On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:36:07 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Edna Freon <
fre...@gmail.com>:
>The Presidential Alert that was intended to access all
>phones, computers and televisions and that raises questions.
That is not a sentence, but let that pass.
>To accomplish this every ISP has to route the alert to every
>one of their customers and receive an acknowledgment from
>each of them. This is a bad thing.
Nope, at least not for the reason you give below.
>Your communication with your ISP opens a route that
>identifies you, your account information and, maybe, credit
>card numbers and browsing history. By accessing your
>computer, phone, television, etc., your information is
>exposed. Hackers have to go to some trouble to do all this
>but the government doesn't. In fact the access is from a
>single source: The Presidential Alert System.
Please cite a link showing that any organization other than
the ISP (which already *has* the information you list) has
direct communication with your computer. As you describe it,
the ISP is required to send an alert to the client base and
receive a response, then send a response to the alert system
indicating compliance. If so, there is no more exposure in
that process than at any other time when you're online.
>No need for warrants or courts or probable cause, just enter
>a key sequence and, Presto! the government is looking over
>your shoulder. There is no opt-out.
>
>So here we have a solid case of social evolution where the
>old, "Mind your own business!" admonishment is meaningless.
>This is also evidence that humans are mutating to a hive
>mentality where one personality fits all. Political
>correctness is the evidence of what we will become. This is
>all the flaky paranoia of course but what are the
>alternatives?
>
>Bill
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov