--
---Tom S.
the failure to nail currant jelly to a wall is not due to the nail; it is due to
the currant jelly.
Theodore Roosevelt, Letter to William Thayer, 1915 July 2
I hated it when that happened! :P
So, here we are, blown into an alternate reality....
Boikat
....and it's not even an All-seeing I thread.
--
macaddicted
Wisdom is radiant and unfading and she is easily discerned
by those who love her and is found by those who seek her.
Wisdom 6:12 (NRSV)
Hmm, I THOUGHT I felt a disturbance in the force. I guess that
explains it.
Do all the men have goatees in this one?
Yes, under pain of torture by fluffy pillow, followed by confinement
to the comfy couch.
Boikat
><http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/11/earth-destroyed-by-large-hadron-collider-martian-questioned/>
Refuted:
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
> On 22 Nov 2009 07:56:14 -0800, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by TomS <TomS_...@newsguy.com>:
>
>
> >><http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/11/earth-destroyed-by-large-hadron-collid
> >er-martian-questioned/>
>
> Refuted:
>
> http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
I don't trust the algorithm used on that site. It seems to be
committing the fallacy of affirming the consequent.
> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
Would anyone notice?
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
And we still have Mudbrain and Spincronic to deal with :(
>
>Boikat
--
Bob.
Read a Spincronic post in the morning and nothing worse will happen to
you for the rest of the day.
>> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
>Would anyone notice?
At least then I could stop looking for my keys...
--
--- Paul J. Gans
You would stop, out of necessity
And if I didn't, who'd notice?
Actually, it was a Star Trek reference, not Monty Python.
> John Wilkins <jo...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
> >In article <hecrr6$dnv$4...@reader1.panix.com>, Paul J Gans
> ><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>
> >> Desertphile <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
> >> >On 22 Nov 2009 07:56:14 -0800, TomS <TomS_...@newsguy.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
> >>
> >> >Would anyone notice?
> >>
> >> At least then I could stop looking for my keys...
>
> >You would stop, out of necessity
>
> And if I didn't, who'd notice?
Not me.
Clearly a case of the collision of two parallel universes. ;)
And moved one foot to the left.
Happens all the time.
"Worlds on worlds are hurling ever
From creation to decay,
Like the bubbles on a river
Sparkling bursting borne away." Shelly
--
A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard.
Do we have dolphins?
Except that the average IQ has dropped 20 points.
>> John Wilkins <jo...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
>> >In article <hecrr6$dnv$4...@reader1.panix.com>, Paul J Gans
>> ><gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> Desertphile <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote:
>> >> >On 22 Nov 2009 07:56:14 -0800, TomS <TomS_...@newsguy.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
>> >>
>> >> >Would anyone notice?
>> >>
>> >> At least then I could stop looking for my keys...
>>
>> >You would stop, out of necessity
>>
>> And if I didn't, who'd notice?
>Not me.
Besides, I've never seen a large hadron, much less seeing two
of them collide.
Similar events occurred in the Deep Space Nine spin-off.
> On Nov 22, 11:00Â pm, Klaus Hellnick <khelln...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > Boikat wrote:
> > > On Nov 22, 2:40 pm, Cory Albrecht <coryalbre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Boikat wrote, on 09-11-22 11:05 AM:
> >
> > >>> On Nov 22, 9:56 am, TomS<TomS_mem...@newsguy.com> Â wrote:
> > >>>> <http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/11/earth-destroyed-by-large-hadron-...>
> > >>> I hated it when that happened! :P
> > >>> So, here we are, blown into an alternate reality....
> > >> Do all the men have goatees in this one?
> >
> > > Yes, under pain of torture by fluffy pillow, followed by confinement
> > > to the comfy couch.
> > Actually, it was a Star Trek reference, not Monty Python.
> Clearly a case of the collision of two parallel universes. ;)
Boikat, your agonizer! Your agonizer, please!
No agonizer, but you can use my fluffy pillow...
Boikat
Didn't that happen just over a year ago? About the first Tuesday
in November (US time)?
>On 22 Nov 2009 07:56:14 -0800, TomS <TomS_...@newsguy.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
>
>Would anyone notice?
Actually, no, they wouldn't. Maybe if we manage to establish
Lunar colonies...
>Happens all the time.
Yeah. No wonder the Right Wing is upset. The earth is always
moving, step by step, to the left.
Unfortunately, the Left is moving, giant leap by giant leap, to the
Right.
It's just a jump to the left...
JohnN
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:52:03 -0700, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by Desertphile
> <deser...@invalid-address.net>:
>
>> On 22 Nov 2009 07:56:14 -0800, TomS <TomS_...@newsguy.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: earth destroyed by large hadron collider
>>
>> Would anyone notice?
>
> Actually, no, they wouldn't. Maybe if we manage to establish
> Lunar colonies...
>
In related news, the first steps towards doing a movie (with perhaps a remake
to follow) of the 1969 Gerry & Sylvia Anderson SF seriers _UFO_ have been
taken. Ah. Extremely mammalian young women in fishnet jumpsuits on submarines
and in very tight silver jumpsuits (and purple wigs...) running Moonbase.
Ah, yes. Now there's a film project I want to succeed.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
No, no no, it's recreated every billionth of a second each one much like
it predecessor. The succession gives the illusion of movement.
Thus we avoid Zeno's paradox, without calculus.
Some physical theories state that time is quantized, IOW that there is a
smallest time. If this is true, then whether every unit time is a
different universe or the same one with a time increment is a
philosophical rather than scientific question, like choosing between the
various interpretations of quantum mechanics.
> In article <heffa1$9r$3...@reader1.panix.com>, Paul J Gans
> <gan...@panix.com> wrote:
>
> > Walter Bushell <pr...@panix.com> wrote:
> > >In article <231120092020064546%jo...@wilkins.id.au>,
> > > John Wilkins <jo...@wilkins.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > >> In article <bdOdnfOskrdGppfW...@giganews.com>, Dakota
> > >> <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On 11/22/2009 4:57 PM, Ye Old One wrote:
> > >> > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:05:25 -0800 (PST), Boikat
> > >> > > <boi...@bellsouth.net> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> On Nov 22, 9:56 am, TomS<TomS_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > >> > Or as Steven Wright might say, the earth was totally destroyed and
> > >> > replaced by an exact duplicate.
> > >> >
> > >> And moved one foot to the left.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Happens all the time.
> >
> > >"Worlds on worlds are hurling ever
> > >From creation to decay,
> > >Like the bubbles on a river
> > >Sparkling bursting borne away." Shelly
> >
> > Yeah. No wonder the Right Wing is upset. The earth is always
> > moving, step by step, to the left.
>
> Unfortunately, the Left is moving, giant leap by giant leap, to the
> Right.
There is an American left to begin with?
Wonders never cease,
Jan
A little wobbly on that concept, are you?
>Wonders never cease,
>
>Jan
Ugh. I think I'm joining the Last Tuesdayans. There's a branch
here, the Church of the Warm Mantlepiece, IIRC, that has some
cool folks in it. And lots of cats.
Then all I have to do is hold out until tonight at 1800 UT and it
will all be over.
There's a new world being built right now!
heheheheh
Good one.
Not that kind of wobbly, though.
http://www.washington.edu/uwired/outreach/cspn/Website/Course%20Index/Lessons/18/18.html
Well, we could always ask Wilkins....
>Wonders never cease,
You can't see it because you are not looking to your right.
>Always on thursday,
Tuesday, you heretic.
'Tis a fine old conflict.
--
Dan Drake
d...@dandrake.com
Yeah, the fundies here are ripe for a story in which a main
plot point is the aliens' "hereditary sterility"; I can hear
the chortling even now...
I agree about the eye candy, though. ;-)
I'm completely uncertain on the matter. I tend towards causal realism,
though.
That's certainly a realistic viewpoint. All I know is that the
current state of the world isn't *my* fault...