Pangea recent
Michael
http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
on the big raft we now call America.
John Harshman
I find your explanation hard to credit. For starters, can you back up
the earthworm claim?
John Stockwell
The same "family" not "species" of earthworms are found in South
America as in
South Africa. This is consistent with the notion that South America
and Africa started
splitting in the upper Triassic, lower Cretaceous. 120-150 million
years ago.
-John
Kermit
Presumably by "exact same" you mean "looks the same to an illiterate's
cursory glance". To an earthworm, you and chimps are
indistinguishable.
Kermit
Michael
> On Dec 18, 7:35�am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
>
> > Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
> > tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
> > on the big raft we now call America.
>
> The same "family" not "species" of earthworms are found in South
> America as in
> South Africa.
Url.
John Harshman
Devils Advocaat
There are three families of Oligochaeta common to South America and
Africa, and another family the distribution of which is disputed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthworm#Taxonomy_and_distribution
All-seeing-I
Have you interviewed the earthworm ?
Boikat
You're a worm, what's your opinion?
Boikat
Ron O
I was going to write that we have to wait and ask Pagano.
Ron Okimoto
Walter Bushell
<d8ba854e-74e8-4c37...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
Kermit <unrestra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Except for taste and smell.
--
A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
Michael
I had spent a lot of time looking up the particular url's I wanted to
use but you, the pretend moderator here
banned me from here a while back. I don't have the time to look them
up again, but the issue here sir wasn't
my supporting the claim, but the OP.
Nice try faggot bucko retard.
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
>On Dec 18, 1:49�pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> Michael wrote:
>> > On Dec 18, 11:11 am, John Stockwell <john.19071...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Dec 18, 7:35 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
>> >>> Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
>> >>> tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
>> >>> on the big raft we now call America.
>> >> The same "family" not "species" of earthworms are found in South
>> >> America as in
>> >> South Africa.
>>
>> > Url.
>>
>> The claim is made in a footnote, but is unreferenced. That's not support.
>
>I had spent a lot of time looking up the particular url's I wanted to
>use but you, the pretend moderator here banned me from here a while back.
You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would you
make such a silly claim?
>I don't have the time to look them up again, but the issue here sir wasn't
>my supporting the claim, but the OP.
Whatever.
Michael
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:26:51 -0800 (PST), Michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
> wrote in talk.origins:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Dec 18, 1:49�pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> Michael wrote:
> >> > On Dec 18, 11:11 am, John Stockwell <john.19071...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Dec 18, 7:35 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>>http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
> >> >>> Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
> >> >>> tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
> >> >>> on the big raft we now call America.
> >> >> The same "family" not "species" of earthworms are found in South
> >> >> America as in
> >> >> South Africa.
>
> >> > Url.
>
> >> The claim is made in a footnote, but is unreferenced. That's not support.
>
> >I had spent a lot of time looking up the particular url's I wanted to
> >use but you, the pretend moderator here banned me from here a while back.
>
> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would you
> make such a silly claim?
Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
his identity.
Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
Boikat
Ah, so you're pleading insanity.
Boikat
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
I'm hoping that you are merely playing a paranoid fool for our
entertainment.
Michael
So because reality doesn't cut it for you, you claim that reality is
insanity becuase you lie here on usenet
and say so on usenet.
You govt idiots don't realize no court nor mental professional will
say I am crazy when they
can all see what is actually occuring dumbfucks!@
So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
that line of arguing, knowing full well
it leads no where and simply wastes time?
Boikat
Where was there any "reality" in your post?
>
> You govt idiots don't realize no court nor mental professional will
> say I am crazy when they
> can all see what is actually occuring dumbfucks!@
Too bad they probably are not insane, though. You, on the other
hand.... Well, it's rather obvious.
>
> So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
> that line of arguing, knowing full well
> it leads no where and simply wastes time?-
Probably because I'm not insane, like you.
Boikat
Kermit
> In article
> <d8ba854e-74e8-4c37-81fb-e90f9ff09...@j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
>
> �Kermit <unrestrained_h...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 18, 6:35�am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
>
> > > Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
> > > tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
> > > on the big raft we now call America.
