrticle
> > <18089c92-6c9b-4634-8b38-5986a5cae...@p16g2000vbo.googlegrrrroups.com>,
> > ha ha.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> You little spat, and this topic, does not belong in Talk.Origins.
> Please keep your trash in the proper trash can and edit your
> newsgroups line.
>
> Boikat
Congratulations on catching the real culprit: it was Keegan who set
follow-ups to talk.origins and alt.flame in addition to the two
original newsgroups, alt.abortion and talk.abortion:
Newsgroups: talk.abortion, alt.abortion
Followup-To: talk.abortion, talk.origins, alt.abortion, alt.flame
From: "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:39:54 -0500
Local: Sat, Mar 5 2011 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: Pro-Choicers in alt.abortion are liars and hypocrites
Note that Keegan only started crossposting himself after he trapped
Heishman in this way.
Heishman, who returned recently to Usenet after over a year's absence,
missed the fact that talk.origins (where he has started posting
*separately* from the abortion newsgroups) had been added.
Did you catch the fact that Keegan added "misc.test" to the follow-ups
line the second time around?
Peter Nyikos
pnyikos
>
>
>
>
>
> pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> > > <b340199e-5999-4a8a-b4ca-3c04fe649...@o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 7, 2:23 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> > > > Like Elizabeth and Keegan, you have a deep fear and obsession over me.
>
> > > "If you can't prove it on your next post, by default you admit you
> > > lied."
>
> > > coward bobby heishman posting as"SeahawkFan" <deseahawk...@hotmail.com>
> > > innews:xb6dnQH276BlFX_a...@comcast.com:
>
> > The link doesn't work
>
> would you care to tell readers the number of times you responded to it
> in the past when it clearly worked,
Zero. I went to the trouble of inserting keywords into Google until I
finally came up with the original posts. Your link never worked for
me.
By the way, I don't think Heishman had the posts blocked; he had no
reason to, and lots of reason to keep them in the public domain. And
if you hadn't deleted what I wrote about Humphrey's sidekick Gwen
Bennet, you would know why.
Peter Nyikos
pnyikos
With my last post to talk.origins, it was I who was trapped into
crossposting by Keegan setting followups:
Newsgroups: alt.abortion, talk.abortion
Followup-To: alt.abortion, talk.abortion, talk.origins
From: "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:48:00 -0500
Subject: Re: ..the return of coward bobby heishman
[It's past my usual bedtime, and I was suffering from inattention to
such details.]
Keegan just never stops being mischievous, in addition to being a
pathological liar.
Peter Nyikos
On Mar 8, 12:48 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <7131cc68-d672-4fb5-8ebc-4cd2af54a...@u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 10:51 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <b340199e-5999-4a8a-b4ca-3c04fe649...@o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 7, 2:23 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> > > > Like Elizabeth and Keegan, you have a deep fear and obsession over me.
>
> > > "If you can't prove it on your next post, by default you admit you
> > > lied."
>
> > > coward bobby heishman posting as"SeahawkFan" <deseahawk...@hotmail.com>
> > > innews:xb6dnQH276BlFX_a...@comcast.com:
>
> > The link doesn't work
>
> would you care to tell readers the number of times you responded to it
> in the past when it clearly worked, plagiarist (actually, how many
> dozens of times)? perhaps this is one of the posts you advised coward
> bobby to have google block public access to?
>
> your effort to misrepresent fools no one, plagiarist.- Hide quoted text -
John Harshman
Peter, if you have to respond to this, please remove TO from the list.
Even if you didn't add it.
pnyikos
I'm making every effort, but sometimes my attention lapses. Didn't
you see my apology?
By the way, schoolmarm Harshman, you could have posted this separately
to talk.origins and the abortion newsgroups, the way I do it when I am
paying enough attention to what is going on -- and as I am doing now.
Peter Nyikos
james g. keegan jr.
