Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
sex, 2nd try
35 views
Skip to first unread message
Dale
May 19, 2012, 9:01:16 PM5/19/12
to
I've stripped the extraneous parts
I watched a documentary of sex on cable television, I forget the channel
during sex the female sex system releases chemicals that kill sperm
the male sperm squad has specific members that attack this chemical and
allow certain sperm to pass through and proceed towards the egg
what processes choose what sperm do what?
could the brain be trying to pass off environmental knowledge by
selecting certain sperm for certain processes?
this addition to mutation and natural selection makes much more sense
--
Dale
I watched a documentary of sex on cable television, I forget the channel
during sex the female sex system releases chemicals that kill sperm
the male sperm squad has specific members that attack this chemical and
allow certain sperm to pass through and proceed towards the egg
what processes choose what sperm do what?
could the brain be trying to pass off environmental knowledge by
selecting certain sperm for certain processes?
this addition to mutation and natural selection makes much more sense
--
Dale
Arkalen
May 19, 2012, 9:22:18 PM5/19/12
to
even though I really try to engage with what you're saying and all that,
but when you repost a question could you at least try and indicate you
*read* all the responses to the original one, and explain why they were
inadequate ?
Dale
May 19, 2012, 10:34:42 PM5/19/12
to
On 05/19/2012 09:22 PM, Arkalen wrote:
>
> You know I don't really care that you ignore all my responses to you
> even though I really try to engage with what you're saying and all that,
> but when you repost a question could you at least try and indicate you
> *read* all the responses to the original one, and explain why they were
> inadequate ?
no one was talking about the choice of what sperm do what
>
> You know I don't really care that you ignore all my responses to you
> even though I really try to engage with what you're saying and all that,
> but when you repost a question could you at least try and indicate you
> *read* all the responses to the original one, and explain why they were
> inadequate ?
I'll try to reply to you better
--
Dale
Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
May 20, 2012, 7:17:38 AM5/20/12
to
didn't even know about DNA." Nevertheless,
Darwinism /is/ about DNA - nowadays, anyway.
I don't know how sperm are (apparently) made
for different roles, and I'm not sure that
anyone does, but it doesn't appear that the
brain has much to do with it. After all,
sperm are made quite a long time before
they are used. However, evolution can
be expected to take advantage of any
opportunity to improve individual success,
and I could believe that committing
adultery releases brain chemicals - the
hormones of lust and fear of being caught -
that are received by sperm as last-minute
instructions to change some of their roles.
But me describing it isn't science, it is
making it up.
I Googled for"sperm" and "different roles"
and got various results, from unauthenticated
sources. One in written in 2006 refers to
"kamikaze sperm". One in 2011 uses the words
"might be" and "kamikaze sperm hypothesis".
This is how people write when they don't know.
So you may as well stop asking - but, if you
still want to know the answer, then look for
a way to help with scientific research.
Arkalen
May 20, 2012, 9:05:36 AM5/20/12
to
so you may not have realized it. But thanks for your reply.
Arkalen
May 20, 2012, 9:10:14 AM5/20/12
to
(2012/05/20 20:17), Robert Carnegie: Fnord: cc
saying that.
talk-o...@moderators.isc.org wrote:
> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 2:22:18 AM UTC+1, Arkalen wrote:
>> (2012/05/20 10:01), Dale wrote:
>>> I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>
>>> I watched a documentary of sex on cable television, I forget the channel
>>>
>>> during sex the female sex system releases chemicals that kill sperm
>>>
>>> the male sperm squad has specific members that attack this chemical and
>>> allow certain sperm to pass through and proceed towards the egg
>>>
>>> what processes choose what sperm do what?
>>>
>>> could the brain be trying to pass off environmental knowledge by
>>> selecting certain sperm for certain processes?
>>>
>>> this addition to mutation and natural selection makes much more sense
>>>
>>
>> You know I don't really care that you ignore all my responses to you
>> even though I really try to engage with what you're saying and all that,
>> but when you repost a question could you at least try and indicate you
>> *read* all the responses to the original one, and explain why they were
>> inadequate ?
>
> Most of the answers were only saying "Darwin
> didn't even know about DNA."