>
> > Presumably by "exact same" you mean "looks the same to an illiterate's
> > cursory glance". �To an earthworm, �you and chimps are
> > indistinguishable.
>
> > Kermit
>
> Except for taste and smell.
>
> --
> �A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
I expect after lying around for a month, deceased, humans and chimps
taste pretty much the same even to an earthworm gourmet.
Kermit
I AM
> On Dec 21, 9:08嚙窮m, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 9:59嚙窮m, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 21, 8:52嚙窮m, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 21, 9:48嚙窮m, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:26:51 -0800 (PST), Michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote in talk.origins:
>
> hand.... 嚙磕ell, it's rather obvious.
>
>
>
> > So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
> > that line of arguing, knowing full well
> > it leads no where and simply wastes time?-
>
> Probably because I'm not insane, like you.
What you have done is made a claim.
For some reason to you, you feel that DIG is immortal.
I think you are delusional.
Obviously, DIG is mortal and subject to dying.
Secondly, if a case was being run by the govt to try and keep
knowledge of things
like that from me, they would have a govt agent assume his usenet
identity, and pretend everything
was hunky dory.
Now why would the govt do that?
So they can claim I am crazy, when everyone can see DIG is dead.
So anyone and everyone here can jump in and type on usenet like a
mentally retarded 3 or 5th grade
special ed remedial student "no he's not", but that won't make it
otherwise, nor bring
him back to life, mentally retarded shill
charlatan liars!
Boikat
I never said that.
> I think you are delusional.
It's called "projection". Have your mental health care professional
explain it to you.
>
> Obviously, DIG is mortal and subject to dying.
I never said otherwise.
>
> Secondly, if a case was being run by the govt to try and keep
> knowledge of things
> like that from me, they would have a govt agent assume his usenet
> identity, and pretend everything
> was hunky dory.
> Now why would the govt do that?
> So they can claim I am crazy, when everyone can see DIG is dead.
See. You are insane after all.
>
> So anyone and everyone here can jump in and type on usenet like a
> mentally retarded 3 or 5th grade
> special ed remedial student
You would be an example of that, I'm guessing.
> "no he's not", but that won't make it
> otherwise, nor bring
> him back to life, mentally retarded shill
> charlatan liars!-
Take your meds, loony-toon.
Boikat
I AM
>
> I never said otherwise.
So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
he can actually be dead, so
as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
Free Lunch
<unrestra...@hotmail.com> wrote in talk.origins:
But do the worms play pinochle on your snout?
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
Why have you decided to use the name that God calls Himself in one
story?
I AM
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:28:54 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
To let you know who is helping me.
Duh.
I AM
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://www.godrules.net/library/kjv/kjvexo3.htm
3:13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, [when] I come unto the children
of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent
me unto you; and they shall say to me, What [is] his name? what shall
I say unto them?
3:14 And God said unto Moses ... Thus shalt thou say unto the children
of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
Now do you honestly want people to die so you can waste time arguing
your stupid comments?
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
Your god must have a sense of humor -- talking you into saying such
silly things.
I AM
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:11 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
He is a personal GOD, so yes he does.
Free Lunch
wrote in talk.origins:
>On Dec 21, 2:22�pm, I AM <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 21, 2:19�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:28:54 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
>> > wrote in talk.origins:
...
>> > >So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
>> > >he can actually be dead, so
>> > >as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
>> > >So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
>>
>> > Why have you decided to use the name that God calls Himself in one
>> > story?
>>
>> To let you know who is helping me.
>> Duh.
>
>http://www.godrules.net/library/kjv/kjvexo3.htm
>
>3:13 And Moses said unto God, Behold, [when] I come unto the children
>of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent
>me unto you; and they shall say to me, What [is] his name? what shall
>I say unto them?
>
>3:14 And God said unto Moses ... Thus shalt thou say unto the children
>of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
>
>Now do you honestly want people to die so you can waste time arguing
>your stupid comments?
I know the Bible story. I also know that the whole event did not happen.
You are really unhinged.
I AM
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:28:19 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost_...@hotmail.com>
Then why did you waste time typing onto usenet such an asinine
statement?
I don't think you do know it at all.
> I also know that the whole event did not happen.
Another retarded comment.
How do you know it didn't happen, genius?
Is the court going to just sit there when I have won my case so they
can swill cough syrup
and type stupid things onto usenet to waste time?
John Stockwell
> On Dec 21, 2:33 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:11 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote in talk.origins:
>
> > >> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:28:54 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
> > >> wrote in talk.origins:
>
> > >> >> On Dec 21, 9:28 am, I AM <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > On Dec 21, 10:15 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > On Dec 21, 9:08 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > On Dec 21, 9:59 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > > On Dec 21, 8:52 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > > > On Dec 21, 9:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:26:51 -0800 (PST), Michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
> > >> >> > > > > > > wrote in talk.origins:
>
>
> > >> >> > > > So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
> > >> >> > > > that line of arguing, knowing full well
> > >> >> > > > it leads no where and simply wastes time?-
>
> > >> >> > > Probably because I'm not insane, like you.
>
> > >> >> > What you have done is made a claim.
>
> > >> >> > For some reason to you, you feel that DIG is immortal.
>
> > >> >> I never said that.
>
> > >> >> > I think you are delusional.
>
> > >> >> > Obviously, DIG is mortal and subject to dying.
>
> > >> >> I never said otherwise.
>
> > >> >So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
> > >> >he can actually be dead, so
> > >> >as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
> > >> >So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
>
> > >> Why have you decided to use the name that God calls Himself in one
> > >> story?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >To let you know who is helping me.
> > >Duh.
>
> > Your god must have a sense of humor
>
> He is a personal GOD, so yes he does.
So, He actually *talks* to you. Verbally. Voices in your head.
That sort of thing?
-John
PS> I also notice that you are using a blasphemous handle. How
about telling us who you really are?
John Stockwell
Well, gee, Michael, who peed in your Cheerios? Basically, you
made an absurd claim, but didn't have the wherewithall to do your
own footwork. Now you are abusive.
Basically the claim "that the earthworms of Africa and South
American are the same" is easily refuted. They are the same
family, but not the same genus or species.
from: http://www.earthlife.net/inverts/oligochaeta.html
"The Megascolecidae is a large family of often large worms found only
in the tropics. It is most well know because of its larger Australian
members such as Megascolides australis which may reach up to 3 metres
in length. Not all Megascolecidae are huge however, Microscolex dubius
from South America for instance seldom reaches more than 9cm (4 ins)
in length. Another Megascolecid Amynthas corticis, while slightly
larger with a maximum length of 17cm (6.5 in) is also interesting
because it is parthenogenetic (all females are asexual and give birth
to other females without a male) and because it can shed part of the
tail end of its body like a lizard to help it escape predators.
The Microchaetidae from south Africa are most well known because of
Microchaetus rappi, the longest worm in the world (6.7 metres) (22 ft)
which was found at the edge of a road. Most members of this family are
far smaller than this."
-John
Devils Advocaat
> On 18 Dec, 14:35, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
>
> > Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
> > tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
> > on the big raft we now call America.
>
> Africa, and another family the distribution of which is disputed:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthworm#Taxonomy_and_distribution
Just in case you missed my post, its families not species.
Hope that clears up the confusion. :)
Dan Listermann
"John Stockwell" <john.1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a422bc55-758f-4904...@15g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
>> He is a personal GOD, so yes he does.
>
>
> So, He actually *talks* to you. Verbally. Voices in your head.
> That sort of thing?
>
.
John Harshman
John Harshman
John Harshman
Why did you post? What were you trying to say? I thought you were trying
to advance the notion that Pangea was recent, using the evidence that
the same species of earthworm is found in two widely separated places.
Aside from dealing with all the independent evidence that Pangea went
away a good 180 million years ago, you would have to back up the
earthworm claim in order for your post to mean anything.
Kermit
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:21:29 -0800 (PST), Kermit
<looks suspicious>
Is this a trick question?
<googles>
Ah, references! Why, yes, apparently. Yes, they do.
Kermit
Fish4Cats
> On Dec 21, 2:33 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:11 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote in talk.origins:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 21, 2:19 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:28:54 -0800 (PST), I AM <yost...@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote in talk.origins:
>>>>>> On Dec 21, 9:28 am, I AM <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 10:15 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 9:08 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 9:59 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 8:52 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 9:48 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:26:51 -0800 (PST), Michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in talk.origins:
>>>>>>>>> So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
>>>>>>>>> that line of arguing, knowing full well
>>>>>>>>> it leads no where and simply wastes time?-
>>>>>>>> Probably because I'm not insane, like you.
>>>>>>> What you have done is made a claim.
>>>>>>> For some reason to you, you feel that DIG is immortal.
>>>>>> I never said that.
>>>>>>> I think you are delusional.
>>>>>>> Obviously, DIG is mortal and subject to dying.
>>>>>> I never said otherwise.
>>>>> So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
>>>>> he can actually be dead, so
>>>>> as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
>>>>> So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
>>>> Why have you decided to use the name that God calls Himself in one
>>>> story?- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> To let you know who is helping me.
>>> Duh.
>> Your god must have a sense of humor
>
> He is a personal GOD, so yes he does.
>
So personal, and so humorous that he personally murdered every first
born in Egypt, including babies and children, who didn't have a certain
type of blood daubed on their house in a certain way.
Oh how he laughed.
..fish
magicus
wrote:
This was fairly recent:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea_%28album%29
;-P
ciao,
f
--
aa #2301
"The truth is the truth whether anyone believes it or not. Though a
million people may believe a lie, it is still a lie."
-- Siddhartha Gautama
--
aa #2301
"The truth is the truth whether anyone believes it or not. Though a
million people may believe a lie, it is still a lie."
-- Siddhartha Gautama
Michael
> Michael wrote:
> > On Dec 18, 1:49 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> Michael wrote:
> >>> On Dec 18, 11:11 am, John Stockwell <john.19071...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Dec 18, 7:35 am, Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>http://everything2.com/title/Plate+tectonics
> >>>>> Living creatures - The exact same species of earthworm is found on the
> >>>>> tip of South America and the tip of South Africa. They travelled over
> >>>>> on the big raft we now call America.
> >>>> The same "family" not "species" of earthworms are found in South
> >>>> America as in
> >>>> South Africa.
> >>> Url.
> >> The claim is made in a footnote, but is unreferenced. That's not support.
>
> > I had spent a lot of time looking up the particular url's I wanted to
> > use but you, the pretend moderator here
> > banned me from here a while back. I don't have the time to look them
> > up again, but the issue here sir wasn't
> > my supporting the claim, but the OP.
> > Nice try faggot bucko retard.
>
> I'm not the moderator. Sorry.
You sure act like it asswipe dickhead fuckface retard!
>
> Why did you post? What were you trying to say? I thought you were trying
> to advance the notion that Pangea was recent, using the evidence that
> the same species of earthworm is found in two widely separated places.
> Aside from dealing with all the independent evidence that Pangea went
> away a good 180 million years ago, you would have to back up the
> earthworm claim in order for your post to mean anything.
And I already addressed that. You think you can repeat yourself over
and over?
You want another do over, it is 5th grade recess time.
Boikat
That's a good starting point.
> in reality
> he can actually be dead,
Where's he buried?
> so
> as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
That sounded a bit nutty.
> So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
Your meds must have worn off.
Boikat
Boikat
Is that before or after you mix your meds with a pint of Jack Danials?
Boikat
Michael
Ask his family.
Now to be thorough, he may not be buried, as some people cremate and
spread the ashes in the ocean, etc.
David Iain Greig
>> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would you
>> make such a silly claim?
>
>
> Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
> robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
> his identity.
I'm fine, actually. When was it I was supposed to have died?
> Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>
> Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
> fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
> blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't feel
like it's a mystery.
The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
first for the entertainment value?
--D.
--
david iain greig dgr...@ediacara.org
moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~dgreig arbor plena alouattarum
David Iain Greig
>
> What you have done is made a claim.
