T.O. isn't the only place infested with trolls. Aron Ra posted a
recent Youtube video where he answers the challenge questions of one
particularly aggressive troll. IMO discussing these questions would
be a refreshing change of pace:
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYngbZ28LL4>
I acknowledge that some of the following questions have been discussed
in T.O., some several times; many of the following questions are
variations of what R.Dean posted, both recently and in the past. My
impression is repetition has never bothered anybody on T.O.
Note: There are discrepancies between the transcript, the displayed
text, and standard punctuation. I used the displayed text as the
final arbiter, presuming that to be the most accurate rendition
available of the troll's original text.
Science Questions:
@6:23
1. Since Einstein proved his theory of relativity that the Universe
had a beginning. How did everything (Universe) material come from
nothing? Give me real science not your blind Faith.
@8:21
2. How did all life come from non-life material? Has that ever been
duplicated and observed by science? Again I want science not faith in
assumptions.
@14:56
3. Since we know have life. Outside of science fiction, there could
only be two possible explanations: Supernatural creation from God or
natural spontaneous generation. Since the atheist has vehemently
ruled out Supernatural creation they're left with only spontaneous
generation. Has spontaneous generation ever been proved? Has it ever
been duplicated and observed? I'll take science on this too, not just
faith.
@17:03
4. Since macro-evolution (not microevolution) is touted as the only
explanation for our existence. Has there ever been one kind of animal
evolved into another kind of animal? Has one transitional fossil ever
been discovered?
@19:37
5. This question proves that 99% percent of atheists are only
non-logical believers not because the evidence, but because of morals
or rather immorals. Science and biology have nothing to do with what
they believe. So as an atheist that only believes in materialism and
nothing exists outside of what we see. No God, no soul, no spirit
no supernatural. With that being sa[i]id one question must be asked.
Question: Is it biologically possible to be a woman trapped in a man's
body? In other words, is it biologically possible for a person's
gender to not correspond with his/hers birth sex?
Moral Questions:
@22:20
1. Since the atheist believes that morality is subjective and only a
social construct. Was being gay 150 years ago immoral since society
deemed it sinful and wrong. If tomorrow as a society they deem it
immoral again, will it be?
@24:17
2. If the atheist believes that there is NO eternal fixed moral
standard, literally saying there is nothing intrinsically evil or
wrong. How can any one say that Hitler was evil. Not if one believes
according to their opinion, he was evil. Because it was their social
construct to exterminate what they called the weaker races following a
textbook example the survival of the fittest. Are we not dealing with
only opinion since nothing is inherently morally wrong.
@25:52
3. If one is not intelligent enough to understand that without a fixed
eternal standard, nothing is inherently right or wrong, and says I'm
an atheist but I disagree. If an atheist makes the claim that they
believe morality is not subjective but rather objective. Which
would be a total contradiction of reality and logic. It's called the
Law of non-contradiction. It's a law that governs logic. But if one
being very confused, insists that as an atheist they do believe in a
fixed moral standard (distorting logic and thus distorting reality)
and as an atheist they believe some actions are inherently evil. So if
that is the case, please explain WHAT the eternal fixed moral standard
is? Outside of morality being a social construct not IF but WHY is
anything evil?
--
You're entitled to your own opinions.
You're not entitled to your own facts.