And ? All the more reason to respond to the answers that *weren't* only
> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 2:22:18 AM UTC+1, Arkalen wrote:
>> (2012/05/20 10:01), Dale wrote:
>>> I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>
>>> I watched a documentary of sex on cable television, I forget the channel
>>>
>>> during sex the female sex system releases chemicals that kill sperm
>>>
>>> the male sperm squad has specific members that attack this chemical and
>>> allow certain sperm to pass through and proceed towards the egg
>>>
>>> what processes choose what sperm do what?
>>>
>>> could the brain be trying to pass off environmental knowledge by
>>> selecting certain sperm for certain processes?
>>>
>>> this addition to mutation and natural selection makes much more sense
>>>
>>
>> You know I don't really care that you ignore all my responses to you
>> even though I really try to engage with what you're saying and all that,
>> but when you repost a question could you at least try and indicate you
>> *read* all the responses to the original one, and explain why they were
>> inadequate ?
>
> Most of the answers were only saying "Darwin
> didn't even know about DNA."
saying that.
Earle Jones
May 20, 2012, 11:05:59 PM5/20/12
to
In article <5l65a9....@news.alt.net>,
*
Dale:
In one month, the human female can produce one egg cell.
The male can produce, in one month, about 375 million sperm cells.
Do you know why?
Because the males do not stop and ask for directions.
earle
*
Dale:
In one month, the human female can produce one egg cell.
The male can produce, in one month, about 375 million sperm cells.
Do you know why?
Because the males do not stop and ask for directions.
earle
*
Karel
May 21, 2012, 7:04:43 AM5/21/12
to
On 20 mei, 03:01, Dale <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> I've stripped the extraneous parts
[snip]
> I've stripped the extraneous parts
Thanks for the suggestion. And don't worry, sometimes it
just takes more tries.
Regards,
Karel
Bob Casanova
May 22, 2012, 1:34:22 PM5/22/12
to
On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>I've stripped the extraneous parts
Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
levels...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>I've stripped the extraneous parts
levels...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
J. J. Lodder
May 22, 2012, 5:07:59 PM5/22/12
to
Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>
> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>
> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> levels...
Maybe he can sing?
> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>
> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>
> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> levels...
Jan
Bob Casanova
May 23, 2012, 4:33:09 PM5/23/12
to
On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
He's a horse?
in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
jillery
May 25, 2012, 1:14:44 AM5/25/12
to
On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
wrote:
>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>Lodder):
>
>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>
>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>
>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>> levels...
>>
>>Maybe he can sing?
>
>He's a horse?
Or a pig?
>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>Lodder):
>
>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>
>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>
>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>> levels...
>>
>>Maybe he can sing?
>
>He's a horse?
J. J. Lodder
May 25, 2012, 3:21:33 AM5/25/12
to
Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
> >> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
> >>
> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
> >>
> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> >> levels...
> >
> >Maybe he can sing?
>
> He's a horse?
No, a chipmunk, obviously.
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
> >> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
> >>
> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
> >>
> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> >> levels...
> >
> >Maybe he can sing?
>
> He's a horse?
(consults the illustrations in the authorative works
of the most learned Prof. W. Disney)
It checks, no external parts,
Jan
Bob Casanova
May 25, 2012, 1:17:43 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
Bob Casanova
May 25, 2012, 1:18:20 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 09:21:33 +0200, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>> Lodder):
>>
>> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>> >> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>> >>
>> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>> >>
>> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>> >> levels...
>> >
>> >Maybe he can sing?
>>
>> He's a horse?
>
>No, a chipmunk, obviously.
>(consults the illustrations in the authorative works
>of the most learned Prof. W. Disney)
>
>It checks, no external parts,
Aha! A bit obscure, but OK.
Lodder):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>> Lodder):
>>
>> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>> >> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>> >>
>> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>> >>
>> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>> >> levels...
>> >
>> >Maybe he can sing?
>>
>> He's a horse?
>
>No, a chipmunk, obviously.
>(consults the illustrations in the authorative works
>of the most learned Prof. W. Disney)
>
>It checks, no external parts,
Burkhard
May 25, 2012, 1:23:49 PM5/25/12
to
On May 23, 9:33�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
> >> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inva...@invalid.invalid>:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>
> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>
> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> >> levels...
>
> >Maybe he can sing?
>
> He's a horse?
> --
.
> >> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>
> >> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
> >> levels...
>
> >Maybe he can sing?
>
> He's a horse?
> --
of course, of course.
Free Lunch
May 25, 2012, 1:54:00 PM5/25/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:23:49 -0700 (PDT), Burkhard <b.sc...@ed.ac.uk>
wrote in talk.origins:
Did Hollywood really inflict that television show on the UK or Germany?
wrote in talk.origins:
Burkhard
May 25, 2012, 2:20:50 PM5/25/12
to
On May 25, 6:54 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:23:49 -0700 (PDT), Burkhard <b.scha...@ed.ac.uk>
Both, I'm afraid - the German version in my formative years. Maybe I
should sue someone...
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:23:49 -0700 (PDT), Burkhard <b.scha...@ed.ac.uk>
should sue someone...
jillery
May 26, 2012, 3:42:33 AM5/26/12
to
On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:43 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
parable of teaching a pig to sing.
wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>>>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>Lodder):
>>>
>>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>
>>>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>
>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>> levels...
>>>>
>>>>Maybe he can sing?
>>>
>>>He's a horse?
>>
>>Or a pig?
>
>Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
Possibly. There exist horseflys, but it remains unclear whether
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>>>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>Lodder):
>>>
>>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>
>>>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>
>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>> levels...
>>>>
>>>>Maybe he can sing?
>>>
>>>He's a horse?
>>
>>Or a pig?
>
>Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
parable of teaching a pig to sing.
Mark Isaak
May 26, 2012, 12:30:07 PM5/26/12
to
On 5/26/12 12:42 AM, jillery wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:43 -0700, Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by jillery<69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:43 -0700, Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by jillery<69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off>
>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>>>> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>> Lodder):
>>>>> Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale<inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>>> levels...
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe he can sing?
>>>>
>>>> He's a horse?
>>>
>>> Or a pig?
>>
>> Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
>
> Possibly. There exist horseflys, but it remains unclear whether
> flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
> parable of teaching a pig to sing.
Teaching a pig to sing is particularly difficult if the pig is hoarse.
>>>> in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>> Lodder):
>>>>> Bob Casanova<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale<inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>>> levels...
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe he can sing?
>>>>
>>>> He's a horse?
>>>
>>> Or a pig?
>>
>> Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
>
> Possibly. There exist horseflys, but it remains unclear whether
> flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
> parable of teaching a pig to sing.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) curioustaxonomy (dot) net
"It is certain, from experience, that the smallest grain of natural
honesty and benevolence has more effect on men's conduct, than the most
pompous views suggested by theological theories and systems." - D. Hume
Bob Casanova
May 26, 2012, 1:52:21 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 03:42:33 -0400, the following appeared
expressed as "when pigs fly".
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:43 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>>>>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>>Lodder):
>>>>
>>>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>>> levels...
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe he can sing?
>>>>
>>>>He's a horse?
>>>
>>>Or a pig?
>>
>>Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
>
>
>Possibly. There exist horseflys, but it remains unclear whether
>flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
>parable of teaching a pig to sing.
Point; I was thinking of the conditional probability usually
>On Fri, 25 May 2012 10:17:43 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:14:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:09 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:07:59 +0200, the following appeared
>>>>in talk.origins, posted by nos...@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
>>>>Lodder):
>>>>
>>>>>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:01:16 -0400, the following appeared
>>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by Dale <inv...@invalid.invalid>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I've stripped the extraneous parts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Combined with the Subject:, this is disturbing on *so* many
>>>>>> levels...
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe he can sing?
>>>>
>>>>He's a horse?
>>>
>>>Or a pig?
>>
>>Wouldn't the relevant activity then be "fly"?
>
>
>Possibly. There exist horseflys, but it remains unclear whether
>flying horses are more likely than flying pigs. I am thinking of the
>parable of teaching a pig to sing.
expressed as "when pigs fly".
jillery
May 27, 2012, 12:36:49 PM5/27/12
to
horse? I will take a stand and say yes it can!
jillery
May 27, 2012, 1:19:45 PM5/27/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:52:21 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
I've seen a housefly, horsefly and dragonfly, but I agree when I see a
pig fly that will be a most unusual event.
pig fly that will be a most unusual event.
deadrat
May 27, 2012, 1:25:12 PM5/27/12
to
Bob Casanova
May 27, 2012, 6:03:33 PM5/27/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 13:19:45 -0400, the following appeared
My point exactly.
And remember Groucho's famous words: "Time flies like an
arrow; fruit flies like a banana".