>
> For some reason to you, you feel that DIG is immortal.
I'd agree I'm not immortal. On the other hand, I'm just guessing.
> Obviously, DIG is mortal and subject to dying.
I agree, but am not interested in proving it.
> Secondly, if a case was being run by the govt to try and keep
> knowledge of things
> like that from me, they would have a govt agent assume his usenet
> identity, and pretend everything
> was hunky dory.
> Now why would the govt do that?
Well, I'm in Canada, so which government. U.S. or Canadian?
> So they can claim I am crazy, when everyone can see DIG is dead.
Really, I'm fine.
> So anyone and everyone here can jump in and type on usenet like a
> mentally retarded 3 or 5th grade
> special ed remedial student "no he's not", but that won't make it
> otherwise, nor bring
> him back to life, mentally retarded shill
> charlatan liars!
I really, really want to know why you think I'm dead.
I just saw Avatar 3D IMAX, I can't be dead.
--D.
--
david iain greig dgr...@ediacara.org
David Iain Greig
>> So the question becomes, why is the court allowing you to proceed with
>> that line of arguing, knowing full well
>> it leads no where and simply wastes time?
>>
>
Well deduced, Robert!
Er me?
Uh
David Iain Greig
> So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
> he can actually be dead, so
> as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
> So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
Well, it's actually impossible that I am dead, as I would not
be able to type this, were I so life-challenged.
--D. 'this is a new one'
Earle Jones
*
Glory Hallelujah!
Dig has arisen from the dead!
It's a freakin' miracle!
earle
*
Ye Old One
Ah! But was it on the third day?
--
Bob.
Ron O
The rollock has already gotten Tapestry, Great Dayne and Picasso. It
looks like Michael is next.
Ron Okimoto
Dick C.
news:cabal-slrnhj5s...@darwin.ediacara.org:
> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would
>>> you make such a silly claim?
>>
>>
>> Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
>> robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
>> his identity.
>
> I'm fine, actually. When was it I was supposed to have died?
>
>> Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>>
>> Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
>> fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
>> blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
>
> Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't
> feel like it's a mystery.
>
> The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
> because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
> first for the entertainment value?
I vote for the entertainment value.
>
> --D.
>
--
Dick #1349
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
~Benjamin Franklin
Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
email: dic...@gmail.com
Dick C.
>
> I'd agree I'm not immortal. On the other hand, I'm just guessing.
heekster
<foo.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote in
>news:cabal-slrnhj5s...@darwin.ediacara.org:
>
>> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would
>>>> you make such a silly claim?
>>>
>>>
>>> Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
>>> robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
>>> his identity.
>>
>> I'm fine, actually. When was it I was supposed to have died?
>>
>>> Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>>>
>>> Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
>>> fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
>>> blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
>>
>> Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't
>> feel like it's a mystery.
>>
>> The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
>> because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
>> first for the entertainment value?
>
>I vote for the entertainment value.
>
Seconded. You can't buy this much fun for a dollar.
>>
>> --D.
>>
David Iain Greig
> David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote in
> news:cabal-slrnhj5s...@darwin.ediacara.org:
>
>> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would
>>>> you make such a silly claim?
>>>
>>>
>>> Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
>>> robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
>>> his identity.
>>
>> I'm fine, actually. When was it I was supposed to have died?
>>
>>> Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>>>
>>> Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
>>> fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
>>> blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
>>
>> Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't
>> feel like it's a mystery.
>>
>> The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
>> because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
>> first for the entertainment value?
>
> I vote for the entertainment value.
It wasn't really a poll... and NOT banning him is terribly arbitrary
of me.
--D.
Dick C.
He uses a lot of nyms, granted. But, I am not so sure he is doing it
to avoid killfiles, as much as just different personalities posting.
Michael
> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would you
> >> make such a silly claim?
>
> > Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
> > robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
> > his identity.
>
> I'm fine, actually. � When was it I was supposed to have died?
>
> > Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>
> > Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
> > fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
> > blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
>
> Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't feel
> like it's a mystery. �
>
> The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
> because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
> first for the entertainment value?