<e898c750-1ec8-449f...@x13g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
pnyikos <nyi...@bellsouth.net> wrrrrote:
> On Mar 8, 12:48 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > On Mar 7, 10:51 am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <b340199e-5999-4a8a-b4ca-3c04fe649...@o21g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > RHeishman <ospre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mar 7, 2:23 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> > > > > Like Elizabeth and Keegan, you have a deep fear and obsession over me.
> >
> > > > "If you can't prove it on your next post, by default you admit you
> > > > lied."
> >
> > > > coward bobby heishman posting as"SeahawkFan" <deseahawk...@hotmail.com>
> > > > innews:xb6dnQH276BlFX_a...@comcast.com:
> >
> > > The link doesn't work
> >
> > would you care to tell readers the number of times you responded to it
> > in the past when it clearly worked,
>
> Zero.
yer post be bein' cut after yer first new lie, plagiarrist
james g. keegan jr.
John Harshman <jhar...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> pnyikos wrote:
> Peter, if you have to respond to this, please remove TO from the list.
> Even if you didn't add it.
interestin' how th' t' bozo thinks 'tis reasonable t' ask plagiarrrist
nyikos t' do that which he himself did not.
John Harshman
Yes, thanks. But not until after I responded.
> By the way, schoolmarm Harshman, you could have posted this separately
> to talk.origins and the abortion newsgroups, the way I do it when I am
> paying enough attention to what is going on -- and as I am doing now.
I do what seems best calculated to catch the attention of the person I'm
trying to reach. Had I been thinking properly, I would have posted to TO
only.
pnyikos
Actually, I might have missed that, since I have been very busy trying
to help Heishman get re-accustomed to the hellhole that is
talk.abortion, in addition to making it clear to readers over there
what a hellhole it is, and who is responsible for its sad condition.
I've also been helping another honest poster, Bill Mosco, against
these hellions.
Also, of course, there are discussions about abortion here and there
where I need to set the record straight.
So separate posts is the way to go if you want my attention.
You may not like the way I get into scraps with the likes of raven1,
RAM, jillery, and of course Ron Okimoto, but they are the analogues of
the people in talk.abortion who could safely be ignored in the early
1990's and who now rule the roost in talk.abortion. I don't want
talk.origins to go the same way.
Peter Nyikos
John Harshman
Let me remind you that I don't care. My only concern here is that all
this crap depart from TO.
> Also, of course, there are discussions about abortion here and there
> where I need to set the record straight.
>
> So separate posts is the way to go if you want my attention.
>
> You may not like the way I get into scraps with the likes of raven1,
> RAM, jillery, and of course Ron Okimoto, but they are the analogues of
> the people in talk.abortion who could safely be ignored in the early
> 1990's and who now rule the roost in talk.abortion. I don't want
> talk.origins to go the same way.
I will merely note that you are getting into these scraps to the
near-total exclusion of any real content.
pnyikos
If you are sincere, you should be happy with the posts where I talk
about the shape of our universe, in the topological sense. Here is
the second of a trio from this morning:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/ec1c56e35703b641
and here is that part of the thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/8a9740ca7f94ff23/ec1c56e35703b641
Peter Nyikos
RAM
You are an obnoxious troll.
And the fool who pretends panspermia is of scientific relevance for
ID. You get poked by me because of your willful ignorance of the DI
scam. Ron is overwhelmingly correct in his assessment of the DI's
bait and switch scam.
I don't readily read or participate knowingly in talk.abortion but I
am familiar enough with it to know that you are trying to poke back
with stupid and trolling analogies.
That you of all people do not want TO to go the way of talk.abortion
is arrogant obnoxiousness. First and foremost TO has many people who
are intellectually honest scientists and that is doubtfully true of
talk.abortion. Additionally TO is nominally and very effectively
moderated to prevent the "keegan" syndrome.
John Harshman
I am indeed happy to see you posting something real. It's not a subject
I have much interest in, but at least it's a subject.
I'll ignore the "If you are sincere" bit.