And remember Groucho's famous words: "Time flies like an
arrow; fruit flies like a banana".
Walter Bushell
May 27, 2012, 9:41:39 PM5/27/12
to
In article <k295s71h5s4gkoh5l...@4ax.com>,
But, but but pigs fly all the time, sometimes escorting prisoners.
--
This space unintentionally left blank.
--
This space unintentionally left blank.
jillery
May 28, 2012, 4:40:25 AM5/28/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 15:03:33 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
One of my favorite tag lines.
Earle Jones
May 28, 2012, 2:43:05 PM5/28/12
to
In article <2fe6s7181ukd8h8qj...@4ax.com>,
*
I also like this line:
"You stole my wife, you horse thief!"
earale
*
I also like this line:
"You stole my wife, you horse thief!"
earale
*
Walter Bushell
May 29, 2012, 10:11:04 AM5/29/12
to
Walter Bushell
Jun 2, 2012, 1:21:30 PM6/2/12
to
In article <vrm4s79jomnea9abb...@4ax.com>,
But I done seen 'bout anything when I see an elephant fly!
Paul J Gans
Jun 2, 2012, 3:02:07 PM6/2/12
to
--
--- Paul J. Gans
Louann Miller
Jun 2, 2012, 3:39:36 PM6/2/12
to
Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
@reader1.panix.com:
> How about a Boing 767?
Is that the noise it makes?
@reader1.panix.com:
> How about a Boing 767?
Walter Bushell
Jun 2, 2012, 6:15:54 PM6/2/12
to
Paul J Gans
Jun 2, 2012, 9:55:54 PM6/2/12
to
Paul J Gans
Jun 2, 2012, 9:56:52 PM6/2/12
to
Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>
>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>
>> Is that the noise it makes?
>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
That's too eerie for me.
>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>
>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>
>> Is that the noise it makes?
>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
jillery
Jun 3, 2012, 1:16:46 AM6/3/12
to
jillery
Jun 3, 2012, 1:56:44 AM6/3/12
to
Bob Casanova
Jun 3, 2012, 3:17:23 PM6/3/12
to
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
jillery
Jun 4, 2012, 8:45:54 AM6/4/12
to
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>
>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>
>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>
>>
>>Do you mean "earie"?
>
>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
Perhaps Sue the mule?
wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>
>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>
>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>
>>
>>Do you mean "earie"?
>
>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
Bob Casanova
Jun 4, 2012, 3:14:37 PM6/4/12
to
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:45:54 -0400, the following appeared
a low bridge...
in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>>
>>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>>
>>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you mean "earie"?
>>
>>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
>
>
>Perhaps Sue the mule?
Or maybe the problem is actually in his dentures, and he has
>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>>
>>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>>
>>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you mean "earie"?
>>
>>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
>
>
>Perhaps Sue the mule?
a low bridge...
jillery
Jun 5, 2012, 3:04:16 AM6/5/12
to
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:14:37 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:45:54 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>>>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>>>
>>>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do you mean "earie"?
>>>
>>>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
>>
>>
>>Perhaps Sue the mule?
>
>Or maybe the problem is actually in his dentures, and he has
>a low bridge...
It would make everybody down.
>On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:45:54 -0400, the following appeared
>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:17:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 01:56:44 -0400, the following appeared
>>>in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 01:56:52 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans
>>>><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>In article <W_SdnUbrtrtl9lfS...@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> Louann Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul J Gans <gan...@panix.com> wrote in news:jqdnvf$79g$5
>>>>>>> @reader1.panix.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > How about a Boing 767?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that the noise it makes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>What no Dumbo reference in the thread?
>>>>>
>>>>>That's too eerie for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Do you mean "earie"?
>>>
>>>Probably has something stuck in his earie canal...
>>
>>
>>Perhaps Sue the mule?
>
>Or maybe the problem is actually in his dentures, and he has
>a low bridge...
Bob Casanova
Jun 5, 2012, 2:33:50 PM6/5/12
to
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:04:16 -0400, the following appeared
On a similar note, I recall a comic panel: a city street,
with a periscope sticking up out of a manhole. From the
manhole, a speech bubble, "MISTER navigator!"
OK, I'm outta here... ;-)
with a periscope sticking up out of a manhole. From the
manhole, a speech bubble, "MISTER navigator!"
OK, I'm outta here... ;-)
0 new messages