You won't be able to ban jackshit golaszewski, as you are going in
your cell.
Michael
And you are incredibly stupid to boot, as you know full well there
are programs that allow someone to forge any usenet header.
David Iain Greig
Well, according to my 2nd year epistemology prof, I'm entitled generally
to claim knowledge of my own mental state, and 'dead' is not as aspect
thereof.
So, who should we send copies of these articles to claiming that I
am dead, as evidence that you are likely insane, again?
As to forging USENET headers, you can examine the Path: header if nothing
else. Obviously any post I make comes from darwin here in Canada,
so all the posts on talk.origins you see should have identical Path
headers as they're ALL posted from darwin, since I post them, as moderator.
Again, I'd like to know *WHY* you think I'm dead. I haven't even been
unwell, nor in a car accident for a couple decades. As the concerned
party, I'd just like to know. Or if you don't feel like chatting I
can just ban you again.
--D. '"flagrant abuse of moderation power" power, go!'
--
david iain greig dgr...@ediacara.org
moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
Devils Advocaat
You could - if there is a hereafter - be using a medium to type on
your behalf. :P
Devils Advocaat
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:37:32 -0800, Earle Jones
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <cabal-slrnhj5t44.2d75.dgr...@darwin.ediacara.org>,
> >> > So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
> >> > he can actually be dead, so
> >> > as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
> >> > So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
>
> >> Well, it's actually impossible that I am dead, as I would not
> >> be able to type this, were I so life-challenged.
>
> >> --D. 'this is a new one'
>
> >*
> >Glory Hallelujah!
>
> >Dig has arisen from the dead!
>
> >It's a freakin' miracle!
>
> >earle
> >*
>
> Ah! But was it on the third day?
It was half-past Tuesday :P
>
> --
> Bob.
John Harshman
apparently another of his sock puppets, taking the place of the real DIG
after his unfortunate demise.
I AM
> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 11:56 pm, David Iain Greig <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >> I AM <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > So your claim that I am crazy because I claim dig is dead, in reality
> >> > he can actually be dead, so
> >> > as far as possibilities go, it is possible.
> >> > So your objection is not that "that's impossible".
>
> >> Well, it's actually impossible that I am dead, as I would not
> >> be able to type this, were I so life-challenged.
>
> > And you are incredibly stupid to boot, as you know full well there
> > are programs that allow someone to forge any usenet header.
>
> Well, according to my 2nd year epistemology prof, I'm entitled generally
> to claim knowledge of my own mental state, and 'dead' is not as aspect
> thereof.
>
> So, who should we send copies of these articles to claiming that I
Feel free to send them to the federal judge.
>
> As to forging USENET headers, you can examine the Path: header if nothing
> else. �Obviously any post I make comes from darwin here in Canada,
> so all the posts on talk.origins you see should have identical Path
> headers as they're ALL posted from darwin, since I post them, as moderator.
Which part of 'program that can forge any usenet header' fell out of
your puny
brain, imbecile?
Mitchell Coffey
> Michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> You must know that John Harshman cannot ban you from here. Why would you
> >> make such a silly claim?
>
> > Because you mentally retarded lying robotarded idiot, harshman is
> > robert golaszewski, when DIG died, "harshman" assumed
> > his identity.
>
> I'm fine, actually. � When was it I was supposed to have died?
>
> > Why do you think your lies on usenet will change reality?
>
> > Fuck you you dumbfucking mentally retarded govt agent asshole dipshit
> > fuckhead retard jerk asshole fuckface idiot fuckhead stupid
> > blockheaded fuckface asshole!@
>
> Well I *was* going to ask why I banned you, but now I really don't feel
> like it's a mystery. �
>
> The question is, should I be consistent and ban you immediately, or
> because you're so obviously insane, let you rant for a couple days
> first for the entertainment value?
Why on earth should you hold yourself to consistent behavior?
Mitchell Coffey
Mitchell Coffey
Is this a like Dr. Who-type thing?
Mitchell Coffey
Mitchell Coffey
And you would have problems with that, how? Arbitrary behavior is the
only thing that stands between an arbitrary tyrant and a tyrant.
Mitchell
David Iain Greig
I Googled for the name, and all I could find was some guy who advocates
cough medicine as a means of getting high? It sounds vile...
--D.
David Iain Greig
Ok, but articles have to be posted somewhere, and travel via
various hops from server to server, to you. So it's possible
to determine that all the posts from this group can only be injected
at one of the hops between darwin and wherever you're reading it.
Even a forged Path: header would stand out as it would not match
other paths on other systems. This would be trivial to crosscheck.
Of course if you assume the US government is somehow controlling
a UNIX machine in Canada where ALL posts are coming from, then
obviously they can inject any post they want into t.o seamlessly.
If you do find any posts with nonstandard Path: headers would you
please send them to my notice as it would, in fact, mean that someone
is forging the Approved: header on them, which would make me mad,
as Moderator only I can Approve: posts.
You do know you're clearly barking mad, right?
--D.
John Harshman
Far as I can tell, that's the guy. He's also apparently some kind of
computer geek.
John Harshman
> On Dec 28, 4:35 pm, Kermit <unrestrained_h...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2:18 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@msn.com> wrote:
>>> I was just thinking, this person is clearly mentally disturbed.
>>> Golaszewski may be a real person, and may be confusing DIG with
>>> another. I couldn't find a good connection, but several shows played
>>> recently in Scotland, among them "David Greig and Gordon McIntyre's
>>> Midsummer"
>>> and "Stefan Golaszewski is a Widower". Just an idea of what could be
>>> happening. That's as far as my interest will take me.
>>> http://www.whatsonstage.com/news/theatre/london/E8831249643375/2009+E...
>> Yes. He has posted here frequently, under various names. He saw
>> Washington, DC nuked a few years ago. He thinks he is the US
>> president, he is caught in some sort of time loop, and is restrained
>> by our immoral use of a camera. Or something. It's all rather
>> confused, even to him. Look up Big Dayne's posts.
>>
> I've read about the Big Dayne complex, but hadn't heard "I AM" was
> included, and haven't seen a link. Is it the name, or "Michael", or
> writing style, that connects them?
Many themes and tropes. "Rollock" and "Golaszewski", for instance. And
claims to send people to jail. Etc.
John Harshman
He brings it up occasionally. I don't know when the first time was.
> I was just thinking, this person is clearly mentally disturbed.
> Golaszewski may be a real person, and may be confusing DIG with
> another. I couldn't find a good connection, but several shows played
> recently in Scotland, among them "David Greig and Gordon McIntyre's
> Midsummer"
> and "Stefan Golaszewski is a Widower". Just an idea of what could be
> happening. That's as far as my interest will take me.
That's considerably farther than mine takes me.
John Harshman
> On Dec 28, 2:18 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...@msn.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 12:10 pm, John Harshman <jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Golaszewski may be a real person, and may be confusing DIG with
>> another. I couldn't find a good connection, but several shows played
>> recently in Scotland, among them "David Greig and Gordon McIntyre's
>> Midsummer"
>> and "Stefan Golaszewski is a Widower". Just an idea of what could be
>> happening. That's as far as my interest will take me.
>>
>
> Yes. He has posted here frequently, under various names. He saw
> Washington, DC nuked a few years ago. He thinks he is the US
> president, he is caught in some sort of time loop, and is restrained
> by our immoral use of a camera. Or something. It's all rather
> confused, even to him. Look up Big Dayne's posts.
Great Dayne.
Glenn
el cid
You need to use some imagination.
Why for Xmas dinner I opened a bottle of port (after dinner to
be precise) and my daughter said something about port tasting
like cough medicine. There's a twist of truth there, except
the port I opened was older than her (Graham's 30 year old,
a gift) and so perhaps better than she's had before.
We did finish the bottle and I advocate the same for others.
It was good medicine for this father, son and daughter
after Xmas dinner.
Michael
And since golaszewski is a government agent, that makes him THE
tyrant.
Now how many people want government tyrrany in this newsgroup?
Michael
>
> - Show quoted text -
You mean a basement troll.